Microsoft patents Sudo

By Elliott
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Elliott

Posted
  • Author
Posted
As far as I know there is no way to configure sudo to present the user with a list of users with the appropriate rights. Sudo only lets you manually substitute from a pre-defined list of users.

No, they are patenting only their version that automatically looks up users with the appropriate rights. As far as I know Sudo cannot do this, nor can any frontends for it.

That'd be all well and good (insofar as a vague software patent like this can be), except that's not where it ends.

Although the invention has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological steps, it is to be understood that the invention defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or steps described. Rather, the specific features and steps are disclosed as preferred forms of implementing the claimed invention.

That's from the end of the patent. With that statement, they've basically been given the patent to rights elevators of just about any form as long as it's some GUI.

Grand Master

Ricardo Gil

Posted
Posted
Software patents are evil anyway. This is just one more example of why they need to be abolished.

Abolishing software patents would be disastrous. What we need is a complete reboot of the patenting process, so that the usual abuse of it stops.

Grand Master

hdood

Posted
Posted
That's from the end of the patent. With that statement, they've basically been given the patent to rights elevators of just about any form as long as it's some GUI.

No, it is still limited to the specific invention, they can just change the design and implementation a bit instead of being tied to the exact one described in the application (which includes detailed screenshots and drawings, and point by point details of a specific implementation). It does not seem to give them the rights to elevation in general.

Grand Master

BajiRav

Posted
Posted
There's no significant difference between what Microsoft is trying to patent and the sudo authentication. We're not talking about the command that is used in UNIX here, nor the graphical interface for it, but the process and method that is used. Microsoft is trying to patent all of that and justifies it by including a graphical interface that lists a number of users.

How many times have we seen this? Copy something then develop and add new features. Finally patent it.

ICQ/AIM - MSN messenger

Netscape - Internet Explorer

(...)

So Netscape invented a browser? Thanks for just-because-it's-Microsoft-it-must-be-evil-comment of the day.

Grand Master

Lechio

Posted
Posted
So Netscape invented a browser? Thanks for just-because-it's-Microsoft-it-must-be-evil-comment of the day.

No I didn't say that, Netscape didn't invent the Web browser. Microsoft copied the way Netscape worked and bundled it with Windows OS, same as there MSN messenger, Windows Media Player...

Adopt > "improve" > patent > extinguish > lock-down.

Grand Master

Eric Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
No I didn't say that, Netscape didn't invent the Web browser. Microsoft copied the way Netscape worked and bundled it with Windows OS, same as there MSN messenger, Windows Media Player...

Adopt > "improve" > patent > extinguish > lock-down.

Internet Explorer was purchased from Spyglass. It predates Netscape, which was also bought from another company: Mosaic. Microsoft actually tried to license Netscape but they apparently weren't interested. Oops. Firefox could've been the Windows default browser. :)

Grand Master

Rudy

Posted
Posted
Internet Explorer was purchased from Spyglass. It predates Netscape, which was also bought from another company: Mosaic. Microsoft actually tried to license Netscape but they apparently weren't interested. Oops. Firefox could've been the Windows default browser. :)

I bet at one point they regretted that move... lol

Community Regular

Eice

Posted
Posted
No I didn't say that, Netscape didn't invent the Web browser. Microsoft copied the way Netscape worked and bundled it with Windows OS, same as there MSN messenger, Windows Media Player...

Adopt > "improve" > patent > extinguish > lock-down.

For your own sake, I hope you aren't serious.

You're not really that ignorant... right?

Grand Master

Lechio

Posted
Posted
Internet Explorer was purchased from Spyglass. It predates Netscape, which was also bought from another company: Mosaic. Microsoft actually tried to license Netscape but they apparently weren't interested. Oops. Firefox could've been the Windows default browser. :)

Yeah. I think you forgot that at that time Netscape was far from resembling anything like Mosaic, with all the innovations that were made and then "adopted" by Microsoft. Eh, I think you even forget that tabbed browsing in IE is something that was copied only recently. :rofl:

Grand Master

Growled Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted
Abolishing software patents would be disastrous. What we need is a complete reboot of the patenting process, so that the usual abuse of it stops.

Either way, there needs to be a fundamental change in the way patents are extended. This is so stupid.

