DirectCompute Benchmark for Vista SP2 with DX11 or Win7


Recommended Posts

That might be it. Anyway, I re-ran the benchmark:

DirectCompute%20Benchmark%20v0.35%20by%20Pat.png

EDIT: I installed the 64-bit ATI Stream SDK v2.0 and now, the DirectCompute benchmark won't even start. :|

Nevermind, I fixed it by renaming "OpenCL.dll" to "OpenCL_ATI.dll". There still isn't any OpenCL support though.

Mine is weird... nVidia GeForce 295 GTX, yet with such crappy scores...

CPU is fantastic though! :D

Couldn't run Open_CL, keeps crashing for me!

Yeah, it's gotta be dual-GPU video cards. This benchmark doesn't seem to work well with them. So far, I've beaten an HD 4870 X2 and GTX 295 with my HD 4870. That shouldn't be.

I found the latest beta version (v0.45b) here. OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Here are my results:

2cxahx.png

2njevte.png

OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Perhaps they'll include it in the next driver release. Anyway, try running the benchmark with the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 x64 installed. You can get it here. You need to register an account though.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure v0.35 isn't working properly. People are getting insanely high scores with single-GPU video cards. The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.

any reason why directx 9 is provided with this program? (can't run benchmark on xp with directx 9.0 :laugh:)

not sure if i missed it but does anyone know what this benchmark program is actually doing to test the cards?

In case you run into any compatibility issues, I assume. And it's quite obvious as to why the benchmark won't run on Windows XP. It doesn't support DX10, let alone DX11.

I did say:

Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work:

The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.
I did say:

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work?

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

Off topic but I'm curious to how you get screenies of Windows like that? how you do that?

Back on topic...mine.

<Snipped>

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

The program automatically grabs the Window and uploads it, with transparency and shadowing. It isn't a feature of Windows 7/Vista. There is a dedicated program for capturing Windows in much the same way as the localhostr uploadr; however, it isn't free. It's called Window Clippings.

Back on topic:

ATI video cards (HD 4000/5000-series) seem to get better scores than their NVIDIA counterparts. It seems as though OpenCL works well with ATI video cards right off the bat.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

You take a screenshot of the window with a white background, then another one with a black background, and then you can reconstruct the alpha channel of the window by reading the green channel of both of the images, then you take the screenshot of the black window background and add the alpha channel to it.

The code's pretty simple, and pretty fast when written well (Mozilla use it for windowed plugins and GTK widgets and other things without issue, but they're the ones who wrote it originally), my implementation sucked but it was enough to get Mike's working :p

Edit: Actually, a DirectCompute/OpenCL/CUDA version of it would be quite interesting, and very fast as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!