US soldier gives four-year-old daughter 'waterboarding' over alphab

By Rob2687
in Real World News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Rob2687

Posted
Posted
Joshua Tabor allegedly told police he had used the technique because he was angry and knew his daughter was scared of water.

The 27-year-old, who had recently gained custody of the young girl, said she "squirmed" as he pushed her under the water three or four times, it was claimed.

...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/7187010/US-soldier-gives-four-year-old-daughter-waterboarding-over-alphabet.html

Grand Master

MasterC

Posted
Posted

Jail the swine, and then ensure he leaves the forces in the most dishonorable fashion.

Agreed. I can't imagine anyone waterboarding an adult, let alone a child. Takes a really sick person to do that.

Grand Master

Growled Member

Posted
  • Member
Posted

More here:

http://abcnews.go.com/US/joshua-tabor-accused-waterboarding-young-daughter/story?id=9778116

He had served 15 months in Iraq. The girlfriend said that Tabor had an "anger management problem." He is definitely sick.

Grand Master

still1

Posted
Posted

I was stuck at that part where Ratchet surf the broken nefarious space station. I kept falling down and couldn't get of the circle station.

I has been trying for atleast 2 days and after more than 500 attempts I finally made it.

I thought of giving up after getting depressed then I thought it not what I want to give up.

Thought to share it with u guys...

sick bas***d...

Proficient

Duality

Posted
Posted

^I'm guessing you quoted you're post from another thread by accident.

This guys definitely needs some help, you can't be a normal human being if you water board your own kid.

Agreed - this is almost certainly a sign of more deep-rooted issues.

Grand Master

ylcard

Posted
Posted

Also is it just a coincidence he decided to use water boarding?

It's not exclusive to Army, or for what matter, US Army, it's quite possible that it is used everywhere, of course you wouldn't know about it because it's not something you talk about.

About PTSD, it's not just soldiers that "get" that, so I still don't see how it is of any relevance that he's a soldier in the US Army (or whatever).

Going as far as saying that he shouldn't have been "allowed" to breed is just.. err.. crazy. Regardless of what he did, no one has the right to deny him of having children, yeah not even you internet warriors.

Mentor

Davo

Posted
Posted

Going as far as saying that he shouldn't have been "allowed" to breed is just.. err.. crazy. Regardless of what he did, no one has the right to deny him of having children, yeah not even you internet warriors.

Someone who would use a torture technique on a four year old girl and leave bruises on her throat should be allowed to have kids? There are people who shouldn't be allowed to have kids for less.

Proficient

AgentGray

Posted
Posted

Okay, from the article, this

Is a horrible thing to do to a child and should be punished to the full extent of the law and lose any and all contact with the family

But this was no where near what actually water boarding is like and bares no resemblance to what actually happens when someone's water boarded. Her head was dunked under water, a horrifying thing for someone afraid of it, but with water boarding your physical body is made to think it's drowning, not just the mental fear of it, but your physical reality is that you're drowning and going to die. These things are worlds apart. Horrible, but not on the same level.

Considering less then a handful of people have ever trained to water board people, the fact that he was a solider probably has little to do with this whole thing.

Without the tenuous link to water boarding this is just one case of countless horrifying child abuse cases that go unreported upon in this country, by the same willfully ignorant media so quick to jump on this case.

So this story has little to nothing to do with the child abuse, which makes the article significantly more evil, as it's destroying the lives of the victims and bringing them to a spotlight to make some political point that's tenuous at best.

Grand Master

TrueMonolith

Posted
Posted

Damn non-muslims doing their crazy religious practices. If he were muslim he would have simply honor killed her. :shiftyninja:

Waterboarding is a religious practice now?

Is it the 11th commandment (Thou shalt waterboard an unruly child)?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Tidal won't monetize AI slop music, company says

      By monterxz · Posted

      I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States

      By Cosmocronos · Posted

      “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots

      By Usama Jawad96 · Posted

      Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware

      By +Warwagon · Posted

      With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware

      By C:Amie · Posted

      It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!