DirectCompute Benchmark for Vista SP2 with DX11 or Win7


Recommended Posts

That might be it. Anyway, I re-ran the benchmark:

DirectCompute%20Benchmark%20v0.35%20by%20Pat.png

EDIT: I installed the 64-bit ATI Stream SDK v2.0 and now, the DirectCompute benchmark won't even start. :|

Nevermind, I fixed it by renaming "OpenCL.dll" to "OpenCL_ATI.dll". There still isn't any OpenCL support though.

Mine is weird... nVidia GeForce 295 GTX, yet with such crappy scores...

CPU is fantastic though! :D

Couldn't run Open_CL, keeps crashing for me!

Yeah, it's gotta be dual-GPU video cards. This benchmark doesn't seem to work well with them. So far, I've beaten an HD 4870 X2 and GTX 295 with my HD 4870. That shouldn't be.

I found the latest beta version (v0.45b) here. OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Here are my results:

2cxahx.png

2njevte.png

OpenCL works with it, provided you have the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 installed.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Which is still stupid, the latest drivers should come with it as part of the package.

EDIT: Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

Perhaps they'll include it in the next driver release. Anyway, try running the benchmark with the ATI Stream SDK v2.0 x64 installed. You can get it here. You need to register an account though.

Anyway, I'm pretty sure v0.35 isn't working properly. People are getting insanely high scores with single-GPU video cards. The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.

any reason why directx 9 is provided with this program? (can't run benchmark on xp with directx 9.0 :laugh:)

not sure if i missed it but does anyone know what this benchmark program is actually doing to test the cards?

In case you run into any compatibility issues, I assume. And it's quite obvious as to why the benchmark won't run on Windows XP. It doesn't support DX10, let alone DX11.

I did say:

Well, 0.45b refuses to even benchmark my GPU, keeps benchmarking the CPU which keeps jumping around in the score.

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work:

The latest version, v0.45b, seems to work fine for most people. You can get it here.
I did say:

And, then you tell me where I can get 0.45b, so why would you tell me where to get it if I already have it & tried it, and it doesn't work?

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

Off topic but I'm curious to how you get screenies of Windows like that? how you do that?

Back on topic...mine.

<Snipped>

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Because I'm blind and the sky is falling down. :rolleyes: I know what you typed and the latter half of my post wasn't directed to you. It was directed to everyone else. Good job on acknowledging my attempt at helping you by pointing out something so ridiculous and trivial.

http://localhostruploadr.com/

/offtopic

Also, use v0.45b of the benchmark. The version you used (0.35) seems to be buggy.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

The program automatically grabs the Window and uploads it, with transparency and shadowing. It isn't a feature of Windows 7/Vista. There is a dedicated program for capturing Windows in much the same way as the localhostr uploadr; however, it isn't free. It's called Window Clippings.

Back on topic:

ATI video cards (HD 4000/5000-series) seem to get better scores than their NVIDIA counterparts. It seems as though OpenCL works well with ATI video cards right off the bat.

Off topic thanks, I know where they were uploaded too...what I mean was how where screenshots themselves made? I know when you capture a window in OSX it captures it like that but how you do it in Windows?

You take a screenshot of the window with a white background, then another one with a black background, and then you can reconstruct the alpha channel of the window by reading the green channel of both of the images, then you take the screenshot of the black window background and add the alpha channel to it.

The code's pretty simple, and pretty fast when written well (Mozilla use it for windowed plugins and GTK widgets and other things without issue, but they're the ones who wrote it originally), my implementation sucked but it was enough to get Mike's working :p

Edit: Actually, a DirectCompute/OpenCL/CUDA version of it would be quite interesting, and very fast as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Plans. Christ at least editorialise this tripe for what it is or put your own journalistic take on it.
    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!