Windows 7 support by the end of the year?


Recommended Posts

I have been waiting for this before i wanted to setup mine to work on it. I have a Early 2009 MacBook (Aluminum Unibody) however I was waiting for the bootcamp support before i Attempted it.

Everything works fine in Bootcamp for me under Windows 7.

******! You're using old outdate Windows Vista drivers. There are no officially supported Windows 7 bootcamp drivers yet.

On new 13 inch Macbook pro, sleep is sometimes messed up when the lid is closed, the audio drivers don't function correctly (there's more sound output from the left audio channel than the right, no stereo and the sound is very poor quality), the SPDIF output light is also also always on, and additionally the trackpad is also often horribly over sensitive.

All is not quite as sweet as you assume it to be. These are among a few of a great many very well documented faults.

Edited by bmaher
Swear filter evasion
******! You're using old outdate Windows Vista drivers. There are no officially supported Windows 7 bootcamp drivers yet.

On new 13 inch Macbook pro, sleep is sometimes messed up when the lid is closed, the audio drivers don't function correctly (there's more sound output from the left audio channel than the right, no stereo and the sound is very poor quality), the SPDIF output light is also also always on, and additionally the trackpad is also often horribly over sensitive.

All is not quite as sweet as you assume it to be. These are among a few of a great many very well documented faults.

10.6 has Windows 7 drivers. P.S you can use Vista drivers for 7. Quit spreading the FUD.

Edited by bmaher
fixed quote
Apple engineers are on holiday at the moment (probably) so it'll have to wait til the new year.

Seriously, can they say that? I mean can they say something as definite as that and then just not bother? Is that how Apple works?

Anyway I am using 10.6x. My MBP came with it installed - and the lasted boot camp drivers. No official Windows 7 drivers there. I have no clue why you're talking about 'fud'. These are real faults, why would anyone even go to the trouble of making them up?

Edited by jebus197
******! You're using old outdate Windows Vista drivers. There are no officially supported Windows 7 bootcamp drivers yet.

On new 13 inch Macbook pro, sleep is sometimes messed up when the lid is closed, the audio drivers don't function correctly (there's more sound output from the left audio channel than the right, no stereo and the sound is very poor quality), the SPDIF output light is also also always on, and additionally the trackpad is also often horribly over sensitive.

All is not quite as sweet as you assume it to be. These are among a few of a great many very well documented faults.

Whether they be Windows 7 drivers or Windows Vista drivers - it works - flawlessly. 99% of Vista drivers work fine with Windows 7 anyway.

Everything works, I have no errors, and the only really important driver (performance wise), the graphics driver, is automatically updated via Windows Update anyway.

Also...

Thread Cleaned.

Please keep it civilised and please don't evade the swear filter.

Whether they be Windows 7 drivers or Windows Vista drivers - it works - flawlessly. 99% of Vista drivers work fine with Windows 7 anyway.

Everything works, I have no errors, and the only really important driver (performance wise), the graphics driver, is automatically updated via Windows Update anyway.

I am very glad everything works for you. But the point I was trying to make is that this isn't the case for everyone - and in this case they clearly don't work completely effectively for me.

Also Windows Vista drivers are still Windows Vista drivers. Just because they work (although again, they don't work all that well for me) doesn't mean by any measure that they have been optimised for Windows 7. There are still likely to be several improvements to be gained from using fully dedicated drivers.

Whether they be Windows 7 drivers or Windows Vista drivers - it works - flawlessly. 99% of Vista drivers work fine with Windows 7 anyway.

Everything works, I have no errors, and the only really important driver (performance wise), the graphics driver, is automatically updated via Windows Update anyway.

Also...

Thread Cleaned.

Please keep it civilised and please don't evade the swear filter.

I didn't evade it. I edited it myself. Lol. Since when is **** swearing anyway?

Anyway sorry for being frustrated, I just don't get it when people idiotically deny any possibility of a fault with a sytem purely on the basis of what seems like some kind of obsessive brand loyalty. What makes it especially dumb and frustrating is that these faults are real and are not made up, or 'fud' at all.

Edited by jebus197

The Vista boot camp drivers may "work" with Windows 7, but there's obviously room for improvement, as my 2 year old lower-spec'd HP boots and runs 7 faster than my brand new MBP. There's also the hyper-sensitive touchpad driver. Many times I'll accidently click something when I'm meaning to scroll. And they need to update the drivers to allow Windows 7's power management to do its job better - as it is it can't even control screen brightness...

Everything seems to work fine here. Windows 7 Ultimate 32Bit. I got the latest drivers from the NVIDIA site. However I had a nightmare installing it because when it rebooted it didnt turn the screen back on. It just sat there black screen. I eventually got it sorted just guessed when to press next on the windows install lol. It rebooted fine though.

