129 members have voted

  1. 1. Which team will win the Constructors Cup?

    • McLaren
      48
    • Mercedes GP
      11
    • Red Bull
      29
    • Ferrari
      36
    • Williams
      1
    • Renault
      2
    • Force India
      1
    • Toro Rosso
      0
    • Lotus
      1
    • Campos
      0
    • US
      0
    • Virgin
      0
  2. 2. Who will be the world champion this year?

    • Jenson Button
      11
    • Lewis Hamilton
      33
    • Michael Schumacher
      13
    • Nico Rosberg
      1
    • Sebastian Vettel
      10
    • Mark Webber
      21
    • Felipe Massa
      8
    • Fernando Alonso
      26
    • Rubens Barrichello
      1
    • Nico Hulkenberg
      0
    • Robert Kubica
      3
    • Vitaly Petrov
      2
    • Adrian Sutil
      0
    • Vitantonio Liuzzi
      0
    • Sebastien Buemi
      0
    • Jaime Alguersuari
      0
    • Jarno Trulli
      0
    • Heikki Kovalainen
      0
    • Bruno Senna
      0
    • Jose Maria Lopez
      0
  3. 3. Who will be the world champion this year? Continued

    • Timo Glock
      2
    • Lucas di Grassi
      2
    • VOID VOTE (Because of Neowin's restrictions, select this if you choose not to select the above two drivers
      125


Recommended Posts

I enjoyed that race. Alonso had a brilliant drive to stay in contention with those problems. Just seems a bit daft to be putting the full 18k with the gearbox issues while sitting in the warm air behind Button's car right at the end of the race for the chance at getting two more points.

i think alonso should have just backed off and finished behind button. that would have given him at least 2 important points, but he just needed to keep his wdc lead instead of thinking of the team he is driving for. very selfish and egocentric. but then, its alonso we are talking about. expected nothing else.

LH had a fantastic race, p20 to p6, but coulndt pass a Force India :rofl:

Renault critical of Hamilton's weaving

Renault boss Eric Boullier believes Lewis Hamilton was in the wrong for weaving to prevent an attack from Vitaly Petrov - but has ruled out taking the matter any further despite his McLaren rival only getting a warning.

Hamilton was fighting Petrov hard for position during the Malaysian Grand Prix and, after overtaking the Russian, he weaved down the start-finish straight several times to try and prevent a counter-attack.

That action prompted suggestions that Hamilton had broken the unofficial drivers' code of conduct that they can only make one directional move to defend a position.

However, with Hamilton accelerating out of a corner rather than coming under pressure into a braking zone, there were other arguments suggesting he was simply trying to break the tow.

Renault boss Eric Boullier said his team complained to race control about Hamilton's actions during the event - and felt the FIA should have done more than show the former world champion a black and white flag for unsportsmanlike behaviour.

"We just raised our point of view," Boullier told AUTOSPORT. "Very frankly, it is very clear in the regulations that you can have one change of direction, so when you do three in a row something is wrong.

"He got a warning for dangerous driving, but I am not sure it is enough. It is definitely clearly written in the regulations that you can not do any more than one direction change, and it is something you should not be doing."

When asked if Renault would pursue the matter further to seek clarification from the FIA, Boullier said: "No. A warning says that if you do it again you will be penalised."

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82717

anybody know why Luizzi started driving slowly before quitting the race? from where i was watching the race from, it was the most interesting thing to happen, i could hear his engine sputtering as he moved on the straight out of turn 11... looked like he came to a stop there, and his car was pretty quiet up until he tried to start moving again

and the next most interesting thing was that Renault coming to a halt on turn 10 ... i wonder what caused that too...

yeah, Alonso seemed to handle the gearbox problem pretty well, somehow he managed to get best times for the laps, the commentary was somewhere along the lines of 'did the gearbox fix itself?'

overall i never imagined that 2 hours would pass like 5 minutes when im keeping track of the drivers positions with the f1 java app my phone, lucky for me it didnt rain! i didnt bring a raincoat... but then again the race would have been alot more exciting to watch if it did, i was basically telling myself that someone's gonna crash on turn 11 since that was where i was sitting...

