5 Reasons you still need to be a PC gamer


Recommended Posts

I was a PC gamer from 1998-2010. I switched to console (PS3) a few weeks back for a few reasons:

DRM - because I used to switch to and from Window/Linux a lot and lot of my games locked me out due to too many installs. Funnily enough I'd only switch back to Windows because of games!

Playing on a Sofa with wireless controller - This is luxury, not huddled over a keyboard/mouse.

Media Servers - Again I can control my PC media library from the couch.

Linux - Not needing to play games on the PC any more has finally freed me from Windows.

Another bonus for me was that I can't mod/cheat the hell out of games any more. If I got a bit bored of a PC game I'd mod/godmode through it just to see the end, I'm having to put more effort into PS3 games and I'm actually getting more enjoyment from it.

Yes but I don't have £300 to keep my PC up to date, thats the problem with PC gaming. Atleast with a console I know that the games wont change much until a new console comes out. Oh and playing PC games 1280x1024 (if the game isn't too taxing, I sometimes have to drop the resolutions) on a 19" monitor compared to 1080p on a 37" TV......I'll pick the TV :p

You obviously didnt get his point. He was saying the "bleeding edge" was a bull**** reason. My old PC was around his and i spent 200 more to keep it going for another year. It would go 1600(resolution) pretty nicely too.

Playing 1080p from a PC is better then ANY console as PC natively supports 1080 on ALL games. All consoles do is upscale or etc. So idk what your point is there.

PC gaming will stay alive me because theres people like me and spookie and a few others(anaron, sethos, dirtylarry, etc) that will know what games go where. BF BC2? Guess what PC. That game is garbage on consoles compared to PC and yes ive played it on my 360 and PS3 and I still prefer PC for that game.

Also, HOPEFULLY if they keep there acts together, BF3 will be PC only and you console people there will miss out, and im totally happy with that :).

IF your smart and build a PC to your necessities you really dont spend much. Its cheaper then a console for all the stuff youll buy for the console and does A LOT more then a console.

@08993: Your case is different, I would get annoyed of the DRM too but for me im tri booting 7/ubuntu/backtrack and so far my DRM hasnt broken for any of my RETAIL games. Also most of my steam games keep there own DRM through steam so those NEVER break.

Thats one thing I love about steam, doesnt matter what you do on your computer, as long as you are in steam your DRM is fresh doesnt have to reactivate.

Playing 1080p from a PC is better then ANY console as PC natively supports 1080 on ALL games. All consoles do is upscale.

The PS3 and 360 do have some native 1080p titles (not upscaled), though rare.

BF3 will be PC only and you console people there will miss out, and im totally happy with that

I would rather PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 gamers get BF3 so everyone can enjoy the title. To me it's all about gamers as a group of people that enjoy playing games. I think everyone would be happier if everyone had more opportunities than less.

I was a PC gamer from 1998-2010. I switched to console (PS3) a few weeks back for a few reasons:

DRM - because I used to switch to and from Window/Linux a lot and lot of my games locked me out due to too many installs. Funnily enough I'd only switch back to Windows because of games!

Playing on a Sofa with wireless controller - This is luxury, not huddled over a keyboard/mouse.

Media Servers - Again I can control my PC media library from the couch.

Linux - Not needing to play games on the PC any more has finally freed me from Windows.

Another bonus for me was that I can't mod/cheat the hell out of games any more. If I got a bit bored of a PC game I'd mod/godmode through it just to see the end, I'm having to put more effort into PS3 games and I'm actually getting more enjoyment from it.

You bring up some good points but the last one is more about self-control. On the PC platform, the ability to mod or edit the game to your liking is a perk.

#5 contradicts #1 (in the grand scheme of cost), #3 can be done on consoles, and #2 is subjective and irrelevant (given that console gamers are generally never pitted against pc gamers). Not a very solid list.

-Spenser

One could say that you can afford to be on the bleeding edge because the games are $10 cheaper.

5 doesn't contradict number 1. You don't necessarily need a high cost system to play bleeding edge games.

3 can't be done on a console - since when could you play Space Quest on a 360? Heck, can you play Halo 1 on a 360 after April?

2 - debatable. I hear a lot of people say "Wish I had a KB/Mouse on a console". Personal preference really.

So yeah, I agree. PC Gaming's not going away. And after seeing pricing of PC games vs Console games - i'm happy to be a PC gamer.

Yes 5 does contradict 1. A "low cost" PC is still significantly more expensive than consoles and you still have to update it much more frequently.

3 can be done. Heard of Xbox Live Arcade and the Playstation Network? And yes, Xbox games can still be played on Xbox 360 - you just can't go online with them, which isn't an issue in Halo 1 anyways as it never had Xbox Live to begin with.

-Spenser

5 doesn't contradict number 1. You don't necessarily need a high cost system to play bleeding edge games.

3 can't be done on a console - since when could you play Space Quest on a 360? Heck, can you play Halo 1 on a 360 after April?

