Energy From The Vacuum. With Jhon Bedini.


Recommended Posts

Energy From The Vacuum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkNAn6G778&feature=related

When watching this video, it is important to note that the physics equations such as V=IR , P=I^2R that reside within the second law of thermodynamic framework is rendered irrelevent. Now, the skeptical people and engineers would ask me, how is it possible that anything can possibly violate the second law of thermodynamics? What this bunch of people dont know is that if you go buy an Oxford dictionary of Physics, at least one thirds of the phrases and words in it are phenomenas in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. But that does not mean the second law of thermodynamics itself is wrong. The problem with these people is while they claim themselves to be objective and scientific, do not actually know the scientific process well enough and do not have a tad bit of critical thinking and observation skills enough to even make sound judgements of nature. While the little they know (called classical physics) seems like a valid scientific model which is correct when applied appropriately in its own domain from which it is postulated, their dogmatic minds wants to extrapolate these theories into every nook and cranny of the universe such that all other valid postulation and observations are rendered inperceivable. Even with compelling evidence and repeatable experiments, some of these dogmatic minds will still prefer their status quo of self-denial. But there are genuine scientific minds out there in the twenty firts century that I sincerely believe will accept, digest, investigate and perform genuine qualitative and quantitative mental abstraction as well as experimentation on the phenomena. Lets focus our energy on this keen society that is really what the scientific community is about instead of wasting our energy on the dogmatic and slow progressing skeptical society that is epitome of all arbitrary impositions.

Energy From The Vacuum

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GnkNAn6G778&feature=related

When watching this video, it is important to note that the physics equations such as V=IR , P=I^2R that reside within the second law of thermodynamic framework is rendered irrelevent. Now, the skeptical people and engineers would ask me, how is it possible that anything can possibly violate the second law of thermodynamics? What this bunch of people dont know is that if you go buy an Oxford dictionary of Physics, at least one thirds of the phrases and words in it are phenomenas in violation of the second law of thermodynamics. But that does not mean the second law of thermodynamics itself is wrong. The problem with these people is while they claim themselves to be objective and scientific, do not actually know the scientific process well enough and do not have a tad bit of critical thinking and observation skills enough to even make sound judgements of nature. While the little they know (called classical physics) seems like a valid scientific model which is correct when applied appropriately in its own domain from which it is postulated, their dogmatic minds wants to extrapolate these theories into every nook and cranny of the universe such that all other valid postulation and observations are rendered inperceivable. Even with compelling evidence and repeatable experiments, some of these dogmatic minds will still prefer their status quo of self-denial. But there are genuine scientific minds out there in the twenty firts century that I sincerely believe will accept, digest, investigate and perform genuine qualitative and quantitative mental abstraction as well as experimentation on the phenomena. Lets focus our energy on this keen society that is really what the scientific community is about instead of wasting our energy on the dogmatic and slow progressing skeptical society that is epitome of all arbitrary impositions.

So they used Electricity, to create "Free Energy"? That's what I got from that video. Not really free energy if you have to use existing energy to get this "free" energy.

Building and Testing the John Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator Energizer with Simplified Schoolgirl Circuit (SSG)

The electricity its to give impulse to the whole system. Then it recharges itself. John Bedini has been building this kind of systems for years. But everyone says its OMG Conspiracy! FAKE! Without even try it.

The paper its under patent!. And protected! But nah, its fake cause Michio Kaku says it (;

So they used Electricity, to create "Free Energy"? That's what I got from that video. Not really free energy if you have to use existing energy to get this "free" energy.

Actually, the major problem with this guy, is that he has performed a very poor experiment. He has all sorts of electrical systems plugged into the same same system (including main power). He isnt getting "free energy" at all...the entire system is a complex construction with external power sources.

I love where he does his load demonstration by turning on and off lights, which shows that his system is connected in parallel with another power system of some sorts (probably electricity mains).

Absolute joke...this belongs in the conspiracy forums.

Building and Testing the John Bedini Monopole Mechanical Oscillator Energizer with Simplified Schoolgirl Circuit (SSG)

The electricity its to give impulse to the whole system. Then it recharges itself. John Bedini has been building this kind of systems for years. But everyone says its OMG Conspiracy! FAKE! Without even try it.

The paper its under patent!. And protected! But nah, its fake cause Michio Kaku says it (;

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Michio Kaku is probably the one man on this planet that I would believe on this subject, instead of stupid nut jobs.

