Smoking voids Apple warranty?


Recommended Posts

Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and one of you anti-smokers smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!
I'll take you up on it. The parameters to keep equal: volume of smoke inhaled, temperature, filtered/unfiltered. You do realise you're probably going to lose because I have a catalytic converter on my side. :)
Next they'll be saying that the flakes of dead skin and microscopic mites the float around in a PC case void your guarantee. Send em all down an 18th century coal mine, let em see what hazardous working conditions really are, bunch of vaginas.

But both are those are naturally caused and (realistically) unpreventable, just part of everyday life. Cigarettes on the other hand don't have to be smoked into the computer.

If I lay my pc down then eat over - consequently getting crumbs and coffee spillages in it - you would tell me that was my fault and Apple shouldn't repair it.

But both are those are naturally caused and (realistically) unpreventable, just part of everyday life. Cigarettes on the other hand don't have to be smoked into the computer.

If I lay my pc down then eat over - consequently getting crumbs and coffee spillages in it - you would tell me that was my fault and Apple shouldn't repair it.

Refusing to repair equipment due to the neglect of the owner is one thing, saying you won't even look at it because of nicotine stains is just whining like a little baby.

If a mobile phone gets soaked they will not even look at the fault, its presumed to be a moisture fault - no-one complains about this. But anyway by the sounds of it they did inspect it and have deemed the device failed because of tar from cigarette smoke.

She said that the computer is beyond economical repair due to tar from cigarette smoke! She said the hard drive is about to fail, the optical drive has failed and it isn't feasible to repair the computer under the warranty.
Refusing to repair equipment due to the neglect of the owner is one thing, saying you won't even look at it because of nicotine stains is just whining like a little baby.

Uhm, aren't these the exact same? Obviously they would have had to look at the machine to know that it had smoking-related damage, and the article mentions severe buildup of tar, so what's the problem?

Seems like the contract explains this just fine:

The Plan does not cover:

[...]

b Damage due to accident, abuse, neglect, misuse (including faulty installation, repair, or

maintenance by anyone other than Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider),

unauthorized modification, improper environment (including lack of proper

temperature or humidity), unusual physical or electrical stress or interference, failure or

fluctuation of electrical power, lightning, static electricity, fire, or acts of God;

This is like saying someone with bad teeth comes into the dentist and the dentist refuses to do the work...

Sorry, but worst example ever.

Dentists are in the business of fixing teeth, and yes you pay them to do so.

Apple on the other hand is in the business of selling computers. They only fix them when they break. They fix them when the parts in their machines fail unexpectedly under the warranty period. By unexpected I mean, under normal operating conditions the part just fails. That doesn't mean "fried because it couldn't keep itself cool, from all the tar dust packed around the CPU cooler, because you decided to smoking 12 packs a day in your house."

I wasn't referring to Apple's actions. I was referring to ruining computers in general hence why I stated "ruining computers" at the end so people wouldn't think I was referring to Apple's actions.
lol, man... you don't have to explain yourself. I was just joking. :)

How much does this guy smoke, and does he blow the smoke into the vents on the computer?

I live in a house with two smokers, and in the 10+ years I have lived with them not once has any of the computers we have had been covered in tar from cigarette smoke. Granted the longest we have had a computer without cleaning it has been maybe 6 months, with two smokers that would be roughly equivalent to a year with only one smoker, half the time mentioned in the OP....but wouldn't that still build up at least half the amount of tar/dust as the one in the OP?

Not sure how much this 21-year old smoker is smoking or where he blows his smoke, but if it got that bad in two years than its his fault, not Apple's......

EDIT: Also, aren't HDDs airtight? Why would cigarette smoke be the cause of a failing HDD?

EDIT: Also, aren't HDDs airtight? Why would cigarette smoke be the cause of a failing HDD?

No, they aren't air tight. They have at least one opening in order to equalize the pressure inside and outside. This is covered by a filter though, although it would be possible to clog that. Parts of the motor might also be exposed on the bottom of the drive. Coating it in something might also lead it to overheat (which might also be worsened indirectly by the rest of the system being too hot).

I'm with Apple on this but they do need to make their terms of warranty clearer.

Do they? The terms are only two pages and easily readable. I already quoted a relevant section.

bull****. My mother had a baseline Dell (average ventilation) for 4 years, never opened and cleaned until I finally put in a graphics card, and there was a bit of gray dust covering the fans and openings, but that was it. What people are posting is NOT normal. The difference between a PC in a smoke-free home and a home of smokers is like night and day.

bull****. My older AMD64 machine had _more_ dust inside it alongwith some soot and greasy stuff inside it. If there's anything abnormal, it's your reasoning.

Do they? The terms are only two pages and easily readable. I already quoted a relevant section.

