Resistance 2 is a bad game


Recommended Posts

I have no idea how this game got such good ratings. I just got it for free and played through it. It felt incredibly generic.

First, the graphics are pretty ugly looking. Most of the art is bland. The only part I felt that actually looked good was the Chicago level. I'm playing on a 46" Sony KDL-46W3000 so it's not my TV. I can't believe this game was even compared to Gears 2 by some. That level where you get ambushed and there's smoke everywhere looked AWFUL (I think it was the second level).

Second, the story was so boring and uninspired, after the first level, you don't even care what's going on anymore. Voice acting was average at best.

Third, AI is poorly balanced. Enemy AI always comes charging at you and often ignores anyone else, even when you have 5 guys with you. They can strafe and hit you with every shot, which is ridiculous. Your screen ends up red almost every time there's an encounter, regardless of how quickly you can stand up, shoot, and crouch again. I also think how long your screen stays red is too long. I was playing this on normal difficulty and I'm not some FPS noob either. I got through MW and MW2 on veteran.

Now onto team mate AI. This is probably the worst I've seen in any game. They'll run by enemies without even firing at them - causing you to get killed or attacked from behind because you assume it's clear. They'll also jump out in front of shots you take for no reason. Example: I'm behind a wall, sights down about to shoot and my team mate keeps doing his stupid peek animation and blocks my shots. Trying to shoot down those spider robots (stalkers?) with a LAARK when your idiotic team mates do this is just frustrating.

And then there's the level design of the game where it almost seems like you HAVE to die at certain parts just to know what's coming ahead. The first time you encounter a chameleon and you have no idea what the hell you were supposed to do. The times you encounter them when they come out 3 in a row in split seconds. When enemies spawn through a door on your left only after you trigger them to spawn. Ugh.

Multiplayer was okay. 60 players is cool I guess but felt almost as generic as the game itself. Haven't tried co-op though.

Anyone else feel like this game was massively overrated? It doesn't even come close to GoW (either of them) IMO. By the end, I beat it just for the sake of beating it. Now I can finally get started on Uncharted 2 next.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/852486-resistance-2-is-a-bad-game/
Share on other sites

You played and completed MW2, and then went back and played R2?

I recommend playing co-op, btw. It's where I spent most of my time on the game.

Honestly though, it's been so long since I played R2 (that's about 10 games ago for me) that I can't really remember too much about it in comparison to other FPS games that I own. I did enjoy it at the time, though.

I actually liked it simply because it was a throwback to older FPS's I thought. It is very much a generic shooter, but I thought it was done decent enough to the point it was overall a fun experience. Does definitely get a bit repetitive as well, but it was not awful in my opinion. It was just okay. So yeah, might be overrated so to speak, but I also agree with the above. Check out the Co Op, to me it was the best part of it.

Pretty generic game for sure, but I was desperate for a game to play at the time (this was during the summer) that I actually ended up playing through all of it. I suppose it's telling that my memories of the game are all quite vague at this point (for instance, I do recall fighting some giant... thing while standing on a rooftop, but that's about it).

It's weird, though. All of my friends were going on and on about how great the multiplayer was (adversarial that is, I never tried the co-op), and I didn't even enjoy it. The idea of large 32-man games sounded cool, but once I actually jumped into a server, it was just a gigantic mess. I didn't feel like anything I was doing in the match had any impact whatsoever on the outcome. Maybe the smaller games are more fun, but I didn't stick around long enough to find out.

If I can go back in time, I would have probably just rented it or borrowed it from a friend. I think that calling it a "bad game" is a stretch for sure. It's an average game, and more than anything else, it was just a victim of its own hype (kinda like Doom 3 when you think about it).

Pretty generic game for sure, but I was desperate for a game to play at the time (this was during the summer) that I actually ended up playing through all of it. I suppose it's telling that my memories of the game are all quite vague at this point (for instance, I do recall fighting some giant... thing while standing on a rooftop, but that's about it).

It's weird, though. All of my friends were going on and on about how great the multiplayer was (adversarial that is, I never tried the co-op), and I didn't even enjoy it. The idea of large 32-man games sounded cool, but once I actually jumped into a server, it was just a gigantic mess. I didn't feel like anything I was doing in the match had any impact whatsoever on the outcome. Maybe the smaller games are more fun, but I didn't stick around long enough to find out.

