New College policy towards Macs


Recommended Posts

Not really our main guy at IT support just knows about Windows and a bit about Macs and we can't really afford someone just to manage 25 Macs.

In other words, management is to blame as they made a completely wrong decision. You don't buy stuff your IT department is not able to support because that will be too costly. If they don't understand what's going on and how to resolve this they will most likely hire some company who does and they don't come cheap. Now they have problems they should investigate and resolve them as you'd normally do. Calling new purchases off is not a good management decision, it would have been a lot better if those purchases were put on hold. Seems to me management is not really capable of doing what a management should be doing.

Mac's at colleges suck. Not sure why, but they really do, the ones at my old college were slower than my old PC several years ago, yet when i bought myself one its faster than my previous PC.

Only real reason could be windows based network (which generally, any UK education network SUCKS and is 100% hackable without trying) conflicting and slowing down the macs.

Also ?45k for 25 macs is a very BAD deal. Think the whole chinese whispers thing has gone on... Apparently the "HHT's" we use at work (about ?300-400 worth hardware, tops) at ?4k ea;) ;)

I think your school ****ed with the software and made it unstable. Re-install OSX and then install the other software that is needed one by one and see if it goes unstable.

I am thinking that there may be two or more softwares conflicting with one another when they are running.

Your school must have some really bad setups on those Macs. I've seen Macs behave poorly, and it's because the administrators didn't know what the hell they were doing.

My Macs run incredible well. My MBP has been up for 10 days because 10 days ago I had to restart for a software update. I've only ever had a Mac kernel panic once, and it was because of some crappy third party RAM.

For everyone saying "My Mac is the best thing ever, totally stable, never crashes, runs like a demon, praise Apple...", that's nice, but the lab is a different environment, with several unique challenges. Deployment is one, and it links most of the other issues together. If you want to image a set of machines, better make sure that your software licenses will play along nicely. If they don't, expect the software to work on one machine at any given time, even if you have bought 25 licenses *cough* Adobe *cough*. Some settings also will not translate between different machines. Even a few of Apple's own plists encode the UUID or MAC address of the machine on which it was made - and those won't work on other computers. You have to script a find and replace for all those plists if you're using a managment system like Radmind.

I'm not pointing out that Macs are inherently bad, or that this was even a bad choice (ok, maybe I am for that last one), but there are certainly circumstances in which these machines will fall over on their faces, and it doesn't make sense to compare personal at home experiences to woes in a larger multi-user environment.

Having experienced the fun of dancing around software protection policies, I have to mention here that the software doesn't need to be pirated to be mucking up the system. One classic case is Adobe CS packages. Absolutely awful, and essentially requires that all users have administrative rights unless you actually modify both the installer and applications. It just doesn't play nice in a lab setting.

Well my point is that pirated apps often aren't kept up to date.

And there is a lot of legitimately awful software for all OS's. If we knew what software you were using, it'd help

If it's free/open source stuff, it's probably ported from Linux, and that tends to be unstable/unnatural on OS X without a lot of work (imo).

Only real reason could be windows based network (which generally, any UK education network SUCKS and is 100% hackable without trying) conflicting and slowing down the macs.

Thanks, it's really nice to have my job insulted. Cheers for that. You need to realise that IT staff working in a school deal with the some of the most hostile users possible and many of them do their best given the limited resources available to them. In a business anyone attempting to "be l33t hack0rz" would be fired/written up whereas in a school they have to put up with it. Sure there are some really incompetent school IT Departments, but it's the same in any sector so it's not fair to insult us all.

I don't see how a windows network running along side the mac's would "conflict and slow down the macs" in any way. If mac's can't interact with Windows servers without crashing horribly then it's OSX that is at fault, not Windows.

But yes, If the school really wanted mac's they should have done a lot more testing before buying a whole suites worth! To be honest tho, a lot of what you can get on a mac can be bought for Windows as well nowadays, so I question why they would want to run Mac's along side the existing Windows network anyway, it's a lot of extra headache to support an entirely separate platform just for only a few systems and we've turned down the "odd mac" for exactly that reason.

One classic case is Adobe CS packages. Absolutely awful, and essentially requires that all users have administrative rights unless you actually modify both the installer and applications. It just doesn't play nice in a lab setting.

