Windows 7 support by the end of the year?


Recommended Posts

I have been waiting for this before i wanted to setup mine to work on it. I have a Early 2009 MacBook (Aluminum Unibody) however I was waiting for the bootcamp support before i Attempted it.

Everything works fine in Bootcamp for me under Windows 7.

******! You're using old outdate Windows Vista drivers. There are no officially supported Windows 7 bootcamp drivers yet.

On new 13 inch Macbook pro, sleep is sometimes messed up when the lid is closed, the audio drivers don't function correctly (there's more sound output from the left audio channel than the right, no stereo and the sound is very poor quality), the SPDIF output light is also also always on, and additionally the trackpad is also often horribly over sensitive.

All is not quite as sweet as you assume it to be. These are among a few of a great many very well documented faults.

Edited by bmaher
Swear filter evasion
******! You're using old outdate Windows Vista drivers. There are no officially supported Windows 7 bootcamp drivers yet.

On new 13 inch Macbook pro, sleep is sometimes messed up when the lid is closed, the audio drivers don't function correctly (there's more sound output from the left audio channel than the right, no stereo and the sound is very poor quality), the SPDIF output light is also also always on, and additionally the trackpad is also often horribly over sensitive.

All is not quite as sweet as you assume it to be. These are among a few of a great many very well documented faults.

10.6 has Windows 7 drivers. P.S you can use Vista drivers for 7. Quit spreading the FUD.

Edited by bmaher
fixed quote
Apple engineers are on holiday at the moment (probably) so it'll have to wait til the new year.

Seriously, can they say that? I mean can they say something as definite as that and then just not bother? Is that how Apple works?

Anyway I am using 10.6x. My MBP came with it installed - and the lasted boot camp drivers. No official Windows 7 drivers there. I have no clue why you're talking about 'fud'. These are real faults, why would anyone even go to the trouble of making them up?

Edited by jebus197
******! You're using old outdate Windows Vista drivers. There are no officially supported Windows 7 bootcamp drivers yet.

On new 13 inch Macbook pro, sleep is sometimes messed up when the lid is closed, the audio drivers don't function correctly (there's more sound output from the left audio channel than the right, no stereo and the sound is very poor quality), the SPDIF output light is also also always on, and additionally the trackpad is also often horribly over sensitive.

All is not quite as sweet as you assume it to be. These are among a few of a great many very well documented faults.

Whether they be Windows 7 drivers or Windows Vista drivers - it works - flawlessly. 99% of Vista drivers work fine with Windows 7 anyway.

Everything works, I have no errors, and the only really important driver (performance wise), the graphics driver, is automatically updated via Windows Update anyway.

Also...

Thread Cleaned.

Please keep it civilised and please don't evade the swear filter.

Whether they be Windows 7 drivers or Windows Vista drivers - it works - flawlessly. 99% of Vista drivers work fine with Windows 7 anyway.

Everything works, I have no errors, and the only really important driver (performance wise), the graphics driver, is automatically updated via Windows Update anyway.

I am very glad everything works for you. But the point I was trying to make is that this isn't the case for everyone - and in this case they clearly don't work completely effectively for me.

Also Windows Vista drivers are still Windows Vista drivers. Just because they work (although again, they don't work all that well for me) doesn't mean by any measure that they have been optimised for Windows 7. There are still likely to be several improvements to be gained from using fully dedicated drivers.

Whether they be Windows 7 drivers or Windows Vista drivers - it works - flawlessly. 99% of Vista drivers work fine with Windows 7 anyway.

Everything works, I have no errors, and the only really important driver (performance wise), the graphics driver, is automatically updated via Windows Update anyway.

Also...

Thread Cleaned.

Please keep it civilised and please don't evade the swear filter.

I didn't evade it. I edited it myself. Lol. Since when is **** swearing anyway?

Anyway sorry for being frustrated, I just don't get it when people idiotically deny any possibility of a fault with a sytem purely on the basis of what seems like some kind of obsessive brand loyalty. What makes it especially dumb and frustrating is that these faults are real and are not made up, or 'fud' at all.

Edited by jebus197

The Vista boot camp drivers may "work" with Windows 7, but there's obviously room for improvement, as my 2 year old lower-spec'd HP boots and runs 7 faster than my brand new MBP. There's also the hyper-sensitive touchpad driver. Many times I'll accidently click something when I'm meaning to scroll. And they need to update the drivers to allow Windows 7's power management to do its job better - as it is it can't even control screen brightness...

Everything seems to work fine here. Windows 7 Ultimate 32Bit. I got the latest drivers from the NVIDIA site. However I had a nightmare installing it because when it rebooted it didnt turn the screen back on. It just sat there black screen. I eventually got it sorted just guessed when to press next on the windows install lol. It rebooted fine though.

