Microsoft patents Sudo


Recommended Posts

It would be sort of amusing if Microsoft tried to force Ubuntu to pay for the use of sudo in America.

They wouldnt because this only patents the way microsoft does it. Unlike what most people think here this patemnnts the way microsoft does it not the idea.

It's quite different indeed, when you talk about what a Web browser was right after Mosaic and what it became after Netscape implemented all of their innovations, later copied by Microsoft. I'm not against copying features (quite the contrary), I'm against copying features, then "improve" them and make it proprietary based on a stupid, ambiguous, senseless US patent "law".

Until you actually read the history and timeline of web browsers I'm not discussing this with you anymore. Netscape and IE came from the same code base.

Until you actually read the history and timeline of web browsers I'm not discussing this with you anymore. Netscape and IE came from the same code base.

I don't actually need to read it, I've lived it. :rofl:

No-one is saying that Netscape and IE didn't had the same origins, never even implied such thing.

Every time i hear people talking bout software patents I get crys that it's somehow holding up development...

and yet Microsoft is "stealing" from *nix/osx/whatever and patenting it...

so... which one is it? Is microsoft stealing from *nix or are you guys upset because your platform of choice can't steal from microsoft?

Every time i hear people talking bout software patents I get crys that it's somehow holding up development...

and yet Microsoft is "stealing" from *nix/osx/whatever and patenting it...

so... which one is it? Is microsoft stealing from *nix or are you guys upset because your platform of choice can't steal from microsoft?

If you were trying to make a point for software patents I missed it :huh:

This patent covers the way UAC works. When a user with standard rights opens something that needs administration rights, UAC shows all possible accounts that HAVE enough rights to do it, and offers you quickly to just enter the password for one of them.

The showing of accounts that do have the needed rights to do whatever you wanted to do, and allowing you to quickly enter the password to use them for that single application is what is patented. NOT sudo, NOT anything that any other OS uses right now.

It's Microsoft's invention. Let them patent it. Why not?

The patent is way more specific than sudo. It's sad that Groklaw miss that. Didn't they read the patent claims? sudo is a console command, ffs.

Whether the patent is similar to some other random validation GUI is another matter.

Shown is a GUI tool called gksu (frontend for su), this tool allow to run a command or a program as a different user. By clicking on the combobox a list of users is displayed, from which, one can be selected:

Yeah, still not the same thing as Microsoft's patent. All you've got there is a program that shows a list of all users on the system and that lets you manually run a program as one of those users.

Every time i hear people talking bout software patents I get crys that it's somehow holding up development...

and yet Microsoft is "stealing" from *nix/osx/whatever and patenting it...

so... which one is it? Is microsoft stealing from *nix or are you guys upset because your platform of choice can't steal from microsoft?

The most non-consistent and non-comprehensive post I've read in a while.

Quote - (AgentGray @ Nov 12 2009, 21:35)

Every time i hear people talking bout software patents I get crys [WTF?] that it's somehow holding up development... [??]

and yet Microsoft is "stealing" from *nix/osx/whatever and patenting it... [??]

so... which one is it? [Yes, please tell us!] Is microsoft stealing from *nix or are you guys [Pure flame bait AFAIAC!!] upset because your platform of choice can't steal from microsoft? [Why would "we" want to?]

The most non-consistent and non-comprehensive post I've read in a while.

QFT: Comments like the one above [^^] are symptomatic of what Neowin has become/ is becoming! Some of the drivel that get spewed here is beyond comprehension. It is a sad state of affairs!

Edited by Farstrider
Yes, but answer this will you Frank: do you see the "FOSS guys" (as you call people who contribute to Free Software) behaving like Microsoft and even going to the point of selling patents to others to create problems?

That is irrelevant, and you know it, the facts of the matter as they exist are

<snipped>

Come back with a legitimate argument, and I may well take you seriously, but right now all you are doing is coming into every thread and making Anti Microsoft comments at every opportunity, even in threads where it isn't warranted. Whether you like it or not that is trolling.

The US "Software Patents" laws are absurd as they exist now. It does nothing but hold back development.

You don't live in the US should understand this, and be more informed of what your own country defends on this matter.

As most of these products are distributed in the same form in my region, I can assure you it does effect me. For the record I am not a big fan of software patents, it just seems to me you are complaining for the sake of more anti-Microsoft banter, because the fact is that this patent will not affect Linux or OSX in any way due to its specific nature, but you choose to jump in and start bashing on Microsoft without even reading up on the patent, you really should try wiping the foam away from your mouth and looking at this more objectively. Not to mention that Linux seems to be flourishing all on its own even with these 'patent trolls' going, in fact I spent all day getting Kubuntu setup with all the software that I need and its usability has increased a great deal, impressive considering how badly you seem to think these 'patent trolls' are holding them back.

You forgot to continue the story:

And then came Microsoft with IE which copied all of the innovations made by Netscape and eventually bundled it with its Windows OS.

Later on came the EU with a big stick... And you know the rest of the story... :)

Reading your posts can sometimes be nauseating. Seriously, who cares who copied what. Firefox wasn't the first browser to have tabs, yet that feature got copied from another browser. Microsoft could have put tabs into IE6 but they chose not to, tabs where added because of user requests not because of some desire to copy everyone else.

Edited by Colin-uk
Reading your posts can sometimes be nauseating. Seriously, who cares who copied what. Firefox wasn't the first browser to have tabs, yet that feature got copied from another browser. Microsoft could have put tabs into IE6 but they chose not to, tabs where added because of user requests not because of some desire to copy everyone else.

