Recommended Posts

If you're into Windows customization, skinning Windows has usually meant picking between WindowBlinds and uxtheme patching.

If you picked WindowBlinds, you had to use WindowBlinds skins. And while there are a LOT of skins out there, a lot of those skins were pretty wild and crazy and some people just didn't like those styles.

If you picked uxtheme patching, you had to (especially with Vista and Windows 7) sift through a lot of skins whose changes to Aero were so subtle as to be painful -- and that was after you had already put through the effort of patching a system file which isn't always popular.

Enter WindowBlinds 7, scheduled for release this month.

It's designed to combine the best of both worlds. Besides being able to apply existing WindowBlinds skins, convert XP msstyles over it also can now natively skin Aero.

So if you wanted to have a brushed metal Aero you can have it. And it's still Aero. Making such skins, not surprisingly, takes minutes instead of days. Indeed, users can simply choose an existing texture and color and apply it.

Here's a quickie Screencast demo of it so you can see it in action:

WindowBlinds 7 is in beta on Object Desktop right now.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/841646-skinning-windows-7-video-demo/
Share on other sites

Here's a video on how fast skin changing is:

http://screencast.com/t/NW5MG2UID

I didn't finish the video, so sorry if this is a stupid question, but is this speed for Aero derivatives only or for any theme? It was quite impressive.

Also, I wish you guys would let Non-Object Desktop subscribers be on this beta. I'd be happy to shell out the money right now for WB 7 Beta 3.

As much as i love WB and my OD subscription I'm still let down by the amount of quality WB skins. Sure there are a few decent ones bundled with WB7, but the majority of useable skins are for sale for $5 a pop. There isn't many free skins that are even worth the bandwidth atm. I really hope this changes in the future, even if stardock has to hire a few people to push out some free skins, but everything now is either a masterskin which costs money or a free skin with a wincustomize subscription which costs money, it's kinda BS imo to have to pay for a product only to pay for more product.

Come on now Frogboy.. that's like apples and oranges. I mean it would be one thing if WB has plugins you could purchase to add functionality, but comparing software to skins just doesn't make any sense. If i purchase software to burn discs, it's providing me with that function, if i purchase a skin it's doing what every other free skin does.

Anyway, that's my only complain/suggestion is to have more nice skins available to people so that there is a desire to want to purchase WB. Cause i think that is a HUGE drawback for people considering it, they know that by purchasing it their just gonna have to purchase more stuff to get what they want.

I know your stance with stardock Island dog and i'm not dissrespecting you or the product but your opinion is incredibly biased. You post WB skins on this forum all the time that are horrible in an attempt to promote WB. I'm not knocking it, just saying that your opinion on what is "good" is biased. Things with WB are changing for the good, I love the direction its taking i'm just saying that if stardock wants to grow it's fanbase you're gonna need alot more "free" talent. You may think the crowd here on neowin just wants simplified, minimalistic skins etc.. and you may be right, but these are the same people that you continue to try to win over to purchase WB so why not cater to a wider audience. If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins. Now it doesn't matter if the people at WC think the skins are the best thing since sliced bread, you already won them over, try to widen that audience.

I feel the same way every time I have to purchase software for Windows 7. :)

Funny thing there Brad. You're software isn't a full fledged Operating System. It skins objects and controls wallpaper. Also, there are plenty of wonderful free products for Windows XP/Vista/7. Quite honestly, the only products I use that aren't free are recording/editing software for music. If you look hard enough, you can find quality products that do the job.

I know you think so highly of your software, but Windowblinds is not the most technical piece of software out there. To this day it still doesn't do the things I would like it to do, and since Vista came out you have neglected the software. I am glad you are working on it now, but I am also extremely satisfied to know I did not support your products these past few years, because quite frankly I would have been completely disappointed.