Yeah it's a right pain, a lot of it assumes your an administrator (even today) so requires a bit of hacking about with to work correctly with restricted access. (We've just bought CS4 to replace our old Macromedia MX 2004 at work) We had a problem with the licensing engine that was a result of this thinking that we've now solved, but it is somewhat frustrating that a pirated user wouldn't have had the same issue we had.

Edited by DrCheese

I work at a high school in the IT department, and we've about had it with Macs. The problem is that we use only Dells, and than someone somehow got some money and bought a number of iMacs without asking us first. Trying to add Macintosh computers to an otherwise completely windows-based environment is just asking for disaster:

- Macs can not be easily imaged without a Netboot Server (leaving the much easier and more universal PXE out of the question)

- Macs can not easily be remotely monitored without purchasing Apple Remote Desktop, most other management systems don't support Macs

- Macs can not be managed through Group Policy without buying special third-party software

- Software and Upgrade deployment involves going to every computer with a CD, instead of just using a central deployment system

To me, it just doesn't seem that Macs are great computers to add to a primarily Windows-based network, it will increase the workload of IT greatly. In education, the IT department is usually stressed out enough to begin with (students breaking stuff, insignificant budgets, understaffing), so the amount of attention that Macs require is just way higher than what an educational IT department can provide.

It takes time to learn a new OS, no matter what you currently use. It makes no sense to me to introduce Macs to a group of Windows users who obviously aren't going to know how to use them properly. Every IT department is not going to know how to admin every OS out there proficiently.

Besides that, Windows is the commonly used OS and is the one most users will face when they move from the uni to the work place. Give them training on the OS they will be using in the real world.

at my old school, they had a lab of 25 Core Duo iMacs running Tiger, with an Xserve in the closet, and an HP Color LaserJet networked to the Macs (and a CAD Lab full of XP SP3 PCs). the Macs were setup so that all users had their own accounts on the Xserve.

OS lockups, the spinning beachball cursor, Photoshop's inability to print directly to the printer (had to use Preview?) and a couple bad screens. Firefox installed but won't launch (already running), they had some very old version of IE installed and running under Rosetta for the school's computerized attendance system.

i blame 80% of it on the fact that they were networked

The only time I've seen HPs that were more reliable than Macs was during a short acid trip to Bizarro Land a few years back. Maybe Apple's QA has declined since then, but I doubt it has declined THAT much. My guess is the IT staff doesn't know what they're doing.

and than someone somehow got some money and bought a number of iMacs without asking us first.

ow the finance manager needs a slap for authorising that without checking with you guys first... not only that but the guy who "ordered" them needs taking to task for trying in the first place. You really need the backup of SMT for that tho, if you don't have it then there's no way in heck can you be expected to support software/hardware that you've not purchased. There is little point in having an onsite IT department if they just go over it's head whenever they want flashy new toys.

Macs can not be managed through Group Policy without buying special third-party software

If you must keep them, you can buy an el cheapo mac mini with OSX server installed and tie it into your AD. Then you can create the OSX version of group policy on the mac's yet still auth them against your AD.

To me, it just doesn't seem that Macs are great computers to add to a primarily Windows-based network, it will increase the workload of IT greatly. In education, the IT department is usually stressed out enough to begin with (students breaking stuff, insignificant budgets, understaffing), so the amount of attention that Macs require is just way higher than what an educational IT department can provide.

Pretty much, the extra workload of supporting an entirely different platform is beyond the resources of most educational IT departments. As I said above there is very little point when the software is also out for Windows and if not, there's usually an alternative. The *only* piece of software I can think of the top of my head that may be required for media students to learn that is OSX is final cut pro, as it's an industry standard.

There is also no way I could justify the increased costs of mac's (even with educational discount)

Yep, sounds like a Mac to me. Same experience. They far from "not crashing" as all the BS ads are portraying Windows.

Finally smart logic. They should just dump all of them and get 3 times more PCs with Windows 7 and be done with it.

lol With how much time I spend on Mac and Windows, there's a much greater percentage that my Mac will crash than my Windows 7 PC will crash (I use 7 at home and work). Heck, the other day my Mac completely froze and I had to hard reboot it. It's a year old. I've not had that happen with Windows since ... ... ... it's been months. Maybe more than a year.

