SBS 2003 - Required DNS Records?


Recommended Posts

Hello,

Im trying to setup a test version of SBS 2003 R2, using VMware Workstation 7 (Windows 7 x64 is the host).

I have gone through the install fine, i then went on to using the configuartion wizards to set up email, VPN and RWW. In the connect to internet and email wizard, i created the web server certificate as: servername.domain.co.uk

I have set up appropiate port forwarding rules in my router (Netgear DG834PN).

I set up the SBS VM with the, say, domain.local. The domain that i want to use with this (for email, VPN and RWW) is domain.co.uk. On the host where domain.co.uk is hosted, i have setup the following DNS records (see attached).

First of all, do these look correct? Do i need any more?

Can someone explain, the @ in the MX record (and the @ in the A record)? Further, i do not see understand if i have to have my mail.domain.co.uk match my servername.domain.co.uk - does that make sense?

Sorry for the confusing question, please ask anything that i didnt make clear.

Cheers

post-225317-1259089090_thumb.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/848850-sbs-2003-required-dns-records/
Share on other sites

The broken english is a little hard to understand when asking a question. I will answer to the best of my understanding the way the questions were asked.

Everything looks fine with your DNS, you don't need any more entries. VPN, mail, and webmail are all going to go through your mail.x.x.

MX record = Mail eXchange, this is how the internet knows where to route mail. The MX record has to point to an A record. The @ is your main domain ip address, if you just type in domain.co.uk it will direct to that IP Address.

"Further, i do not see understand if i have to have my mail.domain.co.uk match my servername.domain.co.uk - does that make sense?" <---- I don't really understand this question but will give it my best, The A record is just a friendly name on the internet, it has absolutly nothing to do with your internal naming conventions. In otherwords, it does not have to match your computer name as it doesn't resolve to an internal address, it resolves to your external address (external to your network or vmware network).

Hi,

Thanks for the reply (and appologies for the confusion in my question). The problem is i was just not sure what was wrong!

I understand the DNS record setup now (i think!). What i was trying to ask was whether in the SBS CEICW, where you create the webserver certificate and have to supply the FQDN of the server, does this (say servername.domain.co.uk) have to match what you have setup the MX record as. I now undertsand that the FQDN that you set in the CEICW is kinda arbitrary, because as long as you setup a matching A record in the DNS then it will all be fine to access RWW etc (so you can then have a separate MX record, say mail.domain.co.uk for mail - as long as that also has a matching A record to the external IP).

I have attached a screenshot of my new DNS records for clarity (78.xxx.xxx.xxx is the external IP of the router. 195.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP used for web hosting - which is unrelated to any of this)

Now the problem... When i type: https://portal.domain.co.uk/remote all i get is a Server Not Responding page. I have setup the port forwarding correctly (i believe), as when i try to reach this address, i then see a log entry in the router control panel along the line of:

Wed, 2009-11-25 19:55:34 - TCP Packet - Source:192.168.0.2,63874 Destination:78.***.***.***,443 - [HTTPS rule match]

So the DNS is obviously routing correctly. Ive confirmed the internal IP of the server (192.168.0.10) is set, and this matches the port forwarding rules. Ive disabled the firewall on the Windows 7 host, and the SBS 2003 guest doesnt have a firewall becuase it only has one NIC (?). So why doesnt it work?!

Once again, sorry for the long windedness and any confusion i am / have caused!

post-225317-1259179574_thumb.png

You will need to have your certificate reflect the outside fqdn. If you want you can have the inside fqdn so you don't get the certificate errors on the inside of the network, completely up to you in this regard if only a select amout of users are going to be accessing it from the inside.

If you are trying to access the server from the inside (behind the firewall) with the outside address (trying to go out the in or in the out, however way you want to see it), your router is going to have an issue with that. It drops the packet. Easiest way is to make a dns forward entry for domain.co.uk and an A record under that for portal pointing to the internal ip address.

Thanks for the reply.

I appreciate what you say about trying to access the VM inside the router (loopback?) Anyways, i tried on a couple of other computers (not behind the router) and the request still times out... yet i still get the requests logged in the router? For example:

Thu, 2009-11-26 22:50:06 - TCP Packet - Source:87.127.***.***,52785 Destination:78.***.***.***,443 - [HTTPS rule match] - source is not inside the network!

My port forwarding rules are correct, and the 192.168.0.10 that they forward to (the server) is the IP of the server - what am i missing?!

It has to be outside the inside interface of the router. In other words on the public ip segment. If you want it to answer behind the router, any pc behind the router not just behind the vmware server virtual ip range, you would have to put it in the internal DNS server.

I am attaching a very crude drawing but this is basically what you are trying to accomplish, and it is failing on coming back into the router.

post-118098-1259288857_thumb.jpg

Edited by sc302

Hey

I really appreciate all the help but I finally managed to crack it! I was going crazy because I knew my port forwarding rules were set up correctly, so I simply went to a previous snap shot of the SBS VM (before I ran CEICW) and ran it once more and suddenly every thing worked! Looks like rerunning the wizard over and over isn't the thing to do!

On a side note, just curious about how I would go

about setting up some dns so users could type:

owa.domain.co.uk and being sent to portal.domain.co.uk/reomote

rww.domain.co.uk and being sent to portal.domain.co.uk/exchange

Can this be done? Does it require CNAMEs?

Thanks again for all your help. Much appreciated.

I am assuming that you have an internal dns server (if you are using AD you have to), Put in another forward zone matching your external domain name, then put in an a record for portal, owa, and rww. it is not going to default to the subdirectory exchange or remote. you could put in a webpage at portal that has the links pointing to exchange or remote. You can have the default web page automatically point to one or the other when the page is hit, but that is about it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung messages is still alive and well. They reversed that and decided to our more effort into it.
    • I think every American should have a course in a 'dry sense of humour' at school; and perhaps 'using sarcasm in jest' oh, and also 'the use or irony in humour'.
    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!