Recommended Posts

I emailed Zone Labs last week asking them about Zone Alarm Pro and its compatibility with Windows 2003 Server. They finally replied and here's their answer for those of you who still believe that it is compatible with Windows 2003. As you will clearly read. It is NOT compatible with Win2003. If you installed it, it may seem to be working fine, but it is not. I hope this finally clears any doubts or questions about the issue. Read on.

Hello Zone Labs customer,

Your case has been updated as follows: Changed Description, Title, or Field, Changed status to Closed, Appended a description

If a representative has responded to your case, it will be located in the Description field below.

If not, then the case is still in process, and we will respond as quickly as we can.

You may need to scroll down in your e-mail program to view the response.

To contact Technical Support again regarding this issue, simply reply to this email and type your message at the top.

Be sure to leave the subject line unchanged.

----------------------------------------------------

YOUR CASE DETAILS

----------------------------------------------------

Case Number: 105704

Case Assigned to: Zone Labs Technical Support

Case Subject: Windows 2003 Compatibility

Case Status: Closed

Case Creation Date: 06/07/2003

----------------------------------------------------

DESCRIPTION

----------------------------------------------------

Hello,

Server are not supported at this time. Any changes to that will be

announced on our website.

Thanks,

Mike

----------------------------------------------------

PROBLEM WITH WEB FORM

----------------------------------------------------

If you experience any problems using Zone Labs Technical Support web form, please send email directly to [email protected]

NOTE: Priority One Support: Licensed (paid) users of ZoneAlarm Plus or ZoneAlarm Pro receive the highest priority in our support queue.

Trial users of Zone Alarm Pro/Plus receive the same level of service during their 30-day free trial period.

You should receive a reply to your issue via email within 3-4 working days (excluding weekends) under normal circumstances.

Thank You,

Zone Labs Technical Support Team

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/84704-zone-alarm-pro-v37159/
Share on other sites

I tested Zone Alarm 3.7.159 and WIN2K3 with several firewall tests and It's working fine. I've had Windows Server 2003 beta and now the trial version for some time now with Zone Alarm 3.7.159.

In all the testing I've done(since March 2003), I have no choice but to say that Zone Alarm 3.7.159 IS COMPATIBLE with Win2K3.

Before blasting away saying that it's not...do some testing man...I've been doing it for over 3 months, so I know what I am talking about.

I don't have to do any testing "man" because if the makers of Zone Alarm (ZoneLabs) tell you that the product IS NOT compatible than IT IS NOT compatible. By saying it is not compatible they are not telling you that it won't run on Windows 2003, they are simply telling you that it is not going to run, perform, or protect the OS like it's supposed to. Easy CD Creator 5 installed just fine in Windows XP and burned CDs fine but it could not copy CDs well or do other things. Why? Because it was not compatible so they had to release several patches to fix the flaw and make it compatible with XP 100%. Zone Alarm may seem to be running fine, but it is not. It is broken and not performing at 100%. You want to keep using? Fine, Suit yourself. Don't say I didn't warn you when something fu**@# up on your system.

First of all, if the zone alarm guys say it's not compatible, then let it be.

But if someone else's says it's working fine for them, , so be it. He could have done something to make it working 100 % efficiency un win 2k3.

Why get so worked up ? The truth will reveal when users test it for themselves. Arguing makes you look like a kid, Scorbing.

First of all, if the zone alarm guys say it's not compatible, then let it be.

But if someone else's says it's working fine for them, , so be it. He could have done something to make it working 100 % efficiency un win 2k3.

Why get so worked up ? The truth will reveal when users test it for themselves. Arguing makes you look like a kid, Scorbing.

Who's arguing? I am not arguing dude. Dell Dude is the one that got all hyped up about it. All I did was post a reply from an email I got from ZoneLabs and he made a big issue of it.

OK I have found some information. I had to dig like crazy on their site but I found it. Zone Alarm 3.7.159 IS COMPATIBLE with Windows Server 2003. I guess the Zone Labs representative that replied to my email is unaware of it but here it is. Go to the link and see for yourselves.

http://download.zonelabs.com/bin/free/info...aseHistory.html

My apologies to Dell Dude. I didn't know man. Sorry.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!