Bugatti Veyron in a Lake


Recommended Posts

[offtopic]

No, but that's what they are trying to show.

What they have there is a 8.0L quad turbo car - which seems like overkill (the quad turbo actually)

Only thing that excites me about the veyron is it's brakes and braking system, which is state of the art indeed.

Other than that, I would get an Enzo or an F1.

My point is that Bugatti cares more to show they broke the 1000HP barrier than pure performance - lap times of the veyron prove that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferrari_FXX_Evoluzione

This yes! This is a great achievement. Close to Bugatti from a smaller, NA engine.

Probably not road-legal though.

edit : and let's not hate Toyota, they were the ones in F1 not Bugatti or VW.

[/offtopic]

I don't think this is totally off-topic. There's only so much you can say about a car in a lake :p

The difference is that the Veyron is a comfortable GT cruiser with an automatic gearbox, as well as being a hugely quick car in general. The FXX would probably be far more exciting to drive if you had the skill to push it to the limit, but it isn't road-legal, there's no interior, the chassis is very stiff and a lot of the performance comes from the fact it uses slick tyres. The tuned Supras and Vipers in the world are the same, albeit road legal. You wouldn't want to go on a cross-continental road trip in one, but a Veyron would eat up the miles. The technical exercise isn't about getting 1000BHP from a road-legal car, but about making that power manageable for a driver of any skill level in a car you could actually use every day. VW did something similar with the Phaeton - VWs chief executive came out with a list of things it had to be capable of, which meant a massive development budget, but also meant they had a brilliant car at the end of it. Power isn't the be-all and end-all, it's the total package they were after with the Veyron. If it's speed and track performance you're after, take a look at the latest Ariel Atom, which has nearly 1000BHP/ton, against the Veyron's 500-and-something.

I don't think this is totally off-topic. There's only so much you can say about a car in a lake :p

The difference is that the Veyron is a comfortable GT cruiser with an automatic gearbox, as well as being a hugely quick car in general. The FXX would probably be far more exciting to drive if you had the skill to push it to the limit, but it isn't road-legal, there's no interior, the chassis is very stiff and a lot of the performance comes from the fact it uses slick tyres. The tuned Supras and Vipers in the world are the same, albeit road legal. You wouldn't want to go on a cross-continental road trip in one, but a Veyron would eat up the miles. The technical exercise isn't about getting 1000BHP from a road-legal car, but about making that power manageable for a driver of any skill level in a car you could actually use every day. VW did something similar with the Phaeton - VWs chief executive came out with a list of things it had to be capable of, which meant a massive development budget, but also meant they had a brilliant car at the end of it. Power isn't the be-all and end-all, it's the total package they were after with the Veyron. If it's speed and track performance you're after, take a look at the latest Ariel Atom, which has nearly 1000BHP/ton, against the Veyron's 500-and-something.

I agree with all these (well I doubt you can go on a cross-continental road trip with the Veyron as it literally drinks the fuel!) but I think when they started designing the Veyron the number 1 on the list was the Engine. The veyron may have all the gadgets and tricks in the world (and sure it is very drivable and comfortable) but if it didn't have the 1000HP under the hood, most people would say it's heavy and crap (like with Cayenne Turbo or X5M/X6M).

As a fan of motorsport and engineering (well I am going to the CS field but still) what excites me is :

- High Revving NA engines (screaming at 9.000 RPM is great) with the maximum output possible from the smallest displacement. It shows that some real work has gone in to this. For me it's overkill to quad-turbo the veyron but they probably did it for consumption/emissions and mostly to say they did a quad turbo system (people get excited over turbo because the words make you believe that it's much faster than a NA engine).

- Lightweight constructions, carbon fiber and doing some serious thinking in reducing the weight.

That said, yes VW and Bugatti got what they wanted from the Veyron (which of course is a great car and I wouldn't say no to donations from ###### :p) but well from the engineering point of view it doesn't excite me that much.

for a car that gets 8 MPG city, 13MPG Highway and at top speed uses 1.3 Gal/min the car deserves to be in salt water..... they made what 200 of them? and they sell for a million+? what a waste of money

I think that regardless of the maker of the car or the speed or anything, is a million dollars car, and what kind of idiot would land into a lake with it???

good job VW, I am sure those guys with 1500HP supra's showed what you want some years ago and apparently didn't waste millions.

One phrase: There is no replacement for displacement.

