DirectCompute Benchmark for Vista SP2 with DX11 or Win7


Recommended Posts

That might be it. Anyway, I re-ran the benchmark:

DirectCompute%20Benchmark%20v0.35%20by%20Pat.png

EDIT: I installed the 64-bit ATI Stream SDK v2.0 and now, the DirectCompute benchmark won't even start. :|

Nevermind, I fixed it by renaming "OpenCL.dll" to "OpenCL_ATI.dll". There still isn't any OpenCL support though.

Mine is weird... nVidia GeForce 295 GTX, yet with such crappy scores...

CPU is fantastic though! :D

Couldn't run Open_CL, keeps crashing for me!

Yeah, it's gotta be dual-GPU video cards. This benchmark doesn't seem to work well with them. So far, I've beaten an HD 4870 X2 and GTX 295 with my HD 4870. That shouldn't be.

I found the latest beta version (v0.45b) here. OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Here are my results:

2cxahx.png

2njevte.png

OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Perhaps they'll include it in the next driver release. Anyway, try running the benchmark with the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 x64 installed. You can get it here. You need to register an account though.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure v0.35 isn't working properly. People are getting insanely high scores with single-GPU video cards. The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.

any reason why directx 9 is provided with this program? (can't run benchmark on xp with directx 9.0 :laugh:)

not sure if i missed it but does anyone know what this benchmark program is actually doing to test the cards?

In case you run into any compatibility issues, I assume. And it's quite obvious as to why the benchmark won't run on Windows XP. It doesn't support DX10, let alone DX11.

I did say:

Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work:

The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.
I did say:

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work?

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

Off topic but I'm curious to how you get screenies of Windows like that? how you do that?

Back on topic...mine.

<Snipped>

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

The program automatically grabs the Window and uploads it, with transparency and shadowing. It isn't a feature of Windows 7/Vista. There is a dedicated program for capturing Windows in much the same way as the localhostr uploadr; however, it isn't free. It's called Window Clippings.

Back on topic:

ATI video cards (HD 4000/5000-series) seem to get better scores than their NVIDIA counterparts. It seems as though OpenCL works well with ATI video cards right off the bat.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

You take a screenshot of the window with a white background, then another one with a black background, and then you can reconstruct the alpha channel of the window by reading the green channel of both of the images, then you take the screenshot of the black window background and add the alpha channel to it.

The code's pretty simple, and pretty fast when written well (Mozilla use it for windowed plugins and GTK widgets and other things without issue, but they're the ones who wrote it originally), my implementation sucked but it was enough to get Mike's working :p

Edit: Actually, a DirectCompute/OpenCL/CUDA version of it would be quite interesting, and very fast as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • There are so many of these apps now that do this, what do people recommend?
    • Just the price of doing business. The scamble to pull as much from the web as possible is happening, and it's happening before a case like this changes how or what is legal do to with AI in terms of data harvesting. But even then as we've seen with the likes of Google who ignore cookie requests and just accept the fact they'll get fined, it's built into their business price model now. AI is here, its not going away. Their reward if any from the court case would be best suited to trying to incorprate AI or licence their end points as authentic human verified content. The problem is, as we've seen these same news papers are using AI themselves.
    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!