As I said, I think you guys are possibly missing the point slighly. The point of the thread, and my question isn't that 'it works for you', it's that there are plenty of cases, especially with some of the newer MBP's where the old Windows Vista drivers don't work all that well at all.

Also the point is that they are mostly all still Windows Vista drivers, hence not optimised for the new Windows 7 kernel etc. Thus at some point or other, you will still be missing out on performance.

Moreover the starting premise of the thread was simply that Apple seemed to be taking their own dear sweet time in holding themselves to a promise they made shortly after Windows 7 was officially released.

There's still clearly some time for them to do this, but it does seem odd that they are cutting it so fine.

Edited by jebus197
Seriously, can they say that? I mean can they say something as definite as that and then just not bother? Is that how Apple works?

Anyway I am using 10.6x. My MBP came with it installed - and the lasted boot camp drivers. No official Windows 7 drivers there. I have no clue why you're talking about 'fud'. These are real faults, why would anyone even go to the trouble of making them up?

Well maybe they planed to release before Christmas but some major bug appeared they ran out of time and rather than release a pile of crap come back in the new year.

The Boot Camp drivers work in Windows 7. They work just fine, in fact, considering that it's not the OS the hardware was designed for. However, the drivers are designed for Vista, and my understanding is that 7 offers some new things, like better power management, multi touch support (via the trackpad), etc.

I'm hoping that the reason Apple is taking their time is because they're taking advantage of all Windows 7 has to offer. They showed some promise with the improved drivers included with Snow Leopard.

The Boot Camp drivers work in Windows 7. They work just fine...

But the point is they don't work well in all cases! Look up the issues I have described on any notable Apple forum and you will find more than plenty examples of these.

However you are correct that Windows Vista drivers have also not been optimised for Windows 7, so overall performance is unlikely to be on the same level as a sytem running fully dedicated drivers.

Vista drivers works fine on my MacBook Pro 13"... but the tap click is too sensitve, the optical light is always on and Im using a modified sound driver to get max. volume. Then the line-in doesn't work... I would be glad if they improved the trackpad driver alot, and released it soon...

I installed Windows 7 x64 without Bootcamp, erasing everything the disk had, natively alone, at an Aluminium iMac.

I also installed drivers natively from each hardware manufacturer missing ( one :p )

All that was missing, a stupid Bluetooh stack Apple uses and a Special Key, in iMac keyboard for eject.

Everything, even iSight Camera was instantly recognised by Windows 7 + Windows Update.

I just installed Bluetooth Stack from Vista, and the stupid button.

I updated even Drivers that Windows 7 recognised such as Realtek Audio, Marvel Yukon Gigabit and Broadcom Wireless.

PC..errrrm the Mac now runs superb/splendid Windows 7 x64 native, alone.

No need to wait for Apple SuperDuper Engineers...

P.S. to install I had to alter the original win7 iso, so Apple's stupid EFI co-operates with UEFI 2.x that Windows 7 x64 support, or else both Windows/EFI boot were halted.

Lol, I give up! It's completely irrelevant that "it works for you." Clearly if you read the links I supplied above you will find that this is not the case for everyone.

Many of the drivers for the newer Macbook Pros cannot be downloaded directly from the manufacturers site. This includes trackpad and audio drivers (and chipset drivers too - which will almost certainly have a direct impact on performance).

I also have to run hacked audio drivers to get 'full' volume, although the sound quality is still nothing short of terrible and there is higher volume coming from the left speaker than the right speaker.

Again I genuinely can't see the point of posting comments saying 'it works for me.' If it does, then great, what this means is that you're not affected. It probably also means you're running a slightly older version of a Macbook.

Moreover working drivers and 'optimised' drivers are not the same thing. Working Vista drivers may appear to work, but they are not optimised for Windows 7, hence performance overall is likely to suffer.

http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3920

Note: The following models will not be supported for use with Windows 7 using Boot Camp.

iMac (17-inch, Early 2006)

iMac (17-inch, Late 2006)

iMac (20-inch, Early 2006)

iMac (20-inch, Late 2006)

MacBook Pro (15-inch, Early 2006)

MacBook Pro (17-inch, Late 2006)

MacBook Pro (15-inch, Late 2006)

MacBook Pro (17-inch, Early 2006)

Mac Pro (Mid 2006, Intel Xeon Dual-core 2.66GHz or 3GHz)

Does anyone know why this is the case that they are not supported? is it a technical reason or a matter of policy because these products are End of Life? And does anyone know if any technical restriction will be put in place to prevent attempted installation on this hardware in an unsupported manner?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!