Apple Buying Ads Against Windows 7 Searches


Recommended Posts

Yes because owning things from a business that calls the competition cancer and communism is vastly better, eh?
Show me where that happened

Bill Gates compared open source software to communism and Steve Balmer said it was a cancer.

Link

As marketing stunts go, this isn't really that bad. At least, it's nothing companies haven't done for ages before this. Pretty much the computer equivalent of "Put down that Coke, try all new Blackberry-Vanilla Pepsi!"

Obnoxious, yes, but that's marketing for you.

You never see ads on TV anymore where they "Show off" Their products. All they do in every add is slam the competition.

Not true exactly. When it comes to Macs and OS X, sure, that's completely true. Their iPod / iPhone advertising on the other hand does a great job showing off their product. This is what baffles me to be honest, as they do so well in one area, yet fail completely with their main hardware and operating system.

I've got friends that don't really even care to get involved in the Mac vs. PC wars, but it's pretty sad when they come to saying, "Have you seen those Apple ads? They're really getting out of hand..." On top of that though, I'm still trying to find an "average joe" who has even heard of OS X. When I ask them about the PC vs Mac commercials, many have told me they don't even pay them any attention because they don't get it. Apple, your customers can't make comparisons when they don't understand what exactly you want them to compare! This is pretty pathetic given that it's their main product they've been selling for years and years...

iPhone and iPod ads are completely different though, in that you get to see what their product is directly, the things it can do, and so forth. They look nice, appear simple and easy to use, and well... generate hype. They quite literally make people say, "I want that!"

As for this Google ad, I find it quite displeasing, as ads are supposed to be set up around what the user is interested in.

I'm no attorney, and I don't even play one on TV, but I'd think that Apple using Microsoft's trademarks to sell their own product is probably a no-no...

In the UK, Canada, and the USA this would not constitute trademark infringement - it was sorted out a decade ago (Playboy v Netscape) and nearly every year since. The case most specific to this would be Google v Rescuecom.

The court makes it clear that <company x> has a right to buy advertising based on <company y> keywords and that google is allowed to sell them.

Apple face it, you lost.

Apple has enough cash in the bank to purchase every share of Dell. Given that those two are in nearly identical business: computers, media players, screens, accessory bits, networking gear, etc. how does that count as losing?

20091102-ne4rbha9rmbm2uf2ugyridba14.jpg

Not getting it over here, but searching Bing for " Mac os download" does show a Windows 7 ad

Not going to solely criticize Apple for this since Microsoft is apparently doing the same :shifty: Pretty ridiculous IMO, but oh well. That's competition.

post-102022-1257182835_thumb.png

Not getting it over here, but searching Bing for " Mac os download" does show a Windows 7 ad

I'm not, but I did get one on Google. Tip: use better keywords. Having "OS download" in there alone is going to bring you less specific results, especially considering the OS that can run on a Mac can be either OS X or Windows (Linux too I believe, right?).

When properly searching "Mac OS X download", the results are perfectly clear.

You mean like this;

http://arstechnica.com/microsoft/news/2009...c-users-too.ars

Seriously, both sides are pretty rotten in the "throwing feces on the other" so I wouldn't go calling out either of them worse.

Yea, but most of that was true, even as an Apple owner I have to admit that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!