That said, I like my Mac. It's great. Mac OS will never replace Windows PCs in the corporate world though, unless they learn to play better with Windows Servers (among a great many other things). Snow Leopard is a tiny step in the right direction with Exchange 2007 support... but they have a long way to go.

I'm a Mac. And a PC. :) I use them both equally at home. I slightly prefer 7 over OS X, but I like them both about the same.

Thanks, it's really nice to have my job insulted. Cheers for that. You need to realise that IT staff working in a school deal with the some of the most hostile users possible and many of them do their best given the limited resources available to them. In a business anyone attempting to "be l33t hack0rz" would be fired/written up whereas in a school they have to put up with it. Sure there are some really incompetent school IT Departments, but it's the same in any sector so it's not fair to insult us all.

Actually, after working a few years at a pretty awesome undergraduate institution, I have to say, the users were never a huge headache. We let them do pretty much anything they wanted, pushed out software on request, sometimes within 24 hours (I was usually happy to entertain requests for simple software/updates), kept things up to date, and would install software for them on a one-off basis. We never saw a huge amount of abuse in return - why try and push the limits of the system when there pretty much aren't any?

Yeah it's a right pain, a lot of it assumes your an administrator (even today) so requires a bit of hacking about with to work correctly with restricted access. (We've just bought CS4 to replace our old Macromedia MX 2004 at work) We had a problem with the licensing engine that was a result of this thinking that we've now solved, but it is somewhat frustrating that a pirated user wouldn't have had the same issue we had.

After around CS3, I started to joke that we should just install a pirated version. After all, we were a paying customer, had the software licenses, and weren't getting any support from Adobe (we actually ordered their CS4 Deployment Toolkit, and they sent us the Windows version). They had our money and we had nothing but headaches from their software. I never did figure out the issue where the first launch of Photoshop CS4 would trigger a license-related crash, and all subsequent launches would work perfectly...

They claimed that they were the least reliable computer they'd ever used

They are idiots if they think such a thing about a Mac. I am a Windows user and I also own a Mac and they are not rocket science. Snow Leopard is rock solid and I haven't had a single issue with it. It is my first Mac and I already know how to use it and learned a lot in the 3 weeks I have had it.

People are just so used to things being "easy" that they don't want to spend the time to learn anything new.

They are idiots if they think such a thing about a Mac. I am a Windows user and I also own a Mac and they are not rocket science. Snow Leopard is rock solid and I haven't had a single issue with it. It is my first Mac and I already know how to use it and learned a lot in the 3 weeks I have had it.

People are just so used to things being "easy" that they don't want to spend the time to learn anything new.

Well, I guess you are calling several of my co-workers idiots as well.

If that's what they are experiencing with their computers I don't see why they should be insulted. After all, they are just voicing what they experience.

You having some great experience with SL doesn't mean other people have the same experience and it doesn't make them idiots. You should go over the original post again. They are not claiming it is hard to use SL, they are rather claming Macs are unreliable.

Edited by zagor
Actually, after working a few years at a pretty awesome undergraduate institution

Yeah, our post 16 students are fine (16 - 18) but it's the younger ones who try to play the system (11-16). It's better to be as relaxed as you can with it i.e don't have a crazy webfilter in place or ban students from doing simple things like right click just because you can (I've seen this at one school...) but at the same time you can't take your eye off the ball as there's always one or two who will try to take more.

After around CS3, I started to joke that we should just install a pirated version.

nice to know I wasn't the only one :p It wasn't something I'd ever seriously consider but when your banging your head against the wall due to a licensing error it does annoy you :p

Well, I guess you are calling several of my co-workers idiots as well.

If that's what they are experiencing with their computers I don't see why they should be insulted. After all, they are just voicing what they experience.

No insult intended. Let me tell you this:

I ALWAYS thought a mac was the most evil thing in the world. To me, there was nothing out there better than a PC and Windows. I thought of Windows as a God. It was it. Mac were an unnecesary evil and the worst machines in the world. I never could understand what the big deal was with them. I found them hard to learn and hard to understand so guess what? One day I said to myself "I am getting one. Fu.... it. Let's try it." so I got one.

