Microsoft: Windows 7 GUI Was Not Copied from Mac OS X


Recommended Posts

As the report started spreading across the web, Microsoft was quick to react. In an official statement, Brandon LeBlanc, Windows Communications Manager on the Windows Client Communications Team, indicated that Aldous had absolutely no idea what he?s talking about. LeBlanc stated that Aldous was not involved in the design process of Windows 7, and that the information he supplied was far from being correct or even informed for that matter.

?An inaccurate quote has been floating around the Internet today about the design origins of Windows 7 and whether its look and feel was ?borrowed? from Mac OS X. Unfortunately this came from a Microsoft employee who was not involved in any aspect of designing Windows 7. I hate to say this about one of our own, but his comments were inaccurate and uninformed. If you?re interested in learning more about the design of Windows 7, I suggest reading this AP story with Julie Larson-Green as well as these WSJ (membership required) and Fast Company articles. And here is one of many blog posts on the E7 blog discussing the design process of Windows 7,? LeBlanc said

source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-W...-X-126769.shtml

If you people don't think Microsoft is getting inspiration from Apple and trying to pretty up their OS in direct response to Apple, then you're delusional. This isn't apophenia, it's plain as day. Microsoft might claim otherwise, but get real.

i agree with you completely, taskbar look & feel says it all when compared to dock.

It's like every other competitive industry. You make yours pretty, we'll make our pretty. Only the consumers win here. Are we really supposed to think the Microsoft isn't upping their game because Apple has a slicker UI? If they would have went back to the Windows 3.1 UI I would have laughed.

Who cares about who copies whom? Of course it would be stupid of Microsoft not to get at least some inspiration from their competition -- but it doesn't mean they ripped anything off either. Technology constantly builds upon other technology and that's how we learn and grow is by taking ideas and doing something more/different with it. I'd say more but then I'd end up ranting. I'm also tired of seeing threads like this.

It's like every other competitive industry. You make yours pretty, we'll make our pretty. Only the consumers win here. Are we really supposed to think the Microsoft isn't upping their game because Apple has a slicker UI? If they would have went back to the Windows 3.1 UI I would have laughed.

I have my windows 7 set to 3.1. =]

Who cares about who copies whom? Of course it would be stupid of Microsoft not to get at least some inspiration from their competition -- but it doesn't mean they ripped anything off either. Technology constantly builds upon other technology and that's how we learn and grow is by taking ideas and doing something more/different with it. I'd say more but then I'd end up ranting. I'm also tired of seeing threads like this.

amen

Must it necessarily be delusional? Many aspects of the current superbar can be found in prior versions of Windows, such as grouping similar items together (XP) and quick launch bar (???). Coupled with several requests to allow users to move taskbar items around, it is a logical progression of where the taskbar is heading (of course this is in hindsight). All that is new is how everything comes together with live previews instead of headings, removal of titles from the taskbar leaving only the icon behind, and a proper presentation of it that is pleasing and functional to most people.

Here's an article about the Windows7 taskbar.

Engineering Windows 7 Blog Article

If Mac OSX predates Windows 1.0 (circa 1985) as shown in the image, then I "agree" that Microsoft coppied OSX, else, it's just some uninformed manager making a silly comment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!