Windows XP 0-day flaw: remote code execution, exploit released!


Recommended Posts

It is possible to invoke winhlp32.exe from Internet Explorer 8,7,6 using VBScript. Passing malicious .HLP file to winhlp32 could allow remote attacker to run arbitrary command. Additionally, there is a stack overflow vulnerability in winhlp32.exe.

To trigger vulnerability some user interaction is needed, victim has to press F1 when MsgBox popup is displayed.

AFFECTED software: Windows XP SP3

NOT affected: Vista, Windows 7

This is a simple demo (Proof of Concept): http://isec.pl/poc-isec27/ :rofl:

==> yet another reason to upgrade to Vista/7 :rolleyes:

  On 27/02/2010 at 12:31, franzon said:

It is possible to invoke winhlp32.exe from Internet Explorer 8,7,6 using VBScript. Passing malicious .HLP file to winhlp32 could allow remote attacker to run arbitrary command.

Additionally, there is a stack overflow vulnerability in winhlp32.exe.

AFFECTED software: Windows XP SP3

NOT affected: Vista, Windows 7

This is a simple demo (Proof of Concept) for WinXP vulnerability: http://isec.pl/poc-isec27/?? :rofl:

==> yet another reason to upgrade to Vista/7 :rolleyes:

but what if i dont use internet explorer?

Setting the default internet security zone in IE to "High" will protect you from this exploit.

Also, there will undoubtedly be a patch for it, since Windows XP is in extended support until 2014.

  On 27/02/2010 at 12:31, franzon said:

It is possible to invoke winhlp32.exe from Internet Explorer 8,7,6 using VBScript. Passing malicious .HLP file to winhlp32 could allow remote attacker to run arbitrary command. Additionally, there is a stack overflow vulnerability in winhlp32.exe.

To trigger vulnerability some user interaction is needed, victim has to press F1 when MsgBox popup is displayed.

AFFECTED software: Windows XP SP3

NOT affected: Vista, Windows 7

This is a simple demo (Proof of Concept): http://isec.pl/poc-isec27/ :rofl:

==> yet another reason to upgrade to Vista/7 :rolleyes:

==> yet another reason NOT to use IE. ;)

As much as I love Windows Seven, I'll be glad when they fully purge IE from Windows completely.

  On 27/02/2010 at 12:37, carmatic said:

but what if i dont use internet explorer?

Alot of those who stick with XP (businesses) do so its an issue for them.

  On 27/02/2010 at 13:04, Madoshi said:

what if i never ever under any circumstance press F1 in a message dialog?

Dialogue box : "Your PC might be infected!!! Press F1 to begin a free web scan!"

  On 27/02/2010 at 13:37, Sadelwo said:

Alot of those who stick with XP (businesses) do so its an issue for them.

Dialogue box : "Your PC might be infected!!! Press F1 to begin a free web scan!"

Please, don't tell me that someone would actually comply!?

  On 27/02/2010 at 13:41, Buendia said:

Please, don't tell me that someone would actually comply!?

They all comply, i've never known an average user who has not complied

  On 27/02/2010 at 13:37, Sadelwo said:

Alot of those who stick with XP (businesses) do so its an issue for them.

many schools too

  On 27/02/2010 at 13:37, Sadelwo said:
Dialogue box : "Your PC might be infected!!! Press F1 to begin a free web scan!"

i wouldn't, but i know plenty of people who would; fortunately i got them all to use Firefox or Chrome :)

  On 28/02/2010 at 06:24, Bioran23 said:

What's this? The 42,000th 0-day flaw?

Actually, there are probably only a handful of Zero-Day flaws. Most common exploits use patched flaws, but target users who never update. :no:

  On 01/03/2010 at 13:53, Mocosoft said:

This is not an XP flaw, is a Internet Explorer Flaw!!. Theres no reason for me to upgrade to Windows # as far as I have common sense and know how to use a PC properly.

except improved speed, stability, security, sand boxing, improved new hardware support, better feature sets, streamlined integration with new technology (.net, WPF, ectra) , UI taking advantage of more of your hardware (D2D) and regular patching and upgrades coming from microsoft...

*sigh* "NO REASON"

Still, this is a nasty bug for IE, but how has it gone this long without being detected? Or is it as bad as it seems? Am i misreading how simple it is to pull off?

  On 01/03/2010 at 13:53, Mocosoft said:

This is not an XP flaw, is a Internet Explorer Flaw!!.

FALSE! :no:

The flaw is in Windows XP's Help Files subsystem (winhlp32).

winhlp32 is no longer present in Vista/7 (there's only a fake stub for backward compatibility) because the .HLP files are deprecated ==> yet another reason to upgrade to Vista/7

Speed improved? What? about 2 miliseconds faster? OMG! Hurry! Let's BUY IT. Security?. What about the latest exploit affecting IE on 7 and vista?. Sandbox applications? To what? Sharepoint? There's other apps that can do that on XP. Improved new hardware? Hm, let's say MS is not even responsible about the hardware support.. thats responsibility of the hardware developers/companies. That was the WinME Failure. .NET still works on XP. WPF? HM, "pretty" apps that use more Hardware?. More gpu using for just render my desktop to make it look "pretty". Nop. NO REASON for me to upgrade.

if you stopped using internet exploder then that would help alot and use something better but xp still works well and why change something that works?well internet exploder needs to go.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Elon Musk's robotaxi will have a human driver for 'safety' reasons by David Uzondu Image via Depositphotos.com A few days ago, we reported that Tesla was gearing up for its robotaxi launch, set to kick off in Austin, Texas, and now the details of the service are trickling out. Electrek says that some popular pro-Tesla influencers on X have gotten invitations to the launch. These invitations came with a list of rules, and the most glaring one was the presence of what Tesla called a "Safety Monitor" in the front passenger seat. This is basically a human supervising driver whose entire job is to watch the car and make sure it does not drive itself into a ditch. This might feel a little strange, especially given Musk's claims of "no driver" testing in the past. The safety monitor is one of the employees with access to buttons that can stop the car, much like the ones available to Waymo passengers in their fully autonomous rides. The service will operate within a geofenced area from 6 AM to 12 AM and will not run during bad weather. Other requirements include a credit card on file and an agreement that you will not be a jerk. Participants must also agree to a bunch of other rules, and one of the most interesting ones is that their access can be terminated if they share content on social media that shows the vehicle being misused. On top of that, they're not allowed to reverse engineer the technology in any way. At least the passenger gets a bit of a break. So, unlike the Tesla Full-Self Driving Beta, which requires the owner's constant attention, the supervising driver is expected to pay attention. At the same time, you, the passenger, can relax and enjoy the ride. According to Electrek's Fred Lambert, the robotaxi launch seems like an optics thing, designed to let Elon Musk say he met his June deadline for launching a robotaxi network.
    • I don't get why you care how thin your phone is. Most people slap a giant case on it anyway, so it doesn't mean much in the long run.
    • Yay it finally made it to openSUSE Tumbleweed. Installed on the rest of my PCs/laptops and also working just fine. Was also available before for KDE Neon and Fedora. And I hear Arch also already has it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Helen Shafer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      emptyother earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Crunchy6 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      KynanSEIT earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      gowtham07 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      661
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      268
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      224
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      167
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      160
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!