Console Versions of Modern Warfare 2 Banned in Russia


Recommended Posts

Country (#) is portrayed as an enemy in a game.

1. Russia - bans game

2. US - ****ing nuke the country from which the game originated.

Actually there are a number of games that have been banned in the states or certain versions of it have been banned. One example I can make is a WW2 Strategy game from the 90's where you had the option of playing as a German commander. The game was banned from the United States and the companies legal rights were removed for "Promoting/Encouraging death of American's"

I call so much BS

OK, so let me get some of you in this thread straight. Americans portraying any country as bad, even if a FICTIONAL SENSE, is bad, terrible, and the worst thing ever. Yet all of you [ignorant] foreigners who are so quick and easy to potray ALL of us as the same "closed minded warmongerers", are ok? The way some of you think make you just as bad as your claims of us.

Free Expression, deal with it. If something offends you so much ignore it. If it's such a major issue (which this really is not) then educate people on the wrongs of it. Banning something however is the worst possible thing you can do, all it does is create more interest.

Also, I find it ironic that those who agree with the ban argue that those who created the game are close minded :\

Edited by SOOPRcow
Well yeah, if its fantasy that is most definitely no harm done. No harm done to anyone else at least. I see your point. Essentially, if it happens, we must pretend like it doesn't so people can feel good. For that reason, the government should be able to ban whatever media they want at will. Gotcha.

Well, it hasn't happened yet... it's a possible scenario. I mean, there's a difference between talking about 9/11 and talking about bombing grand central in NYC. I never said the government should ban anything, I'm simply saying I can see where the Russian government is coming from. They're overreacting with a ban, but it's not far fetched that they're reacting. Mind you I have no qualms about IW including the mission in the game. Just to clear that up in case anyone else misread my previous post.

Free Expression, deal with it. If something offends you so much ignore it. If it's such a major issue (which this really is not) then educate people on the wrongs of it. Banning something however is the worst possible thing you can do, all it does is create more interest.

Also, I find it ironic that those who agree with the ban argue that those who created the game are close minded :\

There is no real freedom of speech or free expression in Russia. Freedom is the only way? I guess it should be, but communist governments are notorious for censorship. China is thinking of banning World of Warcraft. Because... ... ??? And the same way you're saying "deal with it", they're saying the same thing (except technically none of us have to deal with it because we're not in Russia so I honestly don't see what the big deal is).

May just be me but ( Game spoiler ahead ) A GENERAL goes rogue along with a huge lump of American soldiers apparently, doesn't that put Americans in a very bad light as well? ...

When you're poking fun at yourself, its parody, when you're poking fun at others its offensive. I can see the Russians point on this one, since it does put them (in some way) in a bad light, given that they're the main characters in the most controversial mission in the game.

Lets not forget that the German version of "Die Hard" portrayed the bad guys as "European", whereas to everyone else they were German. No country isn't going to take offence to the fact that their citizens are being portrayed as evil or immoral, and I'm sure there'd be some outcry if the Russians, Iranians, *insert "enemy of the free world" here* made a shooter that portrayed US, UK, etc armed forces in a poor light.

I think the fact that it is a game must not provide an excuse for cramming it full of atrocities. Portraying individuals of another country or religion in such cruel way, especially in fiction, is bound to create controversy. Considering that now there's an official patch available to remove this mission, it shows that if the developers are so eager to pull it then it shouldn't have been included in the first place. Gratuitous violence, within any form of media and in real life, is completely unnecessary.

Free Expression is no excuse either. Nor should anyone be advised to turn the other cheek in case he/she is offended or ignore it, which is even worse. First you ban, then you educate. Because simply educating doesn't send a message to developers/publishers about levels of what is acceptable within a certain locale and what is not. A ban does. In Germany for example, it is forbidden for games to feature swastika symbols, so German edition of Return to Castle Wolfenstein didn't have any. Developers/publishers have to be sensitive to such matters. IW/Activision didn't do their research on possible effects of such content well enough and if they loose revenue due to this ban, which they almost certainly will, then serve them right and I hope that they will learn from this mistake.

When you're poking fun at yourself, its parody, when you're poking fun at others its offensive. I can see the Russians point on this one, since it does put them (in some way) in a bad light, given that they're the main characters in the most controversial mission in the game.

Lets not forget that the German version of "Die Hard" portrayed the bad guys as "European", whereas to everyone else they were German. No country isn't going to take offence to the fact that their citizens are being portrayed as evil or immoral, and I'm sure there'd be some outcry if the Russians, Iranians, *insert "enemy of the free world" here* made a shooter that portrayed US, UK, etc armed forces in a poor light.