To me, a copy would be a direct copy and paste of the code. No software developer does that. They implement ideas from other sources because of customer requests. They then develop their own spin to the idea. It is not technically a copy.

To me, a copy would be a direct copy and paste of the code. No software developer does that. They implement ideas from other sources because of customer requests. They then develop their own spin to the idea. It is not technically a copy.

Exactly. Now imagine that idea has a patent. Stops that same idea from being implemented, adopted and developed by others.

That is irrelevant, and you know it, the facts of the matter as they exist are

<snipped>

Come back with a legitimate argument, and I may well take you seriously, but right now all you are doing is coming into every thread and making Anti Microsoft comments at every opportunity, even in threads where it isn't warranted. Whether you like it or not that is trolling.

As most of these products are distributed in the same form in my region, I can assure you it does effect me. For the record I am not a big fan of software patents, it just seems to me you are complaining for the sake of more anti-Microsoft banter, because the fact is that this patent will not affect Linux or OSX in any way due to its specific nature, but you choose to jump in and start bashing on Microsoft without even reading up on the patent, you really should try wiping the foam away from your mouth and looking at this more objectively. Not to mention that Linux seems to be flourishing all on its own even with these 'patent trolls' going, in fact I spent all day getting Kubuntu setup with all the software that I need and its usability has increased a great deal, impressive considering how badly you seem to think these 'patent trolls' are holding them back.

Reading your posts can sometimes be nauseating. Seriously, who cares who copied what. Firefox wasn't the first browser to have tabs, yet that feature got copied from another browser. Microsoft could have put tabs into IE6 but they chose not to, tabs where added because of user requests not because of some desire to copy everyone else.

Wow, apparently our resident censorship team doesn't consider the possibility of making a garbled and unintelligible mess of our posts before they make their edits :/. Wonderful.

I am done with this debate, I am not going to bother if our staff insist on messing my posts up, Lechio I will be happy to converse with you using the PM system if you have any further queries about my opinions, also despite disagreeing with you a lot, sorry if I have been offensive.

Exactly. Now imagine that idea has a patent. Stops that same idea from being implemented, adopted and developed by others.

It could happen but it rarely does. Everyone is afraid of pushing this patent thing too far, because it might just backfire in all of their faces. They mainly stick to things they have developed. One day someone will make a mistake and the entire house of cards is going to come tumbling down around them.

Why?

Say you come up with some revolutionary way of compressing data.

If you can't patent it, everyone can just copy your way of doing it for free, leaving you with a big pile of nothing.

People are usually quick to say that patents stifle innovation, but forget that when it comes to software, most good inventions came out from the big companies, not individuals. Since they're in this for the money, if they can't protect their investment, R&D will cease, also stifling innovation.

:huh: Copyrights don't cover my example, only patents do.

Copyright covers the implementation of that new compression method. Your work is protected unless your intention is to not implement anything and just sit on top of your idea.

That idea behind it, the algorithm, should not be patentable for the exact same reasons pure mathematical algorithms cannot be patented.

Copyright covers the implementation of that new compression method. Your work is protected unless your intention is to not implement anything and just sit on top of your idea.

That idea behind it, the algorithm, should not be patentable for the exact same reasons pure mathematical algorithms cannot be patented.

That's not quite it, as copyright if for tangible things like a painting, or a song.

A clever algorithm is an idea, which can only be patented. The patent's purpose is to protect the cleverness of your idea, as there are many ways one can get from A to B.

So in the end, copyright wouldn't protect my work at all, because my work was the idea. Having it patented would protect that specific method of doing compression, while at the same time allowing anyone else to come up with their own.

That's not quite it, as copyright if for tangible things like a painting, or a song.

A clever algorithm is an idea, which can only be patented. The patent's purpose is to protect the cleverness of your idea, as there are many ways one can get from A to B.

So in the end, copyright wouldn't protect my work at all, because my work was the idea. Having it patented would protect that specific method of doing compression, while at the same time allowing anyone else to come up with their own.

Your implementation is a tangible thing, and that's what's protected by the copyright.

Your idea on the other hand, the abstract, is a mathematical algorithm, and it would be based on previous existing algorithms. How much would suck if all of them were patented? Because surely lots of them were impressive ideas, some even revolutionary.

Your implementation is a tangible thing, and that's what's protected by the copyright.

Your idea on the other hand, the abstract, is a mathematical algorithm, and it would be based on previous existing algorithms. How much would suck if all of them were patented? Because surely lots of them were impressive ideas, some even revolutionary.

There are limits to what can be patented, obvious algorithms can't.

I'm talking about breakthroughs in design, just like what happens with desktop processors. If you can't patent your designs, your ideas, you might as well just work for free.

Companies would drop R&D because they could simply wait for someone else to "think" for them.

There are limits to what can be patented, obvious algorithms can't.

I'm talking about breakthroughs in design, just like what happens with desktop processors. If you can't patent your designs, your ideas, you might as well just work for free.

Companies would drop R&D because they could simply wait for someone else to "think" for them.

But we were talking about software patents here, not patents as a whole.

Besides a few countries the rest of the world is doing pretty well without them, so I just don't see any disaster waiting around the corner if they get abolished in those few countries that still allow them.

Software is code, and the ideas behind it are for the most part just maths, so I think plain copyright fits the role pretty well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!