They are VERY different machines yes. Different in every way to Windows. Windows is idiot-proof (no offense intended, I use Windows too). Mac OSX is not idiot-proof. It takes some time to get used to but its not rocket science. My high school used Macs and still use them. The teachers loved them and still do. They are efficient and powerful machines. All you have to do is learn and get used to them. That's all.

Macs are as reliable as PCs. They are no different. Macs use the same hardware PCs use.

** I apologize for the "idiots" thing. No harm intended. **

They are idiots if they think such a thing about a Mac.

Ok... now here is what I see wrong with your opinion.

Hadron collider. It worked for a few days, then broke. Nearing restart, a piece of bread shuts down the most complex machine on Earth. People comment on news stories that the billion dollar machine should be shut down because its flawed and worthless. They have only seen failure, no positive result. Their opinion is based on their short experience.

In this environment, they've only seen things not working as expected, and want to scrap it. The problem is, they aren't giving it a chance to had problems worked out. Do they really have time to? I dunno.

But you can't say their opinion is wrong because YOU have had more time and a different experience using a Mac.

- Software and Upgrade deployment involves going to every computer with a CD, instead of just using a central deployment system

Mac OS X Server mixed with the Apple Remote Desktop management package that you mentioned earlier in your posts give you the ability to remotely upgrade and install software, as well as deploy Software Updates through a single central deployment system.

I work at a high school in the IT department, and we've about had it with Macs. The problem is that we use only Dells, and than someone somehow got some money and bought a number of iMacs without asking us first. Trying to add Macintosh computers to an otherwise completely windows-based environment is just asking for disaster:

- Macs can not be easily imaged without a Netboot Server (leaving the much easier and more universal PXE out of the question)

- Macs can not easily be remotely monitored without purchasing Apple Remote Desktop, most other management systems don't support Macs

- Macs can not be managed through Group Policy without buying special third-party software

- Software and Upgrade deployment involves going to every computer with a CD, instead of just using a central deployment system

To me, it just doesn't seem that Macs are great computers to add to a primarily Windows-based network, it will increase the workload of IT greatly. In education, the IT department is usually stressed out enough to begin with (students breaking stuff, insignificant budgets, understaffing), so the amount of attention that Macs require is just way higher than what an educational IT department can provide.

ARD is like $300 unlimited for EDUs..

3 of the 4 things above can be solved with a cheap Mac Mini Server.

Well I'll give a little background info first, during the summer my college bought 25 new Macs for a the new Media suite. Apparently we spent close to ?40k (does this sound about right, not sure of the exact specs). Anyway for the last few weeks students and teachers alike have began steadily more frustrated with them. They claimed that they were the least reliable computer they'd ever used or that was the general feeling we were getting. I thought this didn't sound right so I went to try once for myself (as I'm doing Computing I can get in to the Media suite). I was surprised it wasn't some joke they were dreadful, the crashed every ten minutes or so, very disappointed Apple :-(

Anyway now the Principal has gotten involved, we spent so much on these and there totally unusable, the rest of our campus use HPs and Senior Management is annoyed that we colud have bought so many more HPs with the money we "wasted" (not use of the "s) on the Macs, overall there's a huge shortage of computers across the campus with every computer in the Library nearly always in use and a room full of macs being unused, seems a bit of a waste. Anyway our Principal has made his decision, the plans for two more Mac powered Media suites called off and we not allowed any more Macs period. Were not sure what's going to happen to the ones we already have, some of the computing teachers are saying they'll being removed next week, belief that when I see it.

My school Macs are just as ****ty. Not to mention 25% of the Macs suffered hardware problems all in the same month.

Macs are good if you aren't going to be doing anything advanced on it. Once you add them to a large network, **** happens. And it's bad. Random lockups, crashes, Finder completely disappearing, Firefox not working, etc. the list goes on and on and on...

Edited by WatchTheSoup

For some reason, I find it hard to believe that all 25 Macs are having issues at the same time. My school has tons of Mac labs (and an equal number of PC labs), and we've never had problems with them. The only thing I can think of is if your school bought from a reseller, and they somehow messed things up? But even that is a little far fetched.

They need to get apple, or contractors in. I think apple would be more helpful if they are loosing sales.

I went to one of the largest colleges in the UK, with large tech support dept split over hq + campuses, so I guess that's why our macs worked fine :p

Also HP in education? I always thought the norm was Dell, RM or Stone.

