Texas county to name drunk drivers on Twitter


Recommended Posts

Those of you who are American, what do you think of this:

If you get busted for drunk driving in Montgomery County, Texas, this holiday season, your neighbors may hear about it on Twitter.

That's because the local district attorney's office has decided to publish the names of those charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) between Christmas and New Year's Eve.

County Vehicular Crimes Prosecutor Warren Diepraam came up with the idea as a way of discouraging residents from getting behind the wheel while drunk. "It's not a magic bullet that's going to end DWIs, but its something to make people think twice before they get behind the wheel of a car and drive while they're intoxicated," he said.

The Houston-area county will start publishing names on Twitter during holiday weekends such as the Christmas holidays, Fourth of July and Memorial Day, which are thought of as times when a lot of people drive while intoxicated.

The information is already a matter of public record and it is not uncommon for local newspapers in the U.S. to publish the names of those charged with drunk driving or soliciting a prostitute as a kind of public shaming. But these practices are controversial, and some legal pundits wonder if publishing names on Twitter is going too far.

http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/1224...name-drunk.html

Edited by Cy-Kill

It is already public record. Would it make a difference to you if it was the DA office or a regular cirizen? If so why? It shouldn't matter whether it is a government office or a regular citizen posting the information. It is all a matter of public record to begin with.

If it keeps just one person from drunk driving it has done its job of detering those who contemplate breaking the law in my opinion.

That's because the local district attorney's office has decided to publish the names of those charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) between Christmas and New Year's Eve.

I hope its just the article misrepresenting what they are actually doing but I hope that they're only posting the names of those convicted. And even then, I'm not so sure the whole "scarlet letter" thing works very well.

not as bad as a judge in houston, tx that sentenced a guy involved in a dwi related death to sit out on the most populated street intersection with a sign saying he killed someone because he was drinking and driving.

To be honest, thats a pretty decent punishment. I bet he won't do it again.

if they are proved guilty and charged then yeah, i do.

Two completely different things.

Do you think Ice Cream will kill anyone? If it is filled with arsenic then yeah, i do.

My problem with this is that I consider cops dishonest and racist people (especially in Texas). They have earned that scarlet letter. They could arrest and charge someone with DWI unjustifiably. If a court of law finds someone guilty of DWI then that is different.

Go Texas!!

Seriously, we're getting WAY too soft on criminals. It's about time we actually give them a reason to regret their decision.

Seriously do you have any idea what the already do to you if you get popped w/ DWI? Your record is dragged through the mud, your license is suspended, you can face jail time (think anal rape)....then you are on probation for at least 6 months with regular drug/alcohol tests and forced to attend AA.

Look, driving drunk is stupid! No doubt. But to say that the law is not already sufficiently harsh is just being ignorant or a complete hard ass jerk.

Two completely different things.

Do you think Ice Cream will kill anyone? If it is filled with arsenic then yeah, i do.

My problem with this is that I consider cops dishonest and racist people (especially in Texas). They have earned that scarlet letter. They could arrest and charge someone with DWI unjustifiably. If a court of law finds someone guilty of DWI then that is different.

Seriously do you have any idea what the already do to you if you get popped w/ DWI? Your record is dragged through the mud, your license is suspended, you can face jail time (think anal rape)....then you are on probation for at least 6 months with regular drug/alcohol tests and forced to attend AA.

Look, driving drunk is stupid! No doubt. But to say that the law is not already sufficiently harsh is just being ignorant or a complete hard ass jerk.

how is this any differnt from any other puplic record that is posted in a news papers or on state websites everyday?

... or a complete hard ass jerk.

Sign me up! Drunk Driving is not an "accident", it's a decision to endanger others. So yes, I do realize the harsh penalties

and I'm all for it.

And you know... your ignorance is scary. You label all cops racist and dishonest as though your own remarks weren't those

of a bigot, yourself.

You guy seriously think everyone who is charged with a DWI is guilty or putting someone's life at risk? Grow up already.

No but they are stupid enough to drink and get behind the wheel of the car, regardless of how they think they feel. Its all about what you will blow. Which is why when I drive, I don't even have 1 beer. People say you can have one and still pass the breathalyzer, but I don't even risk it. Whats so hard about that?

Funny, but it won't do a thing to change anything about drunk driving in his district. It will get some votes when he runs for office, which is what this is probably about. People don't stop drink driving out of embarrassment, unfortunately. Taking a tough stand on crime in Texas isn't exactly being bold. How about voting for education, or better yet, if he wanted to be REALLY tough on crime he could start repossessing cars, or removing their livers. Now that is tough on crime and drunk driving.

