New College policy towards Macs


Recommended Posts

For some reason, I find it hard to believe that all 25 Macs are having issues at the same time. My school has tons of Mac labs (and an equal number of PC labs), and we've never had problems with them

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

psh hey we had a Art Mac lab at our univeristy all fail at once, all 105 of them... but then we had a major power surge take them all out at once :laugh: nothing like just setting up 105 Mac Pro's and not putting surge protection on yet and then have the univeristy power plant (yes we have our own power plant, its a natural gas one) spike in power and fry them all at once

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

wow, just wow. :rolleyes: there is always one...

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

Newsflash: not all products can be seen in a positive light all the time. Not sure if you're aware of this, but products do have a tendency of failing. Also, people are surely capable of causing any number of products to fail.

Last but not least, not everyone is a troll or fanboy. In fact, going around dismissing a post just because it places a certain company in a negative light would certainly seem a little... nevermind, I'm not going to say it. You catch my drift though. :)

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

I guess the ~25 dead hard drives my school techs removed, confirmed faulty by Disk Utility and other tools, is a lie. I'm sorry physical evidence is not believable in your court of law. :rolleyes:

Why are most Mac users like this? Butt hurt because you overpaid for a PC painted in white with a fruit logo?

-----

The warranty expired on our school Macs (they are almost 2 yrs old) so my school had to order all new ones from Apple. One of them was DOA, fun stuff! And yes, ~25 of them died September/October. It's rather puzzling that they all died in the same time frame

Edited by WatchTheSoup
The warranty expired on our school Macs (they are almost 2 yrs old) so my school had to order all new ones from Apple. One of them was DOA, fun stuff! And yes, ~25 of them died September/October. It's rather puzzling that they all died in the same time frame

Hard drives under similar stress tend to die around the same time if they're all the same model. Imagine that. :p

Just as a counter to this lab story (because if you know what you're doing, experiences like these shouldn't happen), I deployed 30 iMacs in a school lab over the summer. They're all being managed by a Mac Mini running Mac OS X Server connected to an Active Directory controller. We haven't had one fail yet, and they all work very well for the students.

Go back to support and tell them to fix it. After all, Mac has the best customer support available to man and will always service you with a smile....thats what their ads claim. Keep in mind, their ads also claim to be better and more stable/reliable that PCs...

And yes, first part of the paragraph was loaded with sarcasm. But in seriousness, always but one or two of something for testing purposes first. I would also go back to Apple and demand them to fix the issues, or refund your money.

I guess the ~25 dead hard drives my school techs removed, confirmed faulty by Disk Utility and other tools, is a lie. I'm sorry physical evidence is not believable in your court of law. :rolleyes:

Why are most Mac users like this? Butt hurt because you overpaid for a PC painted in white with a fruit logo?

-----

The warranty expired on our school Macs (they are almost 2 yrs old) so my school had to order all new ones from Apple. One of them was DOA, fun stuff! And yes, ~25 of them died September/October. It's rather puzzling that they all died in the same time frame

Your school must be giving off EMPs or dirty power. 25% failure rate on HDs? It's possible, but really only due to overheating or a really bad batch. Were they Seagates o.O

I think that throwing them all out is quite a waist.

What kind of Macs are these? I'd buy one!

It would be pretty bad luck if they were all full of bad hardware because of a batch problem at the manufacturer. I'm willing to bet it has something to do with some software installed (probably server related).

:laugh: I wondered the same thing. Seagate drives are horrible. I've had to RMA just about every single Seagate drive I've ever bought.

Really? Hmm... I have had to RMA Western Digital and Maxtor drives before. I don't think I've ever had to RMA a Seagate drive.

Bit of an update, you can't even empty the bin on some of them any more, they claim you don't have permission.

Can't you do a clean install on one of the machines and isolate it from the network? I bet you anything something was screwed up software-wise when these things were setup initially.

Really? Hmm... I have had to RMA Western Digital and Maxtor drives before. I don't think I've ever had to RMA a Seagate drive.

Can't you do a clean install on one of the machines and isolate it from the network? I bet you anything something was screwed up software-wise when these things were setup initially.

It's not up to me lol I'm just a student watching the tale unfold.

I havent ready through the whole thread but when they realized they had a problem have they contacted Apple about it ? What did they say ?

I am sure they would have had something to advice, there were some instances of machines being sent out with a corrupt installation recently so an fresh install from the DVD would have been required.

two many of our customers rather than ring us and tell us they have a problem they just live with it get more and more frustrated and then call us up after 3 months ranting..

You'll find that Neowin, amongst other places, is full of people who pull things out of thin air to show some product or manufacturer in a bad light. Lying is easy when you don't need to prove anything and no one knows who you are.

This post is pretty much 2nd hand info and it's not from someone involved in working on it so there's little if any value. There's so little information on actual problems just generic terms like "they're unusable" and crashing so that no one can offered a reasoned explanation or assistance. Instead it's just food for trolls and fan boys from both sides.

  • 2 weeks later...
If worst comes to worst, they could always bootcamp them and load Windows (only) on them!

