New Mazda RX-7 may replace slow selling RX-8

By revvo
in The Neobahn

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

revvo

Posted
Posted
Mazda are preparing a replacement for the slow-selling RX-8, ready to combat the forthcoming Toyota/Subaru FT-86 and Hyundai’s Genesis Coupe. Rather than sticking with the RX-8 name, reports coming out of Japan say that the company is keen to revive the RX-7.

The new model will use Mazda’s next-generation Renesis 16X rotary engine which was shown at the 2007 Tokyo Auto Show in the Taiki concept. The 1600cc twin-rotor Wankel engine (800cc x 2) is larger than the current RX-8’s 654cc x 2 configuration and is rumoured to be capable of producing nearly 350 bhp and 215 lb-ft of torque, compared to the RX8’s more modest 227 bhp and 159 lb-ft of torque.

Earlier reports had suggested that Mazda would utilise the full potential of the new Renesis 16X engine, enclosing it within a body that took its styling cues from the Furai Concept, but we now hear Mazda are steering towards a more conventional design that evokes the original RX-7 and can be priced aggressively against its new competitors.

Choosing an output of nearer 250 bhp would enable Mazda to focus on lowering the weight of the engine itself, improving reliability and lowering fuel consumption, which would address some of the issues found with the current RX-8’s 13B rotary engine.

The RX-8 replacement was originally muted to appear in 2012, however according to Edmunds Inside Line we may now see it as early as 2011.

source: http://www.skiddmark.com/new-mazda-rx-7-ma...w-selling-rx-8/

It was bound to happen if you ask me.

First, Nissan brings back the GT-R. Then Hyundai created an affordable Genesis Coupe RWD car. Then Toyota decides to work on an affordable RWD competitor, and now a new RX-7? God dammit Honda, what are you waiting for? Soichiro Honda would be dissapointed :hmmm:

Experienced

gian

Posted
Posted

Sadly, I don't see Honda doing anything :(

They seem like they are lost, they were working on the NSX replacement with a V10 which got "deleted" due to the state of economy.

Then there is the HSV-010 Honda is going racing with, but I think they have said they aren't going to produce it.

Plus if they have us begging they should at least release something more Hond-ish like a V6. Leave the V8 for Ferrari :D

But they are not focusing on fast sports car anymore it seems.

Grand Master

revvo

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The RX8 chassis is amazing, but that engine is just too underpowered. If this new RX7 does indeed produce 350hp with a NA rotary, it will be a very interesting car.

Then there is the HSV-010 Honda is going racing with, but I think they have said they aren't going to produce it.

Plus if they have us begging they should at least release something more Hond-ish like a V6.

Have you heard the damn thing? The V8 sounds like an F1 car and looks like it corners pretty fast as well :pinch:

Grand Master

AltecXP

Posted
Posted (edited)

The RX7 is the only other car(MSP) Mazda has made that I actually like. It had better have a turbo option again, that was what made it so craved for tuners vs the competition.

The 8 would have been nice had it not barely been able to out run a Ford Escort.

Edited by HouseOfLeaves
Experienced

bloodrain

Posted
Posted
NooooOO! I love the RX-8's design and they are going to get rid of it. :( The RX-7 (current) is UGLY and unless they make it as good looking like the RX-8 I am still going to hate it. :(

there is no current RX7... it was discontinued a while ago, and the "current" (aka 3rd gen) RX7 is a master piece, way ahead of its time. Similiar to the Supra.

Proficient

hougtimo

Posted
Posted

Am I missing something? The RX7 and Supra have been long dead and they're both horrible, horrible jellymould designs.

The RX8 has been out a few years, and is a wonderful car to drive; even if it isn't the most powerful. I really hope they don't get rid of the current design with the suicide doors :o

Experienced

gian

Posted
Posted
The RX8 chassis is amazing, but that engine is just too underpowered. If this new RX7 does indeed produce 350hp with a NA rotary, it will be a very interesting car.