(You can infer the sarcasm tags where appropriate, and Merry Xmas!)

You guy seriously think everyone who is charged with a DWI is guilty or putting someone's life at risk? Grow up already.

Last I checked, no one is falsely charged with DUI's.. since ya know, breathalizers are standard practice... And yes a person who is Driving While Intoxicated.. IS putting someone's life at risk.. Their own, and anyone in their path.. are you really that naive?

<first half of ignorance removed>

Seriously do you have any idea what the already do to you if you get popped w/ DWI? Your record is dragged through the mud, your license is suspended, you can face jail time (think anal rape)....then you are on probation for at least 6 months with regular drug/alcohol tests and forced to attend AA.

Look, driving drunk is stupid! No doubt. But to say that the law is not already sufficiently harsh is just being ignorant or a complete hard ass jerk.

Seriously.. people should be put through worse than having their license suspended.. Jail time is 100% must have.

Drunk driving isn't stupid.. stupid is too kind of a word.

It's wreckless, ignorant, idiotic.. anyone who drinks and drives should be shot in the back of the head. there's 0 excuse for it.. take a cab, call a friend.. walk.

Two completely different things.

Do you think Ice Cream will kill anyone? If it is filled with arsenic then yeah, i do.

My problem with this is that I consider cops dishonest and racist people (especially in Texas). They have earned that scarlet letter. They could arrest and charge someone with DWI unjustifiably. If a court of law finds someone guilty of DWI then that is different.

Seriously do you have any idea what the already do to you if you get popped w/ DWI? Your record is dragged through the mud, your license is suspended, you can face jail time (think anal rape)....then you are on probation for at least 6 months with regular drug/alcohol tests and forced to attend AA.

Look, driving drunk is stupid! No doubt. But to say that the law is not already sufficiently harsh is just being ignorant or a complete hard ass jerk.

I am pretty sure that blowing anything higher than a .08 on a breathalizer is pretty self evident. If found over the legal limit, DUI?DWI are a charge that is really hard to beat. AND NO THE PUNISHMENT ISN'T HARD ENOUGH. I think the laws nationwide should be harsher on all crimes(except for 95% non violent crimes). I THINK WE NEED TELEVISED EXECUTIONS. a breathalizer is something that should be standard on all cars. in order to start the car you need to prove you are sober. now that wont eliminate the DWI w drugs involved. but that would eliminate a almost aLL dwi w/alcohol. I THINK A WORLD WITHOUT ALCOHOL RELATED DEATHS IS A MUCH BETTER WORLD

I'm not downplaying the level of damage drunk or even buzzed driving does, I think it's needlessly stupid and an incredibly selfish thing to do. I just think this is a lame attempt to gain some headlines during a slow news cycle and add to the re-election war chest.

On the other hand short of public flogging there isn't much you can do to educate people about DUIs that they haven't heard before. It's sort of like smoking, there's only so much you can tell people about the dangers, there will still be people dumb enough to do it.

That should be against the law.

and drunk driving is not?

You guy seriously think everyone who is charged with a DWI is guilty or putting someone's life at risk? Grow up already.

I concluded just from reading your response is the only person who needs to grow up is you. When you drink and drive you endanger everybody.

Edited by webeagle12
It's wreckless, ignorant, idiotic.. anyone who drinks and drives should be shot in the back of the head. there's 0 excuse for it.. take a cab, call a friend.. walk.
I am pretty sure that blowing anything higher than a .08 on a breathalizer is pretty self evident. If found over the legal limit, DUI?DWI are a charge that is really hard to beat. AND NO THE PUNISHMENT ISN'T HARD ENOUGH. I think the laws nationwide should be harsher on all crimes(except for 95% non violent crimes). I THINK WE NEED TELEVISED EXECUTIONS. a breathalizer is something that should be standard on all cars. in order to start the car you need to prove you are sober. now that wont eliminate the DWI w drugs involved. but that would eliminate a almost aLL dwi w/alcohol. I THINK A WORLD WITHOUT ALCOHOL RELATED DEATHS IS A MUCH BETTER WORLD

You guys are being dramatic. Take it down a notch.

As for the topic, I think it's pointless and won't do a damn thing. Many socially active people on the internet don't even care for Twitter already, what makes them think that your average person will?

Now, if it was on Facebook with a mugshot and all, maybe it'd be a different story...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!