Dennis: McLaren initiated Mercedes split

McLaren was the party that initiated the end of its exclusive tie-up with Mercedes-Benz at the end of last season, former team principal Ron Dennis has revealed.

Mercedes-Benz ended its long-running partnership with McLaren at the end of 2009, so it could shift its main focus into taking over the former Brawn GP outfit.

And although at the time there were suggestions that McLaren losing its exclusive arrangement with Mercedes-Benz could hurt the team's future prospects, Dennis remains adamant it was for the best - especially since his team continues to receive a supply of customer engines.

Furthermore, he has also claimed that it was McLaren ? and not Mercedes-Benz ? that wanted the relationship to change.

"It was completely and utterly amicable," Dennis told Arabian Business magazine about the split with Mercedes-Benz. "They continuously over the years wanted to have control of McLaren and we continuously told them we did not want them to have control of McLaren.

"The more they wanted it, the less we wanted to give it to them. Because you look at what happens... the influence they [car manufacturers] control is not always productive. CEOs change overnight. I have got 30-odd years of my life in this company, huge quantities of friends and people who have been through thick and thin with me, and I made it very clear to Mercedes-Benz, as did the other shareholders, that we are not for sale. They hankered always."

He added: "We initiated it, we wanted to be independent. This wasn't something which we weren't party to. I mean engine supply to Brawn in 2008 [for the 2009 season] required our consent.

"At the end of the day we were a fully integrated partner of Mercedes-Benz, and we still are. We are fiercely competitive on circuit, but off circuit we are still firm friends. I wouldn't call it a sweetheart deal, but it was a win-win situation.

"They got exactly what they wanted: a grand prix team they had complete control over ? and we had continuous engine supply and the ability to promote our product and build the McLaren brand.

"It was just a win-win situation. In the end, obviously, when we all realised this was going to happen, it was all very logical."

Source: Autosport

Decent qualifying, and well done once again to Sebastian Vettel and the Red Bull Team.

Tomorrow's race will be a lottery if the weather forecast is to believed: 85% chance of rain.

It was expected. It's the engine he had used for practice sessions in Bahrain, then one that was assumed not be good enough for the entire race.

still its not good. :shifty: he has not ennough engines now! only 5 left for 15 races or something like that. no way he is gonna do it. his championship chances are over.

todays qualifying was a bit of a shocker for me. redbull - especially in the hands of vettel - is SO MUCH AHEAD its acutally frustrating. i bet he wasnt even pushing but just did a great lap. still its great to see that mclaren has closed the gap in qualifying somehow. between position 2 and 6 there is really nothing. everyone could be on webbers starting-position.

i start to feel worried about schumacher :( today he was dead slow and there is no excuse for it. hope he ll be back up to speed very soon.

lets see what happens tomorrow, there is a chance of rain. :D

here in Indian broadcast -"Star Sports", a commentator was saying that FIA allows "Reliabilty upgrades" to the engine.

So could ferrari do a reliability upgrade to increase the performance ? :p

coz i didnt see their engines suffering like this in recent past.

& Nico changed the rear wing for quali/race, they were evaluating the their version f-duct, MS is still using that wing, it gave them 3Kmph advantage in top speed.

here in Indian broadcast -"Star Sports", a commentator was saying that FIA allows "Reliabilty upgrades" to the engine.

So could ferrari do a reliability upgrade to increase the performance ? :p

coz i didnt see their engines suffering like this in recent past.

& Nico changed the rear wing for quali/race, they were evaluating the their version f-duct, MS is still using that wing, it gave them 3Kmph advantage in top speed.

