Recommended Posts

Hmm where are the DLC located? Are they automatically installed? When I click the DLC tab in L4D2 properties nothing shows.

The DLC for the L4Ds are classed as updates for the game rather than separate entities so they get downloaded and applied automatically (or manually if you haven't got it set to automatically update). Yay Valve and its freebies :)

The DLC for the L4Ds are classed as updates for the game rather than separate entities so they get downloaded and applied automatically (or manually if you haven't got it set to automatically update). Yay Valve and its freebies :)

Excellent, thanks for the help :)

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I Jumped on it :)

Not sure whether I'll get a chance to play it before I get my new PC. I've got a feeling it might destroy my current one. I heard stories about low FPS on fairly high end rigs, don't know if the patch has helped with that in any way.

has anyone here used gamersgate. how good is it?

As I said in another thread here, GamersGate > Steam. Valve can only dream to have GG's support guys. They are the best.

In terms of the service, you log in the site and purchase the games. You can download them and install them whenever you like. You need internet to activate during installation, but there is one trick you can use... When you activate for the first time, the downloader will start downloading the decrypted setup files in a temp directory. You can back up that directory, and will never need internet connection to install that game ever again. Some rare games may come with activation limits, everything is written on the game's page. Even if you ever make a mistake when purchasing, GG will gladly refund you, and you will be able to correct your purchase.

Plus, you get blue coins for every purchase / rating / review / help / you name it, with which you can buy games (instead of spending real money).

GG > Steam ? I guess you're entitled to your opinion, but it would be nice to see that it is your opinion and not a display of facts.

I like GamersGate, they have a nice collection of games :)

My opinion, of course. :) Oh, and the comparison was about their support, an opinion based on a more than dozen cases where they refunded my friends when they couldn't get the game working, or made a wrong/uneducated purchase.

As I said in another thread here, GamersGate > Steam. Valve can only dream to have GG's support guys. They are the best.

In terms of the service, you log in the site and purchase the games. You can download them and install them whenever you like. You need internet to activate during installation, but there is one trick you can use... When you activate for the first time, the downloader will start downloading the decrypted setup files in a temp directory. You can back up that directory, and will never need internet connection to install that game ever again. Some rare games may come with activation limits, everything is written on the game's page. Even if you ever make a mistake when purchasing, GG will gladly refund you, and you will be able to correct your purchase.

Plus, you get blue coins for every purchase / rating / review / help / you name it, with which you can buy games (instead of spending real money).

You can do that with Steam, too, the backup thing that is.

You can do that with Steam, too, the backup thing that is.

And how do you install the game later if you don't have an internet connection or Steam? You can't. :) With GG, its not like that. You don't have any requirements once you get the decrypted files.

And how do you install the game later if you don't have an internet connection or Steam? You can't. :) With GG, its not like that. You don't have any requirements once you get the decrypted files.

Funny fact: I've never used Steam's backup thingy, I'm using it now to see how it works and it doesn't seem to require an internet connection, it obviously requires Steam, but I don't know how dependent it is on the internet to restore a backup that is on a CD/DVD/HDD.

Also, sometimes the setup file in GG's releases are not pure .EXE's, hey can only be launched by using GG's downloader and if there is an updated version of that game on their server you'll have to redownload the game, it won't even use your downloaded setup file. I've only had this happen to me once, but it's not something I'd trust completely.

So? Is backing up/installing games something you do daily? I don't mean to pick a fight or start a flame war or anything but that's not a reason why one should be considered better than the other.

Nah, its not like we're fighting for our lives. :D :D

A little plus for GG would be that it doesn't require a client. Everything else seems pretty much the same, when it comes to backing up / restoring back up. :)

Also, sometimes the setup file in GG's releases are not pure .EXE's, hey can only be launched by using GG's downloader and if there is an updated version of that game on their server you'll have to redownload the game, it won't even use your downloaded setup file. I've only had this happen to me once, but it's not something I'd trust completely.

True, in some rare cases. Though, I know a guy from GOG's forums that had his money refunded because he wasn't able to back it up in that way. :)

I fail to see how Steam's requirement of its Client, or an

internet connection, is in any way a negative. The purpose

of Steam is to track your games real-time in order to track

Achievements, game updates and patches, ect. If I wanted

to simply purchase a game in digital form I would go through

Amazon, or Gamestop, ect. I choose Steams because of those

benefits.

Besides, when my ISP crapped out and my internet connection

was down, I was still able to play Civ V just fine.

Microsoft is redesinging Games for Windows with new marketplace, there are some promotions like Borderlands for 9,99$ or Osmos 2,49$. There might be others, but they seem to be lacking a category for "special offers" atm.

http://www.gamesforwindows.com/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!