If your system got infected, would you reformat?


If you got infected, would you reformat.  

242 members have voted

  1. 1. If you got infected, would you reformat.

    • Yes - Once you are infected, your sytsem can never be trusted again.
      159
    • No - I feel confident that once I get rid of all the malware my personal data from this point foward would not be at risk.
      83


Recommended Posts

Why trust an antivirus program if you're just going to reformat? I would rather remove the infection(s) and exhaust all other recovery options before that.

Trojan horses suck big time... Always nice having a clean install before doing your backup. I still don't trust the software at all, not even Windows 7 will please me after that. I have to reformat.

+1 The whole point of running an AV is to avoid re-format. Refomart is a No-NO, i'd rather scan and scan all over again, safemode, from ubuntu cd, etc. then reformat.

Ugh, no. It is to stop it in it's tracks and protect your data. That's exactly what I use it for, it protects my data. If I backup bad data, reformats do nothing.

The last virus I got on my own system was from a 5.25" floppy disk (boot sector virus on a shareware game) back in 1994. However since it's my job, I deal with infected PCs all the time, and I always tell the customer it would be best to let me reformat and reinstall if they'll let me. Not only does it guarantee all the malware is gone, something no antivirus program can do, Windows just runs a lot better after a fresh install.

By the way, it seems like the common denominator of nearly all infected systems I see is Limewire.

Exactly... Songs are downloaded off Limewire and people download some virus instead. It's terrible. Everybody around me thinks I'm complicated for not using it, they think I'm stupid. Zune Pass is really nice. Have it for 3 months right now, so 30 songs to keep. :)

Ok. Well. Here is how it goes. Operating systems have a main problem, they all have it in common. Well, some don't, for example, iPhone OS (when it isn't jailbroken) does not have this issue. The operating system has everything mainly on one partition and allows so much modularity, that it blends right on in with the main functions of the operating system. Uninstall files, app settings, invalid registry entries, hidden Flash Player game files, computer repair utilities scattered, left-over files from bad uninstalls, etc. This all collects on most operating systems. Then you have complex ways to customize something and that goes wrong. For example, a friend had a desktop full of **** everywhere, and not only that, Luna was turned off, and some mix between Windows Classic and Luna was on, it was gray and ugly, that's all I know. I find this stuff on every computer before I reformat. A solution can be found for this. The boot loader can be isolated, and now in recent operating system releases, it has been. The boot loader can contact a filesystem which has information on where everything is. The boot loader finds the data store where Windows is located and launches it. Then you are in Windows, but the usual Windows folder is no longer available to you or any programs. An SDK can be used to change the way Windows functions. For most smart Windows users, you would just jailbreak, which would load another boot loader entry and it would find the authentication that would authorize access to Windows' inner workings. This would make everything more manageable as Windows would stay the same. I use Windows as an example as it suffers the most. Imagine everything being managed neatly and any modification to Windows could just be undone. Basically any modification would be launched on an insertion platform which the SDK would take advantage of. Anything that hurts Windows in the many years of having it running perfectly, could easily throw you into a Safe Mode which stops the insertion platform temporarily while the issue is fixed. This could stop BSODS, viruses, general clutter, etc. Until I see Windows manageable enough that after it is cleaned from a virus, it is completely identical to any other copy, I'm back to a reformat. This is the way it should be, an image that nothing can change it unless it is on the insertion platform. Right now, files can just be corrupted easily, and your Windows folder has to link to so much other stuff on your HDD, causing you to need to defragment it. If Windows was an image that had bits and pieces loaded into memory when needed, it could be kept on a certain location on your HDD, and during install, it would ensure no fragments were found, and that the image was always where it should be and not scattered across the HDD, needing constant defragmenting. Windows would still defragment your data though. Sounds like an idea to me. :D

if it's my personal machine...then I trust my work...if it's a customer's machine...well, that may be a different story....it's not because I like to gouge them, it's because I've seen such terrible infections, that most of the time, that's the only solution....but not for me though. I run my own domain, and don't have to worry about stuff like this...I constantly repair several clients macnines per month...all successful...just general PEBKAC, for the most part....or kids, who think they know what they're doing...

