Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. My job is looking into switching to VOIP and they want my involvement, but I don't really know much about VOIP so I figured I would ask. They're of course talking to some people that say that it is, but of course they're going to say that... They want to sell us equipment... But I figured the Neowin members are pretty knowledgeable so I could trust their information.

So, is VOIP ready for adoption in a corporate environment? Of course up-time, call clarity, call forwarding, call transferring, and reliability is all very important. A company can't really afford to miss a phone call. We would also have several lines as well, as we do now.

I really don't know a heck of a lot about VOIP. I've been reading up a bit on it of course, but I don't know anyone who's actually rolled out a VOIP system. I'm not sure what I should know going into this, what issues may be involved which I wouldn't think of, etc. So I'm asking everyone their opinion. Any and all information is greatly appreciated.

Thanks Again, I'm very curious to hear what everyone has to say.

-Matt-

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/841818-is-voip-ready-for-prime-time/
Share on other sites

I have not read everything that u wrote but bottom line is that yes it is ready for a corp inv.

Vonage is based off of voip. The comcase tripple play is based off of voip, verizon fios phone service is based off of voip. So it would be safe to say a corp phone system can be voip based.

I said it years ago when it really was in its infancy before vonage came out that it was the future of phone service.

Thank you both very much for your responses. I really appreciate it. What if there is some slow down on the DSL line, or one or several users are downloading large files, or something? The fact that this uses the internet line for the conversations is a concern for me. I don't know much about this. They did say that we could use our current phones, so that's a plus. Do you think DSL is fast enough? Or do we need something faster? How much bandwidth should we have?

Thanks Again,

Nothing is going to be fast enough. But what you should be primarily looking at is QoS. Well designed QoS policy will make sure that you will always have required bandwidth for your voice/video traffic. Do some home work on these technologies and how they best work together, before you go ahead with a solution.

From your post its not clear whether you are going for single site or multiple sites implementation. However, a voice call will take somewhere between 8Kbps to 64Kbps depending on sampling and quality you are looking for. You also have ability to setup a quota for simultanious voice call, this can help in avoiding the overloading of the WAN links.

Another important point you should consider is whether to go for industry standard VoIP solution or proprietary VoIP solution. Propriety solution allow vendors to add more features & functions into their devices but locking you into a specific vendor. With industry standarized solution you have the ability of going across different vendors but you will be getting only basic features and functionality.

Hi everyone. My job is looking into switching to VOIP and they want my involvement, but I don't really know much about VOIP so I figured I would ask. They're of course talking to some people that say that it is, but of course they're going to say that... They want to sell us equipment... But I figured the Neowin members are pretty knowledgeable so I could trust their information.

So, is VOIP ready for adoption in a corporate environment? Of course up-time, call clarity, call forwarding, call transferring, and reliability is all very important. A company can't really afford to miss a phone call. We would also have several lines as well, as we do now.

I really don't know a heck of a lot about VOIP. I've been reading up a bit on it of course, but I don't know anyone who's actually rolled out a VOIP system. I'm not sure what I should know going into this, what issues may be involved which I wouldn't think of, etc. So I'm asking everyone their opinion. Any and all information is greatly appreciated.

Thanks Again, I'm very curious to hear what everyone has to say.

-Matt-

We mainly use mobile wifi phones in our office, like the SC-6060S from www.yippz.com. They work great anywhere in the office. can be taken on the road, and sound much better than our old phone lines and cell phones (with no monthly massive cell bills). We also have several office Voip phones that do pretty much anything you would want an office phone do to. Most features are dependent on which voip provider you choose. Voip service is SO cheap now that any company can save hundreds in the first month.

Unlike Voip several years ago, sound and reliability are nearly perfect these days.

Nothing is going to be fast enough. But what you should be primarily looking at is QoS. Well designed QoS policy will make sure that you will always have required bandwidth for your voice/video traffic. Do some home work on these technologies and how they best work together, before you go ahead with a solution.

From your post its not clear whether you are going for single site or multiple sites implementation. However, a voice call will take somewhere between 8Kbps to 64Kbps depending on sampling and quality you are looking for. You also have ability to setup a quota for simultanious voice call, this can help in avoiding the overloading of the WAN links.

Another important point you should consider is whether to go for industry standard VoIP solution or proprietary VoIP solution. Propriety solution allow vendors to add more features & functions into their devices but locking you into a specific vendor. With industry standarized solution you have the ability of going across different vendors but you will be getting only basic features and functionality.

Wow, thank you VERY much for your great response. That was really very helpful. I wasn't even aware that I had to decide between a proprietary solution and a standard solution... I guess a standard solution probably makes the most sense really, doesn't it? We've been locked into systems in the past, and that just never seems to work out in the end.

When I spoke to the one VOIP company the other day on the phone they said that they did 16 kb's a phone call, but they didn't seem to be very confident about their explanations of things, so I'm not sure. We would be looking at a single site implementation I would imagine, as we only have the main office. But they told us that if we took the phone to our home and connected it to our router there that we would be able to use that phone then as if we were at the office.

