[Official] Assassin's Creed 2


Recommended Posts

but how long does it take you think?

I mean I like massacering guards but yeah. and running on buildings is sweet

GameTrailers said it would be between 9-12 hours of gameplay (more if you want to get all the achievements).

http://www.gametrailers.com/game/assassins-creed-ii/11094

I have to say, while I am truly enjoying this game, I really do not see massive leaps and bounds in gameplay from the first game. They have definietly refined a lot of aspects for sure, no doubt about it, but I am not sure I quite get the talk from a lot of reviews I have read about how it is a huge improvement over the last and that much better of a game. All they really have done IMO is fix the largest issues with the first one. This is the game I think they wanted to release to begin with but just could not at the time. So yes, that undeniably means it is a much better game than the first, but the way it has been getting reviewed and praised I was expecting something much more drastic than the first one. Perhaps it was just me reading into things to much and forgetting the hype involved.

GameTrailers said it would be between 9-12 hours of gameplay (more if you want to get all the achievements).

http://www.gametrailers.com/game/assassins-creed-ii/11094

so it will get a good 30 hours of play

12 hours for me and 12 hours for my little brother. plus all the times when i am bored and decide to go building hoping

but my mom got it for me and my little brothers birthday. even though I was there. she wouldnt get a roll of duct tape so I could **** my little brother off right now. its installing right now I think its done so im gonna go play :)

I love this game, but the jumping puzzles and timings with the Assassin's Tombs sucked. Altair's armor looks really good though when you wear it.

I figure I have a couple of hours left before finishing it. Definitely better than AC1!

I have to say, while I am truly enjoying this game, I really do not see massive leaps and bounds in gameplay from the first game. They have definietly refined a lot of aspects for sure, no doubt about it, but I am not sure I quite get the talk from a lot of reviews I have read about how it is a huge improvement over the last and that much better of a game. All they really have done IMO is fix the largest issues with the first one. This is the game I think they wanted to release to begin with but just could not at the time. So yes, that undeniably means it is a much better game than the first, but the way it has been getting reviewed and praised I was expecting something much more drastic than the first one. Perhaps it was just me reading into things to much and forgetting the hype involved.

I'm fine with hearing that, I liked the first one enough that I got to the point in the story where the wanting to figure out the rest of the story was stronger than the want to stop playing due to repetitiveness. If that repetitiveness is virtually gone compared to the first then it just makes it that much more fun for me (once it hits PC, that is). I just hope they spend time refining the PC version and we don't get a crappy port like GTA:IV was.

I'm fine with hearing that, I liked the first one enough that I got to the point in the story where the wanting to figure out the rest of the story was stronger than the want to stop playing due to repetitiveness. If that repetitiveness is virtually gone compared to the first then it just makes it that much more fun for me (once it hits PC, that is). I just hope they spend time refining the PC version and we don't get a crappy port like GTA:IV was.

YES! same. the first port of ac1 was horribly done as well. They could have optimized it much better.

hey do you guys know by the end of the game can you get back into the Animus? or just stuck out side in the real world like in AC1? I need to know because there are some achievements I need to get .. O_o.

nvm..

I have to say, while I am truly enjoying this game, I really do not see massive leaps and bounds in gameplay from the first game. They have definietly refined a lot of aspects for sure, no doubt about it, but I am not sure I quite get the talk from a lot of reviews I have read about how it is a huge improvement over the last and that much better of a game. All they really have done IMO is fix the largest issues with the first one. This is the game I think they wanted to release to begin with but just could not at the time. So yes, that undeniably means it is a much better game than the first, but the way it has been getting reviewed and praised I was expecting something much more drastic than the first one. Perhaps it was just me reading into things to much and forgetting the hype involved.

The biggest complaint about the first was the repetition. That's gone. I think that's why it's getting praised so much. I loved the first one, repetition and all, so for me it's not all that much better. But they fixed that and various other things, so people don't have much to complain about anymore.

One thing I noticed is that when you basically have a straight line to climb up, you go MUCH faster than in the first one.

I just finished the game! What an awesome game. :D Just have to get all the achievements now. I can't wait for AC3 now.

By the way, best three words to "end" the game (the part before the credits). "What. The. ****." :laugh:

I just finished the game! What an awesome game. :D Just have to get all the achievements now. I can't wait for AC3 now.

By the way, best three words to "end" the game (the part before the credits). "What. The. ****." :laugh:

indeed, I said it completely in sync actually, what a conclusion to the game. can't wait for AC3, it will be so badass freerunning in the "present"

Why the hell must the PC version be so far off, I really want to try this :(

Probably so they can add in some anti-piracy measures that will prevent people from pirating the game for an extra week after release, as opposed to releasing it now and boosting PC sales from people who are not going to wait for it to release on PC, instead of the small amount who will decide to buy it (instead of pirating it) to get it a week sooner. :p

Probably so they can add in some anti-piracy measures that will prevent people from pirating the game for an extra week after release, as opposed to releasing it now and boosting PC sales from people who are not going to wait for it to release on PC, instead of the small amount who will decide to buy it (instead of pirating it) to get it a week sooner. :p

People wonder why PC gaming is dying (except for MMOs). :p

So I dont know how far I am into the game, I just left the Villa and Mario to go back to talk to Leonardo Da Vinci and I learned some new assassination techniques, so I am maybe only a few hours in, but I have to say the more I play the more I really am enjoying the overall game itself.

They really have refined so many aspects that were not so good the last time around and overall it is a much more enjoyable experience. The amount of detail is insane, and if I had to make one negative comment it almost seems like there is to much going on at the same time, like way to many things to choose to do. So I am still pretty much sticking to the main story and trying to move it along, but the playability factor in this game seems off the charts and it appears there are way more things to do than your average game these days. So for this reason alone I would think it is appealing to gamers who have a lot of time to dedicate to playing games and truly want to get engrossed and wrapped up into completing one game.

I just hope it is not so long that I never beat it, which very well may happen as I tend to lose interest in really long games and / or just got distracted by other games. We shall see.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      577
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!