Short answer edit: No, I would not format...most things can be solved or fixed with knowledge...where you find the knowledge is up to you...but I'll tell you what...I've been around neowin long enough, that I can tell you...there are other solutiions...and there are several experts to guide you...in particular, Budman is my fav...he's inspired me to go back to college, and get my Net+..and go beyond that, if I can...(thanks, b-man!) but anyway, if you trust yourself enough, and are confident in your work, you'll know what to do...and you won't make the wrong decisions ;) The correct answers will come to you, and you will do well, trust me, I get all sorts of people all of the time, saying, "How the H_E_DOUBLE_ELL did you do that?" Just do your homework....it'll come natural ;)

I would have to say, if it's pretty bad, I would reformat and reinstall. I would always have that feeling like something was still lurking. For viruses in files that I might download, well, I would just clean it or delete it. But if I realized I was pretty badly infected, I think it would just be safer to make a fresh start.

  • Like 1

For me personally I would just restore from a clean install image but for technicians as per the original post theres alot of variables to consider and I can easily see why they would prefer not to do a format and clean install. That being said if you do reformat customers are usually pretty happy in the end anyway due to how much better the system is running.

I'd isolate the system from any outside network and clean it.

The belief that once infected implies always infected is faulty - if you're willing to assume that a machine is infected without actual evidence of it being so, then you must also accept the possibility that every single machine you use is already compromised by some stealth program. This is defined as paranoia.

Windows has, believe it or not, only a finite number of mechanisms that can be used to execute code without user interaction. After checking all those, and verifying system file checksums, I'd be reasonably certain that the machine is clean.

Wouldn't all that take lot of time? Not to mention that you still end up with a result that entails a margin of error. Formatting or image restoring is accurate, mostly automated, and quite quick (at least with Windows 7).

Wouldn't all that take lot of time? Not to mention that you still end up with a result that entails a margin of error. Formatting or image restoring is accurate, mostly automated, and quite quick (at least with Windows 7).

What if the drive isnt partitioned and they have data all over it, youve then gotta scan it all and transfer it back and forth anyway; got to make sure you pull the product serials before formatting as you cant rely on customers to know where their install discs are (laptops being the worse for faded oem stickers, but also office etc if it was on there before hand); getting drivers for older laptops XP and even vista based ones can be painful and more often than not the original discs are buried in some box somewhere the client doesnt know where is; clients generally like their systems to come back to them as they were sans the infection and depending on what apps they have installed is another reason it can just be easier to clean it and keep the customer happy.

What if the drive isnt partitioned and they have data all over it, youve then gotta scan it all and transfer it back and forth anyway; got to make sure you pull the product serials before formatting as you cant rely on customers to know where their install discs are (laptops being the worse for faded oem stickers, but also office etc if it was on there before hand); getting drivers for older laptops XP and even vista based ones can be painful and more often than not the original discs are buried in some box somewhere the client doesnt know where is; clients generally like their systems to come back to them as they were sans the infection and depending on what apps they have installed is another reason it can just be easier to clean it and keep the customer happy.

If your sytsem got infected, would you reformat?

Why should anyone format their computer if it's infected?

I believe you just answered your own question.

How do you plan to recover your data then?

How do you plan to recover your data if your hard drive fails? Some of us have enough sense to keep our data backed up. ;)

I never get any crap on my PC, mainly because I stick to gaming and visiting the same 5-6 websites but if it happened, I definitely would format!

Not that it matters, I do a format every other week on the dot :)

( Great to have a second 750GB HDD for backup )

The whole point of running an AV is to avoid re-format. Refomart is a No-NO, i'd rather scan

and scan all over again, safemode, from ubuntu cd, etc. then reformat.

I think you missed something out there. Didn't you mean something like . . .

"The whole point of running an AV is to avoid re-format. Reformat is a No-NO, i'd rather scan and scan all over again, from safe mode,

from a ubuntu cd, etc ... then if all else fails, and I've exhausted all possible methods and ideas, THEN I'd reformat and reinstall."

. . . ?

I've put in italics the bit I think you had meant to include in your quoted post.

As for me ... reformat and reinstall would be a last resort, or if a system is fubar'd, and there's absolutely no other option left.

If your sytsem got infected, would you reformat?