I am going to research those technologies you mentioned as well. I've never heard of them before. This is all new to me, and I don't want to make any noobish mistakes...

We mainly use mobile wifi phones in our office, like the SC-6060S from www.yippz.com. They work great anywhere in the office. can be taken on the road, and sound much better than our old phone lines and cell phones (with no monthly massive cell bills). We also have several office Voip phones that do pretty much anything you would want an office phone do to. Most features are dependent on which voip provider you choose. Voip service is SO cheap now that any company can save hundreds in the first month.

Unlike Voip several years ago, sound and reliability are nearly perfect these days.

Thank you very much for that suggestion. I am DEFINITELY going to consider that. That sounds like a really good idea. Then we just tell the VOIP company that that's the phone we have and they set them up? I really like that idea. The time and expense it saves in laying phone lines (And connecting them to the router) seems to be well worth it. Does that phone support encryption? Our network at the office is security enabled. It sounds like you can set it up with different profiles, so if you were at the office it would connect, at home it would connect, etc. without any setup. That is a very nice feature (If I'm understanding it correctly).

Thanks Again everyone for all of your help. It's been invaluable really. I've learned a lot.

It depends on the size of the company, If a plain DSL connection is enough to handle everybody then the company just wouldn't be that large. Of course, you could get multiple DSL connections, one for VOIP and one for everything else.

Thanks for your suggestion too. Getting a second DSL line is definitely cheaper than upgrading to T1 or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft fixes one of Excel Copilot's most frustrating limitations by Usama Jawad Microsoft began integrating Copilot into Excel a couple of years ago and has been upgrading it with new functionalities since then. While some changes have been controversial, Microsoft is hoping to win over users by allowing them to be more productive via Copilot. To that end, it has now announced a Copilot improvement that may actually be appreciated by people who use it regularly. Excel customers often use the Copilot prompt box to issue instructions to format and customize their data, but it can become quite tiring to keep repeating the same instructions again and again. Microsoft now allows you to define Copilot personalization rules for formatting, naming conventions, formulas, and report styles. These can be accessed via Settings > Personalization, where you can explain your rules in natural language like "Always format currency in USD with no decimals", and just let Copilot take care of the rest. Microsoft is going a step further in this direction by allowing you to set workbook rules too. These rules are stored as a .Rules sheet, and are preserved while the workbook is shared. This fosters collaboration while making sure that standard rules govern the Copilot editing experience across the organization. Other advantages of this capability include pointing it to specific examples, defining dynamic formulas, and referencing an entire sheet and asking Copilot to infer rules based on that. You can leverage this feature by opening Copilot in Excel, clicking on "+", and selecting Create workbook rules. If you have an existing .Rules sheet, you can simply start listing the rules in column A as well. Personalization features are available to all Copilot in Excel users across the web, Mac, and Windows. Meanwhile, workbook rules are currently being previewed for Windows and Mac customers on the Insiders channel. General availability is scheduled after a few weeks, but a concrete date is currently unknown. Overall, the Excel capability is quite similar to ChatGPT's memory features, which allow you to permanently store items in the AI model's context window.
    • Imagine you still haven't discovered Total Commander that is doing all those things for three decades already...
    • This sounds like underneath the nice marketing spin, either someone at Adobe got tired of their lazy devs and asked Microsoft to help them sort at least some of Adobe's ancestral spaghetti code to make it go faster, or Microsoft wanted Adobe's crap to run better on Windows to make it look better when compared to Apple, so they offered to intervene. Either way, GOOD.
    • My favorite file manager for Windows 11 finally gets a long-requested feature by Taras Buria Files is among the best File Explorer alternatives for Windows 10 and 11. This free app is packed with all sorts of features and conveniences, but there is one crucial feature that is still missing—Tree View. Fortunately, the latest update in the Preview channel finally delivers it. With version 4.1.4, which is now available for download in the Preview channel, developers implemented Tree View, a new mode that displays folders in an expandable hierarchy. Windows 11's stock File Explorer always had this feature, but it was nowhere to be found in Files until now. Starting with the latest preview update, you can expand each drive and its nested folders without leaving the current location and then open the folder you need in the main view. To try Tree View in Files, update the app to the latest preview version, then click the small arrow next to a drive to expand its content. The developers say they are rolling out Tree View in Preview first to gather feedback from users and improve the feature before bringing it to all in the stable channel. In addition to Tree View, Files 4.1.14 improves the Windows Fonts folder. You can now preview each font directly in Files with no need to open the built-in font viewer. For now, these two features are only available in the Preview channel. For those using the stable release, developers recently released version 4.1.3, with improvements for the built-in tag system, on-demand folder size calculation, and plenty of various fixes. You can check out the full release notes here. You can download Files from the Microsoft Store (paid version) or its official website (free).
    • Who is paying for this 30x scale-up? Its sounds expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!