Recommended Posts

If you're into Windows customization, skinning Windows has usually meant picking between WindowBlinds and uxtheme patching.

If you picked WindowBlinds, you had to use WindowBlinds skins. And while there are a LOT of skins out there, a lot of those skins were pretty wild and crazy and some people just didn't like those styles.

If you picked uxtheme patching, you had to (especially with Vista and Windows 7) sift through a lot of skins whose changes to Aero were so subtle as to be painful -- and that was after you had already put through the effort of patching a system file which isn't always popular.

Enter WindowBlinds 7, scheduled for release this month.

It's designed to combine the best of both worlds. Besides being able to apply existing WindowBlinds skins, convert XP msstyles over it also can now natively skin Aero.

So if you wanted to have a brushed metal Aero you can have it. And it's still Aero. Making such skins, not surprisingly, takes minutes instead of days. Indeed, users can simply choose an existing texture and color and apply it.

Here's a quickie Screencast demo of it so you can see it in action:

WindowBlinds 7 is in beta on Object Desktop right now.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/841646-skinning-windows-7-video-demo/
Share on other sites

Here's a video on how fast skin changing is:

http://screencast.com/t/NW5MG2UID

I didn't finish the video, so sorry if this is a stupid question, but is this speed for Aero derivatives only or for any theme? It was quite impressive.

Also, I wish you guys would let Non-Object Desktop subscribers be on this beta. I'd be happy to shell out the money right now for WB 7 Beta 3.

As much as i love WB and my OD subscription I'm still let down by the amount of quality WB skins. Sure there are a few decent ones bundled with WB7, but the majority of useable skins are for sale for $5 a pop. There isn't many free skins that are even worth the bandwidth atm. I really hope this changes in the future, even if stardock has to hire a few people to push out some free skins, but everything now is either a masterskin which costs money or a free skin with a wincustomize subscription which costs money, it's kinda BS imo to have to pay for a product only to pay for more product.

Come on now Frogboy.. that's like apples and oranges. I mean it would be one thing if WB has plugins you could purchase to add functionality, but comparing software to skins just doesn't make any sense. If i purchase software to burn discs, it's providing me with that function, if i purchase a skin it's doing what every other free skin does.

Anyway, that's my only complain/suggestion is to have more nice skins available to people so that there is a desire to want to purchase WB. Cause i think that is a HUGE drawback for people considering it, they know that by purchasing it their just gonna have to purchase more stuff to get what they want.

I know your stance with stardock Island dog and i'm not dissrespecting you or the product but your opinion is incredibly biased. You post WB skins on this forum all the time that are horrible in an attempt to promote WB. I'm not knocking it, just saying that your opinion on what is "good" is biased. Things with WB are changing for the good, I love the direction its taking i'm just saying that if stardock wants to grow it's fanbase you're gonna need alot more "free" talent. You may think the crowd here on neowin just wants simplified, minimalistic skins etc.. and you may be right, but these are the same people that you continue to try to win over to purchase WB so why not cater to a wider audience. If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins. Now it doesn't matter if the people at WC think the skins are the best thing since sliced bread, you already won them over, try to widen that audience.

I feel the same way every time I have to purchase software for Windows 7. :)

Funny thing there Brad. You're software isn't a full fledged Operating System. It skins objects and controls wallpaper. Also, there are plenty of wonderful free products for Windows XP/Vista/7. Quite honestly, the only products I use that aren't free are recording/editing software for music. If you look hard enough, you can find quality products that do the job.

I know you think so highly of your software, but Windowblinds is not the most technical piece of software out there. To this day it still doesn't do the things I would like it to do, and since Vista came out you have neglected the software. I am glad you are working on it now, but I am also extremely satisfied to know I did not support your products these past few years, because quite frankly I would have been completely disappointed.

