Energy From The Vacuum. With Jhon Bedini.


Recommended Posts

Energy From The Vacuum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkNAn6G778&feature=related

When watching this video, it is important to note that the physics equations such as V=IR , P=I^2R that reside within the second law of thermodynamic framework is rendered irrelevent. Now, the skeptical people and engineers would ask me, how is it possible that anything can possibly violate the second law of thermodynamics? What this bunch of people dont know is that if you go buy an Oxford dictionary of Physics, at least one thirds of the phrases and words in it are phenomenas in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. But that does not mean the second law of thermodynamics itself is wrong. The problem with these people is while they claim themselves to be objective and scientific, do not actually know the scientific process well enough and do not have a tad bit of critical thinking and observation skills enough to even make sound judgements of nature. While the little they know (called classical physics) seems like a valid scientific model which is correct when applied appropriately in its own domain from which it is postulated, their dogmatic minds wants to extrapolate these theories into every nook and cranny of the universe such that all other valid postulation and observations are rendered inperceivable. Even with compelling evidence and repeatable experiments, some of these dogmatic minds will still prefer their status quo of self-denial. But there are genuine scientific minds out there in the twenty firts century that I sincerely believe will accept, digest, investigate and perform genuine qualitative and quantitative mental abstraction as well as experimentation on the phenomena. Lets focus our energy on this keen society that is really what the scientific community is about instead of wasting our energy on the dogmatic and slow progressing skeptical society that is epitome of all arbitrary impositions.

Energy From The Vacuum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkNAn6G778&feature=related

When watching this video, it is important to note that the physics equations such as V=IR , P=I^2R that reside within the second law of thermodynamic framework is rendered irrelevent. Now, the skeptical people and engineers would ask me, how is it possible that anything can possibly violate the second law of thermodynamics? What this bunch of people dont know is that if you go buy an Oxford dictionary of Physics, at least one thirds of the phrases and words in it are phenomenas in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. But that does not mean the second law of thermodynamics itself is wrong. The problem with these people is while they claim themselves to be objective and scientific, do not actually know the scientific process well enough and do not have a tad bit of critical thinking and observation skills enough to even make sound judgements of nature. While the little they know (called classical physics) seems like a valid scientific model which is correct when applied appropriately in its own domain from which it is postulated, their dogmatic minds wants to extrapolate these theories into every nook and cranny of the universe such that all other valid postulation and observations are rendered inperceivable. Even with compelling evidence and repeatable experiments, some of these dogmatic minds will still prefer their status quo of self-denial. But there are genuine scientific minds out there in the twenty firts century that I sincerely believe will accept, digest, investigate and perform genuine qualitative and quantitative mental abstraction as well as experimentation on the phenomena. Lets focus our energy on this keen society that is really what the scientific community is about instead of wasting our energy on the dogmatic and slow progressing skeptical society that is epitome of all arbitrary impositions.

So they used Electricity, to create "Free Energy"? That's what I got from that video. Not really free energy if you have to use existing energy to get this "free" energy.

Building and Testing the John Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator Energizer with Simplified Schoolgirl Circuit (SSG)

The electricity its to give impulse to the whole system. Then it recharges itself. John Bedini has been building this kind of systems for years. But everyone says its OMG Conspiracy! FAKE! Without even try it.

The paper its under patent!. And protected! But nah, its fake cause Michio Kaku says it (;

So they used Electricity, to create "Free Energy"? That's what I got from that video. Not really free energy if you have to use existing energy to get this "free" energy.

Actually, the major problem with this guy, is that he has performed a very poor experiment. He has all sorts of electrical systems plugged into the same same system (including main power). He isnt getting "free energy" at all...the entire system is a complex construction with external power sources.

I love where he does his load demonstration by turning on and off lights, which shows that his system is connected in parallel with another power system of some sorts (probably electricity mains).

Absolute joke...this belongs in the conspiracy forums.

Building and Testing the John Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator Energizer with Simplified Schoolgirl Circuit (SSG)

The electricity its to give impulse to the whole system. Then it recharges itself. John Bedini has been building this kind of systems for years. But everyone says its OMG Conspiracy! FAKE! Without even try it.

