New College policy towards Macs


Recommended Posts

Well I'll give a little background info first, during the summer my college bought 25 new Macs for a the new Media suite. Apparently we spent close to ?40k (does this sound about right, not sure of the exact specs). Anyway for the last few weeks students and teachers alike have began steadily more frustrated with them. They claimed that they were the least reliable computer they'd ever used or that was the general feeling we were getting. I thought this didn't sound right so I went to try once for myself (as I'm doing Computing I can get in to the Media suite). I was surprised it wasn't some joke they were dreadful, the crashed every ten minutes or so, very disappointed Apple :-(

Anyway now the Principal has gotten involved, we spent so much on these and there totally unusable, the rest of our campus use HPs and Senior Management is annoyed that we colud have bought so many more HPs with the money we "wasted" (not use of the "s) on the Macs, overall there's a huge shortage of computers across the campus with every computer in the Library nearly always in use and a room full of macs being unused, seems a bit of a waste. Anyway our Principal has made his decision, the plans for two more Mac powered Media suites called off and we not allowed any more Macs period. Were not sure what's going to happen to the ones we already have, some of the computing teachers are saying they'll being removed next week, belief that when I see it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/843688-new-college-policy-towards-macs/
Share on other sites

either they bought some mega crap ones from years and years ago or there not setup properly somehow?

my music course had old imac's setup in the rooms, all streaming off a cheap mac server and the reliability of them was excellent.

do you know what macs they are etc?

well. first thing i would do is swap out a harddrive and have a clean install of the latest mac os for it without anything else installed.

if the problem persists i would be inclined to say it's either the ram or power supply. It is entirely possible that apple may have gotten a bad batch of components from their venders.

of course of the problem goes away with a fresh install i'd start to look at the software installed more closely. i'd remove any startup items and see if it still crashes. and then reactivate each piece of software one at a time to find which one makes it unstable. Something else to remember about macs is that they can only allocate memory in contiguous blocks. that said their could be simply a lack of memory on them.

If worst comes to worst, they could always bootcamp them and load Windows (only) on them!

Strange that they've all performed that badly though... And yeah, my Macs have been great too!

We cant do that, we could have saved a few thousand and just bought HPs but you never know that might yet be one of are only options.

well. first thing i would do is swap out a harddrive and have a clean install of the latest mac os for it without anything else installed.

if the problem persists i would be inclined to say it's either the ram or power supply. It is entirely possible that apple may have gotten a bad batch of components from their venders.

of course of the problem goes away with a fresh install i'd start to look at the software installed more closely. i'd remove any startup items and see if it still crashes. and then reactivate each piece of software one at a time to find which one makes it unstable. Something else to remember about macs is that they can only allocate memory in contiguous blocks. that said their could be simply a lack of memory on them.

This might be a wild guess but I'll through it in to the ring anyway, I Apple know they have a bunch of below average quality Macs I probably better to send them to a College rather than private companies because Colleges buy them at reduced rates.

I just checked with someone doing Alevel IT, they are brand new. This is actually slightly embarrassing.... *runs away*

Well I'll give a little background info first, during the summer my college bought 25 new Macs for a the new Media suite. Apparently we spent close to ?40k (does this sound about right, not sure of the exact specs). Anyway for the last few weeks students and teachers alike have began steadily more frustrated with them. They claimed that they were the least reliable computer they'd ever used or that was the general feeling we were getting. I thought this didn't sound right so I went to try once for myself (as I'm doing Computing I can get in to the Media suite). I was surprised it wasn't some joke they were dreadful, the crashed every ten minutes or so, very disappointed Apple :-(

Anyway now the Principal has gotten involved, we spent so much on these and there totally unusable, the rest of our campus use HPs and Senior Management is annoyed that we colud have bought so many more HPs with the money we "wasted" (not use of the "s) on the Macs, overall there's a huge shortage of computers across the campus with every computer in the Library nearly always in use and a room full of macs being unused, seems a bit of a waste. Anyway our Principal has made his decision, the plans for two more Mac powered Media suites called off and we not allowed any more Macs period. Were not sure what's going to happen to the ones we already have, some of the computing teachers are saying they'll being removed next week, belief that when I see it.

Yep, sounds like a Mac to me. Same experience. They far from "not crashing" as all the BS ads are portraying Windows.

Finally smart logic. They should just dump all of them and get 3 times more PCs with Windows 7 and be done with it.

