New College policy towards Macs


Recommended Posts

For some reason, I find it hard to believe that all 25 Macs are having issues at the same time. My school has tons of Mac labs (and an equal number of PC labs), and we've never had problems with them

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

psh hey we had a Art Mac lab at our univeristy all fail at once, all 105 of them... but then we had a major power surge take them all out at once :laugh: nothing like just setting up 105 Mac Pro's and not putting surge protection on yet and then have the univeristy power plant (yes we have our own power plant, its a natural gas one) spike in power and fry them all at once

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

wow, just wow. :rolleyes: there is always one...

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

Newsflash: not all products can be seen in a positive light all the time. Not sure if you're aware of this, but products do have a tendency of failing. Also, people are surely capable of causing any number of products to fail.

Last but not least, not everyone is a troll or fanboy. In fact, going around dismissing a post just because it places a certain company in a negative light would certainly seem a little... nevermind, I'm not going to say it. You catch my drift though. :)

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

I guess the ~25 dead hard drives my school techs removed, confirmed faulty by Disk Utility and other tools, is a lie. I'm sorry physical evidence is not believable in your court of law. :rolleyes:

Why are most Mac users like this? Butt hurt because you overpaid for a PC painted in white with a fruit logo?

-----

The warranty expired on our school Macs (they are almost 2 yrs old) so my school had to order all new ones from Apple. One of them was DOA, fun stuff! And yes, ~25 of them died September/October. It's rather puzzling that they all died in the same time frame

Edited by WatchTheSoup
The warranty expired on our school Macs (they are almost 2 yrs old) so my school had to order all new ones from Apple. One of them was DOA, fun stuff! And yes, ~25 of them died September/October. It's rather puzzling that they all died in the same time frame

Hard drives under similar stress tend to die around the same time if they're all the same model. Imagine that. :p

Just as a counter to this lab story (because if you know what you're doing, experiences like these shouldn't happen), I deployed 30 iMacs in a school lab over the summer. They're all being managed by a Mac Mini running Mac OS X Server connected to an Active Directory controller. We haven't had one fail yet, and they all work very well for the students.

Go back to support and tell them to fix it. After all, Mac has the best customer support available to man and will always service you with a smile....thats what their ads claim. Keep in mind, their ads also claim to be better and more stable/reliable that PCs...

And yes, first part of the paragraph was loaded with sarcasm. But in seriousness, always but one or two of something for testing purposes first. I would also go back to Apple and demand them to fix the issues, or refund your money.

I guess the ~25 dead hard drives my school techs removed, confirmed faulty by Disk Utility and other tools, is a lie. I'm sorry physical evidence is not believable in your court of law. :rolleyes:

Why are most Mac users like this? Butt hurt because you overpaid for a PC painted in white with a fruit logo?

-----

The warranty expired on our school Macs (they are almost 2 yrs old) so my school had to order all new ones from Apple. One of them was DOA, fun stuff! And yes, ~25 of them died September/October. It's rather puzzling that they all died in the same time frame

Your school must be giving off EMPs or dirty power. 25% failure rate on HDs? It's possible, but really only due to overheating or a really bad batch. Were they Seagates o.O

I think that throwing them all out is quite a waist.

What kind of Macs are these? I'd buy one!

It would be pretty bad luck if they were all full of bad hardware because of a batch problem at the manufacturer. I'm willing to bet it has something to do with some software installed (probably server related).

:laugh: I wondered the same thing. Seagate drives are horrible. I've had to RMA just about every single Seagate drive I've ever bought.

Really? Hmm... I have had to RMA Western Digital and Maxtor drives before. I don't think I've ever had to RMA a Seagate drive.

Bit of an update, you can't even empty the bin on some of them any more, they claim you don't have permission.

Can't you do a clean install on one of the machines and isolate it from the network? I bet you anything something was screwed up software-wise when these things were setup initially.

Really? Hmm... I have had to RMA Western Digital and Maxtor drives before. I don't think I've ever had to RMA a Seagate drive.

Can't you do a clean install on one of the machines and isolate it from the network? I bet you anything something was screwed up software-wise when these things were setup initially.

It's not up to me lol I'm just a student watching the tale unfold.

I havent ready through the whole thread but when they realized they had a problem have they contacted Apple about it ? What did they say ?

I am sure they would have had something to advice, there were some instances of machines being sent out with a corrupt installation recently so an fresh install from the DVD would have been required.

two many of our customers rather than ring us and tell us they have a problem they just live with it get more and more frustrated and then call us up after 3 months ranting..

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

This post is pretty much 2nd hand info and it's not from someone involved in working on it so there's little if any value. There's so little information on actual problems just generic terms like "they're unusable" and crashing so that no one can offered a reasoned explanation or assistance. Instead it's just food for trolls and fan boys from both sides.

  • 2 weeks later...
If worst comes to worst, they could always bootcamp them and load Windows (only) on them!

Strange that they've all performed that badly though... And yeah, my Macs have been great too!

