80 percent of viruses love Windows 7


Recommended Posts

I had a macbook in 2006, this year i went for a XPS.

Mac's are fine, but you always end up needing windows because not all software is available.

Before the mac fanboys come out and say "theres parallels for that", heres my rebuttal.

Why pay for 2 OS's and more expensive hardware.

Instead i can buy cheaper hardware and use the one OS that can do everything i want. Mac's arent a complete product, as a consumer, i dont see why i should pay for that, and thats why i went back to MS and Dell.

Instead i can buy cheaper hardware and use the one OS that can do everything i want. Mac's arent a complete product, as a consumer, i dont see why i should pay for that, and thats why i went back to MS and Dell.

Actually, I run Windows about twice a month, and that's only to check websites in Internet Explorer. Macs are a complete product for those who are just willing to change up how they work slightly. When I came from Windows, I had no trouble finding equivalents for just about every product I used on Windows, and, this is just a personal opinion, they were usually better than the Windows equivalents.

Why don't Spophos test whether Mac OS X and Linux are still vulnerable to the rm -rf ~/* "virus".

They should also run another test when they run it with sudo.

The logic is completely the same. The Sophos used trojans, not viruses (probably since a virus wouldn't be able to find any writeable .exe file to infect with UAC on). And troyan doen't really need mach system access to work. Look: Google Chome is sending/receiving data, executing scripts, downloading/uploading files, updating itself. Trojans are doing the same. The difference is very subtle and the problem of distinguinshing malware is generally unsolveable.

How does a thread which is about an virus test turn into a Windows vs OS X competition :/ ? It baffles me, honestly.

because windows 7 is a threat to peoples lively hoods and people don't have lives :rofl:

this thread will be closed eventually anyways

Why don't Spophos test whether Mac OS X and Linux are still vulnerable to the rm -rf ~/* "virus".

They should also run another test when they run it with sudo.

The logic is completely the same. The Sophos used trojans, not viruses (probably since a virus wouldn't be able to find any writeable .exe file to infect with UAC on). And troyan doen't really need mach system access to work. Look: Google Chome is sending/receiving data, executing scripts, downloading/uploading files, updating itself. Trojans are doing the same. The difference is very subtle and the problem of distinguinshing malware is generally unsolveable.

Exactly. This has nothing to do with Windows' security mechanisms.

Why don't Spophos test whether Mac OS X and Linux are still vulnerable to the rm -rf ~/* "virus".

They should also run another test when they run it with sudo.

The logic is completely the same. The Sophos used trojans, not viruses (probably since a virus wouldn't be able to find any writeable .exe file to infect with UAC on). And troyan doen't really need mach system access to work. Look: Google Chome is sending/receiving data, executing scripts, downloading/uploading files, updating itself. Trojans are doing the same. The difference is very subtle and the problem of distinguinshing malware is generally unsolveable.

Listen to the man.

Why is that Mac users are so happy with there system or whatever they wanna call it, but yet they have to preach and lie to us that they do this and that, is it because maybe they are lying to themselves?

We're just trying to clean up the FUD, like all the Windows users in here cleaning up the FUD that Sophos is spreading.

Hacked, yea. Apple's managed to fix those vulnerabilities (usually involving third-party libraries in things like Safari or DNS). Viruses, not yet, but I wouldn't be surprised if someone managed to create one that could outbreak.

In 2009 the hacker hacked OSX with a vulnerability he discovered the year before, that doesn't say much for their ability to swiftly patch exploits

The Pwn2Own contests are about getting attention for yourself, so of course people are going to concentrate their efforts of getting that headline.

Quoting the hacker:

"I hack Apple machines because OSX is the easiest platform to hack"

Sounds straightforward to me ;)

Why is that Mac users are so happy with there system or whatever they wanna call it, but yet they have to preach and lie to us that they do this and that, is it because maybe they are lying to themselves?

If I paid $3000 for a machine with only $1000 of parts I'd be lying left and right too...

In 2009 the hacker hacked OSX with a vulnerability he discovered the year before, that doesn't say much for their ability to swiftly patch exploits

I can't find where it says that the 2009 exploit was the same as the 2008 exploit. Also, that same day, Firefox and IE8 were both hacked.

By the way, Safari 4 has no currently known vulnerabilities. Just sayin'.

Quoting the hacker:

"I hack Apple machines because OSX is the easiest platform to hack"

Sounds straightforward to me ;)

He's also an avid Mac user (which means it's probably the OS he knows best), and hacked it because he believes it'll make the platform stronger. Just sayin'. ;)

If I paid $3000 for a machine with only $1000 of parts I'd be lying left and right too...

Hrmmmm...

dell.png

vs.

mac.png

Edited by Elliott

This was already posted by one of the News Writers here on Neowin. The original article pwned this article involving Sophos because Sophos exposed the Windows 7 operating system with the top 10 worst malware in the world. How was Windows 7 supposed to survive such infamous viruses? If it did, there would be no purpose for antiviruses.

This is an absolute crock - and I'll tell you why.