Grand Master

Subject Delta

Posted
Posted
Yeah. I think you forgot that at that time Netscape was far from resembling anything like Mosaic, with all the innovations that were made and then "adopted" by Microsoft. Eh, I think you even forget that tabbed browsing in IE is something that was copied only recently. :rofl:

People copy each other's ideas all the time, in every industry. It isn't new, and you are trolling for the sake of it because it is Microsoft. If you look through any Linux distribution, you will find ideas not original to Linux. Same for OSX, Windows, Solaris, ETC...

Grand Master

hdood

Posted
Posted
If Microsoft can patent thing that they never invented, why not?

Can you tell us where Microsoft's "invention" is already implemented? Don't say sudo, because sudo doesn't do what the patent describes (and the people who approved the patent and who studied sudo as part of the approval process don't seem to think so either.)

Grand Master

Lechio

Posted
Posted
People copy each other's ideas all the time, in every industry. It isn't new, and you are trolling for the sake of it because it is Microsoft. If you look through any Linux distribution, you will find ideas not original to Linux. Same for OSX, Windows, Solaris, ETC...

Yes, but answer this will you Frank: do you see the "FOSS guys" (as you call people who contribute to Free Software) behaving like Microsoft and even going to the point of selling patents to others to create problems?

The US "Software Patents" laws are absurd as they exist now. It does nothing but hold back development.

You don't live in the US should understand this, and be more informed of what your own country defends on this matter.

Grand Master

Eric Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
Yeah. I think you forgot that at that time Netscape was far from resembling anything like Mosaic, with all the innovations that were made and then "adopted" by Microsoft. Eh, I think you even forget that tabbed browsing in IE is something that was copied only recently. :rofl:

Maybe you should read up on computer history and the browser wars? :) It's kinda irrelevant whether Netscape resembled Mosaic or not. Spyglass licensed Mosaic, Microsoft bought Spyglass, Netscape was started by the former Mosaic people. Both browsers came from the same source, so nobody ripped anyone off.

Several companies licensed Mosaic to create their own commercial browsers, such as Spry Mosaic and Spyglass Mosaic. One of the Mosaic developers, Marc Andreessen, founded Mosaic Communications Corporation and created a new web browser named Mosaic Netscape. To resolve legal issues with NCSA, the company was renamed Netscape Communications Corporation and the browser Netscape Navigator. The Netscape browser improved on Mosaic's usability and reliability and was able to display pages as they loaded. By 1995, helped by the fact that it was free for non-commercial use, the browser dominated the emerging World Wide Web.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Browser_wars

Also, many Linux distributions are compiled and distributed by corporations now. Kinda breaks the anti-corporate free mentality to me. I guarantee you that Canonical and Red Hat would sue each other over stealing each others' non-open additions.

EDIT: They do exactly that: http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/120117

Grand Master

Lechio

Posted
Posted

You forgot to continue the story:

And then came Microsoft with IE which copied all of the innovations made by Netscape and eventually bundled it with its Windows OS.

Later on came the EU with a big stick... And you know the rest of the story... :)

EDIT: They do exactly that: http://www.linux.com/archive/feature/120117

But you know why that happens, it's explained in that page.

Grand Master

Eric Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted
You forgot to continue the story:

And then came Microsoft with IE which copied all of the innovations made by Netscape and eventually bundled it with its Windows OS.

Later on came the EU with a big stick... And you know the rest of the story... :)

But you know why that happens, it's explained in that page.

The "story" is right there in my previous post and in the Wikipedia article. Microsoft did not "come with IE." They licensed the same exact browser engine that Netscape used. The story is no different than the WebKit one. WebKit came from Konquerer and is now used in multiple browsers.

Grand Master

Lechio

Posted
Posted
The "story" is right there in my previous post and in the Wikipedia article. Microsoft did not "come with IE." They licensed the same exact browser engine that Netscape used. The story is no different than the WebKit one. WebKit came from Konquerer and is now used in multiple browsers.

It's quite different indeed, when you talk about what a Web browser was right after Mosaic and what it became after Netscape implemented all of their innovations, later copied by Microsoft. I'm not against copying features (quite the contrary), I'm against copying features, then "improve" them and make it proprietary based on a stupid, ambiguous, senseless US patent "law".

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware

      By Nick H. · Posted

      Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware

      By Ivan Jenic · Posted

      Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions

      By News Staff · Posted

      Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs

      By Steven P. · Posted

      Not on my Aeron Remastered no.
    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says

      By Steven P. · Posted

      I like Tidal, but it still does not control devices from the mobile/app and still no surround support. And yeah re: above comment I still get a lot of network errors and I am on a 4/4 Gbit Fiber connection.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!