Smoking voids Apple warranty?


Recommended Posts

Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and one of you anti-smokers smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!
I'll take you up on it. The parameters to keep equal: volume of smoke inhaled, temperature, filtered/unfiltered. You do realise you're probably going to lose because I have a catalytic converter on my side. :)
Next they'll be saying that the flakes of dead skin and microscopic mites the float around in a PC case void your guarantee. Send em all down an 18th century coal mine, let em see what hazardous working conditions really are, bunch of vaginas.

But both are those are naturally caused and (realistically) unpreventable, just part of everyday life. Cigarettes on the other hand don't have to be smoked into the computer.

If I lay my pc down then eat over - consequently getting crumbs and coffee spillages in it - you would tell me that was my fault and Apple shouldn't repair it.

But both are those are naturally caused and (realistically) unpreventable, just part of everyday life. Cigarettes on the other hand don't have to be smoked into the computer.

If I lay my pc down then eat over - consequently getting crumbs and coffee spillages in it - you would tell me that was my fault and Apple shouldn't repair it.

Refusing to repair equipment due to the neglect of the owner is one thing, saying you won't even look at it because of nicotine stains is just whining like a little baby.

If a mobile phone gets soaked they will not even look at the fault, its presumed to be a moisture fault - no-one complains about this. But anyway by the sounds of it they did inspect it and have deemed the device failed because of tar from cigarette smoke.

She said that the computer is beyond economical repair due to tar from cigarette smoke! She said the hard drive is about to fail, the optical drive has failed and it isn't feasible to repair the computer under the warranty.
Refusing to repair equipment due to the neglect of the owner is one thing, saying you won't even look at it because of nicotine stains is just whining like a little baby.

Uhm, aren't these the exact same? Obviously they would have had to look at the machine to know that it had smoking-related damage, and the article mentions severe buildup of tar, so what's the problem?

Seems like the contract explains this just fine:

The Plan does not cover:

[...]

b Damage due to accident, abuse, neglect, misuse (including faulty installation, repair, or

maintenance by anyone other than Apple or an Apple Authorized Service Provider),

unauthorized modification, improper environment (including lack of proper

temperature or humidity), unusual physical or electrical stress or interference, failure or

fluctuation of electrical power, lightning, static electricity, fire, or acts of God;

This is like saying someone with bad teeth comes into the dentist and the dentist refuses to do the work...

Sorry, but worst example ever.

Dentists are in the business of fixing teeth, and yes you pay them to do so.

Apple on the other hand is in the business of selling computers. They only fix them when they break. They fix them when the parts in their machines fail unexpectedly under the warranty period. By unexpected I mean, under normal operating conditions the part just fails. That doesn't mean "fried because it couldn't keep itself cool, from all the tar dust packed around the CPU cooler, because you decided to smoking 12 packs a day in your house."

I wasn't referring to Apple's actions. I was referring to ruining computers in general hence why I stated "ruining computers" at the end so people wouldn't think I was referring to Apple's actions.
lol, man... you don't have to explain yourself. I was just joking. :)

How much does this guy smoke, and does he blow the smoke into the vents on the computer?

I live in a house with two smokers, and in the 10+ years I have lived with them not once has any of the computers we have had been covered in tar from cigarette smoke. Granted the longest we have had a computer without cleaning it has been maybe 6 months, with two smokers that would be roughly equivalent to a year with only one smoker, half the time mentioned in the OP....but wouldn't that still build up at least half the amount of tar/dust as the one in the OP?

Not sure how much this 21-year old smoker is smoking or where he blows his smoke, but if it got that bad in two years than its his fault, not Apple's......

EDIT: Also, aren't HDDs airtight? Why would cigarette smoke be the cause of a failing HDD?

EDIT: Also, aren't HDDs airtight? Why would cigarette smoke be the cause of a failing HDD?