I would take one of the Macs out of the mix and uninstall one app at a time. If you find out what program is causing these problems, do the same to the rest. If problem still persists, do a clean install of the OS. If reinstall of OS doesn't fix problem... could be a hardware or network issue.

/2 c

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Passkeys: Think of them like a broken heart necklace. Imagine one of those heart necklaces that breaks into two matching pieces. One person keeps one half, and the other person keeps the other half. With passkeys, the website has one half, and you have the other half. If the website gets hacked and someone steals its half, that stolen piece is useless by itself. It cannot unlock your account without your matching half. This particular heart necklace is one of a kind, there is only one in existence. Your half of the necklace has to be stored somewhere. It might be stored on your phone, tablet, computer, security key, or a password manager that can sync it between all your devices. A security key is a small physical device that you keep with you, kind of like a house key, car key, or flash drive. I would not usually recommend a security key as the first option for the average person. For most people, it is easier to use their phone, computer, or a password manager that can sync passkeys between their devices. A security key is more like a spare key you keep in a safe place, just in case you lose access to your other devices or your password manager. Some security keys plug into your computer. Some plug into your phone or tablet. Some get tapped against your device. The idea is simple: a security key can hold another passkey for the same website. Think of it like creating a second one-of-a-kind heart necklace for the same account. One necklace could be paired with your password manager, while another necklace could be paired with your security key. That means the website has more than one matching half on file. One half matches the passkey in your password manager. Another half matches the passkey stored on your security key. So, if you lose access to your phone, computer, or password manager, you would still be able to log in using the passkey stored on your security key. Think of it like keeping an extra special necklace piece on a tiny keychain, stored somewhere safe. The website still has the matching half for that security key, but your half is safely stored inside the little key. A passkey does not automatically exist on every device you own. It lives wherever you save it. If your half is stored on one device, then that device is the one that has the matching piece. For example, if you create the passkey on your Windows computer and it is only saved to that computer, your iPhone does not automatically have that same half. If you create it on your iPhone and it only stays on that iPhone, your Android phone does not automatically have it either. That is where password managers come in. A password manager can act like a protected jewelry box for your passkeys. Instead of your half of the necklace being locked to only one device, the password manager can securely sync that half to your other approved devices. For example, Apple Passwords and iCloud Keychain can sync passkeys between your Apple devices. Google Password Manager can sync passkeys with your Google account. But password managers such as 1Password and Bitwarden can sync passkeys between everything, your phones, tablets and computers. Now, you might ask: “What happens if I lose access to the device that has my passkey?” That depends on where your passkey was saved and what recovery options the website gives you. If your passkey was synced through a password manager, you may be able to sign in from another device that has access to that same password manager. For example, if your passkey is saved in iCloud Keychain, Google Password Manager, 1Password, or Bitwarden, another approved device may still have access to it. If your passkey was saved only on one phone, computer, or security key, and you lose that device, then you may not have your half of the necklace anymore. In that case, you would usually need to use the website’s backup login or account recovery options. A lot of websites that support passkeys still let you fall back to your regular password. So if you lose access to your passkey, the site may still let you log in with your password, a code sent to your email, a text message, a recovery code, or some other account recovery process. That is convenient, but it is also important to understand: if the website still allows password login, then your password still matters. Passkeys are safer than passwords, but if your account still has a password as a backup, you should still use a strong, unique password and turn on two-factor authentication if the website offers it. This is why it is a good idea to have more than one safe way back into important accounts. For example, you might keep your passkey in a syncing password manager, add a second trusted device, save recovery codes somewhere