Recommended Posts

It can take many months for a human newborn child to learn how to walk. In the first few months of life, the child is highly dependent on its parents for everything, and they learn to move on their own after much experimenting and failure. Experts have wondered for a long time why this is the case with our species, when other higher mammals give birth to cubs that are able to walk within hours of being born. The work uncovered that, in fact, all animals began to walk at the same stage in brain development. It would then appear that it takes a longer time for children to reach it, LiveScience reports.

Another factor that was determined to be of great importance in predicting the time when a creature would begin to walk was the size of that species' mature brain, as well as the type of stride it employed. For example, we walk by placing our heels on the ground, and placing all our body's weight on the bones. Other animals, such as cats and horses, step on the toes, or the equivalent of toes (hoofs), and do not place their heels on the ground, except in rare occasions.

According to the lead researcher on the new study, expert Martin Garwicz , from the Lund University in Sweden, it may be that, "The neuronal mechanisms that underlie the onset of walking are very similar in different mammals, and that they are activated at a very similar relative time point during brain development." Details of the new investigation appear in the current issue of the respected journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). How humans start walking is "something I've always wondered about/ Even children ask this question ? how come a little foal can start walking straight after birth and it takes us such a long time?" he adds.

In the new work, he and his team looked at more than 24 mammal species (including chimps, hippos, camels and guinea pigs), and analyzed the correlations between a number of characteristic factors, such as the brain size and limb biomechanics. The group also set the reference time for the experiments to represent the moment of conception, and not that of the birth. The expert says that, when accounting for the development stage that the brain undergoes while the children are still inside the womb, different brain-mass patterns appear, and can be more easily explained.

"By increasing the time of development we grow a brain that is so much larger and so much more complex, and at first glance would seem so different from other species. But maybe the underlying principles and building blocks of development are similar in different species," Garwicz says. "It is possible using our model and data from other mammals you can predict when a human baby will start walking despite the fact that we walk on two legs, despite the fact that we have a large brain, and despite the fact that we learn many other things," he concludes.

source

They don't explain why the baby doesn't stay inside the womb for a longer time than it is: women's pelvis would have to be too wide for them to easily walk.

In the same documentary I also heard that the humans' brain takes longer to fully develop than other mammals, this isn't really a surprise for me, just a confirmation ;)

Damn quadrupeds, making us bipeds look bad.

I agree with what everyone else is saying though. If they wanted to do a fair comparison, they should have compared how long it takes us to crawl rather than how long it takes us to walk upright.

I also saw nothing in the article about muscular development. Humans have much larger legs than most other mammals, so it takes longer to develop enough muscle for us to walk upright.

There are four stages that a baby goes through:

The army crawl -> The baby doesn't yet have enough muscle to hold him/herself up, so they drag themselves along the carpet instead.

Crawling -> Moving around on hands and knees. Humans have longer legs than arms, so we use our knees for crawling instead. If we use our feet, our ass sticks up in the air like when you pet a cat. Also, our kneecaps are on the wrong way.

Standing -> Not walking, but standing up straight for short periods of time without a parent holding you up or holding onto a piece of furniture.

Walking -> Finally moving around on two legs without assistance, then falling and cracking your head open on the coffee table.

If the baby stayed in the womb until their brain was ready for them to walk, they'd never get their heads through the birth canal. Their brains would be too large and they and their mother would die.

And it still takes ages compared to the animals they showed for us to crawl also.

From my understanding, we're born premature because of our large brains. If a baby were to stay in its mother's womb until its brain was fully developed, it wouldn't be able to fit through the birth canal.

i found it funny that at 12 weeks old, my dog knew she had to pee outside, knew what sit, laydown, stay and heel meant. she could also feed herself.

lol tho at 12 weeks a human baby can....sleep?

But the dog will only live till it's around 13 or it get's hit by the milk truck(if it survives it will learn)

My boy turns 9 months Friday, and he can walk holding himself on his crib (or pack n' play) railing.

You'd also have to consider that in the wild, it's imperitive for animals to be able to walk, the herd can't wait around for you. Apes in general are communal, stick to certain areas, and are able to be carried/held, so they can develop other skills (like breaking remote controls and hiding car keys).

