Microsoft: Windows 7 GUI Was Not Copied from Mac OS X


Recommended Posts

As the report started spreading across the web, Microsoft was quick to react. In an official statement, Brandon LeBlanc, Windows Communications Manager on the Windows Client Communications Team, indicated that Aldous had absolutely no idea what he?s talking about. LeBlanc stated that Aldous was not involved in the design process of Windows 7, and that the information he supplied was far from being correct or even informed for that matter.

?An inaccurate quote has been floating around the Internet today about the design origins of Windows 7 and whether its look and feel was ?borrowed? from Mac OS X. Unfortunately this came from a Microsoft employee who was not involved in any aspect of designing Windows 7. I hate to say this about one of our own, but his comments were inaccurate and uninformed. If you?re interested in learning more about the design of Windows 7, I suggest reading this AP story with Julie Larson-Green as well as these WSJ (membership required) and Fast Company articles. And here is one of many blog posts on the E7 blog discussing the design process of Windows 7,? LeBlanc said

source: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Microsoft-W...-X-126769.shtml

If you people don't think Microsoft is getting inspiration from Apple and trying to pretty up their OS in direct response to Apple, then you're delusional. This isn't apophenia, it's plain as day. Microsoft might claim otherwise, but get real.

i agree with you completely, taskbar look & feel says it all when compared to dock.

It's like every other competitive industry. You make yours pretty, we'll make our pretty. Only the consumers win here. Are we really supposed to think the Microsoft isn't upping their game because Apple has a slicker UI? If they would have went back to the Windows 3.1 UI I would have laughed.

Who cares about who copies whom? Of course it would be stupid of Microsoft not to get at least some inspiration from their competition -- but it doesn't mean they ripped anything off either. Technology constantly builds upon other technology and that's how we learn and grow is by taking ideas and doing something more/different with it. I'd say more but then I'd end up ranting. I'm also tired of seeing threads like this.

It's like every other competitive industry. You make yours pretty, we'll make our pretty. Only the consumers win here. Are we really supposed to think the Microsoft isn't upping their game because Apple has a slicker UI? If they would have went back to the Windows 3.1 UI I would have laughed.

I have my windows 7 set to 3.1. =]

Who cares about who copies whom? Of course it would be stupid of Microsoft not to get at least some inspiration from their competition -- but it doesn't mean they ripped anything off either. Technology constantly builds upon other technology and that's how we learn and grow is by taking ideas and doing something more/different with it. I'd say more but then I'd end up ranting. I'm also tired of seeing threads like this.

amen

Must it necessarily be delusional? Many aspects of the current superbar can be found in prior versions of Windows, such as grouping similar items together (XP) and quick launch bar (???). Coupled with several requests to allow users to move taskbar items around, it is a logical progression of where the taskbar is heading (of course this is in hindsight). All that is new is how everything comes together with live previews instead of headings, removal of titles from the taskbar leaving only the icon behind, and a proper presentation of it that is pleasing and functional to most people.

Here's an article about the Windows7 taskbar.

Engineering Windows 7 Blog Article

If Mac OSX predates Windows 1.0 (circa 1985) as shown in the image, then I "agree" that Microsoft coppied OSX, else, it's just some uninformed manager making a silly comment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It depends, but it's also going to push more adoption of open source AI models that can run locally, I'm seeing a pattern among the US and China when it comes to closed and open source AI models, they close when they feel they have the advantage, open up when they feel they don't. This has little to do with security and everything to do with control, the irony is that the ones that do go open and get the community behind them are the ones that have the real control, hence why we keep seeing this seesaw from closed to open. Ultimately, it's far too dangerous to let any one country or corporation to control AI, which is why open source AI or AI you can run locally on your hardware is very likely going to be the future of AI over the long run, this is especially the case as AI becomes more powerful and useful for user, privacy, security and censorship will become more of an issue for users and businesses.
    • A person should only be required to click through to an article if they want to know more details. The headline should give basic facts. A basic fact would include the name of the service being shut down.
    • That would probably be a good outcome, but it would also require other "features" be changed to comply, such as Auto play, scrolling, and advertising. Having the laws shift these platforms back to a socially responsible and useful places is a benefit for everyone. The addictive nature is the problem, and while many blame the individual, psychologists would suggest the platform is using a well trodden playbook to hook in more revenue..
    • It is in fact being discontinued in the US in July.
    • It was a rather nice rant as I rather dislike when people support the shitifcation of the Internet. My comment also factually applied the definition of "clickbait' to this headline unlike your comment. I have been reading this site for some 20 years now so I will call them out when they are doing carp they shouldn't be doing but thanks for your concern. You can't even do a search by headline anymore to do a quick search to find something because most of the titles lack all the relevant keywords that should be there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      114
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!