safe, or set up a backup security key. A passkey is very secure, but just like a real key, you need a backup plan in case you lose access to it. Now, you might ask: “What stops a hacker from copying my half of the necklace?” That’s the important part: your half is protected. It is not something you type in, and it is not something the website gets to keep. Think of your half as being locked inside a tiny safe on your phone, computer, security key, or password manager. That safe only opens when you approve it with your fingerprint, face, PIN, or device password. When you log in, the website does not need to see your half. It only needs proof that your half matches its half. Your actual half is not handed over to the website. This is different from a password. With a password, you type the secret into the website. If you type it into a fake website, the hacker now has it. With a passkey, you are not typing your secret into the website. Your device is proving you have the matching half without giving the half away. That also helps protect you from fake websites. If someone makes a fake login page that looks like the real site, your device can tell it is not the real match. It will not use your passkey there. Now, could someone use your passkey if they stole your device, got into your password manager, or somehow unlocked the safe that holds your half? Yes, that is why your device password, PIN, fingerprint, face unlock, and password manager security still matter. But a hacker cannot just steal your passkey from the website or trick you into typing it into a fake page like they can with a password. That is why passkeys are safer than passwords. The two matching pieces have to come together, like two lovebirds who were once separated and are finally reunited.
    • Newegg offers insane combo deal on Amazon Prime Day 2026 that beats Steam Machine by Sayan Sen Building a PC is undoubtedly difficult nowadays but with this epic combo deal, Newegg is trying to make it as easy for you as it is possible. If you are making a new one or even upgrading an old system to a new Windows 11 device, this combo bundle is truly unmissable as you get AMD's Ryzen 9800X3D, a compatible X870 motherboard, a 240mm AIO liquid cooler and finally a Samsung 990 PRO SSD all for under $1000 (purchase link under the specs table down below). This should beat out the newly launched Steam Machine from Valve in terms of performance and performance per dollar especially if you are willing to set Linux up on it. Essentially with this combo you will get the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-core 3D V cache CPU, Samsung's 990 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD, the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI ATX Motherboard, and finally the Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240. Thanks to that massive vertically stacked L3 cache, the X3D desktop processors, including the 9800X3D, also come with the benefit of not needing fast memory. Even DDR5-5600 should be plenty for it. The technical specifications of the Ryzen 7 9800X3D are given in the table below: Specification Value Architecture Zen 5 Cores / Threads 8 / 16 Base Clock 4.7 GHz Max Boost Clock Up to 5.2 GHz L1 Cache 640 KB L2 Cache 8 MB L3 Cache 96 MB Total Cache 104 MB CPU Core Process TSMC 4nm FinFET I/O Die Process TSMC 6nm FinFET Socket AM5 Default TDP 120W Max Temperature (Tjmax) 95°C Thermal Solution Not included Memory Type DDR5 Max Capacity 256 GB Memory Speeds 2x1R: DDR5-5600 2x2R: DDR5-5600 4x1R: DDR5-3600 4x2R: DDR5-3600 PCIe Version PCIe 5.0 PCIe Lanes (Total/Usable) 28 / 24 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 4 USB 2.0 1 Graphics Cores 2 CU RDNA 2 Frequency 2200 MHz DisplayPort over USB-C Yes Overclocking Unlocked Up next we have the tech specs for the MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI Motherboard: Specification Value Chipset AMD X870 CPU Support AMD Ryzen 9000 / 8000 / 7000 Series Desktop Processors Socket AM5 Memory Slots 4 × DDR5 UDIMM Maximum Memory Capacity 256GB Memory Support DDR5 8400–5600 MT/s (OC), DDR5 5600–4800 MT/s (JEDEC) Integrated Graphics Outputs 1 × HDMI 2.1 FRL (up to 8K 60Hz) 2 × USB4 Type-C with DisplayPort 1.4 HBR3 (up to 4K 60Hz) Expansion Slots PCI_E1: PCIe 5.0 x16 (CPU) PCI_E2: PCIe 3.0 x1 (Chipset) PCI_E3: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset) Audio Realtek ALC4080 Codec 7.1-Channel USB High Performance Audio Supports up to 32-bit/384kHz playback on front panel S/PDIF output M.2 Slots 4 × M.2 M2_1: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 22110/2280) M2_2: PCIe 5.0 x4 (CPU, 2280/2260) M2_3: PCIe 4.0 x2 (Chipset, 2280/2260) M2_4: PCIe 4.0 x4 (Chipset, 2280/2260) SATA Ports 4 × SATA 6Gb/s RAID Support RAID 0, 1, 5, 10 for M.2 NVMe storage devices Rear USB Ports 4 × USB 2.0 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 2 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 2 × USB4 40Gbps Type-C Front USB Headers 4 × USB 2.0 4 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 1 × USB 20Gbps Type-C LAN