Energy From The Vacuum. With Jhon Bedini.


Recommended Posts

Energy From The Vacuum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkNAn6G778&feature=related

When watching this video, it is important to note that the physics equations such as V=IR , P=I^2R that reside within the second law of thermodynamic framework is rendered irrelevent. Now, the skeptical people and engineers would ask me, how is it possible that anything can possibly violate the second law of thermodynamics? What this bunch of people dont know is that if you go buy an Oxford dictionary of Physics, at least one thirds of the phrases and words in it are phenomenas in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. But that does not mean the second law of thermodynamics itself is wrong. The problem with these people is while they claim themselves to be objective and scientific, do not actually know the scientific process well enough and do not have a tad bit of critical thinking and observation skills enough to even make sound judgements of nature. While the little they know (called classical physics) seems like a valid scientific model which is correct when applied appropriately in its own domain from which it is postulated, their dogmatic minds wants to extrapolate these theories into every nook and cranny of the universe such that all other valid postulation and observations are rendered inperceivable. Even with compelling evidence and repeatable experiments, some of these dogmatic minds will still prefer their status quo of self-denial. But there are genuine scientific minds out there in the twenty firts century that I sincerely believe will accept, digest, investigate and perform genuine qualitative and quantitative mental abstraction as well as experimentation on the phenomena. Lets focus our energy on this keen society that is really what the scientific community is about instead of wasting our energy on the dogmatic and slow progressing skeptical society that is epitome of all arbitrary impositions.

Energy From The Vacuum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkNAn6G778&feature=related

When watching this video, it is important to note that the physics equations such as V=IR , P=I^2R that reside within the second law of thermodynamic framework is rendered irrelevent. Now, the skeptical people and engineers would ask me, how is it possible that anything can possibly violate the second law of thermodynamics? What this bunch of people dont know is that if you go buy an Oxford dictionary of Physics, at least one thirds of the phrases and words in it are phenomenas in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. But that does not mean the second law of thermodynamics itself is wrong. The problem with these people is while they claim themselves to be objective and scientific, do not actually know the scientific process well enough and do not have a tad bit of critical thinking and observation skills enough to even make sound judgements of nature. While the little they know (called classical physics) seems like a valid scientific model which is correct when applied appropriately in its own domain from which it is postulated, their dogmatic minds wants to extrapolate these theories into every nook and cranny of the universe such that all other valid postulation and observations are rendered inperceivable. Even with compelling evidence and repeatable experiments, some of these dogmatic minds will still prefer their status quo of self-denial. But there are genuine scientific minds out there in the twenty firts century that I sincerely believe will accept, digest, investigate and perform genuine qualitative and quantitative mental abstraction as well as experimentation on the phenomena. Lets focus our energy on this keen society that is really what the scientific community is about instead of wasting our energy on the dogmatic and slow progressing skeptical society that is epitome of all arbitrary impositions.

So they used Electricity, to create "Free Energy"? That's what I got from that video. Not really free energy if you have to use existing energy to get this "free" energy.

Building and Testing the John Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator Energizer with Simplified Schoolgirl Circuit (SSG)

The electricity its to give impulse to the whole system. Then it recharges itself. John Bedini has been building this kind of systems for years. But everyone says its OMG Conspiracy! FAKE! Without even try it.

The paper its under patent!. And protected! But nah, its fake cause Michio Kaku says it (;

So they used Electricity, to create "Free Energy"? That's what I got from that video. Not really free energy if you have to use existing energy to get this "free" energy.

Actually, the major problem with this guy, is that he has performed a very poor experiment. He has all sorts of electrical systems plugged into the same same system (including main power). He isnt getting "free energy" at all...the entire system is a complex construction with external power sources.

I love where he does his load demonstration by turning on and off lights, which shows that his system is connected in parallel with another power system of some sorts (probably electricity mains).

Absolute joke...this belongs in the conspiracy forums.

Building and Testing the John Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator Energizer with Simplified Schoolgirl Circuit (SSG)

The electricity its to give impulse to the whole system. Then it recharges itself. John Bedini has been building this kind of systems for years. But everyone says its OMG Conspiracy! FAKE! Without even try it.

