Bing Tries To Buy The News

[+Frank B. Subscriber²]

Bing Tries To Buy The News

Rupert Murdoch is pointing a gun to Google's head, and Microsoft is helping him pull back the trigger. For the past few weeks, Murdoch and his officers at News Corp. have been very vocal about their distaste for Google and their desire to lead other media companies in a boycott of sorts.

Murdoch keeps threatening to stop letting Google index the WSJ.com and his other media sites, and wants other news sites to join him in this self-imposed silence. The folks at Microsoft's Bing think this is a great idea. Not only that, but the FT reports that Microsoft is in fact in discussions with News Corp. and other publishers about the possibility of paying them to remove their sites from Google's search index. This report comes on the heels of a meeting in Europe where Bing dangled the prospect of premium spots in search results to publishers and outright money for search R&D.

Microsoft is not afraid to buy search market share, which is what it's doing with the Yahoo search deal and even its Cashback program. But with these latest talks, it is literally trying to buy the news, or at least exclusive access to the news.

Bing can't buy all the news, it can only buy certain brands. If Bing can somehow become the only place you can find news results and working links to the Wall Street Journal and other top papers such as the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the LA Times, for instance, that would be a big reason to switch for a lot of folks. But it's not clear how much Bing would have to pay the news companies of the world for them to give up all the traffic Google sends them in return for a fraction of that traffic and some cash.

Even Google couldn't afford to strike such deals. Says Murdoch, of Google, "If they were to pay everybody for everything they took from every newspaper in the world, and every magazine, they wouldn't have any profits left."

In order to actually make a dent in Google's market share, Bing would have to pay such exorbitant sums to so many different news companies that it would be difficult to recoup its investment. Bing certainly get some marketing buzz out of any such move, but that's about it.

The big problem with a search engine trying to buy market share by buying parts of the news is that information spreads so quickly these days, exclusives last about 30 seconds. That information will end up on a site that is indexed by Google. Or the same news will be broken by someone else on the Web before the WSJ.com even gets to it.

Exclusive indexing goes against the Web's inherent openness. Companies that try to curtail that openness don't last long on the Web.

News source: The Washington Post

[Vice]

Imagine a Microsoft Monopoly on Search and online Ads. I can hear my wallet screaming already. I'm glad that Google are the dominant player that's for sure.

[Malisk]

Classy.

[coresx]

Doesn't sound feasible.

[The_Decryptor Veteran]

"Microsoft is in fact in discussions with News Corp. and other publishers about the possibility of paying them to remove their sites from Google's search index."

Would they even be allowed to do this?

[Richard Hammond]

Let him, his "newspapers" are fit for nothing more than to line the bottom of my cat littertray.

[Pablo2008jedi]

lol, I've never purchased a news paper, and I've never read them. News comes from TV or the web.

Newspapers are nothing but advertisements!

[Saint Shiv]

lol, I've never purchased a news paper, and I've never read them. News comes from TV or the web.

Newspapers are nothing but advertisements!

There's a lot more ads and rubbish on TV than in the newspaper.

[bob_c_b]

Disregarding the fact this just sound impractical, I don't believe it. I don't really believe MS is offering cash for better search positioning and to pay off news sites to block Google. They have done some dumb stuff, but this kind of this is too obvious and they are still under oversite of several review boards and numerous lawyers. I think they are desperate to grow Bing's market, but I don't think they automatically switch to illegal tactics, but I do think it makes a great headline and drives traffic to the WP's site.

[Glowstick]

People are still getting a **** fit over Google using quotes from the articles in the search results?

[Raa]

Classy.

Classy action more like it! :laugh:

Don't see this happening, or being successful if it goes ahead.

[MrA]

People are still getting a **** fit over Google using quotes from the articles in the search results?

Yup. And these are the same idiots that have apparently never heard of robots.txt

[Growled Member]

I can't see this going over well at all with the governments who already have Microsoft under scrutiny.

[FloatingFatMan]

Let him, his "newspapers" are fit for nothing more than to line the bottom of my cat littertray.

You sure? Last time I tried that, my cat crapped on the carpet instead. :p

[Growled Member]

You sure? Last time I tried that, my cat crapped on the carpet instead. :p

Oh, now that is low. :D

[toadeater]

I can't see this going over well at all with the governments who already have Microsoft under scrutiny.

This seems to be a net neutrality issue of sorts. But I am not sure how illegal it is? There's no law that says you must allow Google to index you. However, I'm not sure that there is also any law that says Google must obey your wishes not be indexed. So I am not sure how MS intends to pull this off. Google can still legally link to the articles as long as it doesn't reprint the content.

This is making MS look very bad though. Steve Ballmer has no class.