I'm involved with batch purchasing for the government and I can tell you from first hand experience that whether it's windows or Mac computers, bad batches of hardware happen... All they need to do is tell the volume sales or institutional sales rep that they believe they got a bad batch and they should be able to send you a replacement for all 25... I've had bad batches from Dell, HP, Lenovo... you name it. It happens... If the IT department there hasn't already determined this is just a bad batch then they are obviously in the wrong field or should get more experience in this business. :(

Throwing Windows on it won't solve anything. It will still crash.

ive installed plenty of Windows and Mac Computers, as the above poster has stated, it's entirely possible that a bad batch had been sent out.

However all of the Windows and Mac's ive installed and configured on a network work flawlessly (or about as flawlessly as compters can be). If i installed 25 computers at a clients and they were not working i would be contacting the supplier whether it be Dell or Apple. There is no way in hell i would just right it off to being bad software etc.. Any issue needs to be resolved.

^^To the original poster^^ You should show the powers that be at your school this thread and in particular my and REM2000 Post...

I have over 10 years in the experience managing large million to billion dollar IT projects for the government and trust me, I know what I'm talking about...

I work at a high school in the IT department, and we've about had it with Macs. The problem is that we use only Dells, and than someone somehow got some money and bought a number of iMacs without asking us first. Trying to add Macintosh computers to an otherwise completely windows-based environment is just asking for disaster:

- Macs can not be easily imaged without a Netboot Server (leaving the much easier and more universal PXE out of the question)

- Macs can not easily be remotely monitored without purchasing Apple Remote Desktop, most other management systems don't support Macs

- Macs can not be managed through Group Policy without buying special third-party software

- Software and Upgrade deployment involves going to every computer with a CD, instead of just using a central deployment system

To me, it just doesn't seem that Macs are great computers to add to a primarily Windows-based network, it will increase the workload of IT greatly. In education, the IT department is usually stressed out enough to begin with (students breaking stuff, insignificant budgets, understaffing), so the amount of attention that Macs require is just way higher than what an educational IT department can provide.

That's because a Windows network unfortunately is Windows only and does not provide a lot of management tools (you have to buy those separately...). Novell's Netware has a lot more management options and is able to create a mixed network with Windows and unices like Linux and Mac OS X. If you add Zenworks to that mix you have a very nice management environment to do nearly everything you want. GPO's for example only work on Windows machines, like every other feature AD brings except for credentials (aka username plus password). The same thing goes for the central deployment systems on Windows that only use the MSI to deploy software. That also brings another problem called dll hell as well as software that does not really work great with MSI. Novell's snapshot technology is a bit better at that but it does have the same dll problems which is a typical Windows problem.

Trying to add any non-Windows machine to a Windows network using AD is a disaster. It has been the centre point of all of the court cases and investigations to Microsoft. The EU actually convicted Microsoft because it wasn't doing a lot to enable others to use or mix with their environment. Windows networks are a complete disaster if you ask me. If you want to do anything more than basic you have to buy some piece of (expensive) software to do so. I dunno if OS X Server will be a similar story but it is using a lot of common open source software to do what it does. You can easily do that with any unix/linux OS and use stuff like samba for the Windows machines. The other way around seems to work a bit better (adding Windows to a non-Windows network). That's why you'll mostly find 2 kind of networks: a Windows network and a non-Windows network. Sometimes it's better to not have everything in one big network (security reasons, having things separated, etc.). Especially with a lab this might be useful as you can confine it.

That's because a Windows network unfortunately is Windows only and does not provide a lot of management tools (you have to buy those separately...). Novell's Netware has a lot more management options and is able to create a mixed network with Windows and unices like Linux and Mac OS X. If you add Zenworks to that mix you have a very nice management environment to do nearly everything you want. GPO's for example only work on Windows machines, like every other feature AD brings except for credentials (aka username plus password). The same thing goes for the central deployment systems on Windows that only use the MSI to deploy software. That also brings another problem called dll hell as well as software that does not really work great with MSI. Novell's snapshot technology is a bit better at that but it does have the same dll problems which is a typical Windows problem.

Trying to add any non-Windows machine to a Windows network using AD is a disaster. It has been the centre point of all of the court cases and investigations to Microsoft. The EU actually convicted Microsoft because it wasn't doing a lot to enable others to use or mix with their environment. Windows networks are a complete disaster if you ask me. If you want to do anything more than basic you have to buy some piece of (expensive) software to do so. I dunno if OS X Server will be a similar story but it is using a lot of common open source software to do what it does. You can easily do that with any unix/linux OS and use stuff like samba for the Windows machines. The other way around seems to work a bit better (adding Windows to a non-Windows network). That's why you'll mostly find 2 kind of networks: a Windows network and a non-Windows network. Sometimes it's better to not have everything in one big network (security reasons, having things separated, etc.). Especially with a lab this might be useful as you can confine it.

AD is a pain in my ass. Trying to integrate a large AD database with OD is hellish.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!