DirectCompute Benchmark for Vista SP2 with DX11 or Win7


Recommended Posts

That might be it. Anyway, I re-ran the benchmark:

DirectCompute%20Benchmark%20v0.35%20by%20Pat.png

EDIT: I installed the 64-bit ATI Stream SDK v2.0 and now, the DirectCompute benchmark won't even start. :|

Nevermind, I fixed it by renaming "OpenCL.dll" to "OpenCL_ATI.dll". There still isn't any OpenCL support though.

Mine is weird... nVidia GeForce 295 GTX, yet with such crappy scores...

CPU is fantastic though! :D

Couldn't run Open_CL, keeps crashing for me!

Yeah, it's gotta be dual-GPU video cards. This benchmark doesn't seem to work well with them. So far, I've beaten an HD 4870 X2 and GTX 295 with my HD 4870. That shouldn't be.

I found the latest beta version (v0.45b) here. OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Here are my results:

2cxahx.png

2njevte.png

OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Perhaps they'll include it in the next driver release. Anyway, try running the benchmark with the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 x64 installed. You can get it here. You need to register an account though.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure v0.35 isn't working properly. People are getting insanely high scores with single-GPU video cards. The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.

any reason why directx 9 is provided with this program? (can't run benchmark on xp with directx 9.0 :laugh:)

not sure if i missed it but does anyone know what this benchmark program is actually doing to test the cards?

In case you run into any compatibility issues, I assume. And it's quite obvious as to why the benchmark won't run on Windows XP. It doesn't support DX10, let alone DX11.

I did say:

Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work:

The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.
I did say:

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work?

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

Off topic but I'm curious to how you get screenies of Windows like that? how you do that?

Back on topic...mine.

<Snipped>

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

The program automatically grabs the Window and uploads it, with transparency and shadowing. It isn't a feature of Windows 7/Vista. There is a dedicated program for capturing Windows in much the same way as the localhostr uploadr; however, it isn't free. It's called Window Clippings.

Back on topic:

ATI video cards (HD 4000/5000-series) seem to get better scores than their NVIDIA counterparts. It seems as though OpenCL works well with ATI video cards right off the bat.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

You take a screenshot of the window with a white background, then another one with a black background, and then you can reconstruct the alpha channel of the window by reading the green channel of both of the images, then you take the screenshot of the black window background and add the alpha channel to it.

The code's pretty simple, and pretty fast when written well (Mozilla use it for windowed plugins and GTK widgets and other things without issue, but they're the ones who wrote it originally), my implementation sucked but it was enough to get Mike's working :p

Edit: Actually, a DirectCompute/OpenCL/CUDA version of it would be quite interesting, and very fast as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The $1,428 option The Steam Hardware lineup that Valve announced last year is slowly starting to roll out. Following the recent Steam Controller launch, Valve has now confirmed the price of the Steam Machine, its all-in-one console-like solution for PC gaming in the living room. There are currently four variants being presented, with only the storage and the included controller being the biggest differences. All of the Steam Machines have the same internals consisting of a semi-custom AMD Zen 4 CPU with six cores and 12 threads, an RDNA 3 28CU GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, all inside the familiar box Valve has been showing off for months now. The Steam Machine base model starts at $1,049. This has a 512GB NVMe SSD but does not come with a Steam Controller. Keep in mind that storage can be expanded with the microSD card slot too. Next, the $1,128 model has the exact same storage as the previous one but it does come with the new Steam Controller. If you need the Steam Machine to have more storage for games and apps than that, then the 2TB tiers are also available. The $1,349 Steam Machine has no controller once again, but it does ship with two extra faceplates (red fabric and solid walnut) to replace the standard black one. The final option costs $1,428, and it adds the controller back into the bundle. The Steam Machine ships with the Linux-based SteamOS. The box has a 1 Gigabit Ethernet port, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0, as well as one USB-C and four USB-A ports. Keep in mind that when purchasing standalone, the Steam Controller has a $100 price tag. With the above bundles, that drops to $80. It's a rather expensive machine for the internals it is touting, though the design and small form factor do help it somewhat. However, at the same time, the lack of upgradability hurts it. Valve says the ongoing parts shortages and massive price hikes for memory were the leading causes for this price. "The overall effect is that our original goal for the price of Steam Machine is no longer viable," added the company. "So the prices we're sharing today reflect the state of the world for manufacturing; or, more accurately, it reflects the price of the components as we've secured them over the past 6 months." Valve wants interested gamers to reserve it now to get the chance to pre-order a Steam Machine starting June 25, with shipping starting on June 29. Head here to sign up. The invites to buy it will be sent in a randomized order.
    • What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, Natural gas plants use about 2,803 gallons of water per megawatt-hour produced, which is significantly less than coal-fired plants that use around 19,185 gallons per megawatt-hour. Overall, natural gas plants are more water-efficient, using 584% less water than traditional power plants on average. AI generated
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!