Adobe Flash Player 10.1 beta 3


Recommended Posts

They already are doing OOPP in Firefox.

That won't allow for 64bit at the moment though, since the plugin host is still 32bit (and there's no reason to make 64bit Flash, etc.)

I think the point is that people want to be able to use 64-bit versions of their favorite browsers, but Flash not being 64-bit is a show-stopper. Otherwise, I believe most people couldn't care less about 64-bit Flash. However, with out of process plugins, you can still run your browser in 64-bit and have Flash run in 32-bit. Problem solved.

I've never done any benchmarks, but I do think Safari feels snappier in 64-bit mode.

I think the point is that people want to be able to use 64-bit versions of their favorite browsers, but Flash not being 64-bit is a show-stopper. Otherwise, I believe most people couldn't care less about 64-bit Flash. However, with out of process plugins, you can still run your browser in 64-bit and have Flash run in 32-bit. Problem solved.

I've never done any benchmarks, but I do think Safari feels snappier in 64-bit mode.

64-bit apps run better than 32-bit apps when using a 64-bit OS. Therefore we should be requesting both OOPP and 64-bit Flash. We want the best end user experience, not just a fix to a problem.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!