80 percent of viruses love Windows 7


Recommended Posts

This is why Microsoft will always going to lose more and more markets. They brainwashed their users telling them that this is the more secure and better windows yet.

MS users Brainwashed? LOL

Capt Irony asplodes!!!!!!

And if Microsoft do something in Win 8 to prevent viruses/malware being installed, say...... bundle Security Essentials with the OS... Who will be the first to file the anti-trust case?

It's simple. The most dangerous component of any PC/mac is the user. If you run any unknown app then you deserve to have your files deleted.

This is why Microsoft will always going to lose more and more markets. They brainwashed their users telling them that this is the more secure and better windows yet. But its just another windows version like all previous. Microsoft need really to do something from scrath for windows 8 or Apple will keep getting more market shares!!!

The only brainwashed one here is you, Windows 7 and Vista are infinitely more secure than XP ever was. Windows 7 has a lot of the same underlying code as XP and Vista so stating that it is still vulnerable to viruses is just another large case of stating the bleeding obvious.

Oh and the UAC in 7 wasn't even designed to be more secure, it was designed to be less intrusive, auto elevation actually theoretically makes it marginally less secure. Sophos need to get their facts straight and stop sensationalising things to sell their products

Edited by Frank Fontaine
Well it's not Apple per se.. it's what's happening in the media with companies.. Apple is just coming out with more and more stupidity trying to present Windows in some false light. Sophos is doing useless tests that have no connection with reality because Microsoft now has an anti-virus solution that's free and very effective and I'm sure we wont' see the end of it soon. Seems that companies have more and more PR campaigns that spit on Windows instead of actually showing why their products are better.

Well OK, I know what you mean, but your comment was really out of context in this thread. This is about Sophos and Microsoft, let's not derail this even further.

Please just shut up, Cabron. I own a Mac and love it, but I know its limitations. I'm just as open to having all my user files deleted by a virus as any Windows machine is. Snow Leopard and Windows 7 are very similar, and I don't see one being better than the other when you look at the two side by side. It just boils down to personal preference.

However, I think that both Microsoft and Apple should be careful in lulling their users into a false sense of security just to get sales. That's the kind of crap that leads to pointless class action lawsuits.

Best comment so far (Y)

i can fully understand as to why this would be accurate being that they did not really change that much from vista to 7 so if the virus/malware worked in vista there is a rather large chance that it would work under Win 7 as well. Just my opinion though.

Please just shut up, Cabron. I own a Mac and love it, but I know its limitations. I'm just as open to having all my user files deleted by a virus as any Windows machine is. Snow Leopard and Windows 7 are very similar, and I don't see one being better than the other when you look at the two side by side. It just boils down to personal preference.

However, I think that both Microsoft and Apple should be careful in lulling their users into a false sense of security just to get sales. That's the kind of crap that leads to pointless class action lawsuits.

QFT

So you mean, if you download a fake AV and then when go to run it, UAC appears and you click continue, you mean it will actually install?????? OMG!!!!.

Just what I was thinking. Not all the security programs in the world can help a stupid user.

Wow, not having an antivirus seems really unfair, but at least it'll be interesting to hear from the 'I never run an antivurs and never have security problems on Windows' crowd.

This describes me. :p

I haven't used antivirus since XP. I've never had any infections (well at least I don't think I've ever). If you know where to stay away from, and the software you are using doesn't have massive security holes, you should be fine.

During the betas of 7 and Vista, before I'd upgrade to the new build, I'd install a scanner just to see, and not to my surprise, I was fine.

If you stay away from shotty sites, goofy chain mail attachments, make sure your software is up to date, and use a e-mail provider that scans incoming e-mails, you should be pretty safe.

Also, it was AV companies who forced Microsoft to open up/weaken it's x64 kernel so they could have access to the OS's higher functions... I believe they bitched to the EU about this.

The main culprit in that case was Symantec. They didn't want to have to rewrite the back end to make it work, so they complained that they couldn't make it work with the new kernel protections and considering other security vendors had no issues making their apps work with the new OS (Vista), Microsoft should have sued Symantec in to oblivion for filing a false suit.

Please just shut up, Cabron. I own a Mac and love it, but I know its limitations. I'm just as open to having all my user files deleted by a virus as any Windows machine is. Snow Leopard and Windows 7 are very similar, and I don't see one being better than the other when you look at the two side by side. It just boils down to personal preference.

You're also open to having your files deleted by the OS. No need for malicious software there. :laugh:

This describes me. :p

I haven't used antivirus since XP. I've never had any infections (well at least I don't think I've ever). If you know where to stay away from, and the software you are using doesn't have massive security holes, you should be fine.

During the betas of 7 and Vista, before I'd upgrade to the new build, I'd install a scanner just to see, and not to my surprise, I was fine.

If you stay away from shotty sites, goofy chain mail attachments, make sure your software is up to date, and use a e-mail provider that scans incoming e-mails, you should be pretty safe.