I know your stance with stardock Island dog and i'm not dissrespecting you or the product but your opinion is incredibly biased. You post WB skins on this forum all the time that are horrible in an attempt to promote WB. I'm not knocking it, just saying that your opinion on what is "good" is biased. Things with WB are changing for the good, I love the direction its taking i'm just saying that if stardock wants to grow it's fanbase you're gonna need alot more "free" talent. You may think the crowd here on neowin just wants simplified, minimalistic skins etc.. and you may be right, but these are the same people that you continue to try to win over to purchase WB so why not cater to a wider audience. If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins. Now it doesn't matter if the people at WC think the skins are the best thing since sliced bread, you already won them over, try to widen that audience.

I guess he couldn't take up your challenge....

Also, can someone answer my question about the video?

I know your stance with stardock Island dog and i'm not dissrespecting you or the product but your opinion is incredibly biased. You post WB skins on this forum all the time that are horrible in an attempt to promote WB. I'm not knocking it, just saying that your opinion on what is "good" is biased. Things with WB are changing for the good, I love the direction its taking i'm just saying that if stardock wants to grow it's fanbase you're gonna need alot more "free" talent. You may think the crowd here on neowin just wants simplified, minimalistic skins etc.. and you may be right, but these are the same people that you continue to try to win over to purchase WB so why not cater to a wider audience. If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins. Now it doesn't matter if the people at WC think the skins are the best thing since sliced bread, you already won them over, try to widen that audience.

I think that only the StarDock Design makes the best skins that are very usable and nicely made!!!!!

If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins

The skins I post here are very popular in and out of WinCustomize. They are posted at other sites by the creators or myself and get a totally different response then they do at Neowin. Lets be completely honest here, you can't post a WB skin here and expect it to get a fair shake by most people.

Also, can someone answer my question about the video?

The UIS0 skins are much quicker than others, because they are essentially "native" skins. Other skins, such as UIS2, which most past skins are at this moment, are still very quick and have improved greatly with WB7.

The skins I post here are very popular in and out of WinCustomize. They are posted at other sites by the creators or myself and get a totally different response then they do at Neowin. Lets be completely honest here, you can't post a WB skin here and expect it to get a fair shake by most people.

But that's exactly what i'm trying to get at. You already have the wincustomize crowd, they love the skins that are posted and continue to be supporters, but you need to think, or in this case "skin" outside the box. It's not fair at all to say that the neowin crowd wouldn't give it a fair shake, people here just have different visual tastes, as do the people at WC. Often times they don't give a skin a fair and unbiased shake. I've seen people on WC go ape**** over a skin that looks god aweful, but they like it so it's a win/win for both the product and WC support. However posting skins elsewhere, such as here, or deviantart where, let's be honest, people have a bit more knowledge/feel for good design and graphics etc. So why not try to win them over, that's my point. Stardock needs to hire some people to make all kinds of skins, not just minimalistic ones, not just bulky ones.. but all sorts to try to broaden the fanbase. Like i said before, there really isn't much out there in the way of free skins that would motivate the average user (outside of WC) to buy WB, and it's a shame because it's a great product.

I'm not trying to come down on you Island Dog, I'm all for team stardock and it's products, but you really need to start listening to people's needs/wants outside of your own setup at WC.

There is a pinned topic where I display 10 skins for Neowin users:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=178075

It's getting a little dated now but there are plenty of good skins for WindowBlinds.

Neowin has more than its fair share of griefers who just like to poop on anything. I would know as I get to see both sides intimately every day. :)

At the end of the day, the popularity of WindowBlinds both from a shareware perspective (number of users) as well as from a financial point of view indicates that it's doing pretty well. There's really no competition for it at this point which implies that it must be doing something right.

I do think, on a personal level, that WindowBlinds 7 had to have UIS0 (Aero skinning) to keep being relevant to a fairly large segment. When you're losing me as a user, that's obviously not a good thing for the program. But Aero skinning has revitalized WindowBlinds for me. I can make Aero look like whatever I want in seconds and it kinds of makes moot the whole "WB skins are ugly" argument.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!