Unfortunately not everyone is as clued up as yourself.

In a way i guess you can say by not being clued up you bring it upon yourself

ummm, those pictures you people are pretty normal for just about ever damn computer outside of the pc enthusiast world, even the ones that dont come in contact with smoke. Also, if you cant honor the warranty, dont offer it. I find it funny that some of you people would even attempt to defend apple on this.

Completely agree, word to word.

O wow, guess the computer i am working on that was in a house fire i should have a HAZMAT Suit on in a clean room with its own oxygen supply, but wait i'm a smoker so guess i'm dead already lol.

Apple is really lame for this, always wanted to get a mac just to see but seeing as i am a smoker i'll just go spend that 1500.00 bucks or more on a new PC

Apple is really lame for this, always wanted to get a mac just to see but seeing as i am a smoker i'll just go spend that 1500.00 bucks or more on a new PC

How many other manufacturers offer warranties that cover a machine covered in a thick layer of tar? I don't know why you believe this is a policy that is unique to Apple.

You're a great example of the hysteria that has been built up around cigarettes by anti-smoking groups. Listen to yourself, it sounds like you're describing Ebola. Smokers are exposed to far more nicotine for their entire lives, if it was as dangerous as the anti-smoking lobby insists it is wouldn't smokers be dropping dead after even a few days of exposure?

Fast food will kill you faster than cigarettes!

Meanwhile, I don't see OSHA classifying car exhaust as dangerous. They're letting us all be exposed to death every day. Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and one of you anti-smokers smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!

I don't smoke nor drive.

I walk 95% and if journey is more than 10 miles/ or have children with me and journey is more than 3 miles/ or it's suddenly become bad weather and the children

are with me we use the useless public transport run by Arriva.

If you want to smoke cigarettes or any tobacco product, do it in your own space.

The debate is about cigarettes leaving a stain in an Apple computer not motor vehicles.

Good on Apple. :yes: I've been asked to fix computers owned by smokers or used in smokey environments, and I flat out refuse. It's a complete mistreatment of the computer and certainly should void the warranty.

How many other manufacturers offer warranties that cover a machine covered in a thick layer of tar? I don't know why you believe this is a policy that is unique to Apple.

Acer had no problem fixing my as you would put it thick layer of tar covered laptop. Didn't hear anything about them not wanted to fix it because it smelled like smoke, had tar on it etc. Apple is just trying to get out without fixing the mac, which i see as discrimination towards all smokers.

If there can be a class action for banned xbox's there can be a class action for discrimination towards smokers, plus in all my years of smoking and repairing pc's laptops i have never had one come in that so covered that a little cleaning didn't fix, and i never seen it get into my drives or my hardware and coat it and i would have to say i am a heavy smoker so unless that kid was smoking 12 packs a day there is no way tar did all that damage.

How many other manufacturers offer warranties that cover a machine covered in a thick layer of tar? I don't know why you believe this is a policy that is unique to Apple.

Ah Many, auto manufactures TV manufactures. Dell, Hp...The list is endless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think there will be a 27H1 for actual users of 26H1 The 25h2 supports ARM too : Snapdragon X, Snapdragon X Plus and Snapdragon X Elite
    • Poll: Grand Theft Auto VI price predictions, cast your vote by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe After years of waiting, Rockstar will be solidifying the launch date of Grand Theft Auto VI with the launch of pre-orders next week. While the studio has confirmed a date for this occasion, it is yet to attach a price to the highly anticipated game. So let's see what our readers think it will cost at launch. The Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will kick off on June 25 for digital and physical editions. Unless some last-minute changes happen, the release date will be November 19, 2026, across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. Unfortunately, there's still no information about a PC version from the developer or the publisher Take-Two. Now the question becomes, how much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost at launch? The game is predicted by some analysts to be the biggest launch of an entertainment product ever. With the amount of hype that has been built behind it and with ballooning development costs, Take-Two may price this Grand Theft Auto entry differently from other AAA titles. The current price of a AAA game is $69.99. That norm almost rose to $79.99 before calming down. But with such a massive release, Grand Theft Auto VI may be the game that pushes the boundary again. It's also possible that Take-Two keeps the price relatively low to increase the number of players that jump in early and keep them hooked on Grand Theft Auto Online to spend on microtransactions for years to come. Keep in mind that the below poll is asking for a prediction of the standard edition price, not a deluxe or any other special edition that Take-Two will introduce for additional benefits. Also, there is also the chance of the company splitting up the campaign and online portions. If you think that will happen, put your vote on what you think will be the total cost of the two. Poll Poll: How much will Grand Theft Auto VI cost? $59.99 $69.99 $79.99 $89.99 $100 or more Submit Vote If you have a very specific prediction in mind, sound off in the comments below.
    • Would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      82
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!