Realtek 8126-CG 5G LAN Wireless Wi-Fi 7 (M.2 Key-E module pre-installed) Supports 2.4GHz / 5GHz / 6GHz bands Up to 5.8Gbps Supports 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be Bluetooth Bluetooth 5.4, MLO, 4KQAM Internal Power Connectors 1 × 24-pin ATX Power 2 × CPU Power Connectors 1 × PCIe 8-pin Power Connector Fan Headers 1 × CPU Fan 1 × Combo Fan (Pump/System) 6 × System Fan RGB Headers 3 × Addressable V2 RGB (JARGB_V2) 1 × RGB LED (JRGB) Other Internal Headers 1 × EZ Conn-header 2 × Front Panel Headers 1 × Chassis Intrusion 1 × Front Audio 1 × TPM 2.0 Header Debug Features 4 × EZ Debug LEDs 1 × EZ Digit Debug LED Rear I/O Ports Clear CMOS Button Flash BIOS Button HDMI 2 × USB 40Gbps Type-C 1 × USB 10Gbps Type-C 4 × USB 10Gbps Type-A 3 × USB 5Gbps Type-A 4 × USB 2.0 5G LAN Port Wi-Fi/Bluetooth Antenna Connectors Audio Connectors Form Factor ATX The Samsung 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification Value Interface PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC DRAM Cache 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,200 TBW MTBF 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink No Get the combo deal at this link: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, Samsung 990 PRO 2TB, MSI MAG X870 TOMAHAWK WIFI motherboard, Cooler Master Elite Liquid 240: $784.99 + $25 off with promo code FTTF77: $759.99 (Sold and Shipped by Newegg US) Good to know This Newegg deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I heard from a lot of people that driver support for the latest games when RDNA first came out (Radeon 5000 series) was pretty bad, but if you didn't buy the card on day one, or were not trying to play the latest titles, then you were isolated from that issue. Other than that, it's been good and only getting better.
    • Meta launches new AI glasses in 26 styles and Muse Spark multimodal capabilties by Pradeep Viswanathan Meta today announced a new line of Meta Glasses in partnership with EssilorLuxottica. The new AI glasses build on the company’s existing smart glasses portfolio, which is sold under the Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta brands. The new Meta Glasses start at just $299, are compatible with prescription lenses, and will be available in 26 styles across different colors, lenses, and frames. At launch, Meta Glasses will be available in three frame styles. The Meta Adventurer features a clean rectangular design and comes in Standard and Large sizes. The Meta Fury is a bolder frame for users who want a stronger look. Meta Glasses by Kylie is a slim oval frame designed in collaboration with Kylie Jenner. Similar to existing Meta AI Glasses, the new Meta Glasses include a dedicated action button that can be used to quickly access Meta AI or launch a favorite feature. They also feature open-ear speakers for calls, music, and more. Meta has also included a multi-mic array with wind noise reduction for calls and messaging. Users can capture photos and videos hands-free using voice commands. Meta claims more than eight hours of battery life, while the portable charging case can provide up to 40 additional hours. As expected, Meta Glasses come pre-loaded with Meta AI powered by Muse Spark from day one. Muse Spark is the first model from Meta Superintelligence Labs with improved multimodal capabilities. The same Meta AI upgrade is also now available on existing Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta Glasses in the US and Canada via an update. With the Muse Spark-powered AI assistant, Meta AI in the new glasses can provide smarter answers, understand what the user is seeing, and help with daily tasks such as calendar management and navigation. Meta also announced an upcoming feature called the dynamic photo feature, which captures multiple frames and recommends the best one. Pedestrian navigation is also coming soon to these glasses. Meta is also adding support for 14 new live translation languages, including Japanese, Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, and Korean. The new Meta Glasses are available starting today through Meta.com, Best Buy, Amazon, LensCrafters, Sunglass Hut, and select retailers.
    • is that a personal preference? whether it is or isn't, i get where you're coming from. i try to get and use fully open sourced applications whenever i can but there are instances where i find a superior product that is closed sourced. in these cases i do my best to learn about the company, who operates it, their background, parent and sub structure etc. to some extent, depending on "the smell test". i really believe that Syncback is really and truly something great. even if you don't use it, it's always worth a recommendation to someone else, especially if that someone else is not very computer literate. for someone of your calibre you, you'll manage just fine with Syncthing, no doubt about it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      166
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      87
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!