If I can go back in time, I would have probably just rented it or borrowed it from a friend. I think that calling it a "bad game" is a stretch for sure. It's an average game, and more than anything else, it was just a victim of its own hype (kinda like Doom 3 when you think about it).

Completely agree with you about multiplayer. The 60 player games especially feel like everything you're doing is pointless.

I suppose it is more of an average game than a "bad" game but that's kinda why I made this thread. I'm just not sure how it got or even deserved 9.5 or 9.0 from IGN and Gamespot respectively. If I had paid full price ($59.99 CAD) for this game, I'd be ****ed.

The first game was mega-generic but I needed something to play on my PS3. I didn't get the second one until last summer and I forced myself to finish it at some points, but I would not go so far as to call it awful, just something you had done many times before. That said, I'll agree with some other people, I remember very few specifics and there were really no "wow" moments.

It's the case with a lot of PS3 first party exclusives this generation, I've treid to enjoy them but there is a level of "generic" feel that permeates them all. KZ2 multiplayer was pretty good, but hardly original (but they did steal the "Best Use of Brown in a Video Game" trophy from iD finally). inFamous came out of the gate strong but got reptetive pretty quick and the morality choices were bunk (and all depth was based on a forced replay where you just did the opposite of what you did the first play through). I really wanted to love these games when they first cameout, but the lack staying power or a need for a second playthrough. Uncharted is the PS3s "exclusive" saving grace, and only then if you enjoy (which I do) the very pulp novel story lines and hammy characters. If that is not your thing, it's not so great. This is why my excitement for Heavy Rain and God of War 3 have been a bit tempered, but I'd love to be wrong.

I'm going to give R2 a little love. Too much hate. I really liked the game. Not the best game but I enjoyed it. Anyone that have me on the friend list can tell I was playing it almost every day. Loved the coop mode. Completed Soldier at Lvl 30 in coop and started coop with Medic but didn't get to lvl 30 because I switched to MP. :p

I'm going to give R2 a little love. Too much hate. I really liked the game. Not the best game but I enjoyed it. Anyone that have me on the friend list can tell I was playing it almost every day. Loved the coop mode. Completed Soldier at Lvl 30 in coop and started coop with Medic but didn't get to lvl 30 because I switched to MP. :p

+1

I enjoyed it too, I spent most of my online time in co-op where a bunch of us had good fun.

And the single player wasnt amazing, but it was better than a lot of horrific games that come out, i enjoyed it for what it was.

Speaking of Resistance Kol, I was talking to L3thalSaber (right name spelling? lol) the other day and said if a Resistance 3 comes out we have to get it if there is still that fun loving co-op action fun.

Oh, and he says you should get Boarderlands, I've put it on my list for Xmas. :D

And we will have to try the spec-ops again sometime next week.

+1

I enjoyed it too, I spent most of my online time in co-op where a bunch of us had good fun.

And the single player wasnt amazing, but it was better than a lot of horrific games that come out, i enjoyed it for what it was.

Speaking of Resistance Kol, I was talking to L3thalSaber (right name spelling? lol) the other day and said if a Resistance 3 comes out we have to get it if there is still that fun loving co-op action fun.

Oh, and he says you should get Boarderlands, I've put it on my list for Xmas. :D

And we will have to try the spec-ops again sometime next week.

Yeah we had fun and never had lag like some new games (MW2 I'm looking at you :p)

