features you disabled in Windows 7 and why?


Recommended Posts

Fail.

On what grounds? You said there were no alternatives when clearly there are.

XP will scroll a list-view with 20,000 items 10,000,000 times three milliseconds faster than 7.

Why not use XP then since your wasting your time and money by attempting to turn 7 into something it's not.

Fail.

How is that fail? They are desktop search replacements.

I honestly don't see what the negativity towards the new search is. I use it all the time to find files. Hell, I don't even open explorer anymore. I just type the file name into search and open that way and also use it to find files by type, date, etc.

Those do not replace Windows Search, those do not integrate themselves into Windows Explorer. I am talking about something that replaces Windows Search functionality (see top right corner of your Windows Explorer)

EDIT 1 & 2:

There are plenty of fast search alternatives otherwise.

Just finding one that makes itself part of and/or replaces part of Windows Explorer is hard.

Looking through the link you gave me, it seemed obvious that these were not what I was talking about.

Edited by Udedenkz
Replace explorer then with something else or um, go back to XP?

One shouldn't be forced to use an older OS because the new one they bought had broken features that once worked in older versions.

Microsoft was so focused on being more like OSX with their search function that they killed so much of the usability with it. The fact that one has to go digging in help files or googling how to use the features of the search function is a sign that it's far too obscure for daily usage. Ever since XP SP3, microsoft has gone out of their way to pile on more **** and more garbage while reducing functionality (apparently they don't understand the "less is more" concept). Libraries are completely unneeded. We do not need to give average computer users the ability to create and use symbolic links. They're confused enough as it is where **** is on their computer. And we really need to do away with DEP, UAC, and all these other hand-holding mechanisms. Don't dumb down the OS, make the user smarter.

Granted, I skipped Vista and went from XP/2k3 right to Win7. So I didn't have that transitional period like many did. So maybe that has a part in it. But my experiences with Win7's search aren't isolated to just me. The search and indexing functions just aren't working how they should. Period. And honestly, the only reason I didn't keep 2k3 as my desktop OS is because I had to fight my ass off to get itunes to work on it, and even then, it didn't work right (the latest versions refuse to install on 2k3). I figured they'd at least keep supporting 2k3 for a while after xp was dead considering it's a server OS.

Libraries are completely unneeded. We do not need to give average computer users the ability to create and use symbolic links. They're confused enough as it is where **** is on their computer. And we really need to do away with DEP, UAC, and all these other hand-holding mechanisms. Don't dumb down the OS, make the user smarter.

You contradicted yourself and lost any credibility you had with those statements. It's obvious you have no idea what Libraries are. Suggesting that they do away with DEP and UAC is a completely moronic idea. Please, stop and think before you type your next post.

DEP and UAC are "hand-holding mechanisms"? Ah, that's hilarious.

In any case, a lot of you have to stop and think for a moment: Microsoft do not design an OS specifically around you, They design it around what works best for the vast majority of people. They are also in a hell of a lot better position to 1) understand how the OS works 2) get feedback from all sectors of their customer base 3) prototype/test/deploy various solutions and see how they perform. It's not, as surprising as some of you may wish to believe, a bunch of monkeys typing Hamlet.

Aah! so much ignorance in this thread. All these "modders" and "tweakers" make me look smarter! :p

I disabled Homegroup and Libraries in explorer so it only shows Favorites, Computer and Network down the left side :)

If you disabled Libraries, then make sure your folders are added to indexed locations. Windows search will be really slow if your folders are not indexed.

One shouldn't be forced to use an older OS because the new one they bought had broken features that once worked in older versions.

And what exactly is broken in Windows 7? If you move two generations up, and you already know that the driver compatibility broke with Vista for safety reasons, then you should be smart enough to know that not all XP programs will function correctly.

Microsoft was so focused on being more like OSX with their search function that they killed so much of the usability with it.

Wrong, you're so focused on making it out to be an OSX copy that all you're doing is copying the Apple fanboy speeches on it. OMG WINDOWS SHRINK INTO THE CENTER WHEN CLOSE THEM OS X RIPOFF OMGOMGOMGOMG. Sheesh. Aero Peek. Superbar. That's it. That's all there is "new" as far as eye-candy goes, they didn't totally revamp the whole thing.