As I said, I think you guys are possibly missing the point slighly. The point of the thread, and my question isn't that 'it works for you', it's that there are plenty of cases, especially with some of the newer MBP's where the old Windows Vista drivers don't work all that well at all.

Also the point is that they are mostly all still Windows Vista drivers, hence not optimised for the new Windows 7 kernel etc. Thus at some point or other, you will still be missing out on performance.

Moreover the starting premise of the thread was simply that Apple seemed to be taking their own dear sweet time in holding themselves to a promise they made shortly after Windows 7 was officially released.

There's still clearly some time for them to do this, but it does seem odd that they are cutting it so fine.

Edited by jebus197
Seriously, can they say that? I mean can they say something as definite as that and then just not bother? Is that how Apple works?

Anyway I am using 10.6x. My MBP came with it installed - and the lasted boot camp drivers. No official Windows 7 drivers there. I have no clue why you're talking about 'fud'. These are real faults, why would anyone even go to the trouble of making them up?

Well maybe they planed to release before Christmas but some major bug appeared they ran out of time and rather than release a pile of crap come back in the new year.

The Boot Camp drivers work in Windows 7. They work just fine, in fact, considering that it's not the OS the hardware was designed for. However, the drivers are designed for Vista, and my understanding is that 7 offers some new things, like better power management, multi touch support (via the trackpad), etc.

I'm hoping that the reason Apple is taking their time is because they're taking advantage of all Windows 7 has to offer. They showed some promise with the improved drivers included with Snow Leopard.

The Boot Camp drivers work in Windows 7. They work just fine...

But the point is they don't work well in all cases! Look up the issues I have described on any notable Apple forum and you will find more than plenty examples of these.

However you are correct that Windows Vista drivers have also not been optimised for Windows 7, so overall performance is unlikely to be on the same level as a sytem running fully dedicated drivers.

Vista drivers works fine on my MacBook Pro 13"... but the tap click is too sensitve, the optical light is always on and Im using a modified sound driver to get max. volume. Then the line-in doesn't work... I would be glad if they improved the trackpad driver alot, and released it soon...

I installed Windows 7 x64 without Bootcamp, erasing everything the disk had, natively alone, at an Aluminium iMac.

I also installed drivers natively from each hardware manufacturer missing ( one :p )

All that was missing, a stupid Bluetooh stack Apple uses and a Special Key, in iMac keyboard for eject.

Everything, even iSight Camera was instantly recognised by Windows 7 + Windows Update.

I just installed Bluetooth Stack from Vista, and the stupid button.

I updated even Drivers that Windows 7 recognised such as Realtek Audio, Marvel Yukon Gigabit and Broadcom Wireless.

PC..errrrm the Mac now runs superb/splendid Windows 7 x64 native, alone.

No need to wait for Apple SuperDuper Engineers...

P.S. to install I had to alter the original win7 iso, so Apple's stupid EFI co-operates with UEFI 2.x that Windows 7 x64 support, or else both Windows/EFI boot were halted.

Lol, I give up! It's completely irrelevant that "it works for you." Clearly if you read the links I supplied above you will find that this is not the case for everyone.

Many of the drivers for the newer Macbook Pros cannot be downloaded directly from the manufacturers site. This includes trackpad and audio drivers (and chipset drivers too - which will almost certainly have a direct impact on performance).

I also have to run hacked audio drivers to get 'full' volume, although the sound quality is still nothing short of terrible and there is higher volume coming from the left speaker than the right speaker.

Again I genuinely can't see the point of posting comments saying 'it works for me.' If it does, then great, what this means is that you're not affected. It probably also means you're running a slightly older version of a Macbook.

Moreover working drivers and 'optimised' drivers are not the same thing. Working Vista drivers may appear to work, but they are not optimised for Windows 7, hence performance overall is likely to suffer.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3920

Note: The following models will not be supported for use with Windows 7 using Boot Camp.

iMac (17-inch, Early 2006)

iMac (17-inch, Late 2006)

iMac (20-inch, Early 2006)

iMac (20-inch, Late 2006)

MacBook Pro (15-inch, Early 2006)

MacBook Pro (17-inch, Late 2006)

MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2006)

MacBook Pro (17-inch, Early 2006)

Mac Pro (Mid 2006, Intel Xeon Dual-core 2.66GHz or 3GHz)

Does anyone know why this is the case that they are not supported? is it a technical reason or a matter of policy because these products are End of Life? And does anyone know if any technical restriction will be put in place to prevent attempted installation on this hardware in an unsupported manner?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!