The paper its under patent!. And protected! But nah, its fake cause Michio Kaku says it (;

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Michio Kaku is probably the one man on this planet that I would believe on this subject, instead of stupid nut jobs.

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Michio Kaku is probably the one man on this planet that I would believe on this subject, instead of stupid nut jobs.

OU defies the laws of the physics though....even if they manage to get free energy...it would be as sagan said "coming from somewhere".

Asimov postulated that a Type 4 civilisation could easily do this by taking energy from a dying universe..or weakening a energy rich universe.

OU defies the laws of the physics though....even if they manage to get free energy...it would be as sagan said "coming from somewhere".

Asimov postulated that a Type 4 civilisation could easily do this by taking energy from a dying universe..or weakening a energy rich universe.

To make an apple pie from scratch, one would have to invent the universe.

Same concept with Free Energy.

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

Today's Physics, is not obsolete. I don't even think physics can be obsolete. It can only be better than previous generations.

Overunity isn't possible. If you need electricity to create energy.. that is just using electricity.

Marko Rodin, From what I can find on Google.. Not a Scientist.

Nassim Haramein - Pseudoscience

Michael Talbot - Into ESP and the supernatural.

In The Holographic Universe, Talbot explores the idea that the entire universe is a hologram. He examines the works of physicist David Bohm and neurophysiologist Karl H. Pribram, both of whom independently arrived at holographic theories or models of the universe. Talbot suggests that a holographic model might provide a scientific foundation for understanding various paranormal and anomalous phenomena, such as extrasensory perception, and provide a scientific basis for understanding mystical experience. He also ties in elements of Carl Jung's "collective unconscious" theory, and the synchronicity phenomenon, to suggest the existence of an underlying unified field that ties all things in the universe together.

At least Michio Kaku has an education in Physics.

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

All the names you mentioned are people on the fringe and speak more like religious people than scientists. Every time they bring their proposal to the peer review process, theres something absolutely wrong with their theory shown.

Tesla was nuts, but his work was in wireless power transmission...not OU.

Just because you dont understand physics...doesnt mean plenty of people do exist that understand it perfectly. Even if you're opening a quantum tunnel to other universes and drawing power from another universe...its STILL not OU. OU isnt just a physical impossibility...by definition, its a contradition.

Ok guys, stay on the box. You judge by names, but not for what they've done. At least try to analyze their work. You accuse them of being religious cause some biography on wikipedia or some random forum. All math its based on geometry if you didn't noticed. This info won't appear on normal TV media, because its like forbidden knowledge for those who makes money from this. Yep. Call me nuts. But I know I'm correct on my own information methods and research. I'm not a religious person, I don't belong to any of them. Keep believing the earth its solid, that we are alone in the universe, and that atoms can form solid objects (; .

Peace.

Ok guys, stay on the box. You judge by names, but not for what they've done. At least try to analyze their work. You accuse them of being religious cause some biography on wikipedia or some random forum. All math its based on geometry if you didn't noticed. This info won't appear on normal TV media, because its like forbidden knowledge for those who makes money from this. Yep. Call me nuts. But I know I'm correct on my own information methods and research. I'm not a religious person, I don't belong to any of them. Keep believing the earth its solid, that we are alone in the universe, and that atoms can form solid objects (; .

Peace.

I did analyse their work. Every review they get finds a battery or simulation that is not reproducible.

It isnt forbidden knowledge...these guys are just snake oil sales men. I dont doubt that they believe....they just can equate their beliefs with facts.

This thread belongs in the conspiracy forums. Could a mod please move it?

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Even I know that is impossible. I'm sure physicists in the future will create energy from sources we can't even begin to dream of today, but it won't be free. It has to come from somewhere.

Even I know that is impossible. I'm sure physicists in the future will create energy from sources we can't even begin to dream of today, but it won't be free. It has to come from somewhere.

Exactly.

Although personally I think the future is a mix of solar, wind, hydro, fission, fusion and quite possibly anti-matter in the far future :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!