Yes, and if you bothered to read the OPs actual post, rather than just the poll question, you would see he is also discussing this from the perspective of a technician dealing with clients. I answered what I would do in my first post and followed up your post with the technicians perspective for why its not so easy to just format away.

So put some context in your pipe and smoke that.

Yes, and if you bothered to read the OPs actual post, rather than just the poll question, you would see he is discussing this from the perspective of a technician dealing with clients. I answered what I would do in my first post and followed up some one elses discussion on formatting v. cleaning from a technician perspective..

So put some context in your pipe and smoke that.

Oh, but would you do the same thing for your PC? Or you just do a format?

Oh, but would you do the same thing for your PC? Or you just do a format?

Well if you refer to my original post about 1 to 2 places above yours on the second page, you would see I would format my OS partition and restore an image. However from a technicians perspective where time is money, where clients dont usually have images and nice paritions like so many of us do there would be a multitude of reasons to consider why not to format.

In the broader discussion of things whether you format or clean, if you wouldnt feel safe logging into your personal stuff on the clients machine by the time youre finished, then its not ready to go back to them. That would be my compass on this matter, not what I do with my PC.

"The whole point of running an AV is to avoid re-format. Reformat is a No-NO, i'd rather scan and scan all over again, from safe mode,

from a ubuntu cd, etc ... then if all else fails, and I've exhausted all possible methods and ideas, THEN I'd reformat and reinstall."

Uhm... explain this to us all again? If you have an AV and get a virus the point of running an AV is to avoid formatting?

Isn't the point of an AV not to get the virus in the first place?

I would reformat the computer, I've done it before.

I don't trust the cleaners out there, and it's not worth the time cleaning the system up.

This +1000

AV and Malware scanners cannot be trusted, period. Simply because they can't detect 100% of the viruses that are created. Call me paranoid but it's the truth.

i would never really get an infection because i have this thing called an idiot friend to learn from.

one thing i learned from him was Don't go getting a cracked version of office(not that i would being an open office user) as it came with something that disabled UAC on his system and was killing his internet connection and aprently only something called prevex could remove the problem. So even after installing/buying a sub for prevex and ESET SS he still can't turn UAC on what's up with that?

ROFL prevex is the most useless piece of junk around tell him to use MSE it's free and works unless he's also running a pirated copy of windows... it sounds like the crack he got is some remote network bot basically turning his machine into an zombie to be used in a botnet to DDOS or spam?

as for me i'd only reformat as a last resort or the system was still unstable after a clean out, not that i ever get anything but a few websites have tried good old antivirus 2010 aka 2009 and a whole host of other names my win7x64 + MSE took care of that cr@p though ?

yeh id rather just reformat it, i have 4 hard drives anyway so all the stuff id like to keep is kept on a seperate drive.

id find the source of it, if its on C ill just reformat the whole thing, if its mixed in with the stuff i wanna keep, id just have to get rid of whatever it is causing, but id still reformat C incase it installed or changed anything on my C drive.

i usually end up clogging my OS anyway, so itd be some good incentive to clean it out.

On a Windows system, it is often much quicker to just reinstall (re-image, if one had the foresight to make an image of a fresh install).

Plus, I am not as versed in Windows malware removal any more.