The fact that one has to go digging in help files or googling how to use the features of the search function is a sign that it's far too obscure for daily usage.

"Digging" through help files is not a sign of weakness or bad programming. Have you even LOOKED at the help files? They're geared towards totally new computer users who see a Question Mark button on the application they are on and they want to learn how to use it. Sheesh. Power-user arrogance (I call it PUA).

Ever since XP SP3, microsoft has gone out of their way to pile on more **** and more garbage while reducing functionality (apparently they don't understand the "less is more" concept). Libraries are completely unneeded. We do not need to give average computer users the ability to create and use symbolic links. They're confused enough as it is where **** is on their computer. And we really need to do away with DEP, UAC, and all these other hand-holding mechanisms. Don't dumb down the OS, make the user smarter.

<Snipped> What do you mean "piling on more garbage while reducing functionality"? Try installing a wireless printer out of the box on Windows XP. And then do it on 7. XP will take forever because you have to install third party bull**** which came with your printer and you have to wait for it to install, then it will find the printer on your network and only THEN will it be wireless, and first you have to connect it physically to begin with to install. On Windows 7, I don't even need to connect to a new printer via USB. I click Start, I type "Add A Printer", I select network printer, and it finds the printer, installs it, sets it as default if I wish, and prints a test page all with a few clicks, and all in the time it takes for your XP computer just to launch the installer for your crappy OEM printer apps. Again, PUA right there.

What do you mean "symbolic links"? Are you really this stupid? Do you even know what Libraries are for? They are collections, you dimwit. Not some rocket-science method of organization, just a collection. Instead of having many Picture folders scattered on your computer, you just add all those picture folders to the Pictures library, so no matter where the folder is physically, if you drop a picture into one of those folders, it will show in your library, consolidating where you keep everything. Applications which utilize this (Such as Picasa) make it a lot easier to archive all your pictures regardless of where you are.

Ha. DEP and UAC are quite important. I doubt you even know what DEP is, based on the fact you don't think it should exist. The average user will almost never see or hear of DEP while they use Windows 7. As for UAC, it's simple, it detects if a program requires elevated privileges to access your Windows/Program files directory or has to perform other system operations. Why? Because if for some reason some sort of freeware Painting program is asking you for rights, you immediately know something is up. In XP, anyone could embed a virus into a common program and put it up as a mirror and it would gladly run in the background and steal all your private files without you even noticing a thing.

Granted, I skipped Vista and went from XP/2k3 right to Win7.

Yeaaaaah. That explains a lot.

So I didn't have that transitional period like many did. So maybe that has a part in it. But my experiences with Win7's search aren't isolated to just me.

You're right, it's not just isolated to you, it's isolated to the many other archaic XP users who are just too stubborn to embrace new technology.

The search and indexing functions just aren't working how they should. Period.

No, they're working just how they should. Period. What they aren't doing is working how YOU want them to, there's a difference.

And honestly, the only reason I didn't keep 2k3 as my desktop OS is because I had to fight my ass off to get itunes to work on it, and even then, it didn't work right (the latest versions refuse to install on 2k3). I figured they'd at least keep supporting 2k3 for a while after xp was dead considering it's a server OS.

So...after categorically insulting Windows 7 and Microsoft, you're admitting that your XP-based Operating System is flawed because it can't run the most basic of applications, a multi-media management suite? That's written by Apple? Ha, you kiddies are hilarious.

Have fun.

Edited by Anaron
One shouldn't be forced to use an older OS because the new one they bought had broken features that once worked in older versions.

By all means, stick with XP, or Windows 98, or DOS if you want. The rest of us really don't care about your inability to adapt and learn.

And we really need to do away with DEP, UAC, and all these other hand-holding mechanisms. Don't dumb down the OS, make the user smarter.

I suppose seat-belts and helmets also fall into this category. Obviously you don't use them because it's not like you're stupid enough to crash your car or bike, right? You must also remove the locks from your doors, after all, you have no intention of inviting someone into your house to steal your property. Yup, that's pretty smart of you. :rolleyes:

lol, the fanboys have come out to play.