Have you heard the damn thing? The V8 sounds like an F1 car and looks like it corners pretty fast as well :pinch:

I doubt it will produce 350HP. It will have lower mpg than a mclaren f1 lol

It makes sense for the Honda to sound like an F1 car but I'd rather have the V10 NSX! Or a high-revving smaller engine. (of course I'll probably won't be buying it so they can ask someone who will actually buy one lol)

Veteran

rathefeare

Posted
Posted

Great news. As a long time RX-7 owner I have been waiting for this ever since they stopped making the 3rd gen for the US market. There were rumors back even before the RX-8 that it would be returning. I just hope they make it an actual dedicated RWD, 2 door, 2 seater sports car and keep the weight low. I have high hopes as Mazda is one of the few that actually believe in lightweight cars anymore. I would also hope a few years down the line a turbo version would also be offered. 350hp from a NA is achievable. The old 1.3 could pull off 200ish in NA using 1970's technology and build. Even if they use the newer RX-8 based 2.0 Renesis engine instead of its own independent engine they should be able to get close to 350. Using the new 16x engine there is even more room to work with.

All 3 previous generations were great looking and I hope this one would be also.

Grand Master

MulletRobZ

Posted
Posted

Uh, wouldn't it make more sense to simply call it the second generation RX-8 or if it needed a name change, the RX-9? Reverting to the RX-7 just sounds awkward.

As for Honda, I agree with revvo that they desperately need to get next generation versions of the NSX as soon as possible. Also, they should get an S2000 successor.

Veteran

rathefeare

Posted
Posted
I think they really need to chuck out the rotary that was in the RX-8 and give us something new. The RX8 was a great looking car, but the ****ty engine killed it when compared against the 350z and other cars in the same category.

I am a self acknowledged rotary fanboy so let me put that on the table right up front. I think too much was made of the failings of that engine. It was after all pushing 230hp out of a 1.3 liter. And it did win several engine awards. Most of the "failings" of that engine could be attributed to poor or improper maintenance. And those people that wanted great fuel economy from a rotary and out of a sports car were looking at the wrong car to begin with. That is like buying a small framed 44 mag and complaining about recoil.

Keep in mind that pretty much only Mazda is doing rotary engine and has really only put out a handful compared with the thousands of different piston and cylinder engines that have been done during the last 100 years. The Wankel engine is still in closed beta by comparison. It is rumored though that the new rx7 will be using the 16x engine though so the point is probably moot.

The comparison between the 350z and the RX8 is unfair also. The RX8 in 09 listed for about 24k base and the 350z listed for about 34k. Given 10k I am sure you could close the performance gap between those 2 cars. I am not trying to elevate the RX8 too much either. I vastly prefer even a 2nd gen RX7 to it, nor am I looking to denigrate the Z as they are great cars as well. It is just that the comparison is not fair.

Neowinian

Praizewood

Posted
Posted
I am a self acknowledged rotary fanboy so let me put that on the table right up front. I think too much was made of the failings of that engine. It was after all pushing 230hp out of a 1.3 liter. And it did win several engine awards. Most of the "failings" of that engine could be attributed to poor or improper maintenance. And those people that wanted great fuel economy from a rotary and out of a sports car were looking at the wrong car to begin with. That is like buying a small framed 44 mag and complaining about recoil.

Keep in mind that pretty much only Mazda is doing rotary engine and has really only put out a handful compared with the thousands of different piston and cylinder engines that have been done during the last 100 years. The Wankel engine is still in closed beta by comparison. It is rumored though that the new rx7 will be using the 16x engine though so the point is probably moot.

The comparison between the 350z and the RX8 is unfair also. The RX8 in 09 listed for about 24k base and the 350z listed for about 34k. Given 10k I am sure you could close the performance gap between those 2 cars. I am not trying to elevate the RX8 too much either. I vastly prefer even a 2nd gen RX7 to it, nor am I looking to denigrate the Z as they are great cars as well. It is just that the comparison is not fair.

You pretty much summed up everything I thought when going through the posts.

The wankel engine is as you said in its very early stage and there is a lot of room for improvement. I hope the advantages it has as a hydrogen engine will bring it a bit more interest in the automobile world so progress will be faster and other makers than mazda research this otherwise genius engine.