Yeah, you can boost those 2JZ-GTEs and RB26DETTs to over 1000HP, but you still won't reach 253mph. Even then, those i6s won't last long with that much boost, requiring you to rebuild the engine every once in a while.

They make boring cars. They used to make exciting sports cars; Supra, Celica, MR2, but they killed their own lines. They are worse than boring. They are traitors to the sports car.

Until recently, I would agree, but Toyota finally got some sense smacked into them with the upcoming FT86 and LF-A.

Until recently, I would agree, but Toyota finally got some sense smacked into them with the upcoming FT86 and LF-A.

I will maintain my disgust with Toyota until they actually start producing them and as an actual sports car too. I have been "bait and switched" before by manufactures and their claims on concept cars. Concepts that don't often make it to production and when they do they bear little resemblance to the exciting concepts.

Besides while it might be a sports car, the LFA at 350,000 dollars and a limited production run is a poor substitute for Toyota's previous sports car lines. I have more hope for the FT-86 if it can make it to market without bloat or a shift towards family friendly. Priced in the low 20's it would be closer to previous Toyota sports cars. Part of the allure of Toyota's sports car line was they offered exceptional performance for the money.

One phrase: There is no replacement for displacement.

Yeah, you can boost those 2JZ-GTEs and RB26DETTs to over 1000HP, but you still won't reach 253mph. Even then, those i6s won't last long with that much boost, requiring you to rebuild the engine every once in a while.

Careful now we are talking about a car with 4 turbos :p

I agree with the statement. I believe you can probably squeeze out 1000 HP from a 8.0L NA, I don't know at what cost, emissions, consumption and mainly strain on the engine (and noise also). But well that's why it costs that much, to solve all these..

I will maintain my disgust with Toyota until they actually start producing them and as an actual sports car too. I have been "bait and switched" before by manufactures and their claims on concept cars. Concepts that don't often make it to production and when they do they bear little resemblance to the exciting concepts.

Yeah, I'm tired of seeing great concept cars getting killed too early, but Toyota seems to be sticking with this one especially because Subaru will also have their version AWD version of the "Toyobura".

Careful now we are talking about a car with 4 turbos :p

I agree with the statement. I believe you can probably squeeze out 1000 HP from a 8.0L NA, I don't know at what cost, emissions, consumption and mainly strain on the engine (and noise also). But well that's why it costs that much, to solve all these..

Yeah, it has 4 turbo's, and most probably you have 2 kicking in the low RPM range and the other 2 in the higher range to avoid minimize lag. The fastest NA is the McLaren F1's V12, so 1000hp is a bit tricky with what we know now :\

Yeah, it has 4 turbo's, and most probably you have 2 kicking in the low RPM range and the other 2 in the higher range to avoid minimize lag. The fastest NA is the McLaren F1's V12, so 1000hp is a bit tricky with what we know now :\

I think you used the right word. Tricky but not impossible.

I want to believe that automotive tech has stepped up since 1994 (maybe they did with the wide use of turbo) and we can get more hp/L. Still the F1 is a 6.1L V12 engine that could not rev as high as V12 engines do now. An 8L high-revving engine with modern tech stands a chance IMO.

Wish I had the money to challenge companies :p

I love the comments calling the guy and idiot and saying they could drive it 10x better.

because those cares are super easy to drive. just like there parents prius and accords

2 pedals and a steering wheel. Not so different from our cars now are they?

And yes, I could drive 10x better. You know why? A smart driver should always judge the environment and road conditions to adjust your speed. If you're driving too fast, that's what can happen.

Why would I defend reckless driving? It's irresponsible, it's dumb and it's a waste (in this case, a waste of a great piece of machinery).

2 pedals and a steering wheel. Not so different from our cars now are they?

And yes, I could drive 10x better. You know why? A smart driver should always judge the environment and road conditions to adjust your speed. If you're driving too fast, that's what can happen.

Why would I defend reckless driving? It's irresponsible, it's dumb and it's a waste (in this case, a waste of a great piece of machinery).

I would agree. I think 10x is about the difference between on the road and in a lake. It isn't like this guy had a small "off" while racing on a track. This guy missed the road by quite a large amount. He was obviously going to fast for the conditions and his skill and on a public road that is inexcusable. If he is off the road by that amount he could have easily killed someone. We only see down the road in one direction, but it appears he lost it on a straight!

2 pedals and a steering wheel. Not so different from our cars now are they?