No, they aren't air tight. They have at least one opening in order to equalize the pressure inside and outside. This is covered by a filter though, although it would be possible to clog that. Parts of the motor might also be exposed on the bottom of the drive. Coating it in something might also lead it to overheat (which might also be worsened indirectly by the rest of the system being too hot).

I'm with Apple on this but they do need to make their terms of warranty clearer.

Do they? The terms are only two pages and easily readable. I already quoted a relevant section.

bull****. My mother had a baseline Dell (average ventilation) for 4 years, never opened and cleaned until I finally put in a graphics card, and there was a bit of gray dust covering the fans and openings, but that was it. What people are posting is NOT normal. The difference between a PC in a smoke-free home and a home of smokers is like night and day.

bull****. My older AMD64 machine had _more_ dust inside it alongwith some soot and greasy stuff inside it. If there's anything abnormal, it's your reasoning.

Do they? The terms are only two pages and easily readable. I already quoted a relevant section.

Unfortunately not everyone is as clued up as yourself.

In a way i guess you can say by not being clued up you bring it upon yourself

ummm, those pictures you people are pretty normal for just about ever damn computer outside of the pc enthusiast world, even the ones that dont come in contact with smoke. Also, if you cant honor the warranty, dont offer it. I find it funny that some of you people would even attempt to defend apple on this.

Completely agree, word to word.

O wow, guess the computer i am working on that was in a house fire i should have a HAZMAT Suit on in a clean room with its own oxygen supply, but wait i'm a smoker so guess i'm dead already lol.

Apple is really lame for this, always wanted to get a mac just to see but seeing as i am a smoker i'll just go spend that 1500.00 bucks or more on a new PC

Apple is really lame for this, always wanted to get a mac just to see but seeing as i am a smoker i'll just go spend that 1500.00 bucks or more on a new PC

How many other manufacturers offer warranties that cover a machine covered in a thick layer of tar? I don't know why you believe this is a policy that is unique to Apple.

You're a great example of the hysteria that has been built up around cigarettes by anti-smoking groups. Listen to yourself, it sounds like you're describing Ebola. Smokers are exposed to far more nicotine for their entire lives, if it was as dangerous as the anti-smoking lobby insists it is wouldn't smokers be dropping dead after even a few days of exposure?

Fast food will kill you faster than cigarettes!

Meanwhile, I don't see OSHA classifying car exhaust as dangerous. They're letting us all be exposed to death every day. Let's do a test, I'll smoke a cigarette and one of you anti-smokers smoke a tailpipe, then you tell me which is more dangerous!

I don't smoke nor drive.

I walk 95% and if journey is more than 10 miles/ or have children with me and journey is more than 3 miles/ or it's suddenly become bad weather and the children

are with me we use the useless public transport run by Arriva.

If you want to smoke cigarettes or any tobacco product, do it in your own space.

The debate is about cigarettes leaving a stain in an Apple computer not motor vehicles.

Good on Apple. :yes: I've been asked to fix computers owned by smokers or used in smokey environments, and I flat out refuse. It's a complete mistreatment of the computer and certainly should void the warranty.

How many other manufacturers offer warranties that cover a machine covered in a thick layer of tar? I don't know why you believe this is a policy that is unique to Apple.

Acer had no problem fixing my as you would put it thick layer of tar covered laptop. Didn't hear anything about them not wanted to fix it because it smelled like smoke, had tar on it etc. Apple is just trying to get out without fixing the mac, which i see as discrimination towards all smokers.

If there can be a class action for banned xbox's there can be a class action for discrimination towards smokers, plus in all my years of smoking and repairing pc's laptops i have never had one come in that so covered that a little cleaning didn't fix, and i never seen it get into my drives or my hardware and coat it and i would have to say i am a heavy smoker so unless that kid was smoking 12 packs a day there is no way tar did all that damage.

How many other manufacturers offer warranties that cover a machine covered in a thick layer of tar? I don't know why you believe this is a policy that is unique to Apple.

Ah Many, auto manufactures TV manufactures. Dell, Hp...The list is endless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!