On my Linux box, I have AV and have "chkrootkit" installed. I would be comfortable that I would be able to detect any system file tampering and correct it, so I voted "no". I would not reformat.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it by Steven Parker If you have been reading Neowin for any length of time, you may remember that I reviewed the Sound Blaster Audigy FX Pro back in April. I found it to be an excellent budget sound card, even though it lacked support for formats such as DTS over the included SPDIF port. Anyway, Creative reached out to me again asking if I was interested in reviewing the Sound Blaster AE-X. It is a card mainly targeted at headphone wearers, which I'll get into a bit later. Before we get underway, here is a disclaimer: Creative Labs provided a free sample without any review pre-approval. Here are the full specs of it: Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Dimensions: 179 x 126 x 18 mm Weight: 263g / 9.28 oz Platform: PCI-e DAC: ESS ES9039Q2M Connectivity Options Side: Rear: 1 x HD Audio Front Panel Connector, 1 x ⅛“ Headphone port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Left) port, 1 x RCA Line-out (Right) port, 1 x Coaxial SPDIF-out port, 1 x ⅛“ Mic in/Line-in port, 1 x TOSLINK SPDIF-in port Surround: No DNR / SNR: THD+N: 0.0001% Dynamic Range 130 dB Recording Resolution: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Direct Mode: Line Out (Stereo): PCM up to 32-bit  384 kHz Coaxial SPDIF Out: PCM up to 24-bit 192.0 kHz Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 384kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128, DSD256 Output Impedance: 1Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 8–600Ω, IEM: 0.5Vrms, Low: 1.5Vrms, Mid: 3Vrms, High: 6Vrms, Maximum output power: 350mW @ 32Ω (High), Maximum output voltage: 6Vrms (High) Front Panel Headphone Amp: PCM up to 32-bit / 192kHz (Stereo) Native DSD: DSD64, DSD128 Output Impedance: 10Ω, Supported Headphone Impedance: 32–300Ω, Maximum output power: 40mW @ 32Ω, Maximum output voltage: 1.9Vrms ASIO: ASIO 2.3 Total Harmonic Distortion: THD+N: 0.0006% Dynamic Range: 114 dB Scout Mode: Yes EMI shielding: No (but it passed all the FCC emission tests) Operating temperature: 0–45°C Input Power: 12V⎓0.5A Warranty: 1 Year (MSRP) Price: $179.99 / £169.99 The Sound Blaster AE-X was announced at the end of May, and it becomes clear that it is mainly for headphone wearers. I should also note that the card does not support DDL/DTS encoding technology, but it is said to support decoding through the coaxial SPDIF port. I was able to test this working with the classic Windows Sound properties, but I could not get a DTS (decode) signal through my Logitech Z906, it defaulted to 3D sound whenever I played DTS content through Plex or Emby. In addition, this card only supports two channels (stereo) over the speakers. The surround support is limited to the Headphone Amp, so before I get underway, what we have here is a card mostly intended for headphone use, especially with its SPDIF In (Toslink) port where you could connect another device like a console. So what about the highlights of this card? The AE-X is powered by the ESS SABRE DAC (ES9039Q2M), which is capable of a 130 dB dynamic range. In addition, it supports 32-bit/384 kHz playback for deeper detail and clarity. The headphone amplifier delivers up to 350 mW @ 32Ω, which admittedly far surpasses standard onboard audio, offering support for studio-grade headphones. DSD256 and ASIO 2.3 are also supported. What doesn't it have? No support for What-U-Hear, Super X-Fi, or the SmartComms Kit No EMI shielding, but it passed all the FCC emission tests (from the FAQ) I also want to make it clear that I am no audiophile. For me, it's purely subjective and it should just "work" out of the box. First impressions As I said in the introduction, I was a bit sad to see that the AE-X only supports stereo output, meaning it would not be on par with my ALC1220 over my speakers, as I mentioned it seems like this card is marketed toward headphone users. Since I am not an avid gamer that would rule me out as a potential customer, but I can still test its capabilities! The card arrived in a nice-looking box, as shown above. It's quite a bit larger than the Audify FX Pro that I reviewed back in April, and at first I thought the covering meant that it was EMI shielded, but it isn't as mentioned above in the highlights section. What's in the box: 1 x Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe card 1 x 3.5 mm CTIA TRRS to Dual TRS Headset Splitter Cable 1 x Quick Start Guide Aside from the Quick Start Guide, which someone at my age (I guess) needs a magnifying glass to read thanks to the tiny fonts, Creative Labs also has the manual online, which first requires you to prove that you're human in order to access it (so I can't direct link it). Anyway, the box is mostly made up of cardboard, and the only plastic in it is the anti-static bag for the card itself. Design Top Bottom The card itself looks pretty cool and actually wouldn't look out of place in an all-white build. There's only one connector, and for some reason it is awkwardly placed on the side (front-facing) that is for the front panel audio connector, which will let you use the headphones through the front