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Michio Kaku is probably the one man on this planet that I would believe on this subject, instead of stupid nut jobs.

OU defies the laws of the physics though....even if they manage to get free energy...it would be as sagan said "coming from somewhere".

Asimov postulated that a Type 4 civilisation could easily do this by taking energy from a dying universe..or weakening a energy rich universe.

OU defies the laws of the physics though....even if they manage to get free energy...it would be as sagan said "coming from somewhere".

Asimov postulated that a Type 4 civilisation could easily do this by taking energy from a dying universe..or weakening a energy rich universe.

To make an apple pie from scratch, one would have to invent the universe.

Same concept with Free Energy.

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

Today's Physics, is not obsolete. I don't even think physics can be obsolete. It can only be better than previous generations.

Overunity isn't possible. If you need electricity to create energy.. that is just using electricity.

Marko Rodin, From what I can find on Google.. Not a Scientist.

Nassim Haramein - Pseudoscience

Michael Talbot - Into ESP and the supernatural.

In The Holographic Universe, Talbot explores the idea that the entire universe is a hologram. He examines the works of physicist David Bohm and neurophysiologist Karl H. Pribram, both of whom independently arrived at holographic theories or models of the universe. Talbot suggests that a holographic model might provide a scientific foundation for understanding various paranormal and anomalous phenomena, such as extrasensory perception, and provide a scientific basis for understanding mystical experience. He also ties in elements of Carl Jung's "collective unconscious" theory, and the synchronicity phenomenon, to suggest the existence of an underlying unified field that ties all things in the universe together.

At least Michio Kaku has an education in Physics.

The problem its most of todays physics are obsolete (;

Research about:

Marko Rodin

Nassim Haramein

Michael Talbot

Tesla did a lot more than we've been told.

I won't wait till someone sell this to me when the design and prints are everywhere to build it. Investigate your own, just don't say conspiracy ftw. I don't believe any **** that kaku says now after all I've learn on my own. p:

All the names you mentioned are people on the fringe and speak more like religious people than scientists. Every time they bring their proposal to the peer review process, theres something absolutely wrong with their theory shown.

Tesla was nuts, but his work was in wireless power transmission...not OU.

Just because you dont understand physics...doesnt mean plenty of people do exist that understand it perfectly. Even if you're opening a quantum tunnel to other universes and drawing power from another universe...its STILL not OU. OU isnt just a physical impossibility...by definition, its a contradition.

Ok guys, stay on the box. You judge by names, but not for what they've done. At least try to analyze their work. You accuse them of being religious cause some biography on wikipedia or some random forum. All math its based on geometry if you didn't noticed. This info won't appear on normal TV media, because its like forbidden knowledge for those who makes money from this. Yep. Call me nuts. But I know I'm correct on my own information methods and research. I'm not a religious person, I don't belong to any of them. Keep believing the earth its solid, that we are alone in the universe, and that atoms can form solid objects (; .

Peace.

Ok guys, stay on the box. You judge by names, but not for what they've done. At least try to analyze their work. You accuse them of being religious cause some biography on wikipedia or some random forum. All math its based on geometry if you didn't noticed. This info won't appear on normal TV media, because its like forbidden knowledge for those who makes money from this. Yep. Call me nuts. But I know I'm correct on my own information methods and research. I'm not a religious person, I don't belong to any of them. Keep believing the earth its solid, that we are alone in the universe, and that atoms can form solid objects (; .

Peace.

I did analyse their work. Every review they get finds a battery or simulation that is not reproducible.

It isnt forbidden knowledge...these guys are just snake oil sales men. I dont doubt that they believe....they just can equate their beliefs with facts.

This thread belongs in the conspiracy forums. Could a mod please move it?

Do you even know the concept of "Free Energy?"

It means energy which can be created from nothing. Which is impossible.

Even I know that is impossible. I'm sure physicists in the future will create energy from sources we can't even begin to dream of today, but it won't be free. It has to come from somewhere.

Even I know that is impossible. I'm sure physicists in the future will create energy from sources we can't even begin to dream of today, but it won't be free. It has to come from somewhere.

Exactly.

Although personally I think the future is a mix of solar, wind, hydro, fission, fusion and quite possibly anti-matter in the far future :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      455
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!