2 - debatable. I hear a lot of people say "Wish I had a KB/Mouse on a console". Personal preference really.

So yeah, I agree. PC Gaming's not going away. And after seeing pricing of PC games vs Console games - i'm happy to be a PC gamer.

Yes! (for the bolded part)

Im sorry but I cant stand controls of a computer game. I have to have a controller, preferably a PS type.

Ok. You take your controller. I will take my keyboard and mouse. 1vs1 in every real (real as in Quake / Unreal Tournament / Counter Strike) first person shooter game. No auto aim, no auto fire, no auto whatever. If you kill once, you win, and consoles are better. :)

Ok. You take your controller. I will take my keyboard and mouse. 1vs1 in every real (real as in Quake / Unreal Tournament / Counter Strike) first person shooter game. No auto aim, no auto fire, no auto whatever. If you kill once, you win, and consoles are better. :)

WTF is a "real FPS"? :laugh:

The PS3 and 360 do have some native 1080p titles (not upscaled), though rare.

I would rather PC, PS3 and Xbox 360 gamers get BF3 so everyone can enjoy the title. To me it's all about gamers as a group of people that enjoy playing games. I think everyone would be happier if everyone had more opportunities than less.

I believe they should keep BF "exclusive" to PC. BF on the xbox 360 and ps2 sucked. Nothing like 1942 or 2.

Also, like i said ALL games on PC are native 1080. Better then some like consoles, and i mean all consoles. But I was refering to his post about resolution and pointing out PC > consoles in 1080p.

WTF is a "real FPS"? :laugh:

IMO,

- No auto-aim or any partial implementation of thereof

- No Giant-Cursor

- No hit-everything within the giant cursor no matter what

- The necessity of dynamic switching between precision aiming (per pixel cursor movement) and fast twich shooting (the enemy behind you), in other words a controller which allows precision while the speed of the cursor shouldn't be static or limited in range.*

- A game which rewards those that have fast response time and skill.

- Main strategy should be: if it moves kill it.

I just remembered, in CS:S, in a surf map, where both sides spawn with bulletproof glass between them, I jumped off, did a 180 turn (to look at the other side) and got a scope-less headshot with a scout.

#2 is subjective and irrelevant (given that console gamers are generally never pitted against pc gamers).

It might be subjective, but it's not irrelevant. Many kinds of games are a better experience with a mouse + keyboard control scheme than with console controls. The right controller for the right job.

Never mind that you can buy console style controllers for the PC. Natal will even be available for PCs. Or what if you want simulator controls like a steering wheel, or an entire airplane cockpit? If money is no object, you can even play RTSes or D&D on the MS Surface.

SX02_HRT_Simulator_with_Pro_Series_Sequential_Shift.JPG

Consoles are cheap, dumbed-down PCs, a console cannot compete against a PC for quality. Ease of use maybe, but not quality. If you say people can play whatever they want, sure, except that console gaming is screwing over PC games. All we get is dumbed-down games because publishers want to make everything cross-platform to maximize profits.

I really don't have anything good to say about consoles, except for maybe the Wii and portable consoles because they are unique platforms. The PS3 and Xbox are a cancer of the gaming industry because they're nothing but dumbed-down PCs with monkey-oriented controllers.

A PC can do almost everything a console can do.

Do you like using a controller? Just hook it up to a PC.

Do you like playing on a couch in front of a TV? Hook up your PC to your TV and grab your controller.

And you don't need a top of the line PC to play the latest games. If you just set your resolution to 1280x720, the equivalent of what's output by consoles, you can get by with a 2-3 year old video card with graphics equivalent to consoles.

With Games for Windows Live, PC gamers now even have a gamertag + achievements.

IMO the only advantage consoles have are console-exclusive titles. Damn you Microsoft, why can't you just release Halo 3 + ODST + Reach on PC. :angry:

This is all about gaming right!

Excellent system exclusive games make excellent use of whatever control schemes and graphics capabilities the systems they are on have, and different people will be comfortable paying different prices for games than others. So really all your points are useless, it all depends on the person and what game they are playing.

For me a still need to be a PC gamer because I couldn't handle missing out on the PC exclusive first person shooters and strategy games, plus I personally prefer the keyboard mouse combo for many genres and like to push my games at a super high rez with AA and AF. Still for other people these points could mean little to nothing. I own a Wii for all my casual, first party and local multiplayer games and have just as much fun on it as on my computer.

I think the only definite plus for PC gaming that no one can argue is that the capabilities of the gfx are technically much much higher.

My two cents.

A PC can do almost everything a console can do.

Do you like using a controller? Just hook it up to a PC.

Do you like playing on a couch in front of a TV? Hook up your PC to your TV and grab your controller.

And you don't need a top of the line PC to play the latest games. If you just set your resolution to 1280x720, the equivalent of what's output by consoles, you can get by with a 2-3 year old video card with graphics equivalent to consoles.

