Linux theme/UI refresh mockups for Firefox 3.7/4.0 appear


Recommended Posts

I don't get why they're screwing around with the default looks on both Linux and Mac OS X. As far as I know the button style and the lack of a default Menu Bar in Linux isn't the standard way. The button style of the Mac OS X mockups have been changed from the default look for no apparent reason either.

Also tabs on top look cool at it made me say "Whoa" the first time I saw the Safari 4 beta. But I didn't feel it was that practical during every day usage even if it did save some vertical space. But then again, is saving those ?23 pixelsthat> important (even less on Mac OS X)? Perhaps on a Netbook, but beyond that...

Linux Theme/UI Refresh for Firefox 4.0

Fx-4.0-Mockup-Linux-i01-ToT-T-Human-Brown.png

I suspect the whole brown area is Metacity window decorator, using Emerald instead, and changing the GTK color scheme is going to make this look awesome.

I can't wait.

I reckon the tabs are on top to make it easier for people to drag them around like you can in Chrome. When Apple did this with Safari I wasn't really a fan. However, I do like Chrome which is strange. :)

Regarding the v4.0 mockup on Windows. Why do people like the aero glass look? I don't really see the point of being able to see through the toolbar and titlebar at a blurred version of part of your desktop. It just creates a visual mess.

Because it makes the toolbar it's located on taller.

...

Small Icons, One of the first things I enable when I create a profile.

i like the first one more it, firefox looks pretty ugly by default on every OS ive seen it on

It either mimics the system theme or uses it directly on the OS's it runs on (on Linux it uses Gnome parts directly, on Windows it uses the native system theme, on OS X it has to fake the native gradient because the default gradient is internal to system classes)

If it's ugly, it's because the system theme is ugly (like the ugly purple MS chose on Vista/7)

tabs on top is a stupid decision. It's one of the reasons I use Firefox and not Chrome.

They're optional from what I've read (well, they plan on making it optional anyway, these are all just mockups of course)

It still looks like a native program now, but using Aero would make it look like a different style of native application.

I disagree. Default Firefox has this ugly purple look, and takes up way too much verticle space.

2poccv6.jpg

I think it's kinda funny how everybody is complaining about the color scheme. I guess most of the comments come from people who've never actually used Linux, otherwise they would know that that is the default system color scheme and not a design decision of Mozilla's.

And my gosh Intelman, you have a lot of browsers installed!

I think it's kinda funny how everybody is complaining about the color scheme. I guess most of the comments come from people who've never actually used Linux, otherwise they would know that that is the default system color scheme and not a design decision of Mozilla's.

And my gosh Intelman, you have a lot of browsers installed!

That comparison is directly from Anandtech. But I do posses 4 browsers. Firefox, Chrome, IE, and Opera.

Mainly because all browers have their shortfall. I find it hard to live without Firefox's easy page info > media tab. Otherwise I have to view the source to extract content I want.

w6tdtd.png

Firefox tends to bog down pretty quickly though, and the native look is pretty ugly. I have tried many themes but non feel right. IE8 feels great, works with almost every website out there. Chrome is my favorite browswer. It is fast, has a simple UI, works well with almost everything, but it is missing those advanced features of Firefox...

That comparison is directly from Anandtech. But I do posses 4 browsers. Firefox, Chrome, IE, and Opera.

Mainly because all browers have their shortfall. I find it hard to live without Firefox's easy page info > media tab. Otherwise I have to view the source to extract content I want.

w6tdtd.png

Firefox tends to bog down pretty quickly though, and the native look is pretty ugly. I have tried many themes but non feel right. IE8 feels great, works with almost every website out there. Chrome is my favorite browswer. It is fast, has a simple UI, works well with almost everything, but it is missing those advanced features of Firefox...

Its pretty easy to make firefox fit in in vista using glasser + stylish:

post-159052-1256666334_thumb.png

Regarding the v4.0 mockup on Windows. Why do people like the aero glass look? I don't really see the point of being able to see through the toolbar and titlebar at a blurred version of part of your desktop. It just creates a visual mess.

I like it, because it looks nice :) I love the glass effect and seeing as I have all my windows minimised apart from my active window, it really does not create a visual mess. What it does is allows me to see part of my desktop, whether it be blurred or un-blurred and just creates a really nice look :)

As for these Linux mock-ups - they really do look nice. I really do like the brown, but I think that's part of the theme the person is using on their OS (I'm unsure as I know nothing about Linux :D).

I like it, because it looks nice :) I love the glass effect and seeing as I have all my windows minimised apart from my active window, it really does not create a visual mess. What it does is allows me to see part of my desktop, whether it be blurred or un-blurred and just creates a really nice look :)

As for these Linux mock-ups - they really do look nice. I really do like the brown, but I think that's part of the theme the person is using on their OS (I'm unsure as I know nothing about Linux :D).

You guessed this right. Linux apps usually use the default theme colours, window decorations and icons (Chrome for Linux is an exception, the default look is the same as on Windows, but you can make it use your theme settings). Judging by the colour scheme, I'm 99.9% sure that these shots were taken on an Ubuntu 9.10.

You guessed this right. Linux apps usually use the default theme colours, window decorations and icons (Chrome for Linux is an exception, the default look is the same as on Windows, but you can make it use your theme settings). Judging by the colour scheme, I'm 99.9% sure that these shots were taken on an Ubuntu 9.10.

In the linux version of chrome you can make it use the native theme in the options :)

You guessed this right. Linux apps usually use the default theme colours, window decorations and icons (Chrome for Linux is an exception, the default look is the same as on Windows, but you can make it use your theme settings). Judging by the colour scheme, I'm 99.9% sure that these shots were taken on an Ubuntu 9.10.

They're mockups, not screenshots.

God that looks horrible, and I am not just talking about the color.

To me, the UI is very close to the Windows 4.0 mockup.

They're mockups, not screenshots.

Then they've based the mockups on the Ubuntu 9.10 default theme:

Fx-4.0-Mockup-Linux-i01-ToT-T-Human-Brown.png

18.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!