And yes, I could drive 10x better. You know why? A smart driver should always judge the environment and road conditions to adjust your speed. If you're driving too fast, that's what can happen.

Why would I defend reckless driving? It's irresponsible, it's dumb and it's a waste (in this case, a waste of a great piece of machinery).

it is not the same... at ALL

they handle much diffrently. some high preformance cars will not handle well at lower speeds. because its not what they are designed for.

want a good example? go get GT5 prolouge. the driving is sort of realistic. handling any of the high preformance cars is much different.

not to mention they accelerate MUCH faster.

saying you could handle a car like the Buggati is like saying a new biker could handle a Hayabusa or kawasaki ZX-14\

could easily do that in a lower preformance car

not to mention he was not even speeding and it was dry out

http://www.techeblog.com/index.php/tech-ga...into-texas-lake

its a shame the driver didnt want to hit a bird huh? should have just ran it over instaid but then people would be bitching he was heartless

though I doubt he is flipping out

http://www.carzi.com/2009/11/15/andy-house...ke-crash-video/

he owns the ferrari eddy griffin crashed. and its now repaired and most likley worth more then the buggati cause who crashed it

Edited by mokthraka

Probably the best automotive fail of all time

I wouldnt feel too bad for the driver, from the price tag of the car hes probably some fat balding pindick in his 50's, and god knows anyone who buys a penis extension car deserves nothing less.

As for the subject of the 4 turbos and whether 2 operate at low speed and the other 2 at high, makes sense. I assume 2 operate at lower speeds, it would make sense, after all the thing has 11 radiators.....

I hate to debunk this one.

Wikipedia:

On November 11, 2009, the owner of a 2006 Veyron inadvertently drove his vehicle into a salt water lagoon, near Omega Bay, in La Marque, Texas. The vehicle was submerged in approximately two feet of water before it was retrieved.

This is the video.