Strange that they've all performed that badly though... And yeah, my Macs have been great too!

I'm involved with batch purchasing for the government and I can tell you from first hand experience that whether it's windows or Mac computers, bad batches of hardware happen... All they need to do is tell the volume sales or institutional sales rep that they believe they got a bad batch and they should be able to send you a replacement for all 25... I've had bad batches from Dell, HP, Lenovo... you name it. It happens... If the IT department there hasn't already determined this is just a bad batch then they are obviously in the wrong field or should get more experience in this business. :(

Throwing Windows on it won't solve anything. It will still crash.

ive installed plenty of Windows and Mac Computers, as the above poster has stated, it's entirely possible that a bad batch had been sent out.

However all of the Windows and Mac's ive installed and configured on a network work flawlessly (or about as flawlessly as compters can be). If i installed 25 computers at a clients and they were not working i would be contacting the supplier whether it be Dell or Apple. There is no way in hell i would just right it off to being bad software etc.. Any issue needs to be resolved.

^^To the original poster^^ You should show the powers that be at your school this thread and in particular my and REM2000 Post...

I have over 10 years in the experience managing large million to billion dollar IT projects for the government and trust me, I know what I'm talking about...

I work at a high school in the IT department, and we've about had it with Macs. The problem is that we use only Dells, and than someone somehow got some money and bought a number of iMacs without asking us first. Trying to add Macintosh computers to an otherwise completely windows-based environment is just asking for disaster:

- Macs can not be easily imaged without a Netboot Server (leaving the much easier and more universal PXE out of the question)

- Macs can not easily be remotely monitored without purchasing Apple Remote Desktop, most other management systems don't support Macs

- Macs can not be managed through Group Policy without buying special third-party software

- Software and Upgrade deployment involves going to every computer with a CD, instead of just using a central deployment system

To me, it just doesn't seem that Macs are great computers to add to a primarily Windows-based network, it will increase the workload of IT greatly. In education, the IT department is usually stressed out enough to begin with (students breaking stuff, insignificant budgets, understaffing), so the amount of attention that Macs require is just way higher than what an educational IT department can provide.

That's because a Windows network unfortunately is Windows only and does not provide a lot of management tools (you have to buy those separately...). Novell's Netware has a lot more management options and is able to create a mixed network with Windows and unices like Linux and Mac OS X. If you add Zenworks to that mix you have a very nice management environment to do nearly everything you want. GPO's for example only work on Windows machines, like every other feature AD brings except for credentials (aka username plus password). The same thing goes for the central deployment systems on Windows that only use the MSI to deploy software. That also brings another problem called dll hell as well as software that does not really work great with MSI. Novell's snapshot technology is a bit better at that but it does have the same dll problems which is a typical Windows problem.

Trying to add any non-Windows machine to a Windows network using AD is a disaster. It has been the centre point of all of the court cases and investigations to Microsoft. The EU actually convicted Microsoft because it wasn't doing a lot to enable others to use or mix with their environment. Windows networks are a complete disaster if you ask me. If you want to do anything more than basic you have to buy some piece of (expensive) software to do so. I dunno if OS X Server will be a similar story but it is using a lot of common open source software to do what it does. You can easily do that with any unix/linux OS and use stuff like samba for the Windows machines. The other way around seems to work a bit better (adding Windows to a non-Windows network). That's why you'll mostly find 2 kind of networks: a Windows network and a non-Windows network. Sometimes it's better to not have everything in one big network (security reasons, having things separated, etc.). Especially with a lab this might be useful as you can confine it.

That's because a Windows network unfortunately is Windows only and does not provide a lot of management tools (you have to buy those separately...). Novell's Netware has a lot more management options and is able to create a mixed network with Windows and unices like Linux and Mac OS X. If you add Zenworks to that mix you have a very nice management environment to do nearly everything you want. GPO's for example only work on Windows machines, like every other feature AD brings except for credentials (aka username plus password). The same thing goes for the central deployment systems on Windows that only use the MSI to deploy software. That also brings another problem called dll hell as well as software that does not really work great with MSI. Novell's snapshot technology is a bit better at that but it does have the same dll problems which is a typical Windows problem.

Trying to add any non-Windows machine to a Windows network using AD is a disaster. It has been the centre point of all of the court cases and investigations to Microsoft. The EU actually convicted Microsoft because it wasn't doing a lot to enable others to use or mix with their environment. Windows networks are a complete disaster if you ask me. If you want to do anything more than basic you have to buy some piece of (expensive) software to do so. I dunno if OS X Server will be a similar story but it is using a lot of common open source software to do what it does. You can easily do that with any unix/linux OS and use stuff like samba for the Windows machines. The other way around seems to work a bit better (adding Windows to a non-Windows network). That's why you'll mostly find 2 kind of networks: a Windows network and a non-Windows network. Sometimes it's better to not have everything in one big network (security reasons, having things separated, etc.). Especially with a lab this might be useful as you can confine it.

AD is a pain in my ass. Trying to integrate a large AD database with OD is hellish.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!