PC audio jack. Since the front panel Headphone Amp has fewer capabilities than the rear headphone port, I decided not to use it. Rear of card PCI-e interface The rear of the card is completely open and is normally where you would find the front panel connector. The PCIe interface side is completely covered, which initially made me think it was EMI shielded. I/O panel Side (front-facing) with Front panel connector On the outer rear bracket side we have the TOSLINK SPDIF in, Coaxial SPDIF out, RCA line out (Right), RCA line out (Left), Headphone out, and Mic/Line in ports. On the front facing portion of the card itself is the F-panel connector. Usage Test System Our test system consists of the following: AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER (BIOS F12) Corsair RM1000x (2024) Thermal Grizzly Kyronaut (33x33x0,2mm) 2x 32GB Kingston Fury Beast RGB DDR5 6000MT/s CL36-38-38-80 T-Force Z540 2TB (PCIe Gen5) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Founders Edition (NVIDIA) Creative Sound Blaster AE-X Windows 11 25H2 Pro I installed the card into the Gigabyte X870E AORUS MASTER which includes the RealTek ALC1220 onboard audio. For our subjective listening tests, I used the Coaxial SPDIF port to my Logitech Z906 speakers. For headphone tests I used the OneOdio Studio Max 2 Wireless DJ Headphones that I reviewed last month. After installing the audio driver, I installed Creative Nexus, which is a relatively new app designed for the latest Sound Blaster cards. Then I discovered the AE-X needed both a driver update from 1.00.15.0001 to 1.01.09.000 and a firmware update from 1.00.06.0000 to 1.00.06.0002, then I was set to go. It should be noted that the card did not work without the driver (not Plug and Play). As you can see above, you can manage the firmware, driver, and inputs via Advanced Settings on the Device tab. By default Nexus enabled "Direct Mode". Upon clicking on Acoustic Engine, the Equalizer can be enabled and set to four different presets, which are: Gaming Music Movies Footsteps Enhancer There's also a dedicated Scout Mode for gamers. I mainly used Tidal and Spotify in the past week to listen to some of my Liked Songs (which now total over 700) in Shuffle mode; there were no pops or interference that I could hear. I also found a 5.1 Surround Music playlist on Tidal that sounded really great over Studio Max 2 headphones. When I reviewed the Audigy FX Pro, I went out and purchased a Logitech Z906 set second-hand for €100 specifically to use with the card, but in this instance all I could get on the AE-X was the 3D output of surround sound through Coaxial SPDIF and although it still sounded great, it isn't quite as good as DTS Interactive via my onboard Realtek ALC1220. Conclusion So what have I learned? The AE-X lacks multi-channel support for 5.1/7.1 setups and drops support for modern surround technologies like Dolby or DTS, functioning strictly as a stereo output device. So to really benefit, you will need Studio-grade headphones to "hear" the benefits of this card. With that being said, I can imagine it will appeal to gamers who are switching between console and PC. By utilizing the SPDIF in port, you could just plug your headphones into the AE-X (front or rear port) and then switch between PC and Console without having to move the headphones to a different port. As I said in the Sound Blaster Audigy review, the EQ in the Creative Nexus app offers safe presets, which allows a user to further tweak the lows, mids, and highs for a personal listening experience. Of course it all depends on the headphones you hook up to it. Speaking of headphones, I kind of wish I had higher-quality Studio-grade headphones to really test this card with; I'm not usually wearing headphones in my day to day duties. The only time I will wear them is if I want to listen to music very late at night and I don't want to disturb my neighbors, so my rating (verdict) is based on this fact. Someone with a PC/Console setup and wears headphone religiously to game, and consume media will benefit much more than I from the high-quality Headphone Amps that are included in the AE-X. Once again, I do feel like Creative could have gone the extra mile to support the S/PDIF port a bit more. Why include it if you're not supporting the main popular digital formats? It seems like the decision was more of a legacy-based one, offering uncompressed 2-channel PCM audio, for users with high-fidelity audio systems and external DACs. Maybe I will be lucky enough to review a card that truly includes all these features in the future. I am sure readers with far more knowledge on audio systems than me will correct me in the comments below. I'll just say I am happy to learn what I don't know! Where to buy The Sound Blaster AE-X is available to purchase now in preorder for $179.99 on the U.S. Creative website, or for £169.99 on the Creative UK website and will start shipping to customers from June 25.
    • $80 or 90%, anything else would be financial suicide one way or another.
    • Or... just use Bitwarden. Free, and has on-prem option as well. Works both on desktop and mobile, wherever you are. The age of local password files is over.
    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      164
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!