Veteran

rathefeare

Posted
Posted
my opinion: bring back the original rx-7. It's still a great looking vehicle, still a great car in every respect (aside from maybe the engine, it could use some updating), and there's tons of aftermarket support for it.

Which one? I mean I love all three, but the third is a much more upmarket car than the first two. The third was undoubtedly the better performing car but it had the price tag to go with it too. I would hope they stay with the philosophy of the first 2 of making a good but affordable sports car. If they can squeeze me in the looks and performance of the third I won't complain one bit.

Grand Master

MR_Candyman

Posted
Posted
Which one? I mean I love all three, but the third is a much more upmarket car than the first two. The third was undoubtedly the better performing car but it had the price tag to go with it too. I would hope they stay with the philosophy of the first 2 of making a good but affordable sports car. If they can squeeze me in the looks and performance of the third I won't complain one bit.

They should re-release the third. They will have no r&d costs and if they kept the old tooling, they will not have to make new moulds. This will significantly reduce the cost.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      I love syncback!
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By +primortal · Posted

    • Get $50 of aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim credit for just $24.97

      By News Staff · Posted

      Get $50 of aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim credit for just $24.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 50% off aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler Lifetime eSim Credit: Pay $24.97 for $50. Stay connected affordably in 120+ countries/regions with your own lifetime eSIM! An eSIM is a digital SIM card. It's basically just mobile data. Once it's activated on your device, it can connect you to data networks in other countries – giving you an internet connection with NO roaming charges. With aloSIM, you can load prepaid eSIM data packages onto your phone, tablet, or computer. Your lifetime eSIM never expires, so it's yours forever and there are never any monthly charges. You'll get $50 in eSIM data credit, which is almost always enough to cover all your data roaming needs for a full year. But if you run out of data, you can always top up your lifetime eSIM and stay connected internationally. Pay $24.97 for a lifetime eSIM with $50 in travel data credit Use your eSIM to join data networks in 120+ countries Install your lifetime eSIM on a compatible device to roam on local data networks Your lifetime eSIM never expires, and can be topped up with more data anytime Many data packages cost as little as $4.50 and last 7 days. Depending on the package you choose, the length of time varies. Good to know Length of access: lifetime For NEW customers only Instant digital redemption Once you add your $50 credit to your aloSim account you have up to 12-months to use it — after that your credit will expire When you pay for a data plan you also get a free phone number (via Hushed) for the same duration of your plan that was purchased - IE 7 day eSim plan gives you a free 7-day phone number Purchased coupon must be redeemed and used within 12 months This deal is not stackable (one offer per aloSIM account) A $4.50 data package will last 7 days The data DOES expire, and you WILL NOT have any leftover data for your next trip unless it takes place within the validity period. While the eSIM never expires, the actual data package is only valid for the length of time stated at purchase (i.e. seven days after activation, 30 days after activation, etc.) So if you buy a seven-day package and only use a tiny bit, that package is still going to expire after seven days. Access options: mobile (check compatibility) Max number of device(s): 1 Updates included Here's the deal: This aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim $50 Credit normally costs ... $50, but it can be yours for just $24.97 for a limited time, a saving of $25 (50% off). For specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this aloSIM Mobile Data Traveler eSim for just $24.97 (was $50) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • The Microsoft Office feature that time forgot

      By Fraud OS 11 · Posted

      WordArt was cool. We now have color fonts as a substitute although Word only supports COLRv0 and COLRv1 (Fraud OS 11 only). The OpenType SVG color font format needs to be supported by Office. Adobe's apps support it
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that

      By fintechfooty · Posted

      i backup my files, incl keepass to my proton drive using Syncback which i paid for (thanks Warwagon!). they have a free version but i can't remember what it does and doesn't do anymore. anyways, it's really, really simple and easy to use. i also periodically keep backups of my keepass onsite especially when i've changed or added a password that is important to me. if you don't wanna spend time on the syncthing setup, get syncback. haha i even got my dad to use it for his backups to usb and he doesn't even need my help!!! (thank god!)

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      158
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!