So it is either a problem with the machines/OS, or it is a problem with the software running on them. Does anyone there actually know enough to tell the difference between the former and the latter?

Not really our main guy at IT support just knows about Windows and a bit about Macs and we can't really afford someone just to manage 25 Macs.

Yep, sounds like a Mac to me. Same experience. They far from "not crashing" as all the BS ads are portraying Windows.

Finally smart logic. They should just dump all of them and get 3 times more PCs with Windows 7 and be done with it.

It's to late for that now where stuck with them now, anyways anyone doing Media has a room change now so the Macs won't be used at all. I've got Computing tomorrow second lesson I'll see if theres been any updates over the weekend.

My record uptime for my PowerBook G4 is like 150 days before I got tired of the updater popping up.

Only time I've had it crash is when I was mucking around in the terminal.

You lucky git, most media students here would love uptime of 30 mins without something going wrong.

I find OS X frustrating to use, sure, being a Windows user...

I've got a couple of modern (and classic!) Macs and I've only seen them crash now and then, they run into far less trouble than my relatives who all use Vista OEM-crapware laptops from PC World.

If multiple Macs are failing for you, then it has to be something you guys are doing with them. I can't think what though, it's a very strange issue... and also a tasty snack for the mindless Apple haters around these boards. Hurr derp! Windows 7 neva failz!1

Care to explain exactly how they were set up? Fresh installs I presume, what software are they running, how are they networked, etc.

I find OS X frustrating to use, sure, being a Windows user...

I've got a couple of modern (and classic!) Macs and I've only seen them crash now and then, they run into far less trouble than my relatives who all use Vista OEM-crapware laptops from PC World.

If multiple Macs are failing for you, then it has to be something you guys are doing with them. I can't think what though, it's a very strange issue... and also a tasty snack for the mindless Apple haters around these boards. Hurr derp! Windows 7 neva failz!1

Care to explain exactly how they were set up? Fresh installs I presume, what software are they running, how are they networked, etc.

Speaking of 7 the tech guys (the guys that practically live in the basement, not the buffoons from PC world) are stilling evaluating the possibilities of a full Windows 7 roll-out.

I agree. I really suspect it's a software/configuration issue or a bad batch of hardware.

Did you guys ever call Apple support (still under warranty?). Usually large volume customers get better support than regular customers as well.

I'm not sure we count as large volume, and I presume some contact has been made with Apple, also yes they are defiantly under warranty there to new not to be.

I find that to be rather unusual, because in my experience, I've had no issues with my Macs. My MacBook Pro once went about 60 days without restarting (the only reason I had to restart was because I needed to update OS X), and the Macs in my school run flawlessly. At my school there are about 16 G3 iMacs, 8 Power mac G4s, 3 Power Mac G5s, and 3 Mac Pros. None have had any problems; I spend about an hour a week running basic maintenance on them and keep them well-updated. They run faster than the new Dells.

This isn't the first time I've heard of this story, with Macs being terrible at school. I can only trace it down to two main factors: the students are completely mac-illiterate, or that there's no tech guy to fix the small problems that eventually cause the crashes. I don't find it plausible that 25 brand-new Macs are complete lemons.

Gotta be the software they're using. Is it possible that your school is pirating the Media software?

I know that's a far fetched, and maybe even offensive, idea. But if your school just got a bunch of new Macs, for a media lab, then it really wouldn't surprise me. The media software is damn expensive. I wouldn't suggest it if I hadn't heard of schools doing this before.

Because that isn't the OS X I know. No OS I've used has been unbearably unstable, unless it's a beta/alpha... and even then I usually find it somewhat workable. What you're talking about sounds more like ReactOS :p

I've had no real problems with my Mac, until I bought a HP c5580 printer last week. My Macbook has bluetooth, the printer has bluetooth, so why in the world don't they work together. I gave it a quick google and since Snow Leopard has been released a significant amount of people have had all sorts of printer issues.

I know that's a far fetched, and maybe even offensive, idea. But if your school just got a bunch of new Macs, for a media lab, then it really wouldn't surprise me. The media software is damn expensive. I wouldn't suggest it if I hadn't heard of schools doing this before.

Having experienced the fun of dancing around software protection policies, I have to mention here that the software doesn't need to be pirated to be mucking up the system. One classic case is Adobe CS packages. Absolutely awful, and essentially requires that all users have administrative rights unless you actually modify both the installer and applications. It just doesn't play nice in a lab setting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!