I know your stance with stardock Island dog and i'm not dissrespecting you or the product but your opinion is incredibly biased. You post WB skins on this forum all the time that are horrible in an attempt to promote WB. I'm not knocking it, just saying that your opinion on what is "good" is biased. Things with WB are changing for the good, I love the direction its taking i'm just saying that if stardock wants to grow it's fanbase you're gonna need alot more "free" talent. You may think the crowd here on neowin just wants simplified, minimalistic skins etc.. and you may be right, but these are the same people that you continue to try to win over to purchase WB so why not cater to a wider audience. If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins. Now it doesn't matter if the people at WC think the skins are the best thing since sliced bread, you already won them over, try to widen that audience.

I guess he couldn't take up your challenge....

Also, can someone answer my question about the video?

I know your stance with stardock Island dog and i'm not dissrespecting you or the product but your opinion is incredibly biased. You post WB skins on this forum all the time that are horrible in an attempt to promote WB. I'm not knocking it, just saying that your opinion on what is "good" is biased. Things with WB are changing for the good, I love the direction its taking i'm just saying that if stardock wants to grow it's fanbase you're gonna need alot more "free" talent. You may think the crowd here on neowin just wants simplified, minimalistic skins etc.. and you may be right, but these are the same people that you continue to try to win over to purchase WB so why not cater to a wider audience. If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins. Now it doesn't matter if the people at WC think the skins are the best thing since sliced bread, you already won them over, try to widen that audience.

I think that only the StarDock Design makes the best skins that are very usable and nicely made!!!!!

If you're up for a challenge then i would like to challenge you to find 10 "free" skins on wincustomize that people here would agree are great skins

The skins I post here are very popular in and out of WinCustomize. They are posted at other sites by the creators or myself and get a totally different response then they do at Neowin. Lets be completely honest here, you can't post a WB skin here and expect it to get a fair shake by most people.

Also, can someone answer my question about the video?

The UIS0 skins are much quicker than others, because they are essentially "native" skins. Other skins, such as UIS2, which most past skins are at this moment, are still very quick and have improved greatly with WB7.

The skins I post here are very popular in and out of WinCustomize. They are posted at other sites by the creators or myself and get a totally different response then they do at Neowin. Lets be completely honest here, you can't post a WB skin here and expect it to get a fair shake by most people.

But that's exactly what i'm trying to get at. You already have the wincustomize crowd, they love the skins that are posted and continue to be supporters, but you need to think, or in this case "skin" outside the box. It's not fair at all to say that the neowin crowd wouldn't give it a fair shake, people here just have different visual tastes, as do the people at WC. Often times they don't give a skin a fair and unbiased shake. I've seen people on WC go ape**** over a skin that looks god aweful, but they like it so it's a win/win for both the product and WC support. However posting skins elsewhere, such as here, or deviantart where, let's be honest, people have a bit more knowledge/feel for good design and graphics etc. So why not try to win them over, that's my point. Stardock needs to hire some people to make all kinds of skins, not just minimalistic ones, not just bulky ones.. but all sorts to try to broaden the fanbase. Like i said before, there really isn't much out there in the way of free skins that would motivate the average user (outside of WC) to buy WB, and it's a shame because it's a great product.

I'm not trying to come down on you Island Dog, I'm all for team stardock and it's products, but you really need to start listening to people's needs/wants outside of your own setup at WC.

There is a pinned topic where I display 10 skins for Neowin users:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=178075

It's getting a little dated now but there are plenty of good skins for WindowBlinds.

Neowin has more than its fair share of griefers who just like to poop on anything. I would know as I get to see both sides intimately every day. :)

At the end of the day, the popularity of WindowBlinds both from a shareware perspective (number of users) as well as from a financial point of view indicates that it's doing pretty well. There's really no competition for it at this point which implies that it must be doing something right.

I do think, on a personal level, that WindowBlinds 7 had to have UIS0 (Aero skinning) to keep being relevant to a fairly large segment. When you're losing me as a user, that's obviously not a good thing for the program. But Aero skinning has revitalized WindowBlinds for me. I can make Aero look like whatever I want in seconds and it kinds of makes moot the whole "WB skins are ugly" argument.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!