With Games for Windows Live, PC gamers now even have a gamertag + achievements.

IMO the only advantage consoles have are console-exclusive titles. Damn you Microsoft, why can't you just release Halo 3 + ODST + Reach on PC. :angry:

Well, a PC can do everything a Console can do, not almost everything, but everything. Well maybe except for that Wii crap, but who the hell plays that anyway ? :)

I'm pretty sure you can hook up a keyboard/mouse to consoles these days.. maybe I'm wrong, no one of checking it out for me.. gave my old PS2 away to my nephew.

You also don't need to purchase a new (newer) Xbox360/PS3, they last for a long time, my PS2 that I mentioned before is now 5 years old and it still works and the games created for PS2 work fine.

Overall I'm a PC guy, I can't stand using the console, even games that I love playing on the PC..

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
    • Meta is reusing old DDR4 RAM in its servers instead of buying new hardware by Ivan Jenic Image: Meta The global hardware shortage isn’t exactly news, as the entire world has been struggling with rising component prices for quite some time now. And while big companies certainly aren’t as affected as the average consumer, even they aren’t opposed to the idea of saving a few (million) bucks. Meta appears to have found a way to spend less on new hardware while also putting its outdated infrastructure to use, essentially killing two birds with one stone. The company has built a custom chip that lets it reuse memory from retired servers rather than buying new hardware. The chip is called Vistara and allows for connecting old DDR4 RAM from obsolete servers into new servers that rely on DDR5. The problem Vistara solves goes back to a basic mismatch in how long hardware lasts. Meta replaces its servers every three to five years, but the memory modules inside them are good for seven to ten. When a server gets decommissioned, perfectly usable DDR4 RAM goes with it. Meta is presenting the new method at today’s ISCA symposium, but The Register has got hold of a paper that explains how Vistara works. It's a custom ASIC that bridges DDR4 memory to newer processors via aCXL 2.0/1.1 interface over PCIe Gen5 x16. Meta pulls DDR4 sticks from old machines and installs them in dedicated units it calls MemServers, each of which pairs 768GB of DDR5 with 256GB of recovered DDR4. The operating system sees the DDR4 as an additional memory node and draws from it when the primary DDR5 is running low. Off-the-shelf CXL hardware couldn't do this, so Meta built its own. Existing interfaces bundle their own memory with the controller, which makes reusing old RAM sticks impossible. But Vistara separates the controller from the memory entirely, so Meta can plug in whatever DDR4 sticks it has on hand. Meta plans to deploy the new architecture in hyperscale infrastructure with millions of servers, which should mean that Meta’s AI datacenters will now be more efficient. The company is investing heavily in AI infrastructure, especially with its new AI model, Muse Spark, now widely available. All of this doesn't mean that Meta will exclusively rely on "recycled" RAM, but the company is still looking at considerable savings at scale.
    • Save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI lifetime subscriptions by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time, you can save up to 87% on ChatPlayground AI: lifetime subscriptions. ChatPlayground AI puts the world’s top AI models in one powerful interface, letting you enter a single prompt and instantly compare outputs from multiple models to choose the perfect response for your needs. Boost productivity and creativity with access to the latest AI giants like GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, and dozens more — all in one window. Whether you’re chatting, coding, generating images, or refining prompts, ChatPlayground AI equips you with advanced tools like prompt engineering, image/PDF chat, saved conversations, and AI image creation, plus priority support to keep your workflow seamless. Access the world’s best AI models Side-by-Side Comparisons: Enter one prompt & instantly view results from multiple AI models to find the best output for your needs 40+ AI Models: Includes GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet 4, Gemini 1.5 Flash, DeepSeek V3, Llama, Perplexity, and many more Multi-Function Platform: Access AI for chat, image generation & coding all within a single interface Web Browser Extension: Offers a Chrome extension to seamlessly integrate the platform into your browsing workflow Boost productivity with powerful features ChatPlayground Interface: Designed for seamless AI model comparison in one window Prompt Engineering: Refine & optimize your prompts for better, more accurate responses Chat with Images & PDFs: Upload visuals and documents to get context-aware answers Saved Chat History: Keep track of past conversations for reference & ongoing projects AI Image Generation: Create high-quality visuals powered by top AI image models Priority Customer Support: Get faster assistance whenever you need it What you'll get with the Unlimited Plan Includes unlimited messages/month Built for prompt engineers, startups, and teams who run experiments nonstop Includes priority access to new features and future models Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Desktop Max number of device(s): Unlimited Available to both NEW & Existing users Updates included A lifetime subscription to ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited Plan) normally costs $619, but you can pick it up for just $79 for a limited time - that represents a saving of $530 (87% off). Click the link below for more details, always check terms and specifications before making a purchase. Get this ChatPlayground AI (Unlimited) for $79 (was $619) There are also two other discounted plans to choose from. Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!