They wouldn't increase performance if they're looking to increase reliability. But even if they do, getting each engine to last 3 race weekends is a tall order. And then, even if they do last, by the time each engine gets to its third race, it'll be way down on power.

Naughty naughty, Alonso! Jumped the start just before the green light, and now he's getting punished with a drive-through penalty. :)

And while I'm here, this popped up on Sniffpetrol's Twitter before the penalty was given:

The FIA have looked at the Ferrari jump start evidence and decided to penalise McLaren. #F1

:rofl:

Naughty naughty, Alonso! Jumped the start just before the green light, and now he's getting punished with a drive-through penalty. :)

And while I'm here, this popped up on Sniffpetrol's Twitter before the penalty was given:

:rofl:

Haha yea.

I wonder which bet off mine will be counted as I had both Webber and Alonso tipped to be leading after the first lap. Either way, I see a nice sum of money reaching my account :D

On another note, I have Massa to be ahead of Alonso by the end which itself has some nice odds.

Does anyone know if the stewards are investigating the pit lane incident between Alonso and Massa? Alonso's being a real cheeky fecker today. He's already been penalised for jumping the start, and then he goes and cuts Massa on the inside of the pit lane entrance!

I did see just now that they're investigating another pit lane incident, between Hamilton and Vettel.

Wow, we're only halfway through the race and 10/24 drivers have already retired? :blink:

The way things are going, I bet less than 10 will finish the race.

Sorry, my mistake. I was looking at the standings, and it went away after 14th, so I assumed that was all that was left. Turns out that 18 are still in it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In some countries the law has forced Microsoft to display a menu on a fresh install of Windows which asks which web browser you want and it will install that browser. This doesn't add any bloat to Windows. It simply an additional step when setting up a new PC.
    • Chrome is also a first party browser on Android and ChromeOS. And on those systems, Google is pulling the same dirty tactics as Microsoft does on Windows.
    • Unofficial script lets you install unreleased Windows 11 features without Microsoft Account by Sayan Sen Microsoft has been steadily evolving the Windows Insider Program over the years, introducing new channels and testing paths that allow enthusiasts to experience upcoming and yet-to-be-released Windows features (some interesting hidden ones too) before they reach the public. However, one long-standing requirement has remained largely unchanged as users are generally expected to enroll in the Program and with a Microsoft account. That's where a third-party tool called "OfflineInsiderEnroll" can help. OfflineInsiderEnroll is said to be a lightweight script that enables access to Windows Insider Program builds on systems that are not signed in with a Microsoft account. Essentially the tool configures the necessary Insider settings locally and hence allows users to select and switch between available preview channels while continuing to receive builds through the normal Windows Update channel. If you are wondering how it manages to do so, it is made possible by a Registry value known as TestFlags. When configured to"0x20", Windows stops communicating with Microsoft's online Insider enrollment services thus preventing locally configured Insider settings from being overwritten. This allows the script to apply its own channel configuration directly through the Registry as Windows Update does not verify whether a device has been officially enrolled in the Insider Program or not. Previously the utility has had already supported the traditional Insider branches including Dev, Beta, and Release Preview. However following Microsoft’s recent restructuring of its preview channels, the script has now been updated. The latest OfflineInsiderEnroll version, 2.6.6, adds support for the newly introduced Insider channel lineup. As such, users can now choose from several Experimental channels in addition to Beta and Release Preview options. The update also retains tools for refreshing the Insider cache, resetting Insider settings, and completely stopping Insider enrollment when needed. Keep in mind though that will need elevated privileges when running the script (run as Admin). You can get the latest version of OfflineInsiderEnroll from this page on its official GitHub repo.
    • The "Classic" Outlook has done that for a few years as well. The option to even change that is really hidden away too... It really shouldn't be hard to respect user defaults. Sadly we are the product now, not Outlook. To change in the Classic Outlook: File > Options > Advanced > change "Open hyperlinks from Outlook in"
    • Get yo ass to space
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      472
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      250
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      67
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!