Games 'permit' virtual war crimes


Recommended Posts

I think there needs to be a balance between what is permissible in reality and in a video game. Now if a game were to feature something as horrific and unacceptable as rape, then everybody would be all over it. However, when it comes to torture, death, and killing in the context of a "war" simulation, then everything seems permissible?

It would be ridiculous to have everything played up to the "rules" of reality, but I think there needs to be a line drawn at one point.

Just for the sake of argument, let's say a 9 year old boy got GTA and did those things like dousing priests with gasoline. And let's say the boy had no one to tell him this game was just a game and he wasn't suppose to do those things in real life. After a while wouldn't the limits blur a bit for him and might he think that there wasn't anything wrong with doing those things in real life?

A 9 year old shouldn't be playing a game rated for people over 18. This is the whole issue with video games most of the time. Irresponsible and s***ty parents blaming others: tv, games, celebrities, athletes or what have you for their lack of parenting skills.

Which games depicted war crimes? Maybe that sensationalist airport scene from MW2, but I can't think of anything else? Usually games don't even have any civilians in the combat zone at all, just empty houses you can run around shooting your friends in.

i think that this thread wouldnt exist if it werent for that level...

^Am I the only one who enjoyed that level? It was stress relief! But saying that, it doesn't mean that next time I go to work at the airport I am going to bring in a AK47 and kill a few people. It's not the game that is the issue here, its the level of parenting which the kids of today are not getting. Back in my day, a whole 19 years ago, I was told what was right and what was wrong, these days it seems that parents just let kids get on with it. It's ridiculous, there are a load of do gooders which wont let parents control there kids and laws which don't have any justice. If you want to lower crime, publicly execute a few of these ******* carrying weapons on the streets and the level of crime will soon decrease.

But back to the topic in hand, its a load of ******** saying that you can't have games which permit anything illegal in the real world, the whole point we play these games is so that we can do something we can't do in the real world. The games have ratings to prevent children playing them, its not the game manufacturers fault if some poor parenting allows a children to get the game.

^Am I the only one who enjoyed that level? It was stress relief! But saying that, it doesn't mean that next time I go to work at the airport I am going to bring in a AK47 and kill a few people. It's not the game that is the issue here, its the level of parenting which the kids of today are not getting. Back in my day, a whole 19 years ago, I was told what was right and what was wrong, these days it seems that parents just let kids get on with it. It's ridiculous, there are a load of do gooders which wont let parents control there kids and laws which don't have any justice. If you want to lower crime, publicly execute a few of these ******* carrying weapons on the streets and the level of crime will soon decrease.

But back to the topic in hand, its a load of ******** saying that you can't have games which permit anything illegal in the real world, the whole point we play these games is so that we can do something we can't do in the real world. The games have ratings to prevent children playing them, its not the game manufacturers fault if some poor parenting allows a children to get the game.

Exactly. I too enjoyed the level. I wasn't bothered by it all. As far as I was concerned I was shooting at targets on a screen that don't actually exist apart from in the bits of data held in my computer's RAM.

I like to think that I'm a good person. Like yourself, my parents also taught me right from wrong. And I shall teach my own children one day. But this is a game. The whole point of games is to be able to do things you can't or won't do in real life. I will not shoot civilians in real life. But I will shoot targets on a screen when I'm not actually hurting anyone.

In the game, you haven't hurt anyone.

You haven't committed any crimes.

You haven't left thousands of families and friends without their loved ones.

It's not real.

I'm all about the "other media" arguement.

I went to see the new Rambo movie. Know what I DIDN'T see? A sanctimonious group outside the theatre throwing

stones at all the "murders" coming out of the movie obviously on their way to commit the crimes they just experienced in

the flick.

I read "Of Mice and Men" in high school... no-one accused me of wanting to go out and shoot retards in the back of the head.

I'm looking forward to the Star Trek or The Island days when we can actively take out our aggressions virtually without

causing physical harm. Well, at least somewhat. One thing I have to say about physical sports (especially as a guy) is

that I certainly didn't grow up to be a sissy after playing games like dodgeball, tackle football and rugby... and I'm pretty

sure I've stayed in great health because of it, too.

reason why their are movies and games.

Movies are far worse influence I think. Games are just animations. Movies actually have real actors and whatnot. Only reason why this is a such a big deal is because kids now dont have a reality and follow their game reality because they are retarded and their parent's dont teach them reality.

Human rights groups played various games to see if any broke humanitarian laws that govern what is a war crime.

How can there be humanitarian laws for pixels?

The study condemned the games for violating laws by letting players kill civilians, torture captives and wantonly destroy homes and buildings.

What laws are being violated by eradicating pixels?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!