Nintendo admits it has no more good game


Recommended Posts

Nintendo announced September 29, 2009 interim consolidated financial statements of NEC Electronics are the sales from same quarter previous year 34.5 % decrease of 5480 billion operating income is 1043 billion of the same 58. 6 % decrease, and after an interval of four years and 減収 減益.Effect you may type 据え置き game machine sale since at the end of 06 years, supported the high growth "Wii (we)" decreased the suddenly and 575 million for the same 43 % decrease sales number of the body.It was said, "is one's first half of it is difficult to power regained wants to" Iwata Satoshi President having an interview.

 "Nintendo DS" series handheld game machine body from same quarter previous year 15 %, soft ふるわなかった and same 16 % decrease.For severe business environment is on the same day, forecast of the 10-year 3 month period reduction and sales so far than expected 3000 billion decrease of 5000 1 trillion yen, income 3700 billion of this 1200 billion decrease.

 Iwata President "Wii is a 失速" frankly admitted, "a powerful software-on continuous has cold good mood".

 Nintendo turned to the rally of the 商戦 at the end of the year, and 値下げ Wii, 5000 Yen in October to introduce powerful software, such as "New Super Mario Bros. Wii".However, Sony Computer Entertainment (SCE) and u.s. Microsoft 値下げ main machine, that started in demand, to think result is not gaming environment is not bright seems.

Sorry couldn't find better translation.

Yahoo

Link

That is a pretty crappy translation, Nintendo's position is still secure the have the two most popular (overall) consoles of this generation, this means big userbase. They can still make good games, they have good brands to use like Pokemon and Mario which are still very popular.

Again 3rd party completely fails on a Nintendo platform, however Nintendo handed themselves that coffin this generation by creating hardware so out of line with the PS3/360 3rd party devs can't just port, they need to put resources into a unique Wii title every time.

In other words, Dead Space 360/PS3? Becomes an on rails shooter for the Wii nothing like it's bigger brother, because of this comes out later, then absolutely tanks in sales (it was fairly well critically received). COD? Wii gets lame ass 'Reflex' by Treyarch instead of MW2 by IW, etc. FIFA/PES blow on the Wii as well. Online gaming? LOL.

Nintendo are probably slightly worried the big hitting 3rd parties are already moving onto working with the PS3 Wand/Natal for their motion needs, as most of their attempts on the Wii so far have tanked.

The Wii audience tends to buy Nintendo titles, and ****ty Nintendo title rip offs, and that's it. It's a graveyard calling to try anything different/unique as a 3rd party. Not helped by the fact that what hardcore do still play their Wii most likely pirate the hell out of it as it's hacked to the high heavens.

Yes, because having an overly expensive super powered Wii would have TOTALLY saved Nintendo.

>_>

It would have tanked super quickly because it would have been just like the 360 except without as many features, they'd have ported titles and nobody would have bought them, because the 360 version has live and the such. It would have also sent Nintendo's bottom line to the pits of hell.

Yes, because having an overly expensive super powered Wii would have TOTALLY saved Nintendo.

>_>

It would have tanked super quickly because it would have been just like the 360 except without as many features, they'd have ported titles and nobody would have bought them, because the 360 version has live and the such. It would have also sent Nintendo's bottom line to the pits of hell.

Uhh you don't need an expensive super powered Wii to allow devs to port more successfully. You just need something that's a little more in-line with the hardware in the PS3/360. An overclocked gamecube is nowhere near enough.

If it was at least HD things would've been easier.

And hey I'm only echoing what devs have said on 1UP Yours/Listen Up over the past year(s), it costs them more money and the risk factor is higher when creating a "hardcore" Wii game as they can't port from PS3/360, they have to put resources aside to make a unique ground up title.

Read the news the other day and all I had to say was "about time".

Same story for the past 3 generations.

Exactly, when a Nintendo console is released it has brilliant exclusives, and after they're out it runs out of steam. Yes there is now a 'Second Wave' with NSMB Wii, SMG2 and others. But still, I just wished the Wii had better games out sooner, otherwise I wouldn't have bought an Xbox 360 alongside it.

Nintendo: Focus on HD and Internet Gaming for your next consoles. PLEASE.

Since nsmb for ds has sold soooo many copies , how can you say nsmb for wii wont sell a lot. It comes out in november and has been getting great previews so far.

Yes, they're talking up until this point, as well as once NSMB Wii has been and gone, that's it, they're all out now.

Again 3rd party completely fails on a Nintendo platform, however Nintendo handed themselves that coffin this generation by creating hardware so out of line with the PS3/360 3rd party devs can't just port, they need to put resources into a unique Wii title every time.

...

The PS3 is in the same boat though, the difference is in hardware performance.

You can't make the same kind of game on the Wii as you can on an 360 or a PS3, they're just much more powerful consoles.

That is a pretty crappy translation, Nintendo's position is still secure the have the two most popular (overall) consoles of this generation, this means big userbase. They can still make good games, they have good brands to use like Pokemon and Mario which are still very popular.

That's because they've been hacked...a lot. And grannies buy them with their pensions (UK dude here).

I could swear I heard the exact same thing just after Super Mario Galaxy was released.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!