A General with an army going rogue, wanting to destroy his own country is "poking fun" ... what the hell are you smoking?

To me, its just a video game. I'm British and in a lot of American movies and tv shows british people are portrayed as the evil villains. Something about the accent I guess (haha) but it doesn't annoy me. We play bad guys really well!

The level with the airport in the game was uncomfortable to play, it felt weird shooting down such realistically rendered defenceless civilians, but again its just a game. If anything that was one of the most boring levels in the entire game. If they portrayed that happening in a UK airport I wouldn't be offended, because ...it's just a game.

So Russia finds it OK to portray OTHER countries as terrorists but not theirs ? (Or whatever it is they whine about ?)

The whole freaking game is about war, someone has to be the bad guy, or do we fight evil alien races ?

Oh silly.. so silly.

Pathetic Russia... People that get offended by a bloody game should get their internet connection closed, you might get offended by some obscure web site portraying Russia and hackers.

Edit:

I've seen plenty of movies/series that mention Israel/Mossad as an origin of evil dudes or some ****, but I admit I cried like a ***** in my bed, because it offends me and all, this is srs... /sarcasm

A General with an army going rogue, wanting to destroy his own country is "poking fun" ... what the hell are you smoking?

Sigh. What I meant was that because the game was developed by Americans, they have creative licence to call themselves the bad guys, no-one gets too offended. The Rock, Die Hard 2, Die Hard 4.0, these are all but a few films that portray that. However, if another country was to do such a thing, then the USA would be all "PROPOGANDA", "ENEMIES OF THE FREE WORLD", etc, etc (could you imagine how well received a film coming out of Iran would be in the USA if it portrayed Americans as terrorists?). Historically, the USA and the Russians have a pretty frosty relationship, which is better than it was, but still not great. For people from the USA to turn around and portray the Russians as terrorists could be considered offensive to the Russians. Things like this are always always always politically or religiously motiviated (you're Danish I assume, so I also assume you're aware of the reception of a certain Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) cartoon that was published over there), and you'd be pretty naive to think the Russian government was going to take this light-heartedly.

Edited by Majesticmerc
So Russia finds it OK to portray OTHER countries as terrorists but not theirs ? (Or whatever it is they whine about ?)

The whole freaking game is about war, someone has to be the bad guy, or do we fight evil alien races ?

Oh silly.. so silly.

Pathetic Russia... People that get offended by a bloody game should get their internet connection closed, you might get offended by some obscure web site portraying Russia and hackers.

Being portrayed bad by fiction, including games is really effective on people, especially nationalists. I guess you don't really love your country to understand Russian's position on this.

BTW, the US always have done this, not the Russians, get your facts right.

I'M GOING TO PRETEND I CAN'T SEE THIS POST AND CONTINUE ARGUING LIKE IT'S TRUE FOR ANOTHER 10 PAGES.

Ummmm, who cares. Russia can do whatever they want...their country. I remember places like China banning games as well. Not to mention that Hilary Clinton got GTA edited for content at one point.

And why are people here getting so worked up about a game...seriously, a game?

I'M GOING TO PRETEND I CAN'T SEE THIS POST AND CONTINUE ARGUING LIKE IT'S TRUE FOR ANOTHER 10 PAGES.

AGREED, LET'S ARGUE TOGETHER.

Edit: I'm going to add to this post, in a way that this link really needs shoving around. Surely the topic can be locked now the news report has been proven false?

Edited by Chasethebase
But terrorism in Russia isn't real and just in games. This is in no way a extremely touchy subject in all of Russia.

Terrorism has happened in more than just Russia, *cough*9/11*cough*USS Cole*cough*

I'm not trying to downplay the tragedy, just stating facts.

And also, the in GTA, you can actually go into a FICTIONAL airport and slaughter everyone if you wish. I have played through MW2 and I personally was more bothered by the US military (mainly the brass) than the Russian Ultranationalist faction.

Being portrayed bad by fiction, including games is really effective on people, especially nationalists. I guess you don't really love your country to understand Russian's position on this.

BTW, the US always have done this, not the Russians, get your facts right.

Aside from the fact that this whole thread fails (since the "news" are false), would you rather see made up countries like "Hizbalaland" or something even sillier ?

I don't love my country and it has nothing to do with my SANE approach to video games, there are plenty of reasons though.

Also, I don't get that last sentence, was it addressed to me ?

I'M GOING TO PRETEND I CAN'T SEE THIS POST AND CONTINUE ARGUING LIKE IT'S TRUE FOR ANOTHER 10 PAGES.

I saw the link, but Sethos prompted me to explain the reasoning behind my opinion, so I did, no need to get your knickers in a twist.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!