OpenOffice dropped from Ubuntu Netbook Edition 10.04


Recommended Posts

OpenOffice dropped from Ubuntu Netbook Edition 10.04, replaced with Google Docs

According to the latest Ubuntu Netbook Remix Blueprint, the Ubuntu community have decided to drop OpenOffice from the default installation of Ubuntu Netbook Edition for the upcoming Lucid Lynx release, atleast for now. Now documents will be opened by default in Google Docs.

We have previously told you about Gimp being dropped from Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu replacing Google with Yahoo as the default search engine.

The developers have been removing applications that are irrelevant on a netbook. While document editing is clearly a not irrelevant on a netbook, the developers feel that with netbooks being used mostly for internet related works, Google Docs will suffice.

Full article

Edit: Reminder - Canonical replaced the default search engine setting in Firefox from Google to Yahoo just a short while ago.

^^^ Hello. Netbook. Not "Ubuntu" as a desktop.

OO.o is awfully large for a netbook. Perhaps if one requires a local Office app on a netbook, gnumaric and Abiword would be better options. Heck, it is what I use on my desktop.

It may be time for me to find another distro. I don't care for the direction Ubuntu is heading.

Its not like you cant install OO easily on it... And their decision makes sense for a light netbook version of the distro.

  • Like 1

The time of small slow SSD drive is long gone for Netbook. The smallest HDD is 160GB.... I don't understand why OO would take THAT much space....

If I can run Microsoft Office 2007 on a Netbook, their is NO reason why I could not run OpenOffice.

The time of small slow SSD drive is long gone for Netbook. The smallest HDD is 160GB.... I don't understand why OO would take THAT much space....

If I can run Microsoft Office 2007 on a Netbook, their is NO reason why I could not run OpenOffice.

It *can* be run. And you *can* install it.

They just aren't going to default to installing it for all users. Just the ones that want it will install it.

I've actually removed OO.o from my desktop, and now I use Abiword and Gnumeric. I've even thought about not installing a spreadsheet app at all, the last time I used one was almost two years ago, if I remember correctly. Regarding OO.o, untill those 'Renaissance' changes kick in concerning speed, and gui (does everything *have to* look that large? and broken with every third theme?), I don't feel the need for it.

Btw, I don't think anything's set in stone as of yet, especially concerning Google Docs, even though it would suite a netbook well, I guess. I do hope they add Abiword and Gnumeric, those apps are very light, I think Abiword's package files were only 7 MB of download.

@Growled: Whilst I completely disagree with the Yahoo thing (it has a minimal impact on the user experience, and it's really easy to change it), I can see where that's coming from, but Gimp? Seriously? Face it, home users don't need an app like that. For photo album organization and editing, F-Spot is more than good enough (add web album integration on top of that, and that's it, you've covered 90% of users out there). Also, there are always those B-Sides discs which contain all the apps that couldn't make it to the official CD, in case internet is an issue.

I'm actually liking Ubuntu more and more. Lucid seems to be on a good way of becoming a very strong release. Today also saw a very early release of their 'Me Menu' initiative (making the desktop integrate better with social networking sites like Twitter, Facebook, and message protocols (IMs, e-mail clients)). It's basically a revamp of the current user menu:

image%5B3%5D.png

I guess since I do use Mint and they put their own spin on things, I'll wait and see what they offer before I make a decision. Lucid should be a good release since it's based on Debian Testing rather than the Sid they usually use.

As for OO....they should break in down into individual projects instead of offering it as one big suite.

Mint is awesome, I don't think I've ever seen a distro get that much of an overwhelming reception (I have yet to find a bad review), and I've installed it on a laptop myself. I guess they listen to the community more than Canonical does, especially regarding the application changes (like Empathy over Pidgin, which I never understood WHY). So yeah, in worst case, Mint will be there as 'Ubuntu - done right' :D

I don't see what the fuss is about personally, its not that hard to install GIMP and OO if you want it within Linux. Cutting down install sizes and offering the user more control is good in my opinion, although I will admit that one of the things that I am not so keen on with Ubuntu is that due to the attempts to make the installer a bit easier to use, you don't get an option to customise your install and install the packages you want.

even though it would suite a netbook well, I guess.
Yeah, when you have a connection (in before "Gears would fix that").
I do hope they add Abiword and Gnumeric, those apps are very light, I think Abiword's package files were only 7 MB of download.
Yeah, Abiword and Gnumeric would always be a better solution. Except when you need to work a presentation, then you're on the ****.

They are getting very commercial. They are even offering Bing for search through yahoo as default. If they want to get more notice they should offer the #1 reason that many people still hold on to Windows and that is Office.

They are getting very commercial. They are even offering Bing for search through yahoo as default. If they want to get more notice they should offer the #1 reason that many people still hold on to Windows and that is Office.

That isn't necessarily a bad thing, I feel one of the things lacking in a lot of Linux distributions is the Human touch (IE the thing that turns it from being a geek's OS into something for everyone), and I am personally all for them adding features to make it more usable. Besides, Google is no less corporate than Bing and Yahoo :p

That isn't necessarily a bad thing, I feel one of the things lacking in a lot of Linux distributions is the Human touch (IE the thing that turns it from being a geek's OS into something for everyone), and I am personally all for them adding features to make it more usable. Besides, Google is no less corporate than Bing and Yahoo :p

One of the main reasons I've found the hissy fits regarding the search engine thing so annoying.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!