DirectCompute Benchmark for Vista SP2 with DX11 or Win7


Recommended Posts

Ok, it appears he did change how the application works.

Apparently (from what I can tell) if you DO NOT have OpenCL support, his program refuses to give DirectCompute results. Upon installing the Stream 2.0 SDK from AMDs site, it is now generating DirectCompute results. IMO that is the wrong way to do it, if a GPU supports DirectCompute (like the 4000 series with 9.12 drivers) then generate a DirectCompute Score. If it supports OpenCL (such as the Stream 2.0 SDK from AMD) then generate OpenCL Scores. Do not limit the program by ignoring DirectCompute scores because it doesn't support OpenCL (they are two different things).

i7-920, overclocked to 4Ghz.

ATI 4890 Toxic, overclocked to Atomic speeds (slight bump in core frequency).

post-168771-1262476206_thumb.jpg

I doubt it, at least not exclusively.

DirectCompute Benchmark 0.35: Generates a DirectCompute Score without a problem.

DirectCompute Benchmark 0.45b: Refuses to generate a DirectCompute Score.

How exactly is that "On my end"?

Because it works for others with .45 and ati...

edit: nvm

Results for version 0.45b:

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT @ 1753 MHz (10DE / 614 / 23721682)

Intel® Core2 Quad CPU Q6600 @ 2.40GHz (4 logical CPUs)

Benchmark version: v0.45

DirectCompute: D864.7

OpenCL: C603.2

CPU: M39.7

NVIDIA Windows Kernel Mode Driver, Version 195.62

nvlddmkm 8.17.11.9562

Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Edition (build 7600)

Doesn't look that bad for a two year old system. (the 9800 GT is really a 8800 GT with the BIOS modded)

Because it works for others with .45 and ati...

edit: nvm

I know you have already seen my post on how I fixed the issue, but that statement is too general IMO. Just because a program works for others, doesn't mean its going to work normally for everyone. Thats like saying no program in the world contains bugs, any issue someone has is due to their own mistake.

I know you have already seen my post on how I fixed the issue, but that statement is too general IMO. Just because a program works for others, doesn't mean its going to work normally for everyone. Thats like saying no program in the world contains bugs, any issue someone has is due to their own mistake.

Well I was right, your system didn't have something installed causing it to not work :shiftyninja:

Your answer makes sense, I already had the 9.12 hotfix with the stream SDK installed before i benchmarked 0.45 so I didn't notice that.

Odd thing is, I too installed the 9.12 hotfix (I checked my driver version with the 9.12 hotfix driver version and its an exact match), but I did not have the Stream SDK installed. Its possible I selected to not install it though, if it was possible. When I install the drivers I prefer to go with the bare minimum (I do not install the HDMI audio, as I do not use HDMI, etc).

ViperAFK, we were both right. The author of DirectCompute Benchmark DID change something which prevents the program from using DirectCompute if you are missing OpenCL, that was a "feature" not there in previous versions of DCB. At the same time, you were right in saying it was something with my setup.

What I think is more interesting is WDDM 2.0 and whether it will be coming in Windows 8 or Windows 9 - that will be when directcompute and other features start showing some major leap forwards in terms of the GPU being put to some major use. I hope we'll start seeing some vendors utilise it to speed up video compression speed.

Odd thing is, I too installed the 9.12 hotfix (I checked my driver version with the 9.12 hotfix driver version and its an exact match), but I did not have the Stream SDK installed. Its possible I selected to not install it though, if it was possible. When I install the drivers I prefer to go with the bare minimum (I do not install the HDMI audio, as I do not use HDMI, etc).

ViperAFK, we were both right. The author of DirectCompute Benchmark DID change something which prevents the program from using DirectCompute if you are missing OpenCL, that was a "feature" not there in previous versions of DCB. At the same time, you were right in saying it was something with my setup.

The Stream SDK isn't included with the drivers, you have to install it seperately to get the OpenCL component (stupid I know) but I would imagine that the OpenCL component will probably be included in future driver releases

What I think is more interesting is WDDM 2.0 and whether it will be coming in Windows 8 or Windows 9 - that will be when directcompute and other features start showing some major leap forwards in terms of the GPU being put to some major use. I hope we'll start seeing some vendors utilise it to speed up video compression speed.

Well people have already written lots of CUDA enabled encoders, they'll eventually move to OpenCL (yay for multi-platform) or DirectCompute (yay for Windows only!)

Well people have already written lots of CUDA enabled encoders, they'll eventually move to OpenCL (yay for multi-platform) or DirectCompute (yay for Windows only!)

Sorry, I'm a bit out of the loop; is there a h264/mp4/aac encoder that takes advantage of directcompute?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!