It wasn't Friday the 13th.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's Copilot Cowork now generally available with usage-based billing by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in March, Microsoft first revealed Copilot Cowork, a new agentic AI experience in Microsoft 365 Copilot through which users can assign tasks to AI to complete in the background. After testing the service with a limited set of customers in Research Preview for a few weeks, Microsoft announced the general availability of Copilot Cowork to customers in the Frontier program on March 30. Today, Microsoft announced the general availability of Copilot Cowork worldwide for Microsoft 365 Copilot customers. The company also highlighted that Cowork became the fastest-growing feature in the history of its Frontier program. Unlike regular Copilot Chat, Copilot Cowork can run complex, long-running, multi-tool tasks from start to finish in the cloud by using organizational context through Work IQ. When compared to Claude Cowork, Microsoft claims that Copilot Cowork will be 30% to 40% cheaper on average with its Microsoft 365 connector. For now, Copilot Cowork runs on Anthropic models, including Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 4.6. However, Frontier customers can now use GPT-5.5. Microsoft also announced Cowork 1, a secure fine-tuned model coming in the next few weeks, which is designed to handle everyday Copilot tasks at a lower cost. To access Copilot Cowork, a Microsoft 365 Copilot user subscription is required. Usage is billed separately through Copilot Credits, based on model use, context retrieval, tool calls, and runtime. Pay-as-you-go pricing is set at $0.01 per Copilot Credit. To offer IT teams full control over usage costs, Microsoft provides spending limits, usage alerts, user-level controls, reporting, and prepaid usage plans for organizations. Usage-based billing begins today. However, Frontier customers who used Cowork between March 30 and June 16 will not be billed until July 1, 2026. The Microsoft 365 Copilot app now includes a toggle to enter the full Cowork experience. Microsoft is also adding partner plugins, with Enosix, Harvey, LSEG, Miro, monday.com, Moody’s, Morningstar, S&P Global Energy, and TeamsMaestro available now. Adobe, Atlassian, Box, Canva, Databricks, and others are coming soon.
    • With Nova enabled I am not seeing a difference with compactmode.show?
    • HOLY THREAD REVIVAL   But yes, look for browser.nova.enabled and set it to true
    • 5-year subscription to AdGuard VPN price-dropped now 90% off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 88% off a 5-year subscription to AdGuard VPN. In the digital age where internet privacy is paramount, AdGuard VPN emerges as an essential tool. This virtual private network (VPN) is your encrypted gateway to the internet, helping your data stay secure and your online activities remain private, regardless of your location. More than just a privacy tool, AdGuard VPN is a robust solution packed with features that cater to a variety of internet needs. Why AdGuard VPN subscription deal over other VPNs: Exhaustive List of Locations: With 60+ locations available worldwide, you have the freedom to connect from anywhere you want, effectively bypassing geographically restricted content. Check complete list of servers here. Advanced Security Protocol: AdGuard VPN uses its own security protocol, guaranteeing a faster and safer VPN connection. This means you can browse, stream, and download with peace of mind knowing your data is secure. Zero-Logging Policy: Rest assured, your personal data is not collected and your internet traffic stays private at all times, thanks to AdGuard's strict zero-logging policy. Simultaneous Connections: Connect up to 10 devices simultaneously, providing protection for all your devices under just one account. Trusted Developer: AdGuard is a renowned name in the world of computer security, bringing their expertise and commitment to privacy and security to their VPN service. What You Get: Up to 10 devices connected simultaneously All locations Light-speed servers Unlimited data No logs policy Trusted developer Available on all platforms Privacy Created by a team from Russia, AdGuard software Limited is headquartered in Limassol, Cyprus. While the country does follow European privacy laws, it's not part of the 5/9/14 Eyes Alliance. Adguard may not properly work in China. Good to know Length of access: 5 years This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Device per license: 10 Access options: desktop & mobile Updates included 5- years of AdGuard VPN normally costs $359.40 without discounts, but it can be yours just $39.97, that's a saving of $324.43 (90%) off. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this 5-year AdGuard VPN deal for just $34.97 (was $359.40) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • KillerPDF 1.5.1 by Razvan Serea KillerPDF is a lightweight, portable PDF editor for Windows built for users who want full control without subscriptions, installers, or telemetry. It runs as a single executable, making it ideal for USB use and field work. You can view PDFs with smooth PDFium rendering, navigate quickly with thumbnails, zoom, and shortcuts, and reorganize pages using drag-and-drop. It supports merging multiple PDFs, splitting documents, and extracting selected pages. KillerPDF also allows inline text editing with font matching to preserve the original layout, plus annotations like text boxes, freehand drawing, highlights, and reusable signatures. You can search full text, copy content easily, and print documents with flattened annotations. Designed as a free and open alternative to bloated PDF tools, it works fully offline on Windows 10/11 x64. No runtimes install. Everything needed is inside the EXE (targets .NET Framework 4.8, which ships with every supported Windows release). KillerPDF key features: High-quality PDF rendering via PDFium Edit PDF text inline (double-click to modify text) Page thumbnails and fast navigation with zoom and shortcuts Merge multiple PDFs into one Split PDFs and extract selected pages Drag-and-drop page reordering Font matching to preserve original document appearance Text boxes for notes Freehand drawing tools Highlight overlays with adjustable color, size, opacity Undo actions and clear per-page annotations Create, draw, and save reusable signatures Click-to-place signatures anywhere Full-text search with highlighted results Drag-select or Ctrl+A to copy text Print with annotations flattened Portable single-file app (~10 MB) No installer, no admin rights required No account, no telemetry KillerPDF 1.5.1 changelog: Performance Save Flattened PDF now uses multiple CPU cores. Page rasterization is parallelized (PNG encoding runs across cores; the PDFium render step stays serialized since the library isn't thread-safe), so large documents flatten significantly faster while the UI stays responsive (#68). Fixed PDFs that failed to open with "Unexpected EOF" now open (#72). The failure was PdfSharpCore's Flate inflater (SharpZipLib) rejecting the FlateDecode cross-reference stream on multi-revision PDFs - files that open fine in browsers, Acrobat, and Foxit. KillerPDF now detects this and re-opens the file losslessly through PDFium, preserving selectable text. Thanks to @javajon for the report and a detailed reproduction. Grid view renders every page. It was capped at the first 26 pages, so longer documents stopped loading partway through. Tiles also stream in progressively now instead of blocking until the whole document is rendered. Grid Ctrl+Scroll no longer reloads every page when the zoom is already at its limit and nothing would change. Removed a stray horizontal scrollbar (a thin green line) that could appear across the bottom of grid view. Files on UNC / network shares (including the WSL \\wsl$ filesystem) are copied locally before opening, avoiding partial-read failures on network filesystems. Changed Minimum zoom lowered from 10% to 5%, so grid view can pack more columns (helpful for wide/landscape pages) and single-page view can zoom out further. Download: KillerPDF 1.5.1 | 6.3 MB (Open Source) Link: KillerPDF Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      522
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      111
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      Nick H.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!