Many of you know of me here, and a smaller percentage know of me from other places, forums and sites along the Intarwebs. You know me as "ScottKin" or "ScottK". I've been involved, in one way or another and in an "in-the-wings" bits of stuff on the Intarwebs, so I've got some hefty experience on the Intarwebs and in Computing as well; in "geek-speek", you can say that I =! "noob".

Now, I have a rather small testing lab here at my home office / studio that is powered-on and working at least 99.98% of the time. I have always had one piece of computing equipment in my posession since 1986, and every one of them has been suitable for my needs (Programming, CAD, Design, Illustration & Graphics, Desktop Publishing, Web Site Design, Audio & Sound Design, etc.).

Since 1986, I have encountered TWO Viruses, 0 Trojans and 3 cases of Spyware / Malware. The 3 cases of Spyware / Malware actually were reported by one of the more popular anti-Spyware / Malware software packages in the market today (and I'm not going to divulge which one it was in order that I don't disparage an otherwise-reliable software company's name in public), and those ended-up to be false-positives. The two viruses were contained on a floppy-disk that a friend gave me, and when my system then became infected I destroyed the disk.

Since I became active on the Internet in 1993, I have never received any kind of virus, trojan or any similar kind of infection on any of my systems, outside of the previously mentioned events. There was a lot of hype back in 2000, where it was said that when a Windows system is placed on an un-protected broadband or standard ethernet connection to the Internet that the said system was compromized within 10 minutes of placing it on the Internet; this, according to my own personal experience, is utter "bovine fecal excrement". If it's true, then I must have special super-powers of keeping my systems secure simply due to my proximity to said systems. I regularly help friends & acquaintances with their computer problems, and about 1/2 of them involve removing viruses and other malware from their systems; nearly all of those were exposed due to their visiting websites with questionable content.

So, how do I keep my systems from being compromized? It's very easy:

1) Use some kind of anti-virus to protect my systems from the common viral vectors, and some kind of anti-spyware / malware tools to ensure that you are protected.

2) Don't go to pr0n sites - ever. Pr0n sites are a massive viral vector, due to their popularity

3) Don't download and/or install software that was obtained via illegitimate sources

4) Don't download tools and programs that assist in cracking or patching software that was obtained via Rule #3, and don't even visit the sites that have those bits.

5) Don't to go websites that you aren't sure about, unless you are willing to get bit.

6) Don't use p2p software to download anything.

I would wager that at least 80% of infected systems were compromized by not following at least 2 of these rules.

In real life, why would you want to walk down a dark alley or corridor in an area that you know is rife with crime? You wouldn't intentionally expose yourself or your loved-ones to anything inherently dangerous.

Why do the same on the Internet?

--ScottKin

He's also an avid Mac user (which means it's probably the OS he knows best), and hacked it because he believes it'll make the platform stronger. Just sayin'. ;)

His motives are largely irrelevant. The fact is the mac always gets hacked first, there is a reason for that, and it is simple. Most hackers say that OSX is actually poorly designed from a security standpoint. Just sayin' ;)

His motives are largely irrelevant. The fact is the mac always gets hacked first, there is a reason for that, and it is simple. Most hackers say that OSX is actually poorly designed from a security standpoint. Just sayin' ;)

Erm, except he didn't hack OS X. He hacked Safari via a third-party library exploit in order to gain access to the system, and the same hack worked on Safari for Windows. I also think you missed where I said another hacker also hacked Firefox and IE8 on Windows within minutes. Still slower than what it took to hack Safari, but like I said, that Safari exploit has been patched and there are currently no known vulnerabilities in Safari 4. Not to say that there aren't any, and it'll probably get hacked in nanoseconds or whatever in Pwn2Own 2010, but right now there are no known vulnerabilities.

You really gonna show me dell prices and try and compare to Mac prices? I built my system a year ago under 1500. Btw do mac users now have x64 version of adobe products yet? I understand adobe didn't wanna do it for Mac at first, I wonder why.

cause Mac's arent actually 64bit, would be a waste of time

cause Mac's arent actually 64bit, would be a waste of time

All current Macs are 64-bit, and OS X has run 64-bit software for years. The only issue is that the legacy API Carbon is only available as 32-bit, because it is deprecated and Apple wants people to not use it. They originally said they were going to make it available in 64-bit years ago (which is what Adobe was counting on), but then canceled it. In order for Adobe's software to be 64-bit, they would have to port their software to Cocoa, something that is a substantial amount of work (something Adobe is allergic to).

You really gonna show me dell prices and try and compare to Mac prices? I built my system a year ago under 1500. Btw do mac users now have x64 version of adobe products yet? I understand adobe didn't wanna do it for Mac at first, I wonder why.

What's wrong with comparing two OEMs? News flash buddy: most people don't build their own computers.

And no, like hdood said, Adobe are quite lazy and haven't updated their products to Cocoa yet, which would give them 64-bit capability. Lightroom 3 is the first 64-bit Adobe app for OS X.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. They are seeking a better life too. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!