Smoking voids Apple warranty?


Recommended Posts

The tar and nicotine slime layer on and inside can cause illness.

Nicotine is in same class as an insectoside and highly addictive and poisonous.

When the engineer(s) have to do a repair and maybe a clean, their health is at risk.

I suppose they can wear a bio-hzard suit and breathing apparatus, but that should not be the case.

Oh good grief, if I can afford to use a simple face mask when cleaning a computer, I'm quite sure a department that handles computer repair services will be just fine. Besides, don't people pay a boat load of money for the Apple care thing? Hell, knowing how expensive there products are as it is, I think Apple could certainly afford face masks or even bio-suits for that matter.

ummm, those pictures you people are pretty normal for just about ever damn computer outside of the pc enthusiast world, even the ones that dont come in contact with smoke. Also, if you cant honor the warranty, dont offer it. I find it funny that some of you people would even attempt to defend apple on this.

Yes, because teeth are sensitive electronic components.

Analogy

Function: noun

1 : inference that if two or more things agree with one another in some respects they will probably agree in others

2 a : resemblance in some particulars between things otherwise unlike

ummm, those pictures you people are pretty normal for just about ever damn computer outside of the pc enthusiast world, even the ones that dont come in contact with smoke. Also, if you cant honor the warranty, dont offer it. I find it funny that some of you people would even attempt to defend apple on this.

bull****. My mother had a baseline Dell (average ventilation) for 4 years, never opened and cleaned until I finally put in a graphics card, and there was a bit of gray dust covering the fans and openings, but that was it. What people are posting is NOT normal. The difference between a PC in a smoke-free home and a home of smokers is like night and day.

There is a line that needs to be drawn. Depending on usage conditions, laptops can build up a large amount of dust inside within just a few months of use. If the computer is on 24/7, there may be a large amount of dust inside.

Tobacco smoke, as you all should know, has a tar component. The tar also gets into the computer and makes internal components oily and sticky. This increases the amount of gunk buildup. After two years, you really can get something that looks like fuzzy black sludge, because the tar also sticks to the dirt.

At that point, I'd probably also tell the guy to take a hike.

That computer has CPU Cancer!

I assume apple computers come without thermal compound then since their employee's can't handle it due to it containing items from the OSHA hazardous chemical list. Even silicon is on that list.

Without actually determining the amount of nicotine present to see if it's above the recommended level it's nothing more then an excuse.

It's like saying that owning a pet voids your warranty because some of our employees are allergic to pet dander, so we're not going to bother fixing it.

Nicotine is in same class as an insectoside and highly addictive and poisonous.

When the engineer(s) have to do a repair and maybe a clean, their health is at risk.

You're a great example of the hysteria that has been built up around cigarettes by anti-smoking groups. Listen to yourself, it sounds like you're describing Ebola. Smokers are exposed to far more nicotine for their entire lives, if it was as dangerous as the anti-smoking lobby insists it is wouldn't smokers be dropping dead after even a few days of exposure?

Fast food will kill you faster than cigarettes!

Meanwhile, I don't see OSHA classifying car exhaust as dangerous. They're letting us all be exposed to death every day. Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and one of you anti-smokers smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!

You're a great example of the hysteria that has been built up around cigarettes by anti-smoking groups. Listen to yourself, it sounds like you're describing Ebola. Smokers are exposed to far more nicotine for their entire lives, if it was as dangerous as the anti-smoking lobby insists it is wouldn't smokers be dropping dead after even a few days of exposure?

Fast food will kill you faster than cigarettes!

Meanwhile, I don't see OSHA classifying car exhaust as dangerous. Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and you smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!

Everything, when abused, is deadly. Food, alcohol, water, cigarettes, cigars, pain killers, vitamins, etc.

Oh good grief, if I can afford to use a simple face mask when cleaning a computer, I'm quite sure a department that handles computer repair services will be just fine. Besides, don't people pay a boat load of money for the Apple care thing? Hell, knowing how expensive there products are as it is, I think Apple could certainly afford face masks or even bio-suits for that matter.

Exactly, gloves, facemask - problem solved.

I question how much of this would have been dust to be honest, ive seen desktop pcs ive worked on where smokers smoke inside right next to it and yeah its not pretty but in most cases those machines are alot older than 2 years and with crappy crappy ventilation. Sounds like a wanky crock to me, should clean it out and take it to another tech centre. When the knobs at the 2nd centre repair it for you, be sure to send Dena a pack of cigarettes for being such a useless ****.

Good is all I can say. Seeing what tar does to the cpu heat sink in a desktop I can only imagine the havok it reeks inside a laptop. If you want to smoke go out side. Plus it keeps your house from stinking too. I hate going to people's houses and it smells so bad I can hardly breath.

oh good grief..quit whining. If you fix computers just post a sign telling people 'You refuse to fix or accept payments from smokers' and 'refuse to make house calls of smokers'.

While I agree that having a computer in a house full of smokers is very bad for it, I think Apple should have a special point in their agreement when you sign up for Applecare

The Plan does not cover:

[...]

b Damage due to accident, abuse, neglect, misuse (including faulty installation, repair, or

maintenance by anyone other than Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider),

unauthorized modification, improper environment (including lack of proper

temperature or humidity), unusual physical or electrical stress or interference, failure or

fluctuation of electrical power, lightning, static electricity, fire, or acts of God;

I am a smoker myself and even I don't like working on smokers' machines, it's disgusting. I clean my PC myself all the time, I never let it get that bad. You can tell if the dust in a machine is from smoke though, it smells much worse.

I have worked on machines that are really really bad but you can tell it's not from second hand smoke. I understand where people are coming from, working inside of a dirty machine that has come from second hand smoke is not nice.

If you pumped smoke from burning anything through a PC its improper use... just because its a cigarette people think its reasonable?

You're a great example of the hysteria that has been built up around cigarettes by anti-smoking groups. Listen to yourself, it sounds like you're describing Ebola. Smokers are exposed to far more nicotine for their entire lives, if it was as dangerous as the anti-smoking lobby insists it is wouldn't smokers be dropping dead after even a few days of exposure?

Fast food will kill you faster than cigarettes!

Meanwhile, I don't see OSHA classifying car exhaust as dangerous. They're letting us all be exposed to death every day. Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and one of you anti-smokers smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!

The difference is people do not have their face next to an exhaust while its running. And fast food unless eaten religiously will not kill you faster than cigarettes. I think the problem here is you are taking "normal cigarette activity" and comparing it will "abnormal fast food abuse" and "abnormal locations to breathe".

They never claimed coming into contact sporadically with cigarette waste will kill you as quickly as those who smoke, but pointed out it was a health risk.

Wouldn't a fair test be... normal life: You smoke 20 cigarettes a day and also be exposed to car exhaust fumes, and I'll walk around not smoking whilst being exposed to the same amount of car exhaust fumes.

Wouldn't a fair test be... normal life: You smoke 20 cigarettes a day and also be exposed to car exhaust fumes, and I'll walk around not smoking whilst being exposed to the same amount of car exhaust fumes.

Or read up on how your lungs work then think about what all that tar buildup in your lungs will inevitably lead to. The pictures of the insides of computers demonstrates the concept perfectly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • So its a museum of AI prompts? Boring
    • This one baffles me...so they are creating a museum based around the Ship of Theseus? A museum is supposed to preserve things. It doesn't really work if the conversation goes, "I gazed upon Starry Night the other day, the colours were beautiful!" "Yeah...I didn't expect Godzilla to show up, though." Create a building devoted to displaying AI work, fine. The rainforest idea sounds interesting and I would consider visiting if they pay me a few bucks. But don't call it a museum...
    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!