The paper its under patent!. And protected! But nah, its fake cause Michio Kaku says it (;

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Michio Kaku is probably the one man on this planet that I would believe on this subject, instead of stupid nut jobs.

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Michio Kaku is probably the one man on this planet that I would believe on this subject, instead of stupid nut jobs.

OU defies the laws of the physics though....even if they manage to get free energy...it would be as sagan said "coming from somewhere".

Asimov postulated that a Type 4 civilisation could easily do this by taking energy from a dying universe..or weakening a energy rich universe.

OU defies the laws of the physics though....even if they manage to get free energy...it would be as sagan said "coming from somewhere".

Asimov postulated that a Type 4 civilisation could easily do this by taking energy from a dying universe..or weakening a energy rich universe.

To make an apple pie from scratch, one would have to invent the universe.

Same concept with Free Energy.

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

Today's Physics, is not obsolete. I don't even think physics can be obsolete. It can only be better than previous generations.

Overunity isn't possible. If you need electricity to create energy.. that is just using electricity.

Marko Rodin, From what I can find on Google.. Not a Scientist.

Nassim Haramein - Pseudoscience

Michael Talbot - Into ESP and the supernatural.

In The Holographic Universe, Talbot explores the idea that the entire universe is a hologram. He examines the works of physicist David Bohm and neurophysiologist Karl H. Pribram, both of whom independently arrived at holographic theories or models of the universe. Talbot suggests that a holographic model might provide a scientific foundation for understanding various paranormal and anomalous phenomena, such as extrasensory perception, and provide a scientific basis for understanding mystical experience. He also ties in elements of Carl Jung's "collective unconscious" theory, and the synchronicity phenomenon, to suggest the existence of an underlying unified field that ties all things in the universe together.

At least Michio Kaku has an education in Physics.

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

All the names you mentioned are people on the fringe and speak more like religious people than scientists. Every time they bring their proposal to the peer review process, theres something absolutely wrong with their theory shown.

Tesla was nuts, but his work was in wireless power transmission...not OU.

Just because you dont understand physics...doesnt mean plenty of people do exist that understand it perfectly. Even if you're opening a quantum tunnel to other universes and drawing power from another universe...its STILL not OU. OU isnt just a physical impossibility...by definition, its a contradition.

Ok guys, stay on the box. You judge by names, but not for what they've done. At least try to analyze their work. You accuse them of being religious cause some biography on wikipedia or some random forum. All math its based on geometry if you didn't noticed. This info won't appear on normal TV media, because its like forbidden knowledge for those who makes money from this. Yep. Call me nuts. But I know I'm correct on my own information methods and research. I'm not a religious person, I don't belong to any of them. Keep believing the earth its solid, that we are alone in the universe, and that atoms can form solid objects (; .

Peace.

Ok guys, stay on the box. You judge by names, but not for what they've done. At least try to analyze their work. You accuse them of being religious cause some biography on wikipedia or some random forum. All math its based on geometry if you didn't noticed. This info won't appear on normal TV media, because its like forbidden knowledge for those who makes money from this. Yep. Call me nuts. But I know I'm correct on my own information methods and research. I'm not a religious person, I don't belong to any of them. Keep believing the earth its solid, that we are alone in the universe, and that atoms can form solid objects (; .

Peace.

I did analyse their work. Every review they get finds a battery or simulation that is not reproducible.

It isnt forbidden knowledge...these guys are just snake oil sales men. I dont doubt that they believe....they just can equate their beliefs with facts.

This thread belongs in the conspiracy forums. Could a mod please move it?

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Even I know that is impossible. I'm sure physicists in the future will create energy from sources we can't even begin to dream of today, but it won't be free. It has to come from somewhere.

Even I know that is impossible. I'm sure physicists in the future will create energy from sources we can't even begin to dream of today, but it won't be free. It has to come from somewhere.

Exactly.

Although personally I think the future is a mix of solar, wind, hydro, fission, fusion and quite possibly anti-matter in the far future :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      70
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!