If the baby stayed in the womb until their brain was ready for them to walk, they'd never get their heads through the birth canal. Their brains would be too large and they and their mother would die.

And it still takes ages compared to the animals they showed for us to crawl also.

What if birth cannal was wider to accomodate bigger head? :p

Humans are born with all proper modules ready installed as all other mammals. The neural network that handles walking is present at birth. The problem rises by the neo-cortex needing to be pruned so the whole brain doesn't light up like a xmas tree so it doesn't interfere with the automated motor centers.

When born the brain has neurons linking almost everything with everything else, during aging the brain gets pruned in the areas not/less used and reinforced in those areas more used. That way the brain integrates all the different input from the autonomous body control centers, locomotion etc.

In a human this takes longer since the brain is larger and more complex. More modules need to be integrated so it takes longer.

Nothing special about it.

i found it funny that at 12 weeks old, my dog knew she had to pee outside, knew what sit, laydown, stay and heel meant. she could also feed herself.

lol tho at 12 weeks a human baby can....sleep?

Those commands and behavior patterns are bread into the species. Even before domestication, packs of dogs wouldn't pee or poop in their own den. If the puppy makes that connection early, then you are lucky (for some it takes longer than others). One of my dogs seemed to take 7 months to be completely house broken. She was a struggle.

I think its funny how some puppies seem to get really excited when you put a collar on them and even a leash for the first time. These objects, in some light, can be seen as a way for humans to dominate over this domesticated animal. Generations of dogs have had collars and leashes that it is almost part of their genetic code to have those things.

Those commands and behavior patterns are bread into the species. Even before domestication, packs of dogs wouldn't pee or poop in their own den. If the puppy makes that connection early, then you are lucky (for some it takes longer than others). One of my dogs seemed to take 7 months to be completely house broken. She was a struggle.

I think its funny how some puppies seem to get really excited when you put a collar on them and even a leash for the first time. These objects, in some light, can be seen as a way for humans to dominate over this domesticated animal. Generations of dogs have had collars and leashes that it is almost part of their genetic code to have those things.

At 3 years mine ****es finally only in the kitchen on a towel. I don't complain, beats walking the dog at 5 am in the rain.

But humans are no different from being born with behavior preprogrammed in. Look how a baby finds the nipple, it's not like its aware its a nipple or a source of nutrition.

The dive reflex, the foot reflex all preprogrammed. No difference there with any other mammal

Look how a baby finds the nipple, it's not like its aware its a nipple or a source of nutrition.

The dive reflex, the foot reflex all preprogrammed.

In conclusion, football players really shouldn't get paid as much as they do nowadays. What they do on the field is as hard as finding a nipple.

:D :p

In conclusion, football players really shouldn't get paid as much as they do nowadays. What they do on the field is as hard as finding a nipple.

:D :p

If you really extrapolate, yes that's somewhat true. All repetitive motions are hardwired in the motor centers by training. This is why all athletes, martial arts, sports people outclass a regular person.

The movements are preset, the only thing the brain has to do is activate the correct sequence. An untrained person the brain has to work out first the proper sequence. So they'll always be way slower than a trained person but the basic principle is indeed the same.

Humans are born with all proper modules ready installed as all other mammals. The neural network that handles walking is present at birth. The problem rises by the neo-cortex needing to be pruned so the whole brain doesn't light up like a xmas tree so it doesn't interfere with the automated motor centers.

When born the brain has neurons linking almost everything with everything else, during aging the brain gets pruned in the areas not/less used and reinforced in those areas more used. That way the brain integrates all the different input from the autonomous body control centers, locomotion etc.

In a human this takes longer since the brain is larger and more complex. More modules need to be integrated so it takes longer.

Nothing special about it.

Well growing up around horses as a kid, people always told me, "Look how amazing horses are, unlike humans, they can walk within the first few hours of birth!" I was always told it was attributed only to the fact that they are prey animals, so they need to quickly learn how to run...Is it also because horses have small brains?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!