The OS should provide functionality and ease of use as goal number 1. The features of the OS itself should be laid out clearly not hidden under obscure categorizations (control panel since WinXP) or simple lack of information (Win7 search). The search in Win7 is a great example of a failure to do this. I know I keep harping on this but some of you seem to act like it gives you handjobs every time it finds a file. I haven't had that experience and neither have people I've worked with on projects. It constantly FAILS to find what you're looking for where when the same project (it's directories and folders) are brought onto a Win2k3 box and searched again, they are found just fine and fast.

Libraries are forced on the user, both in the nav pane and the start menu. They operate pretty much exactly like symbolic links in that they are manipulated as directories and whatnot. And they are completely unneeded. Who cares if you have a lot of picture files stored through out your computer? Encourage users to be more organized, not give them a work around for being lazy. That also complicates matters when backing things up because users aren't aware of where their files really are most of the time.

UAC and DEP are unneeded. DEP is simply retarded. No normal user is going to sit there and read the warning it throws up. They want to run that program and they are so used to clicking ok, and next, and I accept that they don't pay attention to the majority of the **** that flies across their screen. What's the point of adding a seatbelt if the majority of people simply skip it? And UAC isn't doing anything for anyone these days. It's the same **** with DEP really. People are going to want to launch/run a program and will go through the steps of getting it to run even if it means compromising system security.

Edit: To LiquidSolstice, the limitation implemented that wouldn't allow itunes to run on 2k3 was put in by Appe, NOT microsoft. They intentionally left it out of their allowed OS' in the MSI files so you have to do some hackery to get things working. But even editing the main MSI files won't fix it completely. Previous versions of itunes ran just fine on 2k3 so it was simply apple not wanting to support that product on that OS anymore. It wasn't a limitation of the OS itself.

Edited by ToastGodSupreme
You are officially an idiot. What do you mean "piling on more garbage while reducing functionality"? Try installing a wireless printer out of the box on Windows XP. And then do it on 7. XP will take forever because you have to install third party bull**** which came with your printer and you have to wait for it to install, then it will find the printer on your network and only THEN will it be wireless, and first you have to connect it physically to begin with to install. On Windows 7, I don't even need to connect to a new printer via USB. I click Start, I type "Add A Printer", I select network printer, and it finds the printer, installs it, sets it as default if I wish, and prints a test page all with a few clicks, and all in the time it takes for your XP computer just to launch the installer for your crappy OEM printer apps. Again, PUA right there.

While I'm happy for you, I personally had to download a 300MB driver from HP to get my network printer to work. You can't make blanket statements like that.

Ha. DEP and UAC are quite important. I doubt you even know what DEP is, based on the fact you don't think it should exist. The average user will almost never see or hear of DEP while they use Windows 7. As for UAC, it's simple, it detects if a program requires elevated privileges to access your Windows/Program files directory or has to perform other system operations. Why? Because if for some reason some sort of freeware Painting program is asking you for rights, you immediately know something is up. In XP, anyone could embed a virus into a common program and put it up as a mirror and it would gladly run in the background and steal all your private files without you even noticing a thing.

That is a dangerous misconception spread by those that don't understand the subject. Anyone can embed malicious code in programs with 7 as well. UAC only prevents non-malicious software from gaining administrator rights. If a program you were installing on 7 had a virus, you would still click yes to the UAC prompt and give it administrator acess. Not just that, but a program really does not need administrator access at all to steal all your files, spy on you, make you part of a botnet, and so on. It can do all these things without ever triggering a UAC prompt. Having administrator rights is just a bonus, and if your malicious program is running as standard user it can actually hijack what you believe to be legitimate elevations and gain admin rights that way. Heck, this can even be as simple as just watching your downloads and replace the installer you were downloading with something malicious. You won't know. All you see in the prompt is "setup.exe." There is not enough detail to make an informed decision, and it is not a security barrier.

The second you run any code at all, you need to consider your system potentially compromised. It's that simple.

UAC and DEP are unneeded. DEP is simply retarded. No normal user is going to sit there and read the warning it throws up. They want to run that program and they are so used to clicking ok, and next, and I accept that they don't pay attention to the majority of the **** that flies across their screen. What's the point of adding a seatbelt if the majority of people simply skip it? And UAC isn't doing anything for anyone these days. It's the same **** with DEP really. People are going to want to launch/run a program and will go through the steps of getting it to run even if it means compromising system security.

