Why are X-Platform PS3 games always buggy on release?


Recommended Posts

Seriously, it's a pattern that repeats itself over and over and over again.

I'm starting to think when the next series of consoles comes out I might switch to the Microsoft one, since so many developers seem to put more effort in to their version (since its similar to PC) over the PS3.

becoze Sony restrains da tru powa of the cellll processor making it hardz to code so devs ..... ups I've stopped paying attention to that PR crap at that point :p but now seriously is not that bad, they catch up in time, PS3 SDK is inferior and not user friendly. All games are originally PC games*, then using an SDK ported to its platform.

* Edit: to clarify that point, all games are developed in the PC environment, even console exclusives begin as a .exe

Edited by Draken

To me, I've noticed that this seems to depend on the developer. It's no secret that the PS3 SDK is not at the same level as the 360's. So, using it to the same or even better potential will require more skill or patience, and not every software house devotes money to both. Latest example is Dragon Age: Origins. The PS3 version boasts better textures and color than the 360 version. Though, Bioware is owned by EA, which has dedicated PS3 development staff.

activision's ps3 mp servers are down now too. :hmmm:

Added:

Activision Support- "I can't say if it'll be up today or not. I certainly hope so."

just wow! :crazy:

Edited by schiz-o-phren-ic
activision's ps3 mp servers are down now too. :hmmm:

Added:

Activision Support- "I can't say if it'll be up today or not. I certainly hope so."

just wow! :crazy:

Now that's a damn shame. No reason for it being down given? Did that many PS3 players get MW2?

It's hardly noticeable, if at all any more with any respectable dev.

What games exactly are you talking about?

Activisions servers have nothing to do with Sony, that's all part of the "console devs never ever ever ever learn how to have a successful smooth day 1 launch of just about any MP title".

@fourzerotwo: PS3 Status: Adding more servers to meet MP demand.

:rolleyes:

Yeah what a crock of ****, biggest game of the year and the developers still fail. I'm growing sick of large anticipated titles met with the "oh we didn't know it would sell well so only put 2 servers online for launch" BS.

Update: Robert Bowling has just tweeted an explanation of sorts for the mishap on PS3. Apparently, “The amount of players on MW2 PSN overwhelmed the PSN presence server which updates “what you’re doing” and is essential to parties.”

He also stated: “PS3 Status: Patch successful. Trophy Unlocks on PS3 now available in Single Player & Spec Ops. Adding more servers to meet MP demand.”

I expect PC owners to get a hold of this and lol hard @ how devs tell us dedicated servers are a stupid idea then **** all over their own launch of a game :laugh:

Now that's a damn shame. No reason for it being down given? Did that many PS3 players get MW2?

It's not like there is NO PS3 owners. There is over 14 million PS3's sold worldwide and imagine if all of them bought MW2 and wanted to play it at the same time, which is not going to happen but let's say about 6 million did. They can crash the servers which set up the matchmaking and more will need to be added. This same thing happened to the X360 a couple years back with MW. This time they were more prepared for the X360 though.

Also, Activision/Infinity Ward how the **** can you screw up no trophy's being unlocked? Are your games not being tested for this ****?

It's not like there is NO PS3 owners. There is over 14 million PS3's sold worldwide and imagine if all of them bought MW2 and wanted to play it at the same time, which is not going to happen but let's say about 6 million did. They can crash the servers which set up the matchmaking and more will need to be added. This same thing happened to the X360 a couple years back with MW. This time they were more prepared for the X360 though.

Also, Activision/Infinity Ward how the **** can you screw up no trophy's being unlocked? Are your games not being tested for this ****?

Dude there's about 25~30 million PS3s now :laugh: IW should not of underestimated the launch, if anything they should have had more than enough servers on just in case.

Patch 1.02 was installed for me before starting MW2 and trophies are working fine.

It's not like there is NO PS3 owners. There is over 14 million PS3's sold worldwide and imagine if all of them bought MW2 and wanted to play it at the same time, which is not going to happen but let's say about 6 million did. They can crash the servers which set up the matchmaking and more will need to be added. This same thing happened to the X360 a couple years back with MW. This time they were more prepared for the X360 though.

Also, Activision/Infinity Ward how the **** can you screw up no trophy's being unlocked? Are your games not being tested for this ****?

I was never trying to imply that there weren't a lot of PS3 players. I prefer playing on mine over my 360, myself. And I'm aware of what happened with the first MW on the 360. My thing is, I thought they would have learned from that and anticipated this, especially with more people owning PS3s. It looks like they underestimated the demand on the Sony front.

EDIT: And wow, this has deviated a long way from the topic :p.

Dude there's about 25~30 million PS3s now :laugh: IW should not of underestimated the launch, if anything they should have had more than enough servers on just in case.

Patch 1.02 was installed for me before starting MW2 and trophies are working fine.

Well, the last I checked was 14M. :p That was more than a couple months back. :p Still my point stands.

Even, if it was installed, games should be taken through tests before they are released and catch these stuff. Which they didn't.

I was never trying to imply that there weren't a lot of PS3 players. I prefer playing on mine over my 360, myself. And I'm aware of what happened with the first MW on the 360. My thing is, I thought they would have learned from that and anticipated this, especially with more people owning PS3s. It looks like they underestimated the demand on the Sony front.

I know you weren't, I am just saying that people buy for the PS3 also. There are not a lot of PS3 and X360 owners. There are some, but not as much as just single console owners. That's Activision for you, what can you do?

I hadn't bought any cross platform games on the PS3 yet, so thank you for the warning!

yeah, Xbox 360 for multiplatform/exclusives and PS3 for exclusives, that's the way to go

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!