Google's Chrome OS revealed


Recommended Posts

Having the encryption key (which is FIXED for a majority of encryption algorithms) makes the decryption millions of times faster than if you didn't have it.
Customised key. As in, the end user gets to pick thier own key that they made.

Randomized key generation and assingment doesn't qualify as custom.

Ah, so now they are random :rolleyes:

Ah, so now they are random :rolleyes:

They have always been random?! What is wrong with you idiots?

"Fixed key" = You cannot change it. It is set by the administrator/software or other device and is out of your control.

Why are you people even bother to comment or argue the point if you don't even know the proper terminology or english required to understand?

Maybe i should start building a list of people to ignore, since you dont' even think for two seconds about what a person means when they write a post :p

They have always been random?! What is wrong with you idiots?

"Fixed key" = You cannot change it. It is set by the administrator/software or other device and is out of your control.

so what your saying is .... fixed key = not random , all they need to do is get that key and they'll get through?

PurePhoenix's original claims:

Uhh he's actually right. Having the encryption key (which is FIXED for a majority of encryption algorithms) makes the decryption millions of times faster than if you didn't have it.
http://www.mycrypto.net/encryption/crypto_algorithms.html

Read, only one of the top six allows you to use a customised key.

The algorithm never changes. Values != algorithm.

Learn to read & comprehend a post.

In the first one, you claim that the key is fixed for a majority of algorithms. The implication being that secret algorithms and implementations are more secure than those that are publicly disclosed. You were then asked to provide evidence for this, which lead to the second post I quote. Here you say that only "one of the top six" algorithms allow you to use a "customized key" (presumably the other five use fixed keys then.) Nothing in the link you provide says that, so again, what are you basing this on?

The reality is that you are simply wrong. All the major algorithms certainly do not have fixed keys. It's also widely accepted that exposing the algorithm to public scrutiny and review actually leads to safer solutions, as potential weaknesses are more likely to be found. The end result is a more secure product.

Are you ready to recognize that you were mistaken? I see that you have in your last few posts changed your position to complain about keys being "random." I still expect you to respond to the above that disputes your original claim. Are we to understand that you are retracting your earlier claims?

Your new claim doesn't really make any sense either, though. How the key is created is separate from the algorithm. An implementation that protected the key with a random three-letter password would obviously not be very secure, even though the algorithm is solid. This defect would not be in the algorithm. I think you'll also have to explain to us why you believe a (pseudo-)randomly generated 256-bit key makes the system less secure than if you could "make it yourself" (whatever that means in this context.) How does that follow? How does this make the key easier to guess?

They have always been random?! What is wrong with you idiots?

"Fixed key" = You cannot change it. It is set by the administrator/software or other device and is out of your control.

Why are you people even bother to comment or argue the point if you don't even know the proper terminology or english required to understand?

Maybe i should start building a list of people to ignore, since you dont' even think for two seconds about what a person means when they write a post :p

What's the problem with pseudo-random generation? It's probably a hell of a lot more secure than any passphrase you can come up with.

Edited by Elliott
They have always been random?! What is wrong with you idiots?

"Fixed key" = You cannot change it. It is set by the administrator/software or other device and is out of your control.

Why are you people even bother to comment or argue the point if you don't even know the proper terminology or english required to understand?

Maybe i should start building a list of people to ignore, since you dont' even think for two seconds about what a person means when they write a post :p

If your concept of proper terminology is that "random = fixed" then I'm done arguing with your :p

Gotta appreciate the subtle backpedaling though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Not even an OLED display on the laptops. Also it seems that the laptop design isn't the same as the Surface Ultra model. Looks like bargain bin at high prices.
    • VirtualBox 7.2.10 by Razvan Serea VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Targeted at server, desktop and embedded use, it is now the only professional-quality virtualization solution that is also Open Source Software. Presently, VirtualBox runs on Windows, Linux, macOS, and Solaris hosts and supports a large number of guest operating systems including but not limited to Windows (NT 4.0, 2000, XP, Server 2003, Vista, 7, 8, Windows 10 and Windows 11), DOS/Windows 3.x, Linux (2.4, 2.6, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x and 6.x), Solaris and OpenSolaris, OS/2, OpenBSD, NetBSD and FreeBSD. Some of the features of VirtualBox are: Modularity. VirtualBox has an extremely modular design with well-defined internal programming interfaces and a client/server design. This makes it easy to control it from several interfaces at once: for example, you can start a virtual machine in a typical virtual machine GUI and then control that machine from the command line, or possibly remotely. VirtualBox also comes with a full Software Development Kit: even though it is Open Source Software, you don't have to hack the source to write a new interface for VirtualBox. Virtual machine descriptions in XML. The configuration settings of virtual machines are stored entirely in XML and are independent of the local machines. Virtual machine definitions can therefore easily be ported to other computers. VirtualBox 7.2.10 changelog: VMM: Fixed issue when CentOS 10 VM was not booting due to the message "Fatal glibc error: CPU does not support x86-64-v3" (​github:gh-642) Devices/EFI: Fixed booting issue when ARM VM had less than 1024 MiB of RAM assigned (​github:gh-679) USB: Fixed issue when it was not possible to attach USB device to headless VM on Apple Silicon/macOS 26.4.1 (​github:gh-631) Storage: Fixed issue when VIRTIO-SCSI device was not recognized as SSD device by guest system (​github:gh-634) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which triggered debug log creation (​github:gh-645) Network: Fixed issue in E1000 emulation code which prevented OS/2 guest from booting (​github:gh-683) Linux Host: Fixed issue when VMs could not be started due to kernel oops (​github:gh-639) Linux Host and Guest: Fixed issue when kernel modules were failing to build with openSUSE 16.0 kernel Linux Host and Guest: Added initial support for kernel 7.1 Linux Host and Guest: Added extra fixes for RHEL 9.8 kernel (​github:gh-676) Linux Host and Guest: Added possibility to build source code using NASM instead of YASM as the assembler (​github:gh-520) Linux Guest Additions: Added initial support for Extended Data Control Protocol for clipboard sharing with Plasma on Wayland guests (​github:gh-33) Linux Guest Additions: Added extra fixes for preventing vboxvideo kernel module build with kernel version 7.0 and newer (​github:gh-655) OS/2 Guest Additions: Fixed issue when Shared Folders automount and clipboard sharing stopped working (​github:gh-551) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 | 170.0 MB (Open Source) Download: VirtualBox 7.2.10 Extension Pack | 19.1 MB View: VirtualBox Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • OK, now ask yourself how are they going to enforce that law? By requiring every single adult to prove their age and provide their legal identity documents to an UNREGULATED 3rd party company that already has a long track record of multiple data breaches. Not to mention, parliament have voted AGAINST this ban, twice, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. So, where's the democracy here, because that looks like dictatorship to me. The solution here is parental responsibility, not government control. Run some public service announcements on TV and UK social media teaching parents how to setup parental controls. That's already been proven to actually work. But the, this is not and has NEVER been about keeping kids safe. It's about control and monitoring. Watching what you're doing online and controlling what you can see and what you can say.
    • Interesting read. I knew the adware was quite controversial at the time, however never realised to the point The Guardian wrote an article about Patchou. I just said no and enjoyed his creation, I’d probably be a lot more wary of something like that today though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      First Post
    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      525
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      180
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      105
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      89
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!