You are confusing DEP with Administrator Approval Mode, which is the part of UAC that gives you the prompts. DEP is a feature that lets you mark pages of memory as either containing code or data, and is an important security feature implemented by all modern operating systems. You really don't want to disable this, and the protection it offers is something you cannot replicate yourself with any amount of common sense or experience, as it is related to bugs in software that will be unknown to you.

I have indeed googled on how to use the current search - luckily all I need to know is "ext:"

DEP never did anything for me, positive or negative. Having it on or off seems to have no effect at all. Although, DEP = Data Execution Prevention - **** sounds serious.

I found UAC to be irrelevant. Using brain is a better option.

Come to think of it, I use libraries just like normal folders - so - their functionality is irrelevant to me. I have all my movies in one folder, all my downloads in one folder, etc.

For me comparing Windows 7 Search vs Classic Search is like Comparing Windows 7 Copy/Move GUI vs TeraCopy GUI.

Windows 2003 is XP pretty much. Slightly newer I think. Drivers and whatnot that worked on XP will work on 2003. Apple = @$$holes is a long standing fact.

lol, the fanboys have come out to play.

The OS should provide functionality and ease of use as goal number 1. The features of the OS itself should be laid out clearly not hidden under obscure categorizations (control panel since WinXP) or simple lack of information (Win7 search). The search in Win7 is a great example of a failure to do this. I know I keep harping on this but some of you seem to act like it gives you handjobs every time it finds a file. I haven't had that experience and neither have people I've worked with on projects. It constantly FAILS to find what you're looking for where when the same project (it's directories and folders) are brought onto a Win2k3 box and searched again, they are found just fine and fast.

I've yet to have ANY issues finding ANYTHING with Windows Search in either Vista or 7. Anything I need to search for, be it a phrase in a file, or a certain bitrate of mp3s, it finds instantly. Which is something XP never could do.

Libraries are forced on the user, both in the nav pane and the start menu. They operate pretty much exactly like symbolic links in that they are manipulated as directories and whatnot. And they are completely unneeded. Who cares if you have a lot of picture files stored through out your computer? Encourage users to be more organized, not give them a work around for being lazy. That also complicates matters when backing things up because users aren't aware of where their files really are most of the time.

Libraries definitely aren't "exactly like symbolic links". They actually provide a decent way to keep your files backed up. I keep everything on external drives and just add them to my Libraries and set them as the default. Here's something to consider: What's organized to you isn't organized to someone else, and vice versa. So, with that in mind, why should MS encourage users to be "organized"?

UAC and DEP are unneeded. DEP is simply retarded. No normal user is going to sit there and read the warning it throws up. They want to run that program and they are so used to clicking ok, and next, and I accept that they don't pay attention to the majority of the **** that flies across their screen. What's the point of adding a seatbelt if the majority of people simply skip it? And UAC isn't doing anything for anyone these days. It's the same **** with DEP really. People are going to want to launch/run a program and will go through the steps of getting it to run even if it means compromising system security.

Stop talking about DEP like you have a remote clue as to what it is. You act like it's similar to UAC, when it's been in Windows since XP SP2. I suggest you look it up before continuing to embarrass yourself.

UAC is nothing like a seatbelt, or even a locked door. Yes, people will launch said application, but only if they're aware of what it does. Trust me, UAC works to make people aware of what's being ran on their on their pc's. I know from personal experience as well as second hand experience where people click "No" to a program they're unsure of. People, including me, like the fact UAC lets them know what's going on with their computers. It's like a home security system. Wouldn't you like to know when someone is intruding into your home? UAC also makes it easier to run limited accounts, and that's a damn good thing considering limited accounts were pretty much useless on XP.

I found UAC to be irrelevant. Using brain is a better option.

If using a brain is a better option, that would include keeping UAC enabled. Read my above statements.

UAC - ugh... thanks, but I know what I do on my computer and I never had problems e.g. on XP or before that UAC would have prevented

Firewall - *yawn* couldn't care less about win f/w tbh...

Backup - Windows is actually just my Gaming OS, my main OS is Snow Leopard and both run backupless.