Yeah I was thinking about getting Borderlands but i have to get AC2 first. Maybe I'll get both after Christmas.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now comes with a money back guarantee instead of a replacement! Hah
    • Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2391 Beta changelog: Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 by Razvan Serea Media Player Classic - Home Cinema (MPC-HC) is a free and open-source video and audio player for Windows. MPC-HC is based on the original Guliverkli project (which is no longer maintained) and contains many additional features and bug fixes. As the continuation of the original Media Player Classic, MPC-HC isn’t flashy but it works with nearly any media format. MPC-HC uses DXVA technology to pass decoding operations to your modern video card, enhancing your viewing experience. And MPC-HC supports both physical and software DVDs with menus, chapter navigation, and subtitles. Overview of features A lot of people seem to be unaware of some of the awesome features that have been added to MPC-HC in the past years. Here is a list of useful options and features that everyone should know about: Dark interface Menu > View > Dark Theme When using dark theme it is also possible to change the height of the seekbar and size of the toolbar buttons. Options > Advanced Video preview on the seekbar Options > Tweaks > Show preview on seek bar Adjust playback speed Menu > Play > Playback rate The buttons in the player that control playback rate take a 2x step by default. This can be customized to smaller values (like 10%): Options > Playback > Speed step Adjusting playback speed works best with the internal audio renderer. This also has automatic pitch correction. Options > Playback > Output > Audio Renderer MPC-HC can remember playback position, so you can resume from that point later Options > Player > History You can quickly seek through a video with Ctrl + Mouse Scrollwheel. You can jump to next/previous file in a folder by pressing PageUp/PageDown. You can perform automatic actions at end of file. For example to go to next file or close player. Options > Playback > After Playback (permanent setting) Menu > Play > After Playback (for current file only) A-B repeat - You can loop a segment of a video. Press [ and ] to set start and stop markers. You can rotate/flip/mirror/stretch/zoom the video Menu > View > Pan&Scan This is also easily done with hotkeys (see below). There are lots of keyboard hotkeys and mouse actions to control the player. They can be customized as well. Options > Player > Keys Tip: there is a search box above the table. You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites You can stream videos directly from Youtube and many other video websites Put yt-dlp.exe or youtube-dl.exe in the MPC-HC installation folder. Then you can open website URLs in the player: Menu > File > Open File/URL You can even download those videos: Menu > File > Save a copy Tip: to be able to download in best quality with yt-dlp/youtube-dl, it is recommended to also put ffmpeg.exe in the MPC-HC folder. Several YDL configuration options are found here: Options > Advanced This includes an option to specify the location of the .exe in case you don't want to put it in MPC-HC folder. Play HDR video This requires using madVR or MPC Video Renderer. After installation these renderers can be selected here: Options > Playback > Output Ability to search for and download subtitles, either automatically or manually (press D): Options > Subtitles > Misc Besides all these (new) features, there have also been many bugfixes and internal improvements in the player in the past years that give better performance and stability. It also has updated internal codecs. Support was added for CUE sheets, WebVTT subtitles, etc. Media Player Classic - Home Cinema 2.7.3 changelog: Updated LAV Filters to version 0.82 Updated MPC Video Renderer to version 0.10.4.2550 Updated MPC Audio Renderer A few crash fixes, bug fixes and small improvements. Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x64) | Standalone | ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: MPC-HC 2.7.3 (x86) | Standalone Links: MPC-HC Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account by Usama Jawad As things currently stand, Microsoft Edge only allows you to sign in to the browser with a Microsoft Account (MSA). This allows you to sync your browser settings and other data across other devices, as long as you sign in with the same account. However, Microsoft is now modifying this mechanism in a way that will likely please many users. In an update to its Microsoft 365 Roadmap, Microsoft has indicated that it will soon let users sign into Edge using a Google account from the profile menu and the Edge sign-in screen. This will be in addition to the MSA login option, and it opens up new doors for people who prefer using Edge, but cannot be bothered to configure a Microsoft account. This brings several advantages such as the ability to sync your data across devices using just a Google account. It may even facilitate flexible single sign-on (SSO) experiences where you can quickly login to websites and services through a single Google account that is presented as the preferred sign-in option. Up until now, Microsoft allowed customers to indirectly use a Google account, by configuring a Google account as a Microsoft account, or by setting up a one-way sync option between Edge and Chrome. This is a rather interesting development, especially considering that Google Chrome still limits you to a Google account sign-in, but it will be interesting to see if the company reciprocates Microsoft's gesture in the future. This is not the only recent instance in which Microsoft has extended a handshake to Google via Edge. In April 2026, it began tracking the development of a work search banner for Google Search queries, just like the one present in Edge. However, if we go back almost seven years, to January 2020, Microsoft had emphasized that it had no plans to "integrate Google services into Microsoft Edge by default", in response to people requesting Google sign-in services on Edge. Fast-forward to today, and Microsoft is planning to release this feature in July 2026, with IT admins having the option to control its availability on Windows and macOS through the NonMicrosoftAccountSignInEnabled policy.
    • If they ever come out and say the AI is no longer accessible to the gen pop people aren't going to know how to tie their own shoelaces.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!