True, to a point. I have security software installed not to protect me from me, but from others who connect in to the network.

That report is so light on details and it is clearly to drive more sales for Sophos but was there any doubt that if you run *any* malware in user context, it will damage the system? Say there is a virus that reads user's address book and then spams all contacts using the default mail client.... that will work equally good on a Mac or Linux or any damn OS.

Yes, it has nothing to do with Windows. A virus is just malicious self-replicating code, which normally embeds itself in other executables (versus a trojan which is a program that pretends to be something else, like a key generator, but turns out to be malicious) so that when the user runs the program, he gets infected. If you add the ability to infect systems automatically by exploiting bugs, you've got a worm.

UAC isn't that relevant here. It's not a security barrier, and it's not designed to stop malware. Technically speaking most malware doesn't really need to be written to need admin access at all. They can spy on you, steal your files, use the network, hide from task manager, make themselves automatically load just as a standard user, and so on.

If they got admin, that would just be a bonus that would make it harder to remove, and that would give the malware the ability to infect other users (most systems are single-user, so this isn't relevan). It could also end up impacting system stability.

If you only were to run the malware as a standard user you would actually risk giving it admin access anyway, because if can hijack elevation requests of something you think is legitimate. In other words you don't really know whether the whole system has been compromised or not even in this scenario.

The only thing that can protect against malware is antivirus software, which can at least attempt to block known threats before they have a chance to execute. This should also be combined with the habit of never running any executables at all unless you really have to and know you can trust them. This is hard to get people to do.

Most Windows infections these days are because the user voluntarily ran something he shouldn't have. This is hard to prevent, as it takes advantage of the user and not any bugs in the OS.

OK, well I guess if that's that case then Microsoft should start bundling Security Essentials with Windows 7 ... I mean this IS what Sophos is suggesting they need to do, isn't it? They're not going to whine and moan about it if Microsoft includes it, are they? Sophos? Talk to me babe...

Please just shut up, Cabron. I own a Mac and love it, but I know its limitations. I'm just as open to having all my user files deleted by a virus as any Windows machine is.

I wasn't aware of that kind of virus for OS X. Wanna share some details?

I wasn't aware of that kind of virus for OS X. Wanna share some details?

There's no actual virus out there like that, but it wouldn't be hard to code one and make it work. Hell, just rm -rf ~/* would work. It doesn't even need elevated privileges.

It's called OS.X/UzGuestAccLOLz

I don't want to sound like a denier here because I know the bug exists and it's a serious flaw, but it's still not common and can simply be fixed by disabling and re-enabling the guest account. It only happens on installations of Snow Leopard that were upgraded from Leopard installations with the guest account enabled. The guest account toggle I mentioned fixes it because it sets it up like Snow Leopard expects it to be set up.

Not sure how Apple or any of the developers beta testing Snow Leopard (me included) missed it, but oh well. Running Time Machine just became all the more important. :p

Edited by Elliott
There's no actual virus out there like that, but it wouldn't be hard to code one and make it work. Hell, just rm -rf ~/* would work. It doesn't even need elevated privileges.

I don't want to sound like a denier here because I know the bug exists and it's a serious flaw, but it's still not common and can simply be fixed by disabling and re-enabling the guest account. It only happens on installations of Snow Leopard that were upgraded from Leopard installations with the guest account enabled. The guest account toggle I mentioned fixes it because it sets it up like Snow Leopard expects it to be set up.

Not sure how Apple or any of the developers beta testing Snow Leopard (me included) missed it, but oh well. Running Time Machine just became all the more important. :p

I know, I was just showing how foolish his ant-Window posts are. All it takes is one bad thing to tarnish the name, which the guest acc thing did for OS X. As per his logic, not mine. ;)

I don't really care, I was primarily a OS X user from late 2004-early 2007 (when I switched to Vista). I have used OS X panther through leopard and almost all versions of Windows. It's down to what you like/prefer. People like that dude are just...trolls.

Read the article, I quickly ran to the closest computer store bought myself a mac, apparently i had to pay extra money for a non-pink version. I loaded it up, saw that I cannot run any actual good programs, returned it. And now I can say im back to my crazy virus loving Windows 7. RAWR!

At the Pwn2Own contests, the macs always get hacked first. 'Nuff said.

Hacked, yea. Apple's managed to fix those vulnerabilities (usually involving third-party libraries in things like Safari or DNS). Viruses, not yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone managed to create one that could outbreak.

Read the article, I quickly ran to the closest computer store bought myself a mac, apparently i had to pay extra money for a non-pink version. I loaded it up, saw that I cannot run any actual good programs, returned it. And now I can say im back to my crazy virus loving Windows 7. RAWR!

Funny you should say that. I loaded up Windows 7 in Boot Camp, saw that I couldn't run any "actual good programs" and uninstalled it. It's called a choice, buddy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!