My external HDD doesn't need to be stuffed with system files I can simply reinstall if something breaks.

I mean, it's a gaming OS, the only real "saves" are game saves and I don't need a whole system service to backup those. xDDD

Glassed Silver:win

DEP never did anything for me, positive or negative. Having it on or off seems to have no effect at all. Although, DEP = Data Execution Prevention - **** sounds serious.

How do you know? How do you know that it didn't prevent an overflow bug in a program you have from being exploitable? You're just being ignorant now.

UAC - ugh... thanks, but I know what I do on my computer and I never had problems e.g. on XP or before that UAC would have prevented

Firewall - *yawn* couldn't care less about win f/w tbh...

Backup - Windows is actually just my Gaming OS, my main OS is Snow Leopard and both run backupless.

My external HDD doesn't need to be stuffed with system files I can simply reinstall if something breaks.

I mean, it's a gaming OS, the only real "saves" are game saves and I don't need a whole system service to backup those. xDDD

Glassed Silver:win

UAC: once again, a stunning argument for usage or non-usage. It didn't happen to me, therefore it's not needed.

Firewall: so I'm assuming you have a different one? As long as you actually have some kind of firewall, fine.

Backup: fair enough that you don't backup a gaming OS. But you just said your main OS doesn't have backups either. Uh...? In any case, backups are something you manually configure - if you don't, they do nothing. Do you mean system restore and shadow copies?

How do you know? How do you know that it didn't prevent an overflow bug in a program you have from being exploitable? You're just being ignorant now.

I didn't notice anything with it off in XP - same performance / stability. Many times I heard that it might interfere with correct functionality of software (the reason to turn it off) but, I didn't have any problems with it on either - same performance / stability. For me it didn't do anything either way.

As you are questioning my claim that it sounds serious - well it does sound serious. And as it doesn't do squat either way, one might as well not bother touching it.

UAC: once again, a stunning argument for usage or non-usage. It didn't happen to me, therefore it's not needed.

Firewall: so I'm assuming you have a different one? As long as you actually have some kind of firewall, fine.

Backup: fair enough that you don't backup a gaming OS. But you just said your main OS doesn't have backups either. Uh...? In any case, backups are something you manually configure - if you don't, they do nothing. Do you mean system restore and shadow copies?

The "It didn't happen to me, therefore it's not needed" is valid. UAC and other security features seem like wearing a bullet proof vest in real life for an office job. It is safer to wear it, surely the guy in the next cubicle might shoot you... but is it likely or just paranoia? It didn't happen to me, it is not logical that it will happen to me, therefore it is not needed.

I don't understand the necessity of it on Home Setups. Firewall, UAC, Anti-Virus. As long as you know what you are doing, nothing bad will happen. All I ever get after I do a virus scan are cookies. Some people do need it as they have no experience with computers and have no idea what is safe and what is not. I sail security-free, I have even turned off the firewall and whatnot that my router provides (it upped my ping). Problems? Malicious Software? NADA. All I have is a scan-only antivirus which I run manually once a month.

In terms of backups, a system image is the best. Second is a registry backup. System Restore sucks as it sometimes deletes all the restore points.

I didn't notice anything with it off in XP - same performance / stability. Many times I heard that it might interfere with correct functionality of software (the reason to turn it off) but, I didn't have any problems with it on either - same performance / stability. For me it didn't do anything either way.

As you are questioning my claim that it sounds serious - well it does sound serious. And as it doesn't do squat either way, one might as well not bother touching it.

Please read what I wrote. You will not "notice" DEP. It is a completely transparent feature that simply denies attempts to execute pages that are marked as data. It does not improve performance or stability, it simply prevents programs from doing this. It doesn't pop up any dialogs or play any sounds, there is no user interaction. As for your claim that it does nothing, again, that is patently false. It does what I describe, and stops a certain class of exploits. This is a demonstrable fact, and not something that is subject to your misguided personal opinion.

Your belief that it is a good idea to disable security measures that were put in place to help prevent software bugs from being exploitable is simply insane. Are you counting on the software you run being bug-free?

You are of course free to do whatever you want, but no one else should follow your example. You think you know and understand what you are doing, but you really don't.

The "It didn't happen to me, therefore it's not needed" is valid. UAC and other security features seem like wearing a bullet proof vest in real life for an office job. It is safer to wear it, surely the guy in the next cubicle might shoot you... but is it likely or just paranoia? It didn't happen to me, it is not logical that it will happen to me, therefore it is not needed.

If you want to create such a fine analogy, it should be pointed out that most people's PCs are essentially in a war zone (the internet). There is a lot of malware out there.

If we want to go for another hilarious analogy: guy drives home drunk one night. He didn't get stopped or have an accident. This means he can always drive home drunk.

I don't understand the necessity of it on Home Setups. Firewall, UAC, Anti-Virus. As long as you know what you are doing, nothing bad will happen. All I ever get after I do a virus scan are cookies. Some people do need it as they have no experience with computers and have no idea what is safe and what is not. I sail security-free, I have even turned off the firewall and whatnot that my router provides (it upped my ping). Problems? Malicious Software? NADA. All I have is a scan-only antivirus which I run manually once a month.

In terms of backups, a system image is the best. Second is a registry backup. System Restore sucks as it sometimes deletes all the restore points.

You don't understand the necessity of a firewall or antivirus in a home setup? Jeez.

You yourself admit that some users don't have the experience to deal with the issues that could arise. Yes, where "some" is the vast majority of people, especially those on "home setups". I'm sorry, but your logic is baffling.

System image is indeed one of the best types of backup, as long as you have regular copies.

[DEP] It doesn't pop up any dialogs or play any sounds, there is no user interaction

Actually, not quite true - it does pop up notices when it blocks something. You can get it with certain games (e.g. I've had it with Team Fortress 2, had to set an exception). I'm not certain who to blame, but I think it's very likely Valve's coding.

but no one else should follow your example.

Eh?

See here,

one might as well not bother touching it.

I haven't bothered touching it (In other words, I have it enabled).

*snip*

That analogy is not a valid counter point. Working as an office drone and driving drunk are two different behaviors, one of which is bad while other is normal.

My logic seems fine to me. Majority of users are - forgive the language - idiots and therefore majority of the users will benefit from extensive protection. You can say that most people do drive drunk...

Huh. I never had that happen to me.

I didn't notice anything with it off in XP - same performance / stability. Many times I heard that it might interfere with correct functionality of software (the reason to turn it off) but, I didn't have any problems with it on either - same performance / stability. For me it didn't do anything either way.

It doesn't really matter what you think it does or doesn't do. You obviously have no idea what DEP is. No, it does not interfere with correct functionality of software.

The "It didn't happen to me, therefore it's not needed" is valid. UAC and other security features seem like wearing a bullet proof vest in real life for an office job. It is safer to wear it, surely the guy in the next cubicle might shoot you... but is it likely or just paranoia? It didn't happen to me, it is not logical that it will happen to me, therefore it is not needed.

Again, it REALLY doesn't matter what you think will happen to you, where the majority of us non-tweaking users find fault is when you start telling people to disable it.

I don't understand the necessity of it on Home Setups. Firewall, UAC, Anti-Virus. As long as you know what you are doing, nothing bad will happen. All I ever get after I do a virus scan are cookies. Some people do need it as they have no experience with computers and have no idea what is safe and what is not.

Yeah, was going to respond to that, but with the red parts above, I'm pretty sure you did that for me already.

I sail security-free, I have even turned off the firewall and whatnot that my router provides (it upped my ping). Problems? Malicious Software? NADA. All I have is a scan-only antivirus which I run manually once a month.

Once again, this is why we don't want you giving people advice. Let's tell the public at large not to use any form of security. Yes.

In terms of backups, a system image is the best. Second is a registry backup. System Restore sucks as it sometimes deletes all the restore points.

A system image takes too long, a registry backup is useless unless you have the exact same programs installed (which you won't if you have to clean install), and System Restore by default doesn't backup to an external hard drive, and therefore deletes backups after a certain point. At any rate, if you need to restore to a Restore Point earlier than 3 points back (or however many the default limit is) then you're not using your computer right and need to go and take a computer class.

Honestly. You're sounding more and more clueless each minute. Like I said; PUA. (Power-User Arrogance)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!